Digital & Print Membership
Yearly + Receive 8 free printed back issues
$420 Annually
Monthly + Receive 3 free printed back issues
$40 Monthly
Cassandra Mayela Allen
WARD: Can you introduce yourself?
CASSANDRA: My name is Cassandra Mayela Allen. I am originally from Venezuela, and I’ve been in New York for the past 11 years. I work mostly with textiles, but I also work in a variety of mediums. I’m really interested in creating a practice that revolves around participatory and communal social work.
WARD: For Slow Forest, you’re sharing a piece of “BRAIDED PRAYER I” [2024], and you have a participatory performance guiding it through the piece. How do you think the setting of Slow Forest will change the context of that work?
CASSANDRA: Well, as you know, I’m currently at Skowhegan, and being here, I’m definitely in nature. When I first planned to come here, I packed a bunch of stuff thinking that I would be focusing on a certain kind of practice or projects, and I basically didn’t touch any of those things. I mainly focused on creating site-specific works, and I developed a net made out of these braids that’s going to be left out here. I recently learned very basic welding, so attaching the weavings could also be something fun. It truly depends on how or where we want to set it up. In a previous residency I did in Uruguay, I extended the thousand-foot-long braid along a path, which was special as a guide through a meditation path. But here, in contrast to those works, the forest “eats” the braid, if that makes sense. It’s thin and spread out, whereas in more compact compositions, there’s a dialogue between the work and the space that I think I’m more interested in exploring. Letting a space guide your work into creating something else has been fun.
You can’t be too precious or too methodical: A, when working with people in manual labor, because we all have different ways of making, and B, when installing in a site-specific space, especially outdoors, because the work is in conversation with the space. It’s been fun to see spiders building webs in the gaps of the net, or fabrics starting to sun-bleach because they’re out in the elements. That, in my opinion, adds to the work in an ephemeral way. It’s creating its own life.
WARD: One thing I love about your work is that it has a tangible use. You can feel it as a blanket or rope. I was looking at “Bodega Quilts” [2025] and could imagine covering myself with them. Even with braids, there’s so much historical context—as beauty, but also as utility. What drew you to work that is so rooted in craft?
CASSANDRA: I agree. I’m always trying to challenge notions of what can be utilitarian but also hold metaphor in that utility. It’s not just covering in a practical sense, but emotionally, feeling contained in community. Same with the net. You build the net to play, but we were trying to keep the ball in the air as long as possible, a way of holding or lifting each other up.
WARD: Your work is also tactile and ritualistic, expressing these elements through braiding, clothing, and tapestry. What are you accessing internally in your process, and how do you connect it to your history and surroundings?
CASSANDRA: For me, working with my hands is definitely an active meditation. It’s how I channel and process anxiety, calm down, and ground myself. That energy comes through my hands; it’s soothing. I’m more interested in the process of making than the conceptual part—not that there’s no concept, but I’m more excited about the making.
This connects to life in the city, carving space for yourself and connecting with others through making. A lot of artists in the Western understanding work alone in a studio, which can be isolating. I enjoy making by myself, but I’m flexible about what my studio can be. I can cut and braid fabric on the subway. I can work during a studio visit while chatting. It’s two streams of release and engagement, making the load easier because so much is repetitive and tedious at times.
I don’t work with fibers. I work with discarded clothing and fabric, material already here. I hate the concept of waste, which only exists in our modern human world. In nature, there’s no waste: leaves fall and compost, feeding the soil; metal rusts and returns nutrients to the earth. But humans put everything in garbage bags and hope for the best.
Growing up in Venezuela taught me that resources aren’t infinite. Even though larger powers could make big changes and don’t, my small protest is to reuse and repurpose. I’d rather work with materials considered waste than buy new canvas or fabric. As for ritual, society often frames ceremony as needing a temple, priest, or extraordinary setting. I believe there are many ways to tap into the ceremonial in the mundane. That communion when making with people feels sacred.
