Digital & Print Membership
Yearly + Receive 8 free printed back issues
$420 Annually
Monthly + Receive 3 free printed back issues
$40 Monthly
To Leave, or Not to Leave? That Is the Question.
In recent years, “leaving America” content has become its own genre – TikToks about “how I moved abroad and never looked back,” YouTube breakdowns of visa pathways, and Instagram reels listing “the best countries for Americans right now.” Some are meticulous and practical: breakdown of digital nomad visas, the savings required for Spain’s non-lucrative visa, and how much French you need to know before applying for citizenship. Others are fueled by something less logistical: exhaustion, grief, and the quiet realization that no matter how hard you work, the country may not work for you.
Then there’s the celebrity version of this narrative. A notable public figure relocates, buys property abroad, or implies that their move is connected to “American decline.” During election years, especially, the “I’m leaving America if…” fantasy resurfaces like a seasonal flu. Most recently, Kristen Stewart shared she will “probably not” stay in the U.S., claiming that “reality is breaking completely under Trump.”
But for ordinary people, leaving the country is rarely an op-ed or Instagram announcement. It is paperwork, money, and risk. If you are wealthy, leaving the United States is often just a lifestyle choice. It can be framed as “prioritizing peace” rather than protecting your life. It’s the ability to live in New York and summer in the South of France, hold a visa as a convenience, and treat crossing borders like crossing sidewalks.
And this year, I quietly became part of that growing number.
When I first told people I was moving to Paris, they often responded with the kind of excitement usually reserved for glossy job offers and engagement rings. Paris. The word itself carries a cinematic sheen of café tables, slate rooftops, and couples sharing a baguette in the park. And to be fair, my announcement on Instagram was quite dreamy: two years abroad, an MFA, mornings spent writing and wandering, evenings spent drinking good wine and smoking skinny cigarettes. But I’d be lying if I said the decision was purely romantic.
Lately, the United States does not just feel politically divided, but politically weaponized. Immigration raids and the expanded presence of ICE agents, a genocide in Gaza directly funded by American tax dollars, the reversal of laws and protections, the quiet panic of layoffs and unemployment threading through professional life, among several other disasters, are constant reminders of the depraved state of our country. Recent research has suggested that, for some Americans, the country is becoming increasingly difficult to live in.
For some, this version of America has always been a reality. In my 2023 book, In Our Shoes: On Being a Young Black Woman in Not-So “Post-Racial” America, I write about my experience and the experiences of dozens of other Black women, with navigating America in our bodies. Through detailing our encounters with micro and macroaggressions, medical racism, policing, and bias, our stories shed light on the various obstacles many Black American women are subjected to from childhood throughout adulthood. For these varying reasons, the idea of leaving America has been a constant thought of mine, but I first seriously considered it in 2022. My boyfriend at the time, who was Swedish, and I were hypothetically discussing having children. A quick online search revealed that the rates at which women die from childbirth and pregnancy complications were much lower in Sweden than in the US. As someone in the demographic who is four times more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than white women, I began rethinking whether childbirth in my homeland made sense for me. But even before this conversation erupted, I’ve known that America has historically never been a safe place for people who look like me.
Even in my particular situation, leaving through means of education is its own advantage – one that places me somewhere between those who relocate with wealth and ease and those who, for financial, legal, or family reasons, cannot leave at all. The resources to afford higher education, the support to stop working full-time, and the ability to fit in elsewhere without fearing for safety are privileged qualities I recognize in my own move. Yet I am sometimes still haunted by my decision to take space from my country at a time when it is desperately struggling. So even when a move is technically temporary, it cannot help but become symbolic. In my case, moving to Paris was both a question of self-preservation and the start of planting seeds elsewhere.
If your identity makes you targetable, leaving becomes rational
There’s a particular American moral trap in the idea that leaving is betrayal and selfish, as though staying automatically makes you principled. But this logic falls apart quickly depending on your specific position within the social hierarchy in America.
America’s political climate doesn’t land evenly. Some bodies are treated as neutral – default citizens – and others are treated as debates. You can often tell who is most endangered by looking at who is most legislated. If you belong to a group that is increasingly framed as a threat – trans people, immigrants, Muslims, Black communities, activists, educators, political journalists – you may not have the luxury of waiting to see what happens. “Let’s give it time” is a phrase that sounds reasonable until your rights evaporate in real time. Many people are not theorizing their danger; they are living it.
And while some argue that leaving concedes the country to extremists, there’s a hard truth underneath: staying in harm’s way is not the only form of resistance, especially if it drains you to the point of collapse. To leave, for some, is not an escape. It is a strategy, a form of protection, or buying time.
Burnout is not a personal failure — it’s a political outcome
The American mythology of activism loves an endlessly giving hero: the organizer who never sleeps and stays “in the fight” until their body becomes the instrument. I’ve always understood the appeal of that story — the romance of sacrifice and the clarity of purpose — but the older I get, I also recognize that activism does not exist without self-care. As Audre Lorde famously wrote, “Caring for myself is not self-indulgence, it is self-preservation, and that is an act of political warfare.” If rest can be political, then exhaustion is not a personal failure. Especially when the people most often cast in that role are the ones already living with the consequences of the fight. Marginalized people are asked to defend rights that are actively being chipped away while simultaneously absorbing the harm of that erosion. It’s a strange logic to expect the people a country is most at war with to be the ones tasked with saving it. So if you’re considering leaving, not because you’ve stopped caring, but because you also need to care for yourself, I don’t see that as weakness.
