Digital & Print Membership
Yearly + Receive 8 free printed back issues
$420 Annually
Monthly + Receive 3 free printed back issues
$40 Monthly
When the Vessel Overflows
Gham and the Limits of Endurance
There were no nurses at 3 am. Only the creak of tiles and my own hands learning how to measure breaths. In Tehran, caregiving became the final act of bearing witness. My grandfather’s last words were not private grief; they were an accusation that moved through the house, through walls thin with heat and dust, carrying the politics in his voice before anyone else did.
Iranian life has long been charged by the proximity of gham (غم — primarily means sorrow, grief, or sadness in Persian, Urdu, and Hindi, often appearing in poetry and literature to express deep emotional pain). It is both a prison and a guide, teaching how sorrow wrenches through bodies, homes, and streets. It is something that learns your name and calls you home. The Islamic Republic does not govern only through fear, but by organising sorrow, deciding whose grief is aligned and whose must be carried in complete isolation, always teetering at the edge of overflow.
I fed him, washed him, timed his breathing; he re-chimed his little bed clock. Each movement carried the weight of what the state refused to provide. Daily power outages rattled the fragile rhythm of the house for hours at a time, leaving me alone with his final moments, worried that I might not be able to alert relatives in an emergency and be faced with his lifeless body in solitude. He died a week before the twelve-day war broke out in June 2025, his body in soil without a stone while bombs filled the skies. Scarcity had a body. It was ours.
At the doctor’s office, awaiting radiotherapy, he told other terminally ill patients that they were all paying the price of Khamenei’s martyrdom, living under sorrow-led beliefs that trained civilians for death. He asked the room how it was possible to be told you were dying of pancreatic cancer and still be sent to radiotherapy and billed for it. Even among strangers, grief carried accusation, precise and sharp.
He cursed the leaders, the infrastructure of absence, the hands meant to care and did not. Rage pressed into the air, the walls, my hands. I tried to fold it into ritual, into routine, into care. But the vessel was cracking. Gham could no longer be contained.
Time stretched and collapsed. Nights outlasted hours; each hour carried the weight of neglected years. Every cough, every sigh, every small gasp became a rhythm I had to follow. The bed clock chimed again. I counted, measured, adjusted. Care was witness. Care was weight. Care was endurance.
Outside, the city pressed on. Hospital corridors closed in on us, bodies leaning against beds, pressed into exhaustion. The air smelled of metal and dust, oppressive and cutting. Khameini’s photographs glared down at the loved ones around me, witnesses to our suspension. I stared back, seeing only a hollow vessel, a beacon of endless violence. Debris showered from a broken air conditioner as it crashed onto the waiting chairs below, striking patients’ loved ones. No one screamed. Someone moved the wreckage aside. We kept waiting.
Scarcity pressed against life itself. What I felt in his room, the overcapacity of grief, the collapse of care, the moral failure, was not singular. It was present elsewhere, latent, waiting to spill.
Gham is porous.
It threads through hands, rooms, households, through air that has learned to carry it. It seeps into the plaster of the walls, presses on floors, saturates spaces. It sits in the shadow of corners, in the pauses between words, in the way certain silences feel thick, inhabited by the suspension of cultivating a full life. Eventually, the vessel gives way, and what was once internal becomes visible, unstoppable.
For almost fifty years, the Islamic Republic has relied on a moral economy of sorrow, demanding that civilians endure what it explicitly refused to repair. We were taught how to hold grief before we were taught how to name occupation and power. But there comes a moment when sorrow no longer deepens; it floods. These protests are not sudden. They are hydrological.
These eruptions are not only a response to political demands. They mark the refusal to continue containing pain, to perform patience, to translate suffering into virtue. People are letting sorrow rupture form.
Gham is not just grief. It is the rhythm of the body learning how much to carry before breaking, the lessons whispered across generations in kitchens, cemeteries, and private roofs. It teaches where sorrow may gather, how loudly it may cry, and the shapes it may take without spilling into accusation. It is a delicate inheritance, breathed in through love, through ritual, through the spaces we inhabit.
