Digital & Print Membership
Yearly + Receive 8 free printed back issues
$420 Annually
Monthly + Receive 3 free printed back issues
$40 Monthly
Isamu Noguchi
A Legacy Split in Two

Olmec and Muse (1985), basalt; by Isamu Noguchi, sold at auction in 2017 for $4.98 million. A title, a year, a material, an artist, the passage of time, a price. A legacy of cultures, a legacy of earth, a legacy of an artist, and “legacy” as a facetious pun—money or property left to the living by the dead.
What does it mean to continue a legacy?

Even a simple understanding of Isamu Noguchi’s work will illuminate some meaning from a piece like Olmec and Muse. It looks to ancient cultures and forms, it is crafted from the same material as the Mesoamerican Olmec heads, and it is codified by pointing back to the relationship humans have with the universe—the Muses. In 1985, the same year Olmec and Muse was made, Noguchi became the first living artist to establish a museum solely for his own work—a space intended to let the art exist for its own sake, free from the noise of the art world. Noguchi was born in 1904 before the invention of the airplane and died in 1988, just a few months prior to the invention of the World Wide Web. His life spanned the touchstones of the 20th century as ease of communication and travel grew on a global scale. Yet, despite these new horizons, the core personal, spiritual questions born into each individual remained present within the artist’s work. “Where was home? Why are we here? What will I leave behind?”
Noguchi ran to the past and pushed toward the future to define the present. He learned from and worked with the peoples of the world—the laborers, the artists, the gardeners, the craftspeople, the activists, and the survivors. It was through global communities that he found himself as an individual.
On one hand, Noguchi is most known for volunteering to be incarcerated in a Japanese-American concentration camp during WWII as an act of solidarity with west coast Japanese-Americans (Noguchi was living on the east coast at the time), while on the other hand, Noguchi is most famous for his Akari light sculptures—a staple in mid-century modern furniture. What many people may not know, however, is that these two hands hold one another. Having witnessed what it meant for people to recreate a home in a desert barracks with only the things they were able to carry, Noguchi designed all his paper lanterns to be flat packed and transported easily. The lamps are a modern continuation of tradition, handmade in Gifu by skilled craftspeople, they are affordable sculpture and a portal to transform any room into “home.”

In 2017, the same year that Olmec and Muse set the record for the most expensive Noguchi piece sold at auction, The Noguchi Museum’s exhibition, Self-Interned, 1942, focused on the artist’s time, experience and the aftermath of being “interned.” Opening on January 18th, the exhibition was born into the first inauguration of Donald Trump. In February, 2017, The Day of Remembrance was the most highly attended day in the Museum’s history up until that point. Humanity and politics intersected at the museum, allowing people to join in community and to consider the most basic existential human questions, “Where was home? Why are we here? What will I leave behind?”
This year, the New York City chapter of The Day of Remembrance Committee was completely absent from The Noguchi Museum. As an organization that highlights not just Japanese-American civil rights issues, but has also deeply considered the plight of the Palestinian people in the struggle against oppression, DOR NYC, along with other community organization, programmatic partners and artists cut their ties entirely with The Noguchi Museum after Director Amy Hau in collaboration with Deputy Director Jennifer Lorch and board Co-Chairs Susan Kessler and Spencer Bailey banned staff from wearing keffiyehs. The artist’s legacy had completely inverted on itself.

So what happened in eight years? The truth is, behind closed doors, The Noguchi Museum was always rife with labor issues and in some ways, the keffiyeh ban can be seen as the straw that broke the camel’s back. (The longer history of racism, power imbalances, and a hostile work environment was exposed in a 70,000-word document we released last month.) The staff lived in dual realities—what the artist’s legacy was in principle versus how the museum’s board and top two leaders ran the institution in practice.