My Paris move is temporary — but the question isn’t
When I first announced that I was moving for two years, my plan was never to leave America for good. Despite my issues with the country’s political landscape, it is still the country where I was born and raised, and where the majority of my loved ones and community reside. James Baldwin famously wrote, “I love America more than any other country in this world, and exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.” That line reminds me that distance and devotion can coexist. The impulse to leave is not necessarily an abandonment of the country, but another form of engagement with it – one shaped by distance, reflection, and the hope that critique can still be an act of care.
My plan to move has been in the making for years, but 2025 felt like an appropriate time to finally execute it. As someone who is very in tune with their body, it didn’t take long for me to realize that my mental and physical health was slowly collapsing in response to racial trauma within my homeland. In order for me to be active, I have to be well. This break, or more so pause, is not an ideological exit. I’m simply stepping into a different life for a while – one built around writing, study, and the chance to breathe in a country where my nervous system is not constantly on alert.
And still, I can feel the larger question stalking the edges of this choice. Because even a temporary relocation is a form of recalibration. It asks you: What does it feel like to live without bracing yourself every day? It dares you to consider that the way America feels may not be inevitable – it may be optional.
For some people, the choice will be to stay, fight, and build. For others, the choice will be to leave, regroup, and survive. Neither means that the work has to stop; it means changing vantage points. Whether through expat support groups that double as communities, voting absentee, donating to mutual-aid funds, organizing over Zoom, publishing essays, or creating content to amplify issues back home, I have witnessed several Americans continue their work abroad in various ways.
“To leave, or not to leave” is no longer a dramatic line. But a realistic question several of us are asking ourselves, and no one answer fits all.
{
"article":
{
"title" : "To Leave, or Not to Leave? That Is the Question.",
"author" : "Brianna Holt",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/to-leave-or-not-to-leave-that-is-the-question",
"date" : "2026-03-05 13:52:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/0b4c627a-9761-451c-9b21-4b12d911879ac17775e930e34d9708_GettyImages-1251260675.jpg",
"excerpt" : "In recent years, “leaving America” content has become its own genre – TikToks about “how I moved abroad and never looked back,” YouTube breakdowns of visa pathways, and Instagram reels listing “the best countries for Americans right now.” Some are meticulous and practical: breakdown of digital nomad visas, the savings required for Spain’s non-lucrative visa, and how much French you need to know before applying for citizenship. Others are fueled by something less logistical: exhaustion, grief, and the quiet realization that no matter how hard you work, the country may not work for you.",
"content" : "In recent years, “leaving America” content has become its own genre – TikToks about “how I moved abroad and never looked back,” YouTube breakdowns of visa pathways, and Instagram reels listing “the best countries for Americans right now.” Some are meticulous and practical: breakdown of digital nomad visas, the savings required for Spain’s non-lucrative visa, and how much French you need to know before applying for citizenship. Others are fueled by something less logistical: exhaustion, grief, and the quiet realization that no matter how hard you work, the country may not work for you.Then there’s the celebrity version of this narrative. A notable public figure relocates, buys property abroad, or implies that their move is connected to “American decline.” During election years, especially, the “I’m leaving America if…” fantasy resurfaces like a seasonal flu. Most recently, Kristen Stewart shared she will “probably not” stay in the U.S., claiming that “reality is breaking completely under Trump.”But for ordinary people, leaving the country is rarely an op-ed or Instagram announcement. It is paperwork, money, and risk. If you are wealthy, leaving the United States is often just a lifestyle choice. It can be framed as “prioritizing peace” rather than protecting your life. It’s the ability to live in New York and summer in the South of France, hold a visa as a convenience, and treat crossing borders like crossing sidewalks.And this year, I quietly became part of that growing number. When I first told people I was moving to Paris, they often responded with the kind of excitement usually reserved for glossy job offers and engagement rings. Paris. The word itself carries a cinematic sheen of café tables, slate rooftops, and couples sharing a baguette in the park. And to be fair, my announcement on Instagram was quite dreamy: two years abroad, an MFA, mornings spent writing and wandering, evenings spent drinking good wine and smoking skinny cigarettes. But I’d be lying if I said the decision was purely romantic.Lately, the United States does not just feel politically divided, but politically weaponized. Immigration raids and the expanded presence of ICE agents, a genocide in Gaza directly funded by American tax dollars, the reversal of laws and protections, the quiet panic of layoffs and unemployment threading through professional life, among several other disasters, are constant reminders of the depraved state of our country. Recent research has suggested that, for some Americans, the country is becoming increasingly difficult to live in.For some, this version of America has always been a reality. In my 2023 book, In Our Shoes: On Being a Young Black Woman in Not-So “Post-Racial” America, I write about my experience and the experiences of dozens of other Black women, with navigating America in our bodies. Through detailing our encounters with micro and macroaggressions, medical racism, policing, and bias, our stories shed light on the various obstacles many Black American women are subjected to from childhood throughout adulthood. For these varying reasons, the idea of leaving America has been a constant thought of mine, but I first seriously considered it in 2022. My boyfriend at the time, who was Swedish, and I were hypothetically discussing having children. A quick online search revealed that the rates at which women die from childbirth and pregnancy complications were much lower in Sweden than in the US. As someone in the demographic who is four times more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than