To bear loss correctly was to belong. To bear it in forms that would not undo the body, the family, or the house was a discipline learned through decades of absence. Gham became the nation’s porous vessel, allowing pain to circulate without overflowing. But now, the vessel has overturned, soaked by decades of state-produced death, poverty and violence. Sorrow has exceeded its use.
I stayed in his room, watching his breath, learning the felt measure of human fragility. I understood that every gesture of care was political. Every measured movement, each hand held, each small task of survival was a refusal: of abandonment, of quiet suffering, of a world in which grief could be disciplined.
I adjusted his blanket. I refilled his water cup. The bed clock chimed again. Each sound marked the vessel’s tremor. Every gesture carried the memory of absence and endurance imposed by fear and neglect. I felt the sudden jolting of generations in my hands.
The vessel has overflowed. Gham creeps, surges, and disillusions everything in its path. No law or ritual can contain it. Once the infrastructure of sorrow cracks, grief no longer educates obedience; it demands reckoning. When sorrow breaks its bounds, it becomes the pulse of collective resistance.
Topics:
Filed under:
Location:
{
"article":
{
"title" : "When the Vessel Overflows: Gham and the Limits of Endurance",
"author" : "Helena Aslani",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/when-the-vessel-overflows",
"date" : "2026-01-22 17:28:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/Helena-Aslani_00301326_003013260025.jpg",
"excerpt" : "There were no nurses at 3 am. Only the creak of tiles and my own hands learning how to measure breaths. In Tehran, caregiving became the final act of bearing witness. My grandfather’s last words were not private grief; they were an accusation that moved through the house, through walls thin with heat and dust, carrying the politics in his voice before anyone else did.",
"content" : "There were no nurses at 3 am. Only the creak of tiles and my own hands learning how to measure breaths. In Tehran, caregiving became the final act of bearing witness. My grandfather’s last words were not private grief; they were an accusation that moved through the house, through walls thin with heat and dust, carrying the politics in his voice before anyone else did.Iranian life has long been charged by the proximity of gham (غم — primarily means sorrow, grief, or sadness in Persian, Urdu, and Hindi, often appearing in poetry and literature to express deep emotional pain). It is both a prison and a guide, teaching how sorrow wrenches through bodies, homes, and streets. It is something that learns your name and calls you home. The Islamic Republic does not govern only through fear, but by organising sorrow, deciding whose grief is aligned and whose must be carried in complete isolation, always teetering at the edge of overflow.I fed him, washed him, timed his breathing; he re-chimed his little bed clock. Each movement carried the weight of what the state refused to provide. Daily power outages rattled the fragile rhythm of the house for hours at a time, leaving me alone with his final moments, worried that I might not be able to alert relatives in an emergency and be faced with his lifeless body in solitude. He died a week before the twelve-day war broke out in June 2025, his body in soil without a stone while bombs filled the skies. Scarcity had a body. It was ours.At the doctor’s office, awaiting radiotherapy, he told other terminally ill patients that they were all paying the price of Khamenei’s martyrdom, living under sorrow-led beliefs that trained civilians for death. He asked the room how it was possible to be told you were dying of pancreatic cancer and still be sent to radiotherapy and billed for it. Even among strangers, grief carried accusation, precise and sharp.He cursed the leaders, the infrastructure of absence, the hands meant to care and did not. Rage pressed into the air, the walls, my hands. I tried to fold it into ritual, into routine, into care. But the vessel was cracking. Gham could no longer be contained.Time stretched and collapsed. Nights outlasted hours; each hour carried the weight of neglected years. Every cough, every sigh, every small gasp became a rhythm I had to follow. The bed clock chimed again. I counted, measured, adjusted. Care was witness. Care was weight. Care was endurance.Outside, the city pressed on. Hospital corridors closed in on us, bodies leaning against beds, pressed into exhaustion. The air smelled of metal and dust, oppressive and cutting. Khameini’s photographs glared down at the loved ones around me, witnesses to our suspension. I stared back, seeing only a hollow vessel, a beacon of endless violence. Debris showered from a broken air conditioner as it crashed onto the waiting chairs below, striking patients’ loved ones. No one screamed. Someone moved the wreckage aside. We kept waiting.Scarcity pressed against life itself. What I felt in his room, the