Noguchi’s cultural prominence continued to rise. In 2023, his sculpture The Family (1956) set a new auction record, selling for $12.28 million. That same year, internal turmoil shook the museum: the CFO resigned in protest, citing unworkable and racist conditions, and several staff members were hospitalized. A recurring pattern of demand letters, racist firings, retaliation, and protest resignations have been disturbingly commonplace.
The sanitization, depoliticization, and whitewashing of an artist is hardly a new story. In fact, it’s the norm. But what was surprising was the lengths to which fear could drive leadership to maintain “comfort.”
Leadership clings to absolute power not for peace of mind, but because their sense of self depends on control. When collaboration itself is seen as a threat, power can only feel secure through the destruction of community. When the institution’s original purpose was to continue the legacy of the artist, we wonder whose legacy it is meant to protect now.
The staff voted unanimously to unionize in January 2025, something that is not just rare, but telling. The community, now also acutely aware, has stood up for the staff, the artist and the future of the institution.
The art world has always reduced historical activism to background decoration, and it has done so in the name of “legacy.” But as people of conscience, we know the other meaning of the word—we know what can’t be bought or sold.
Our community demands letter, first delivered to the board on May 23rd, is still available to read and sign at bit.ly/NoguchiDemands
We are continuing a legacy—a sculpture is more than a stone.


{
"article":
{
"title" : "Isamu Noguchi: A Legacy Split in Two",
"author" : "Noguchi Rights",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/isamu-noguchi-legacy-split-in-two",
"date" : "2025-06-16 14:26:00 -0400",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/25976_ca_object_representations_media_53490_page.jpg",
"excerpt" : "",
"content" : "Olmec and Muse (1985), basalt; by Isamu Noguchi, sold at auction in 2017 for $4.98 million. A title, a year, a material, an artist, the passage of time, a price. A legacy of cultures, a legacy of earth, a legacy of an artist, and “legacy” as a facetious pun—money or property left to the living by the dead.What does it mean to continue a legacy?Even a simple understanding of Isamu Noguchi’s work will illuminate some meaning from a piece like Olmec and Muse. It looks to ancient cultures and forms, it is crafted from the same material as the Mesoamerican Olmec heads, and it is codified by pointing back to the relationship humans have with the universe—the Muses. In 1985, the same year Olmec and Muse was made, Noguchi became the first living artist to establish a museum solely for his own work—a space intended to let the art exist for its own sake, free from the noise of the art world. Noguchi was born in 1904 before the invention of the airplane and died in 1988, just a few months prior to the invention of the World Wide Web. His life spanned the touchstones of the 20th century as ease of communication and travel grew on a global scale. Yet, despite these new horizons, the core personal, spiritual questions born into each individual remained present within the artist’s work. “Where was home? Why are we here? What will I leave behind?”Noguchi ran to the past and pushed toward the future to define the present. He learned from and worked with the peoples of the world—the laborers, the artists, the gardeners, the craftspeople, the activists, and the survivors. It was through global communities that he found himself as an individual.On one hand, Noguchi is most known for volunteering to be incarcerated in a Japanese-American concentration camp during WWII as an act of solidarity with west coast Japanese-Americans (Noguchi was living on the east coast at the time), while on the other hand, Noguchi is most famous for his Akari light sculptures—a staple in mid-century modern furniture. What many people may not know, however, is that these two hands hold one another. Having witnessed what it meant for people to recreate a home in a desert barracks with only the things they were able to carry, Noguchi designed all his paper lanterns to be flat packed and transported easily. The lamps are a modern continuation of tradition, handmade in Gifu by skilled craftspeople, they are affordable sculpture and a portal to transform any room into “home.”In 2017, the same year that Olmec and Muse set the record for the most expensive Noguchi piece sold at auction, The Noguchi Museum’s exhibition, Self-Interned, 