white women, I began rethinking whether childbirth in my homeland made sense for me. But even before this conversation erupted, I’ve known that America has historically never been a safe place for people who look like me.Even in my particular situation, leaving through means of education is its own advantage – one that places me somewhere between those who relocate with wealth and ease and those who, for financial, legal, or family reasons, cannot leave at all. The resources to afford higher education, the support to stop working full-time, and the ability to fit in elsewhere without fearing for safety are privileged qualities I recognize in my own move. Yet I am sometimes still haunted by my decision to take space from my country at a time when it is desperately struggling. So even when a move is technically temporary, it cannot help but become symbolic. In my case, moving to Paris was both a question of self-preservation and the start of planting seeds elsewhere. If your identity makes you targetable, leaving becomes rationalThere’s a particular American moral trap in the idea that leaving is betrayal and selfish, as though staying automatically makes you principled. But this logic falls apart quickly depending on your specific position within the social hierarchy in America. America’s political climate doesn’t land evenly. Some bodies are treated as neutral – default citizens – and others are treated as debates. You can often tell who is most endangered by looking at who is most legislated. If you belong to a group that is increasingly framed as a threat – trans people, immigrants, Muslims, Black communities, activists, educators, political journalists – you may not have the luxury of waiting to see what happens. “Let’s give it time” is a phrase that sounds reasonable until your rights evaporate in real time. Many people are not theorizing their danger; they are living it.And while some argue that leaving concedes the country to extremists, there’s a hard truth underneath: staying in harm’s way is not the only form of resistance, especially if it drains you to the point of collapse. To leave, for some, is not an escape. It is a strategy, a form of protection, or buying time.Burnout is not a personal failure — it’s a political outcomeThe American mythology of activism loves an endlessly giving hero: the organizer who never sleeps and stays “in the fight” until their body becomes the instrument. I’ve always understood the appeal of that story — the romance of sacrifice and the clarity of purpose — but the older I get, I also recognize that activism does not exist without self-care. As Audre Lorde famously wrote, “Caring for myself is not self-indulgence, it is self-preservation, and that is an act of political warfare.” If rest can be political, then exhaustion is not a personal failure. Especially when the people most often cast in that role are the ones already living with the consequences of the fight. Marginalized people are asked to defend rights that are actively being chipped away while simultaneously absorbing the harm of that erosion. It’s a strange logic to expect the people a country is most at war with to be the ones tasked with saving it. So if you’re considering leaving, not because you’ve stopped caring, but because you also need to care for yourself, I don’t see that as weakness. My Paris move is temporary — but the question isn’tWhen I first announced that I was moving for two years, my plan was never to leave America for good. Despite my issues with the country’s political landscape, it is still the country where I was born and raised, and where the majority of my loved ones and community reside. James Baldwin famously wrote, “I love America more than any other country in this world, and exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.” That line reminds me that distance and devotion can coexist. The impulse to leave is not necessarily an abandonment of the country, but another form of engagement with it – one shaped by distance, reflection, and the hope that critique can still be an act of care. My plan to move has been in the making for years, but 2025 felt like an appropriate time to finally execute it. As someone who is very in tune with their body, it didn’t take long for me to realize that my mental and physical health was slowly collapsing in response to racial trauma within my homeland. In order for me to be active, I have to be well. This break, or more so pause, is not an ideological exit. I’m simply stepping into a different life for a while – one built around writing, study, and the chance to breathe in a country where my nervous system is not constantly on alert.And still, I can feel the larger question stalking the edges of this choice. Because even a temporary relocation is a form of recalibration. It asks you: What does it feel like to live without bracing yourself every day? It dares you to consider that the way America feels may not be inevitable – it may be optional.For some people, the choice will be to stay, fight, and build. For others, the choice will be to leave, regroup, and survive. Neither means that the work has to stop; it means changing vantage points. Whether through expat support groups that double as communities, voting absentee, donating to mutual-aid funds, organizing over Zoom, publishing essays, or creating content to amplify issues back home, I have witnessed several Americans continue their work abroad in various ways. “To leave, or not to leave” is no longer a dramatic line. But a realistic question several of us are asking ourselves, and no one answer fits all."
}
,
"relatedposts": [
{
"title" : "How to unpack and resist a pedophilic beauty standard: In a post-Epstein file world",
"author" : "Emma Cieslik",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/how-to-unpack-and-resist-a-pedophilic-beauty-standard",
"date" : "2026-03-05 13:58:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/Justice_Store_(13594585535).jpg",
"excerpt" : "In January, the Department of Justice released a 3,000,000-document drop of Epstein files which mentioned among others Les Wexner, the billionaire behind Victoria’s Secret and Abercrombie & Fitch among other brands. Although Wexner was already labelled a co-conspirator with Epstein by the FBI, this newest file drop raises questions about how Wexner–and by connection Epstein–were connected to clothing marketed towards young girls. In the aftermath, a whole generation of women are deconstructing how a pedophile was actively part of the marketing that eroticized and idealized prepubescent girls’ bodies as the ideal.",