overcapacity of grief, the collapse of care, the moral failure, was not singular. It was present elsewhere, latent, waiting to spill.Gham is porous.It threads through hands, rooms, households, through air that has learned to carry it. It seeps into the plaster of the walls, presses on floors, saturates spaces. It sits in the shadow of corners, in the pauses between words, in the way certain silences feel thick, inhabited by the suspension of cultivating a full life. Eventually, the vessel gives way, and what was once internal becomes visible, unstoppable.For almost fifty years, the Islamic Republic has relied on a moral economy of sorrow, demanding that civilians endure what it explicitly refused to repair. We were taught how to hold grief before we were taught how to name occupation and power. But there comes a moment when sorrow no longer deepens; it floods. These protests are not sudden. They are hydrological.These eruptions are not only a response to political demands. They mark the refusal to continue containing pain, to perform patience, to translate suffering into virtue. People are letting sorrow rupture form.Gham is not just grief. It is the rhythm of the body learning how much to carry before breaking, the lessons whispered across generations in kitchens, cemeteries, and private roofs. It teaches where sorrow may gather, how loudly it may cry, and the shapes it may take without spilling into accusation. It is a delicate inheritance, breathed in through love, through ritual, through the spaces we inhabit.To bear loss correctly was to belong. To bear it in forms that would not undo the body, the family, or the house was a discipline learned through decades of absence. Gham became the nation’s porous vessel, allowing pain to circulate without overflowing. But now, the vessel has overturned, soaked by decades of state-produced death, poverty and violence. Sorrow has exceeded its use.I stayed in his room, watching his breath, learning the felt measure of human fragility. I understood that every gesture of care was political. Every measured movement, each hand held, each small task of survival was a refusal: of abandonment, of quiet suffering, of a world in which grief could be disciplined.I adjusted his blanket. I refilled his water cup. The bed clock chimed again. Each sound marked the vessel’s tremor. Every gesture carried the memory of absence and endurance imposed by fear and neglect. I felt the sudden jolting of generations in my hands.The vessel has overflowed. Gham creeps, surges, and disillusions everything in its path. No law or ritual can contain it. Once the infrastructure of sorrow cracks, grief no longer educates obedience; it demands reckoning. When sorrow breaks its bounds, it becomes the pulse of collective resistance."
}
,
"relatedposts": [
{
"title" : "How to Resist “Organized Loneliness”: resisting isolation in the age of digital authoritarianism ",
"author" : "Emma Cieslik",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/how-to-resist-organized-loneliness",
"date" : "2026-02-13 15:11:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/American_protesters_in_front_of_White_House-11.jpg",
"excerpt" : "Over the past year, many of us have encountered, navigated, and processed violence alone on our phones. We watched videos of Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti being fatally shot and Liam Conejo Ramos being detained by ICE agents. These photos and videos triggered anger, sadness, and desperation for many (along with frustration that these deaths were the inciting blow against ICE agents that have killed many more people of color this year and last).",
"content" : "Over the past year, many of us have encountered, navigated, and processed violence alone on our phones. We watched videos of Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti being fatally shot and Liam Conejo Ramos being detained by ICE agents. These photos and videos triggered anger, sadness, and desperation for many (along with frustration that these deaths were the inciting blow against ICE agents that have killed many more people of color this year and last).While the institutions and people committing these crimes do not want them recorded, the Department of Homeland Security and the wider Trump administration is using “organized loneliness,” a totalitarian tool that seeks to distort peoples’ perception of reality. Although seemingly a symptom of COVID-19 pandemic isolation and living in a more social media focused world, “organized loneliness” is being weaponized to change the way people not only engage with violence but respond to it online, simultaneously desensitizing us to bodily trauma and escalating radicalization and recruitment online.Back in 2022, philosopher Samantha Rose Hill argued that the loneliness epidemic sparked by the COVID-19 pandemic could and would have dangerous consequences. She specifically cites Hannah Arendt’s 1951 book The Origins of Totalitarianism, which argued that authoritarian leaders like Hitler and Stalin weaponized people’s