1942, focused on the artist’s time, experience and the aftermath of being “interned.” Opening on January 18th, the exhibition was born into the first inauguration of Donald Trump. In February, 2017, The Day of Remembrance was the most highly attended day in the Museum’s history up until that point. Humanity and politics intersected at the museum, allowing people to join in community and to consider the most basic existential human questions, “Where was home? Why are we here? What will I leave behind?”This year, the New York City chapter of The Day of Remembrance Committee was completely absent from The Noguchi Museum. As an organization that highlights not just Japanese-American civil rights issues, but has also deeply considered the plight of the Palestinian people in the struggle against oppression, DOR NYC, along with other community organization, programmatic partners and artists cut their ties entirely with The Noguchi Museum after Director Amy Hau in collaboration with Deputy Director Jennifer Lorch and board Co-Chairs Susan Kessler and Spencer Bailey banned staff from wearing keffiyehs. The artist’s legacy had completely inverted on itself.So what happened in eight years? The truth is, behind closed doors, The Noguchi Museum was always rife with labor issues and in some ways, the keffiyeh ban can be seen as the straw that broke the camel’s back. (The longer history of racism, power imbalances, and a hostile work environment was exposed in a 70,000-word document we released last month.) The staff lived in dual realities—what the artist’s legacy was in principle versus how the museum’s board and top two leaders ran the institution in practice.Noguchi’s cultural prominence continued to rise. In 2023, his sculpture The Family (1956) set a new auction record, selling for $12.28 million. That same year, internal turmoil shook the museum: the CFO resigned in protest, citing unworkable and racist conditions, and several staff members were hospitalized. A recurring pattern of demand letters, racist firings, retaliation, and protest resignations have been disturbingly commonplace. The sanitization, depoliticization, and whitewashing of an artist is hardly a new story. In fact, it’s the norm. But what was surprising was the lengths to which fear could drive leadership to maintain “comfort.”Leadership clings to absolute power not for peace of mind, but because their sense of self depends on control. When collaboration itself is seen as a threat, power can only feel secure through the destruction of community. When the institution’s original purpose was to continue the legacy of the artist, we wonder whose legacy it is meant to protect now.The staff voted unanimously to unionize in January 2025, something that is not just rare, but telling. The community, now also acutely aware, has stood up for the staff, the artist and the future of the institution. The art world has always reduced historical activism to background decoration, and it has done so in the name of “legacy.” But as people of conscience, we know the other meaning of the word—we know what can’t be bought or sold.Our community demands letter, first delivered to the board on May 23rd, is still available to read and sign at bit.ly/NoguchiDemandsWe are continuing a legacy—a sculpture is more than a stone."
}
,
"relatedposts": [
{
"title" : "Black Liberation Views on Palestine",
"author" : "EIP Editors",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/black-liberation-on-palestine",
"date" : "2025-10-17 09:01:00 -0400",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/mandela-keffiyeh.jpg",
"excerpt" : "",
"content" : "In understanding global politics, it is important to look at Black liberation struggles as one important source of moral perspective. So, when looking at Palestine, we look to Black leaders to see how they perceived the Palestinian struggle in relation to theirs, from the 1960’s to today.Why must we understand where the injustice lies? Because, as Desmond Tutu famously said, “If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.”{% for person in site.data.quotes-black-liberation-palestine %}{{ person.name }}{% for quote in person.quotes %}“{{ quote.text }}”{% if quote.source %}— {{ quote.source }}{% endif %}{% endfor %}{% endfor %}"
}
,
{
"title" : "First Anniversary Celebration of EIP",
"author" : "EIP Editors",
"category" : "events",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/1st-anniversary-of-eip",
"date" : "2025-10-14 18:01:00 -0400",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/WSA_EIP_Launch_Cover.jpg",