"content" : "In January, the Department of Justice released a 3,000,000-document drop of Epstein files which mentioned among others Les Wexner, the billionaire behind Victoria’s Secret and Abercrombie & Fitch among other brands. Although Wexner was already labelled a co-conspirator with Epstein by the FBI, this newest file drop raises questions about how Wexner–and by connection Epstein–were connected to clothing marketed towards young girls. In the aftermath, a whole generation of women are deconstructing how a pedophile was actively part of the marketing that eroticized and idealized prepubescent girls’ bodies as the ideal.It is a reckoning with how American girlhood was shaped by men like Wexner and Epstein that informed not only the clothing that was marketed and sold to us but also the body shame that came with it, along with purity culture enforced by the very Christian leaders whose writings Epstein sent to his own victims.Birthday letter to Jeffrey Epstein attributed to Donald Trump. The text is censored due to potential copyright concerns (authorship of this work is disputed), though the rest of the piece is composed of simple shape and thus falls into the public domain.Wexner was the creator of L Brands, the retail company behind Victoria’s Secret, Bath & Body Works, and Abercrombie & Fitch, and owned TOO, Inc., the parent company of Justice and other brands marketed directly towards young girls. This past Friday, Wexner participated in a deposition to House Democrats about revelations from this latest file drop, claiming that he was “duped by a world-class con man.”Wexner notes that Epstein became his financial advisor back in the 1980s and at one point, served as his power of attorney. In this same deposition, Wexner revealed that he cut ties with Epstein after he discovered that Epstein stole over $100 million from him.Wexner called the accusations that he was part of Epstein’s sex trafficking “outrageous untrue statements and hurtful rumor, innuendo, and speculation,” claiming that his relationship with Epstein was strictly business. He also denied Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre’s claim that he was one of the men that Epstein trafficked her to. Wexner similarly denied knowing Maria Farmer, who accused Epstein of sexually assaulting her in 1996. Farmer claimed that after she was assaulted, Wexner’s security staff kept her on the property until a parent could pick her up, but Wexner said that “I never met her, didn’t know she was here, didn’t know she was abused.”But House Democrats repeatedly questioned how Wexner could not have known that this sex trafficking was happening and that it was fueled by his own money. The Democrats cast doubt on his story, arguing that “there would be no Epstein Island, no plane, no money to traffic women and girls without the support of Les Wexner.”While Victoria’s Secret sexualization of infantilized women is not new–we have known for years that the modelling industry behind Victoria’s Secret not only targeted children but sold people an ideal of beauty conflated with girlhood, this new file drop reveals that this was intentional by Wexner and others that sold us a form of girlhood that enabled predators.It’s no mistake that President Trump, another person mentioned over 38,000 times in the Epstein files, also owned Miss Teen USA pageants. In fact, in the deposition, Wexner said the only time that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump would have interacted would have been at a Victoria’s Secret fashion show. Both attended fashion shows.But this latest Epstein file release is a wide scale realization that Wexner wasn’t the only one grooming a generation–think of what came out about producer Dan Schneider (who was also named in the Epstein files) after the release of the 2024 docuseries Quiet on Set: The Dark Side of Kids TV. Schneider oversaw the rampant, calculated sexualization of young actors.As children who watched Schneider shows and wore Wexner’s clothes, we are reckoning with the ways that many of us were exploited as children within a system marketing sexualized girlhood to us. Artist Sam Rueter put words to many people’s emotions following the latest Epstein file drop: “women in America are in deep grieving. Not because we are surprised or overcome with disbelief … but because we have to reckon with the cruel proof of our entire lives being a commodified, fetishized version of girlhood: and we are meeting, all at once, the children we were and could not protect.”In the aftermath, how can you reckon with and reject pedophilic beauty standards in the aftermath of the Epstein file drop?1. Do not spend money or support brands that sexualize children or infantilized models.While at first glance, this includes for many of us Victoria’s Secret, Abercrombie & Fitch, and other brands owned by Wexner, this also includes brands that market sexualized clothing or content to children. This month, the babycare brand Frida Baby came under fire for using phrases suggesting sexual innuendo on their baby products. The packaging had the phrases “I get turned on quickly,” “How about a quickie,” and “This is the closest your husband’s gonna get to a threesome.” Other brands like Balenciaga and Fashion Nova have also come under fire, but a number of other brands and fashion corporations are to blame–according to a 2011 study, ⅓ of all children’s clothing for girls is sexualized; “tween” stores like Abercrombie Kids, the study finds, are most to blame.In a capitalist society, sadly our most powerful tool is choosing where we spend our money, so it’s important to boycott and call out brands that sexualize children and market infantilized models.2. Do not consume and boycott any media sensualizing or sexualizing children by avoiding AI, social media platforms, and other content.Sadly in the age of AI, a number of digital platforms have been shown to generate and share sexualized images of minors, and according to the National Center on Sexual Exploitation (NCOSE), a number of online platforms including Instagram, Roblox, GitHub, eBay, Discord, X, Reddit, Spotify, and Snapchat fail to protect children from sexual content, putting them at risk for grooming and sexual exploitation. Avoid AI for this reason (among many others, including environmental impact) but also if you can, boycott social media platforms and call your representatives to urge the government to require these platforms to take actionable steps to protect children.This also applies to what may be some of your favorite Classic movies, television shows, or music, but know that by watching the movie, show, or consuming the content, you not only give your consent but also support its continued existence on streaming platforms. This is also a timely reflection given what has come out in the past three years about children on Nickelodeon; what once seemed innocent, at most odd, is revealed to be intimately