loneliness to exert control over them. Arendt was a Jewish woman who barely escaped Nazi Germany.As Hill told Steve Paulson for “To The Best Of Our Knowledge,” “the organized loneliness that underlies totalitarian movements destroys people’s relationship to reality. Their political propaganda makes it difficult for people to trust their own opinions and perceptions of reality.” Because as Arendt wrote, “the ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the convinced Communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction and the distinction between true and false no longer exist.”But there are ways in which we can resist the threat that “organized loneliness” represents, especially in the age of social media. They include acknowledging this campaign of loneliness, taking proactive steps when engaging with others online, and fostering relationships with friends and our communities to stand in solidarity amidst the rise of fascism.1. The first step is accepting that loneliness affects everyone and can be exploited by authoritarian movements.Many of us know this intimately. Back in 2023, the U.S. Surgeon General flagged an already dire loneliness epidemic, that in combination with a transition of most interaction onto social media, changes the way in which we engage with violence and tragedy online. But it can be hard to admit that loneliness affects us, especially when we are constantly connected through social media. It’s important to admit that even for the most digitally literate and active among us, “organized loneliness” not only can occur but especially occurs on social media.Being susceptible to or affected by “organized loneliness” is not a moral shortcoming or a personal failure but acknowledging it and taking steps to connect with one another is the one way we resist totalitarian regimes.2. Next, take social media breaks–and avoid doomscrooling.Even before the advent of social media or online news outlets, Arendt was warning about how loneliness can become a breeding ground for downward spirals. She explains that the constant consumption of tragic, violent, and deeply upsetting news–and watching it unfold in front of us can not only be overstimulating but can desensitize us and disconnect us from reality.While it can be difficult when most of our social lives exist on social media (this will be unpacked later), experts recommend that people limit using social media to less than two hours per day and avoid using it during the first hour after waking up and the last hour before going to sleep. People can use apps that limit overall screen time or restrict access to social media at set times–the best being Opal, One Sec, Forest, and StayFree. People can also use these apps to limit access to specific websites that might include triggering news.But it’s important to recognize that avoiding doomscrooling does not give people license not to stay informed or to look away from atrocities that are not affecting their communities.3. Resist social media echo-chambers by diversifying your algorithm.When you are on social media, however, it’s important to recognize that AI-based algorithms track what we engage with and show us similar content. People can use a VPN to search without creating a record that AI can track and thus offer us like offerings, but while the most pronounced (and reported on) examples focus on White, cis straight men and the Manoverse, echochambers can affect all of us and shift our perception of publicly shared beliefs.People can resist echo-chambers by seeking out new sources and accounts that offer different, fact-based perspectives but also acknowledge their commitment to resisting fascism, such as Ground News, ProPublica, and Truthout. Another idea is to follow anti-fascist online educators like Saffana Monajed who promote and share lessons for media literacy. People can also do this by cultivating their intellectual humility, or the recognition that your awareness has limits based largely on your own experiences and privileges and your beliefs could be wrong. Fearless Culture Design has some great tips.While encountering and engaging different perspectives is vital to resisting echochambers and social algorithms, this is not an invitation to follow or platform any news outlet, content creator, or commentator that denies your or other people’s personhood.4. Cultivate your friendships and make new ones.In a time when many of us only stay in contact with friends through social media, friendships are more important than ever. Try, if you can, to engage friends outside of social media–whether it’s through in-person meet ups (dinners, parties, game nights) or on digital platforms that are not social media-based, for example coordinating meet-ups over Zoom or Skype. This can be a virtual D&D campaign, craft circle, or a virtual book club. While these may seem like silly events throughout the week, they help build real connection.It’s important to connect with people outside of a space that uses an algorithm to design content and to reinforce that