"excerpt" : "Celebrating One Year of Independent Publishing",
"content" : "Celebrating One Year of Independent PublishingJoin Everything is Political on November 21st for the launch of our End-of-Year Special Edition Magazine.This members-only evening will feature a benefit dinner, cocktails, and live performances in celebration of a year of independent media, critical voices, and collective resistance.The EventNovember 21, 2025, 7-11pmLower Manhattan, New YorkLaunching our End-of-Year Special Edition MagazineSpecial appearances and performancesFood & Drink includedTickets are extremely limited, reserve yours now!Become an annual print member: get x back issues of EIP, receive the End-of-Year Special Edition Magazine, and come to the Anniversary Celebration.$470Already a member? Sign in to get your special offer. Buy Ticket $150 Just $50 ! and get the End-of-Year Special Edition Magazine Buy ticket $150 and get the End-of-Year Special Edition Magazine "
}
,
{
"title" : "Miu Miu Transforms the Apron From Trad Wife to Boss Lady: The sexiest thing in Paris was a work garment",
"author" : "Khaoula Ghanem",
"category" : "",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/miu-miu-transforms-the-apron-from-trad-wife-to-boss-lady",
"date" : "2025-10-14 13:05:00 -0400",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/Cover_EIP_MiuMiu_Apron.jpg",
"excerpt" : "Miuccia Prada has a habit of taking the least “fashion” thing in the room and making it the argument. For Spring 2026 at Miu Miu, the argument is the apron; staged not as a coy retro flourish but as a total system. The show’s mise-en-scène read like a canteen or factory floor with melamine-like tables, rationalist severity, a whiff of cleaning fluid. In other words, a runway designed to force a conversation about labor before any sparkle could distract us.",
"content" : "Miuccia Prada has a habit of taking the least “fashion” thing in the room and making it the argument. For Spring 2026 at Miu Miu, the argument is the apron; staged not as a coy retro flourish but as a total system. The show’s mise-en-scène read like a canteen or factory floor with melamine-like tables, rationalist severity, a whiff of cleaning fluid. In other words, a runway designed to force a conversation about labor before any sparkle could distract us.From the opening look—German actress Sandra Hüller in a utilitarian deep-blue apron layered over a barn jacket and neat blue shirting—the thesis was loud: the “cover” becomes the thing itself. As silhouettes marched on, aprons multiplied and mutated—industrial drill cotton with front pockets, raw canvas, taffeta and cloqué silk, lace-edged versions that flirted with lingerie, even black leather and crystal-studded incarnations that reframed function as ornament. What the apron traditionally shields (clothes, bodies, “the good dress”) was inverted; the protection became the prized surface. Prada herself spelled it out: “The apron is my favorite piece of clothing… it symbolizes women, from factories through to serving to the home.”Miu Miu Spring 2026 Ready-to-Wear. SuppliedThis inversion matters historically. The apron’s earliest fashion-adjacent life was industrial. It served as a barrier against grease, heat, stain. It was a token of paid and unpaid care. Miu Miu tapped that lineage directly (canvas, work belts, D-ring hardware), then sliced it against domestic codes (florals, ruffles, crochet), and finally pushed into nightlife with bejeweled and leather bibs. The garment’s migration across materials made its social migrations visible. It is a kitchen apron, yes, but also one for labs, hospitals, and factories; the set and styling insisted on that plurality.What makes the apron such a loaded emblem is not just what it covers, but what it reveals about who has always been working. Before industrialization formalized labor into factory shifts and wages, women were already performing invisible labour, the kind that doesn’t exist on payrolls but sits at the foundation of every functioning society. They were cooking, cleaning, raising children, nursing the ill. These tasks were foundational to every economy and yet absent from every ledger. Even when women entered the industrial workforce, from textile plants to wartime assembly lines, their domestic responsibilities did not disappear, they doubled. In that context, the apron here is a quiet manifesto for the strength that goes unrecorded, unthanked, and yet keeps civilization running.The algorithmic rise of the “tradwife,” the influencer economy that packages domesticity as soft power, is the contemporary cultural shadow here. Miu Miu’s