connected to abusive behavior and sexualizing children.This also goes for new content, like the new season of America’s Next Top Model.3. Do not dress up as sexy babies, or sexualized children.While the Spirit Halloween costume section was full of sexy babies in the early 2000s, I hope it’s clear that any costumes that sexualizes children or infantilized adults contribute to the perception that sexualizing children is acceptable or funny. This is a simple step that you and others can take next Halloween when choosing your costume, or when engaging in kink and BDSM cultures.And if you are buying clothing for your children or those of friends and family, do not buy them clothing that sexualizes them. This includes snarky sayings like “lady’s man” on a baby’s smock or “heartbreaker” on a baby’s bib. While some people may brush it off, especially if the child can’t read, studies have shown.) that children may begin to view their bodies as sexual objects and may be treated differently, including being targeted by sexual predators.4. Do not police other people’s bodies, period.This may be harder for people who were raised in systems where unshaved armpits or unplucked eyebrows are seen as unkempt (spoiler alert, this is connected to transphobic, racist beauty standards), but pedophilic beauty standards are built not only on a beauty standard that idealizes not just a hairless body but also a small, underdeveloped one. Commenting on other’s bodies, even if it’s not meant to criticize their appearance, can contribute to body image issues, and at the root of pedophilic beauty standards are the very eating disorders glorified in the early 2000s.This beauty ideal (perpetuated not only by companies like Victoria’s Secret but by magazines, music corporations, and media companies that glorified baby-ified women) not only aided and abetted the development of eating disorders but also severe body dysphoria that persists to this day. I distinctly remember friends of mine that experienced amenorrhea, or the absence of regular periods, because of eating disorders. Without vital nutrients, their periods stopped coming regularly, and with it, the development of their bodies—stunting their growth. Many of them remain small or underdeveloped because of childhood eating disorders.The same marketing and cultural influencers that encouraged us that skinniness was not acceptable but necessary also enabled young girls to stop getting their periods, the one thing that many cultures identify as their transition to womanhood. To be clear, a child getting a period does not make them an adult.5. Start with your own beauty routine.Do you dislike shaving or waxing your legs, armpits or other parts of your body? Do you dread expensive, medically unnecessary skincare routines and Botox meant to glorify perpetually young bodies? Good news–you don’t have to do these things.While our American beauty standards are rooted in the model of a young girl, they are not absolute and they only change when people pressure corporations that have marketed these standards to us in order to sell their products. If you can (for cultural and sensory reasons, not everyone is able to), take the first step and reject the urge to shave, wax, pluck, or inject.As someone with autism, I admit that shaving my legs and armpits is a sensory issue informed by pedophilic beauty standards, but it’s still a practice that helps me feel at home in my body. None of these suggestions are asking you to reject what makes you feel at home in your body. Some of the body care processes that pedophilic culture has coopted are ones that help to affirm our genders–practices that affirm who we are and how we feel at home in our bodies should never be challenged, but these steps encourage us to think about what has informed not only our view of what is an attractive woman (often modelled after young girls) but also what a woman is.6. Reject transphobic, racist beauty standards. Consume brands that showcase models of diverse body and beauty types.Because the urge to wax, shave, and pluck our hair is not only rooted in pedophilia, it’s also rooted in White supremacist transphobia that essentializes the beautiful body as inherently thin, White and visually binary. Pedophilic culture is sexist culture is purity culture is racist culture is transphobic culture. Gender essentialism is the bedrock of sexist beauty standards that seek to make adult women feel bad about our bodies. Fighting transphobia goes hand in hand with fighting gender essentialist beauty standards and by extension, pedophilic ones too!In a capitalist economy, much of our power is defined by money. Use that to your advantage! Along with not supporting brands that sexualize children and infantilize adults, seek out brands that showcase and celebrate adult bodies. Some great ones include WRAY, SmartGlamour, Lucy & Yak, and Modcloth that purposefully create clothing for and highlight models of diverse body types.7. Encourage and embody body neutrality.In this same vein, embody body neutrality by refusing to assign value judgement to your body and others’ bodies. Body positivity is great, but it still assigns a value judgement to bodies–for many fat people like me, celebrating our bodies much less feeling beautiful in them is rare because of thinness culture (especially in the age of Ozempic), but assigning our bodies value judgements still exacerbates the problem. Bodies are bodies that help us to stay alive. Need helpful starting steps? Check out Jessi Kneeland’s 2022 book Body Neutrality: A Revolution to Overcoming Body Image Issues.8. Finally, reject new-age purity culture.Although the Purity Culture Movement of the late 1990s and early 2000s is already facing a public reckoning, other Christian groups are trying to rebrand purity culture for the next generation. Back in 2022, I wrote about how modern social media influencers like Girl Defined are rebranding purity culture for a new generation, and I have even argued that modern anti-trans legislation is a new form of purity culture policing queer bodies. Take note of where purity culture continues to exist and call it out!And importantly, fight school districts, religious institutions, and public spaces that enforce sexist clothing rules like the ones we all remember from childhood. The fact that young girls were told that we would distract not just our male classmates but also teachers is deeply upsetting and shifts blame onto children and victims rather than adults and predators.This is a deeply upsetting reckoning but one that we have to undertake personally and communally. I hope that these recommendations are helpful first steps to move towards unpacking the very beauty standards and sexualization that groomed a whole generation of girls and women."