people are three-dimensional (not just a two-dimensional representation of a social media profile). There are even some apps that assist with this goal, such as Connect, a web app designed by MIT graduate students Mohammad Ghassemi and Tuka Al Hanai to bring students from diverse backgrounds together for lunch conversations.Arendt writes that totalitarian domination destroys not only political life but also private life as well. Cultivating friendships–and relationships of solidarity with your neighbors and fellow community members–are the ways in which we not only resist the destruction of private relationships but also reinforce that we and others belong in our communities–and that we can achieve great things when we stand together!5. With this in mind, practice intentional solidarity with one another.While it’s likely no surprise, fascism functions to both establish a nationalist identity that breeds extremism and destroy unification and rebellion against authority. The best way to resist the isolation that totalitarian governments breed is to practice intentional acts of solidarity with marginalized communities, especially communities facing systemic violence at the hands of an authoritarian power.Writer and advocate Deepa Iyer discusses the importance of action-based solidarity in her program Solidarity Is, part of the Building Movement Project, and Solidarity Is This Podcast (co-hosted with Adaku Utah) discusses and models a solidarity journey that foregrounds marginalized communities. I highly recommend reading her Solidarity Is Practice Guide and the Solidarity Syllabus, a blog series that Iyer just started this month to highlight lessons, resources, and ideas of how to cultivate solidarity within your own communities.6. Consume locally and ethically, and reject capitalist productivity.And one way that people can stand in solidarity with their communities is to support local small businesses that invest back into the communities. When totalitarianism strips people of many platforms to voice concern, one of the last remaining power people have is how and where they spend their money. Often, this is what draws the most attention and impact, so it’s important to buy (and sell) based on Iyer’s Solidarity Stances and to also resist the ways in which productivity culture not only disempowers community but devalues human labor.At the heart of Arendt’s criticism of totalitarian domination is the ways in which capitalism, a “tyranny over ‘laborers,’” contributes to loneliness itself (pg. 476). Whether intentional or not, this connects to modern campaigns not only of malicious compliance but also purposeful obstinance in which people refuse to labor for a fascist regime but to mobilize their ability to labor as a form of resistance–thinking about the recent walkouts and boycotts that resist by weaponizing our labor and our spending power.Not only should people resist the conflation of a person’s value to their productivity, but they should use their labor–and the economic products of it–as tools of resistance in capitalism.Thankfully as Arendy writes, “totalitarian domination, like tyranny, bears the germs of its own destruction,” so totalitarianism by definition cannot succeed just as humans cannot thrive under the pressure of “organized loneliness.” For this reason, it’s a challenge to hold on and resist the administration using disconnection to garner support for the dehumanization of and violence against human beings. But as long as we do, we have the most powerful tools of resistance–awareness, friendship, community, and solidarity–at our disposal to undo totalitarianism just as it was undone back in the 1940s."
}
,
{
"title" : "A Trail of Soap",
"author" : "susan abulhawa, Diana Islayih",
"category" : "excerpts",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/a-trail-of-soap",
"date" : "2026-02-13 08:40:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/Trail_of_Soap.png",
"excerpt" : "From EVERY MOMENT IS A LIFE compiled by susan abulhawa. Copyright © 2026 by Palestine Writes. Reprinted by permission of One Signal Publishers/Atria Books, an Imprint of Simon Schuster, LLC.",
"content" : "From EVERY MOMENT IS A LIFE compiled by susan abulhawa. Copyright © 2026 by Palestine Writes. Reprinted by permission of One Signal Publishers/Atria Books, an Imprint of Simon Schuster, LLC.Illustration by Rama DuwajiI met Diana Islayih at a series of writing workshops I conducted in Gaza between February and May 2024. She was one of a couple dozen young people who traveled for hours on foot, by donkey cart, or in cars forced to crawl through the crush of displacement. They were all trying to survive an ongoing genocide. Still, they risked Israeli drones and bombs to be there, just to feel human for a few hours, like they belong in this world, to touch the lives they believed they might still have.Soft-spoken and slight, Diana was the only one who recognized me, asking quietly if I was “the real susan abulhawa.” Each writer progressed their piece at their own pace, and would