apron refuses that rehearsal. In fact, it’s intentionally awkward—oversized, undone, worn over bikinis or with sturdy shoes—so the viewer can’t flatten it into Pinterest-ready nostalgia. Critics noted the collection as a reclamation, a rebuttal to the flattening forces of the feed: the apron as a uniform for endurance rather than submission. The show notes framed it simply as “a consideration of the work of women,” a reminder that the invisible economies of effort—paid, unpaid, emotional—still structure daily life.If that sounds unusually explicit for a luxury runway, consider the designer. Prada trained as a mime at Milan’s Piccolo Teatro, earned a PhD in political science, joined the Italian Communist Party, and was active in the women’s rights movement in 1970s Milan. Those facts are not trivia; they are the grammar of her clothes. Decades of “ugly chic” were, essentially, a slow campaign against easy consumption and default beauty. In 2026, the apron becomes the newest dialect. An emblem drawn from leftist feminist history, recoded into a product that still has to sell. That tension—belief versus business—is the Miuccia paradox, and it’s precisely why these aprons read as statements, not trends.The runway narrative traced a journey from function to fetish. Early looks were squarely utilitarian—thick cottons, pocketed bibs—before migrating toward fragility and sparkle. Lace aprons laid transparently over swimmers; crystal-studded aprons slipped across cocktail territory; leather apron-dresses stiffened posture into armor. The sequencing proposed the same silhouette can encode labor, intimacy, and spectacle depending on fabrication. If most brands smuggle “workwear” in as set dressing, Miu Miu forced it onto the body as the central garment and an unmissable reminder that the feminine is often asked to be both shield and display at once.It’s instructive to read this collection against the house’s last mega-viral object: the micro-mini of Spring 2022, a pleated, raw-hem wafer that colonized timelines and magazine covers. That skirt’s thesis was exposure—hip bones and hemlines as post-lockdown spectacle, Y2K nostalgia framed as liberation-lite. The apron, ironically, covers. Where the micro-mini trafficked in the optics of freedom (and the speed of virality), the apron asks about the conditions that make freedom possible: who launders, who cooks, who cares? To move from “look at me” to “who is working here?” is a pivot from optics to ethics, without abandoning desire. (The aprons are, after all, deeply covetable.) In a platform economy that still rewards the shortest hemline with the biggest click-through, this is a sophisticated counter-program.Yet the designer is not romanticizing toil. There’s wit in the ruffles and perversity in the crystals; neither negate labor, they metabolize it. The most striking image is the apron treated as couture-adjacent. Traditionally, an apron protects the precious thing beneath; here, the apron is the precious thing. You could call that hypocrisy—luxurizing the uniform of workers. Or, strategy, insisting that the symbols of care and effort deserve visibility and investment.Of course, none of this exists in a vacuum. The “tradwife” script thrives because it is aesthetically legible and commercially scalable. It packages gender ideology as moodboard. Miu Miu counters with garments whose legibility flickers. The collection’s best looks ask viewers to reconcile tenderness with toughness, convenience with care, which is exactly the mental choreography demanded of women in every context from office to home to online.If you wanted a season-defining “It” item, you’ll still find it. The apron is poised to proliferate across fast-fashion and luxury alike. But the deeper success is structural: Miu Miu re-centered labor as an aesthetic category. That’s rarer than a viral skirt. It’s a reminder that clothes don’t merely decorate life, they describe and negotiate it. In making the apron the subject rather than the prop, Prada turned a garment of service into a platform for agency. It’s precisely the kind of cultural recursion you’d expect from a designer shaped by feminist politics, who never stopped treating fashion as an instrument of thought as much as style.The last image to hold onto is deceptively simple: a woman in an apron, neither fetishized nor infantilized, striding, hands free. Not a costume for nostalgia, not a meme for the feed, but a working uniform reframed, respected, and suddenly, undeniably beautiful. That is Miu Miu’s provocation for Spring 2026: the work behind the work, made visible at last."
}
]
}