}
,
{
"title" : "Harnessing queer and trans protest magic: How magic has become a conduit to resist and demand justice",
"author" : "Emma Cieslik",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/harnessing-queer-and-trans-protest-magic",
"date" : "2026-03-05 13:40:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/(1993)_March_on_Washington_for_LGB_Equal_Rights_and_Liberation_--_76.jpg",
"excerpt" : "As queer and trans people are under attack in the United States–identified as “extremists” by the FBI as part of a mass far-right campaign to erase us, many are turning to underground networks of support and resistance. Queer and trans people are fighting for their survival, and as they have done for centuries, witches, folk magic practitioners, and pagans are utilizing their magic to protect and defend their communities under attack using spells for protection, herbal sachets for passing, and community solidarity as sacred practice.",
"content" : "As queer and trans people are under attack in the United States–identified as “extremists” by the FBI as part of a mass far-right campaign to erase us, many are turning to underground networks of support and resistance. Queer and trans people are fighting for their survival, and as they have done for centuries, witches, folk magic practitioners, and pagans are utilizing their magic to protect and defend their communities under attack using spells for protection, herbal sachets for passing, and community solidarity as sacred practice.Over the past year, queer protest magic has proliferated online, as has a deep dive into the histories of queer protective magic throughout time. “I have a big handful of queer and trans clients,” Italian-American folk magic practitioner Frankie Anne Castanea said, “that are seeking out protective magics or magics that are a little bit more intensive, or magics to pass and those are all very rooted into historical folk magic, specifically voodoo and conjure tend to have a lot of workings for trans and queer folks.”Castanea has written a literal book on protest magic: Spells for Change: A Guide for Modern Witches published in April 2022. Better known online as the Chaotic Witch Aunt, they are the godparent of modern queer protest magic, publishing a piece on their blog about Protective Magic for Protesting Practitioners, which has been continually updated with workings, safety information, and resources as needed including not only protest safety but intentional practices for identity and healing in the face of queerphobic, xenophobic, and racist violence.Ancestral magicCastanea’s ancestors would’ve known protest magic well, having lived in Italy (while some immigrated out of the country) during the rise and fall of Mussolini. In much the same way, Castanea wrote in their June blog post, “we are seeing our friends and neighbors disappear at the hands of masked men, our queer elders and community members living at the hands of threats of violence, murder, and hate crimes.”Folk magic, Castanea argues, is a form of protection and communal justice to keep us safe and fight systems of Christian nationalism that attempt to erase us, and a way to reconnect with ancestral practices of resistance and survival. At its heart, ancestral magic is decolonial and directly counter to the rising tide of Christian nationalism across the United States.“To me,” Castanea said, “ancestral magic is rooted into practices that have previously been lost by assimilation and to White supremacy. It’s having awareness for the ancestors we come from. Ancestral magic is reconnection and rooting into community spaces and learning from community spaces.” This rejection of assimilation and religious settler colonialism also encompasses current efforts to silence, erase, and punish queer and trans people for existing, especially with the Supreme Court hearing a case this past week to overturn Colorado’s ban on conversion therapy for minors. To be queer is to reject compulsory heteronormativity and cisgender expectations and expressions.This work is also connected to the veneration and celebration of queer ancestors. Castanea recommends everyone connect with queer ancestors, from their families to their friends to queer historical icons. “It can be members of your family that were queer,” Castanea said. “It can be queer community leaders and people who have passed who made huge movements for us, Marsha P Johnson, and anyone who was involved in the Stonewall rides. All of those are our queer ancestors, and when we lean into learning from them or connecting with them, or listening and learning about their stories, we’re also participating in like ancestral veneration that leans into folk magic.”Queer and trans folk magic provides rich ways in which to connect with queer ancestors whose names we might know and those who we may not. One of the best examples is the work of Loki, a Filipino trans man, and his husband Robin, a transmasculine nonbinary Italian American, who founded The Trickster’s Apothecary in 2021. “You hit queer elderhood a lot younger than most people hit elderhood,” Robin explained, “so making sure that people have someone to call in their spiritual practice who understands, feels comforting, feels that same righteous rage” is at the core of what the Tricker’s Apothecary does by creating candles of queer ancestors.The creators of secular saint candles are often hesitant or unwilling to create saint candles with specific religious connotations, nervous about how religion and spirituality are often viewed by both community members and far right leaders as at odds with queer and trans identity. But there is great potential, Robin said, in recognizing and venerating trans ancestors. In fact, Castanea published their new book Ancestral Magic: A Modern Witch’s Guide to Folk Traditions & Reconnection this past November.The inherent queerness of folk magic and witchcraftWhile Castanea argues that queer folk magic speaks specifically to their communities, there is something inherently queer about all folk magic, witchcraft and paganism that exists on the fringes. “The witch is a kind of other,” they said, “an other figure against the state or the system.” This is not to say that affirming and welcoming Christian communities do not exist, nor that some magical traditions are gender essentialist (especially Dianic communities) and have been harmful and exclusionary to queer and trans people.“Queerness is just so intrinsically rooted into everything,” Castanea said. “Even though people try really hard to pretend its not, it’s rooted in nature. It’s rooted into folk magic. A lot of folk magic centered on sex workers and strippers often included queer folks. There have always been magical remedies or ways for trans folks or queer folk magic that is rooted in protection of queerness and making sure we survive.” Folk magic itself exists in a liminal space, a religious other that queers the material cultures we engage with.Maybe this is what draws many queer and trans people to folk magic, witchcraft and paganism. “I think of queerness as this in between space, as this liminal space as actively kind of queering narratives or querying societal norms, is very potent when we’re talking about folk magic and necessity,” Castanea said. For Castanea, being queer and showing up as queer and trans is itself an act of protest, just as practicing folk magic, witchcraft, and paganism is an act of rebellion during a time where far-right forces in the United States continue to demonize both communities.In order to practice queer and trans resistance magic, however, practitioners need to understand how accusations of witchcraft and Satanism (rooted in Christian nationalism themselves) have been used to target, ostracize and incarcerate queer and trans people. The United States is currently witnessing a queer Satanic panic, where queerness is falsely conflated with witchcraft–as seen in Indiana Lt. Gov