read their work aloud in the workshops to receive group feedback. Diana’s was the only story that emerged almost fully formed, as if it had been waiting for language. She teared up the first time she read it aloud, and again, the second.By the third reading, the tears were gone. “I got used to the indignities,” she told me. “Now I’m used to reading them out loud.” She confessed that she struggled living “a life that doesn’t resemble me.” On our last day together, I reminded her of what she’d said. She smiled ironically. “Now I don’t know if I resemble life,” she said.What follows is Diana’s story, written from inside that unrecognizable life, bearing witness not through spectacle, but through one intimate moment in the unbearable weight of the everyday. — susan abulhawa, editor of Every Moment Is a Life, of which this essay is part.Courtesy of Simon & SchusterI poured yellow liquid dish soap into my left palm, which instinctively cupped into a deep hollow, like a well yearning to be a well once more. I would need to wash my hands after using the toilet near our tent, though the faucet was usually empty. Water had been annihilated alongside people in this genocide, becoming a ghost that graciously deigns to appear to us when it wishes to—one we chase after rather than flee.The miserable toilet was made of four wooden posts, wrapped in a makeshift curtain made from an old scrap of fabric—so sheer you could see silhouettes behind it. A blanket full of holes and splinters served as a “door.”Inside, a concrete slab with a hole in the middle. You need time to convince yourself to enter such a place. The stench alone seizes your eyelids and turns your stomach the moment it creeps into your nose.I thought about going to the damned, distant women’s public toilet. I hated it during the first weeks of our displacement, but it was the only one in the area where you could both relieve yourself and scrub off the dust of misery that clung to every air molecule.It infuriated me that it was wretched and run-down, and the crowding only made it worse—full of sand, soiled toilet paper, and sanitary pads scattered in every corner.“Should I go?” I asked myself, aloud.I decided to go, taking one step forward and two steps back. I’d ask anyone returning from the toilet, “Is there water in the tap today?” and await the answer with the eagerness of a child hoping for candy.“You have to hurry before it runs out!”Or, more often, “There isn’t any.”So we’d all—men, women, and children—arm ourselves with a plastic water bottle, which was a kind of public declaration: “We’re off to the toilet.” We’d also carry a bar of soap in a box, although most people didn’t bother using it since it didn’t lather and was like washing your hands with a rock.I looked up and exhaled, staring into the vast gray nothingness that stared right back at me. Then I stepped out onto the sand across from our ramshackle displacement camp—Karama, “Camp Dignity”—though dignity itself cries out in this filthy, exhausted place, choked with chaos and a desperate scramble to moisten our veins with a drop of life.The road was empty, as it was early morning, and even the clamor of camp life lay dormant at that hour. Still, I couldn’t relax my shoulders—to signal my senses that we were alone, that we were safe. My fingers remained clenched over the yellow dish soap, my hand hanging at my side to keep it from spilling.I crossed the distance to the toilet—step by step, meter by meter, tent by tent. The souls who dwelled in them, just as they were, unchanged, their curious eyes fixed on me. I passed a garbage heap, shaped like a crescent moon, overflowing with all kinds of empty food cans—food that had ruined the linings of our intestines and united us in the agonies of digestion and bowel movements.Something trickled from my palm—a thread of liquid that felt like blood dripping between my fingers, down my wrist in thickening droplets. My hand trembled, and my eyes blurred. I convinced myself—without looking—that it was all in my head, not in my hand, quickened my pace, my heartbeat thudding in my ears.At last, I reached the only two public toilets in the area, one for men and the other for women, both encased in white plastic printed with the blue UNICEF logo.Inside, I was met with the “toilet chronicles”—no less squalid than the toilet itself—unparalleled chatter among women who’d waited long hours in the line together.The old women bemoaned the soft nature of our generation, insisting our condition was a “moral consequence” of our being spoiled.Other women pleaded to be let into the toilet quickly because they were diabetic. They banged on the door with urgency and physical pain, like they would break in and grab the person behind it by the throat, shouting, “When will you come out?!”The woman inside yelled back, “I’m squeezing my guts out! Should I vomit them up too? Have patience! Damn whoever called this a ‘rest room’!”I looked around. A pale-faced woman smiled at me. I returned her smile, but my face quickly stiffened again, as if the muscles scolded me for stretching them into a smile. A voice inside me whispered meanly, What are you both even smiling about?A furious cry rang from the other stall, “Oh my God! Someone is plucking her body hair! What are you doing, you bitch? It’s a toilet! A toilet!”Another voice shot back, “Lower your voice, woman, and hurry up! The child’s crying!”Two little girls stood nearby, with tousled hair, drool marking their cheeks, their eyes half shut. They were crying to use the toilet, clutching their crotches, shifting restlessly in the sandy corridor where we stood.I was trying to push through to the water tap at the end of the hall, attempting to escape this tiresome, tragic theater. As my luck would have it, there was no water. I opened my palm. It too was empty. The yellow dish soap my mother bought yesterday was gone. All that remained was a sticky smear across my left hand and a long thread trailing behind me in the sand. Had it been dripping from my hand all along the way?I twisted the faucet handle back and forth—a futile hope for even a thin thread of water. Not a single drop came.My body sagged under the weight of rage, disappointment, fury, and a storm of unanswerable questions. I rushed through the crowded corridor of angry women, out into the street. I couldn’t hold back tears.I wept, cursing myself and the occupation and Gaza and her sea— the sea I love with a weary, lonely love, just as I’ve always loved everything in this patch of earth.I sobbed the entire way back. Without shame. I didn’t care who saw—not the passersby, not the homes or tents, not the ground I walked on. My grief rained tears on this land on my way there and back.But the land’s thirst is never quenched—neither with our tears, nor with our blood.My eyes were wrung dry from crying by the time I reached our tent. I collapsed on the ground, questions clamoring in my head.Can a homeland also be exile?Can another exile exist within exile?What is home?Is home the homeland itself, the soil of a nation?Or is it the other way around—the homeland is only so if it’s truly home?If the homeland is the home, why do I feel like a stranger in Rafah—a place just ten minutes from my city, Khan Younis?And why did I fear the feeling I had when I imagined myself in our kitchen, where my mother cooked mulukhiya and maqluba for the first time in six months, even though I wasn’t at home—in our house?That day, I said aloud, “Is this what the occupation wants? For me to feel ‘at home’ merely in the memory of home?”How can I feel at home without being there?How can I be outside of my homeland when I’m in it?I looked down at my hand—dry and cracked with January’s chill. The yellow soap liquid had turned into frozen white powder between my fingers."
}
,
{
"title" : "Venezuela should be neither dictatorship nor colony: An interview with union leader Eduardo Sánchez",
"author" : "Simón Rodriguez",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/venezuela-should-be-neither-dictatorship-nor-colony",
"date" : "2026-02-12 10:51:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/Eduardo-Sanchez-rueda-de-prensa-diciembre-2024.jpg",
"excerpt" : "",
"content" : "Eduardo Sánchez is an important Venezuelan labor leader with decades of political and union work. He is the president of the National Union of Workers of the Central University of Venezuela (SINATRAUCV) and the Federation of Higher Education Workers of Venezuela (FETRAESUV). He is also a member of Comunes, an organization founded in 2024 that, in its founding documents, aims for the recovery of the legacy of the Bolivarian Revolution, which they believe the Maduro government has broken with, to the point of considering it a neoliberal and “anti-Chavista government.”Sánchez describes Comunes as “a grouping of left-wing sectors that propose an alternative to the polarization between the so-called reactionary left that rules the country, led by President Nicolás Maduro, and the fascist and right-wing sectors represented by the current headed by María Corina Machado. In other words, we are a third option, seeking to establish a political and social solution for the popular and workers’ movement, with the concept of the homeland as a fundamental element.” The following interview took place January 13.How would you characterize the events of the last few days in Venezuela, starting with the US attack?Since the early hours of January 3, the US aggression against Bolívar’s homeland, against Venezuelan soil, materialized. According to statements by US spokespeople themselves, more than 150 aircraft invaded Venezuelan territory to bomb specific areas of Caracas, Miranda, Aragua, and La Guaira. This is an unprecedented event in Venezuelan politics, which has caused outrage because Venezuelan soil has been sullied by the insolence of an imperialist power that, abusing its military might, has taken it upon itself to intervene in our country and remove the president. Not that we defend the president as such, but we do not believe that anyone has given the US president carte blanche