Micah Beckwith’s posts this past May and June. Queer communities and witchcraft are once again associated with Satanic Ritual Abuse, a term that rose to prominence in the 1980s during the HIV/AIDS crisis as conservative Christians stirred moral and spiritual panic surrounding the Satanic Temple.Just as LGBTQ+ people are falsely accused of grooming children, Satanists and witches, pagans, and folk magical practitioners were once accused of ritual abuse of children in a “Pagan Conquest,” which Beckwith described as “ritual child sacrifice–with glitter and hashtags.” Queer and trans protest magic is rooted in histories where magic itself and our connections to it have been demonized; reclaiming magical roots itself reclaims and heals these histories.As a result of increasing violence against queer and trans communities and folk magic and witchcraft communities as well, “ actively sitting in a liminal space is a protest in itself,” Castanea said. “I think that actively participating in queer community and building resilience and joy and forming communal mutual aid networks based on that experience is also a protest in itself, and there are so many different ways to incorporate folk magic in that. And I would even argue that folk magic is community and mutual aid.”Papers inscribed with sigils, created by and with Laura Tempest Zakroff. Photo courtesy of Zakroff.The power of protest magicProtesting in the streets and civil disobedience against the police and ICE is critical, especially for white protestors who have more privilege and protection because of white supremacy, but it’s not a form of rebellion accessible to all people. Especially for disabled individuals, Black and indigenous people of color, and many others who are not physically able to engage in this form of protest or who face intense violence from the police, state-sanctioned officials, and other fringe and private militia groups, risk more deadly violence if they engage in this protest.For Castanea, there is folk magic specifically devoted to keeping people safe during this, especially found in the PaganPunk Community Grimoire Project, a resource created by gay hedge priest Ron Padrón. The Project provides free 1-2 page zines with histories, rituals, and spells that people can easily access online, including one by Padrón about Queer Ancestors, another by M. Belanger to restore equity and justice in the United States, and finally a recipe and ritual for lip balm protection magic by Vittorio Benetti.As Benetti wrote in the zine, his cargo pants act like a hidden backpack, full of non-magical things like a coin wallet and spare keys and magical ones, like crystals and sigils. “In my ongoing exploration of urban, street, and punk witchcraft, I was looking for something protective, easy to carry, versatile enough for multiple uses, and that could be hidden in plain sight whether I’m on the street or at the office.” The protective lip balm he created was a covert but powerful form of protective magic while out in public and while protesting.But for people who cannot go out in the streets to do this work, “protest, especially coming from a place of privilege, a place of whiteness, is finding and being in community spaces and being a good ally when I can for Black, indigenous people of color and queer Black indigenous people of color. It’s ensuring that my spaces are safe and accessible for them.” Queer protest magic doesn’t necessarily have to be what many consider traditional magic–spells, rituals, and sachets–rather, it is collective action inspired by historical solidarity with queer ancestors and the queer and trans people that are today fighting for their lives.A Sigil to Protect Protesters (ICE Sigil), by Laura Tempest Zakroff. Photo courtesy of Zakroff.“It’s ensuring that I am making sure that their voices are the first voices heard,” Castanea said, “and it’s also building community spaces for people to just be themselves. It’s forming mutual aid networks. It’s ensuring that you’re like checking in with your trans and queer friends and relatives. It’s making sure that they know that if they need a place to crash, your house is there. We often think of community and protest as two separate things, but for me, community is protest. Mutual aid is a form of protest and a form of protest magic.”Protest magic at its heart has always been about fighting systemic abuse and violence, and in times of increasingly state-sanctioned and led violence against queer, immigrant, disabled, and BIPOC individuals and communities, protest magic has reemerged as a vital tool not just for queer people but for all peoples who are marginalized, discriminated against, and harmed.“Protest magic isn’t just rooted in being an Italian American,” Castanea continued, “but anyone who experiences or has ever historically experienced marginalization or discrimination, including queer folks, Black and indigenous people of color. There have always been spells and folk magics and practices that are rooted into survival.”So as we near Trans Day of Visibility, Castanea invites queer and trans people–and all people–to engage in folk magic themselves, to not be afraid that they will do it wrong, make mistakes, or be excluded, or that practicing folk magic will invalidate their cultural or religious past or roots or challenge any interfaith identity or practice.Rather, Castanea urges people to find their own local communities–on social media, at local botanicas and metaphysical shops, at magical workshops and circles–and ethical teachers who cite their sources, and more than anything, that in the true spirit of queer and trans folk magic, people not “be afraid to fuck around and find out.”"
}
,
{
"title" : "Seeds of Chronic Hope",
"author" : "Corinne Jabbour",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/seeds-of-chronic-hope",
"date" : "2026-03-04 12:06:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/Heirloom%20Corn%20at%20Buzuruna%20Juzuruna.jpg",
"excerpt" : "",
"content" : "Gathering in BeirutOn the 22nd of November 2025, a day which coincided with Lebanon’s Independence day, we gathered with a crowd at a venue facing the Beirut Port silos, which still stand half demolished, a constant reminder that our crises are in fact not tragic misfortunes, but carefully designed and manufactured atrocities. We gathered that day for the public launch of the Agroecology Coalition in Lebanon (ACL). Agroecology is not just a science or farming practices, but the movement calling for food justice and sovereignty.Mathematics of PredationThe global food system today demands that we forfeit our farmers’ rights and autonomy, our people’s dignity, health, and wellbeing, and the resilience and abundance of the environment we are a part of, all to achieve its goals. It is not driven by hatred for farmers or hatred for the environment and its people, but rather simply by the cold mathematics of this economic system that do not take things like justice, dignity, sovereignty or the health of the ecosystem into account. As a result, they are methodically sacrificed when the outcome is more profit, because this system’s one and only goal is: Ever increasing profit for ever increasing capital accumulation, no matter the cost, a fact proven yet again by today’s colonial wars, and the re-escalation of Israeli aggressions and land invasion in Lebanon.Green Colonialism in LebanonThe World Bank’s hundreds of millions of dollars in “recovery and reconstruction” loans arrive alongside efforts to redirect our production further toward export. New laws compromise seed sovereignty, threaten our cannabis heritage varieties, and surrender the autonomy of our fishermen. Layer by layer we are stripped of food sovereignty and pushed deeper into hegemonic global markets - green colonialism advancing under the banner of modernization. Our news channels are filled with the echoes of our politicians promising wealth and prosperity through global markets. These promises ignore the reality that our country’s one airport, two ports, and limited land crossings can - and have been - paralyzed by Israel within hours. They forget what happened to our imports and exports during Covid, or after the 2019 currency collapse. We grow thirsty crops that do not fill our needs but fulfill the desires of the Global North, and we send them our produce and within it our water, our labour, and the health of our land. Then to complete the dance, our government ships in food grown in poorer soil on distant land, drowning our local markets and driving our farmers into the arms of export traders, or pushing them to abandon farming and migrate to the city… As our Gibran once wrote, “Woe to a nation that eats what it does not grow!”The Trap of Conventional AgricultureOur farmers are coerced into buying hybrid seeds, synthetic chemical fertilizers, biocides (pesticides, fungicides, herbicides, rodenticides…), and other inputs at prices controlled by multinational corporations and their local allies. They sell their crops at prices controlled by traders in the wholesale markets, prices so low they barely cover their costs!