to be the world’s policeman and come and control our country. This is a problem for Venezuelans that we Venezuelans must resolve ourselves. Therefore, we condemn this aggression as a disgraceful act that we hope will not happen again in any of our countries on the continent.President Maduro has led an authoritarian government that arose from an unfortunate event, which leaves doubts about its legitimacy, given that he lost the July 28 elections and arrogated them to himself, generating a process of repression, imprisoning anyone who protested, and acquiring a dictatorial character, which today bears responsibility for what is happening with the current crisis. The gringos have intervened, taking advantage of the crisis and with the support of an anti-national sector of the country that called for intervention and is now very poorly regarded by Venezuelan society.What is the current situation on the streets?The situation on the streets of Venezuela is one of astonishing calm, as a result of the fact that more than 70% of Venezuelans did not sympathize with Maduro’s regime, in addition to its repression, imprisonments, and deaths, as well as the economic and social deterioration that has engulfed the Venezuelan working class, which has paid a high price for a crisis it did not create, which has impoverished its wages and plunged it into a state of critical poverty. Today, when the government sought the support of the working class and the people, the response was negligible, with only a small percentage mobilizing due to the general discontent that existed.This does not mean support for the intervention; everyone laments that more than 100 Venezuelans have died as a result of treacherous bombings against Bolívar’s homeland, and that the concept of homeland has been sidelined and the country’s sovereignty violated.How do you interpret Trump’s announcements that he will allegedly run the country and take over Venezuelan oil?For us, there is now a dilemma: republic or colony. Facing it, we are putting forward our proposals to unify the country, to unify the working people around the concept of the Republic. We cannot be a colony of anyone, much less of the gringos, who have been the most reactionary and recalcitrant imperialist power on the continent, responsible for interventions that have taken place since the beginning of the last century, and who now seek to arrogate to themselves rights they do not have in order to turn us into a protectorate.The call we are making to Venezuelan society and the workers’ movement is for unity and action, and to the interim government, which also lacks legitimacy, despite being the element with which they intend to make a transition, is that any solution that is proposed must be framed within the Constitution and the democratic process. Relations with the US from a commercial point of view must be within the framework of respect for the Venezuelan Constitution and laws, and not under the guise of a kind of protectorate where they are giving orders on the premise that if they are not obeyed, they will bomb again.We believe that the country has sufficient political reserves to achieve an independent, autonomous, democratic, and patriotic state that can lead this country and put an end to the attempt to impose a dictatorship by a government that claimed to be revolutionary but ended up being neoliberal and capitalist, and prevent us from becoming a protectorate of a foreign power. We consider it important for the country to move towards democracy, allowing us to elect our president in accordance with the Constitution and laws of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela.What message would you give to workers in other countries who are closely following the situation in Venezuela?This situation is very unfortunate for the entire continent. It represents a wake-up call to the different peoples of the world, in the understanding that the gringos now consider that they are once again managing the region as their backyard, and from that point of view they simply intend to take our oil, our gold, our rare earths, turn Venezuela into a kind of protectorate or colony, and take over the wealth of our country.It is important that the peoples of the world see themselves in the mirror of the Venezuelan situation, which today stands at a crossroads between becoming a US colony or continuing on the path of the Republic. We call on the working classes of Latin America and the world to unite to avoid ending up in a situation like the one we are now experiencing. We call on them to fight the authoritarian regimes that have brought so much pain to the different countries of the American continent. The call is for unity as a class, with a perspective of struggle, not only for labor rights but also for the homeland, a fundamental and unifying concept of each of the countries that make up the Latin American homeland, which continue in the struggle for self-determination, to expand and develop democracy to place it at the service of the majority."
}
]
}