“Being a farmer is like being in love with a bad woman, the whole world will tell you she is bad but all you see is the beauty in her!” This was the reply of Georges, a seasoned farmer from a mountain village in the Chouf, when I asked him why he still chooses to be a farmer one disappointing season after another. As we walked through his terraces he told me some stories: “We used to sprinkle grains on the snow, to help the birds through the harsher days of winter… My father would tell us to skip harvesting some of the fruits on the high branches of the trees, he would say that those were the share of the birds from this season!” How did capitalism succeed at slowly eroding our worldview, where we shared our harvest with the birds? How far can this love for the land and its abundance carry our increasingly burdened growers? How long can they stand in the face of the scourge of the industrial model of food production that has invaded our way of life?Our farmers are stuck in a rat race, bullied into finding ways to intensify production with every season. Instead of fair distribution where farmers get their fair share, the only choice this system offers them is: “We will take the largest share of the profit generated by your hard labour, but if you keep finding ways to produce more, the small percentage we allow you to keep might become enough for you.” The outcome is farmers under tremendous pressure to produce more, better, and faster, and that intensification requires more and more synthetic chemicals!As for people who are choosing what to eat, they find themselves with limited choices, mostly laced with toxins, because within this system, clean and nutritious food has become a luxury! Beyond human health, these intensive production methods and long-distance transportation are crumbling our entire ecosystem and massively contributing to climate change, the consequences of which we are all experiencing, from unpredictable and extreme weather, to raging wildfires and prolonged droughts. Our farmers are among those paying the highest price for this change!A System of OppressionThis system, in complicity with our local varieties of comprador aspiring billionaires, continues to turn every right that we have, every care we offer each other, every abundance we receive from nature, into commodities to be bought and sold for profit. Today’s realities in the Global South are living testament to the price that the many have to pay in service of the few, and we are the many!We reject attempts to depoliticize food, we reject attempts to sanitize this predatory dynamic with performative gestures and token measures. The charades of charity and benevolence have long expired. These tools of neo-colonialism are now seen for what they are, instruments of oppression and hegemony. We do not need an invitation to drown further in debt through loans offered under the guise of development and recovery by the same powers that fund, arm and enable the Zionist colonial project that brings on that destruction. This system has exposed itself through its oppression and subjugation of nature, women, and colonized peoples. Through military complexes, genocides, sanctions, poverty, and famine, it leaves devastation in the wake of its hollow promises of prosperity through progress and development.Tangible AlternativesWhat brought us together that day in Beirut was not just a common perspective on the root of the so-called “crises”, but a shared conviction that this system is dying, and that real, tangible, solid alternatives already exist. Alternatives that spring from the ground and require change on all levels, including the political level. Alternatives that converge the world into ways of life that prioritize human wellbeing, dignity, and harmony with the planet that is our home.For the food system, one such alternative is Agroecology, the fundamental pillar of food sovereignty. It is not just a set of farming practices or the science behind them, agroecology is a social movement that places the autonomy of small scale farmers at its center, embraces traditional knowledge, and adopts democratic and horizontal methods for governance and knowledge transfer. It is a roadmap, not for superficial reform, but for radical transformation from exploitation to sovereignty. We need to liberate our commons, our seeds, our water, our land, our spaces, our festivals, our ancestral knowledge and worldview. We need to meet our growers, trust and support them. We need to rebuild resilience into our food system in preparation for the inevitable changes that have already begun to impact our food production. We need to decentralize our seed banks, our power sources, and our decision making. Systems such as seed harvesting and propagation have been managed collectively by farmers ever since agriculture was born in our fertile crescent, it is our treasured pool of biodiversity that should not be handed over to corporations. Intellectual property rights over seeds are the equivalent of visiting the ruins of Baalbek, installing a gate at the entrance, and claiming that the ruins are now yours because of that final modification! The absurdity of this system is not lost on us.The time has come to reclaim food, health, ecosystem, and lives with dignity, for ALL people, not SOME people, as rights and not as commodities for sale! The time has come to decolonize our food, to delink ourselves from this parasitic system that has been bleeding us dry for decades, and will not stop until it starves the world, and the last bird on the last tree goes silent.We gathered that day, not for romantic ideals, but a concrete political project, a vision, and a battle for liberation that we do not wage alone. We are part of a global and widespread movement that includes farmers, peasants, and peoples everywhere, all clearly and loudly united in their categorical demand for their fundamental right to food sovereignty!Chronic HopeAfter the day had ended, with smiles, inspiration, and a warm atmosphere of camaraderie, while walking away from that venue and passing by the remains of the silos, the walk took me back 5 years, where I took those same steps after the Beirut Port explosion. I had been walking and looking around at the destruction with tears blurring my vision and silently rolling down my cheeks. I remember looking down at the ground and finding seeds in the corner where the sidewalk meets the shoulder of the road. The pods on the trees had popped open at the pressure of the explosion, spreading their seeds everywhere along with the shattered glass and rubble. I couldn’t help smiling through my tears, smiling and thinking: “We are those seeds, and we will never stop bringing life back into the death that is brought upon us.”"
}
]
}