WARD: Earlier, you mentioned growing up in Venezuela and how it shaped your work and use of donated fabrics. Could you elaborate on how growing up affected your process and philosophy?
CASSANDRA: Growing up in a failing state as I became an adult shaped how I think—not just in art, but in life. In the U.S., many take certain things for granted because they’ve never seen the end of them. Experiencing state failure and lacking access to basics like water and electricity makes you resourceful. Crisis teaches you to see things differently and make something out of nothing.
I also come from a very fragmented society. This made me conscious of the need to focus on what people have in common rather than the differences. In my practice, I initially wanted to bring the Venezuelan diaspora together through a tapestry of stories, a physical space for healing and communication. But I learned that migration often means parting radically with roots, and some aren’t ready to revisit them. Non-participation became the most common form of participation. So, I shifted my focus to a broader immigrant community, and also to parallels in movement and adaptation that exist even within one’s own country or city.
Longing for home and belonging is universal, and if my work can create empathy rather than displacement, that’s my goal— establishing conversations between people who might otherwise never talk. Even if you come to one of these gatherings and sit next to someone you don’t think you have anything in common with—or don’t agree with—the space itself opens an opportunity for a conversation you wouldn’t normally have. That’s the spark you need to maybe contemplate certain things in your life.
WARD: You’ve also lived in New York for 11 years now. How do you think New York City has changed your practice compared to growing up in Venezuela?
CASSANDRA: New York has given me and taken so much. It’s a city that can embrace you, squeeze you so hard, spit you out, and then take you back again—it’s such a moody girl. It’s been an amazing place to understand what an expansive community can be. A lot of like-minded people navigate here, and things can happen spontaneously if you’re open to them. It’s tall, it’s challenging, and at this point, almost offensive to live in, but it has exposed me to so many backgrounds I never would have met in Venezuela. One of my best friends is from Cambodia; I’ve learned about weaving traditions in the Philippines that are similar to those in South America. New York shows the human part of what life can be, and I’m grateful for that.
WARD: We met in New York years ago.
CASSANDRA: Yes, and that’s a beautiful thing. You meet people in passing, connect, then life gets busy, and later you reconnect. There’s a rhythm to it, like breathing within the city with everyone else. I also love how anonymous it can be—like Where’s Waldo?—and then on a Wednesday in Astoria, you’ll run into someone and think, “I really live in New York.”
WARD: Let’s go back to your fabric use. You work with donated and reworked fabric. Do you feel there’s energetic memory in the clothing?
CASSANDRA: Definitely. When working with clothes people intentionally bring, they’re charged with energy. In gatherings, I ask people to bring something tied to their migratory story, something seen as joy, resistance, or something they want to let go of. This space offers a cathartic outlet, a way to honor and transform it. Even without telling the audience every story, the work holds those layers. You can feel that presence without knowing the details.
WARD: Could you talk about your work “Maps of Displacement” [2021-] and how shipping memory contributes to it? Do you envision an end to the project?
CASSANDRA: I’d love to return to and expand that body of work, but right now it feels precarious given the current persecution of immigrants. When I started “Maps of Displacement” [2021-], I noticed an increase in Venezuelans in New York. Venezuela’s migration is young—only in the past 20 years—and recognized as a crisis internationally for just the past decade. Compared to older diasporas like Mexican, Puerto Rican, Bangladeshi, or Filipino communities, it’s very new. I became curious about why people were choosing New York, which seems hostile if you don’t know the language. The media offered little. Right-wing narratives frame Venezuela as a communist hellhole; left-wing ones romanticize it because it’s a leftist government. Neither side holds it accountable as a dictatorship.
So I started asking Venezuelans to share something from their migratory process, regardless of why they left. I received everything from a childhood stuffed animal to the outfit worn on the day they traveled, to a favorite pair of pants that no longer fit. I kept the request flexible so people could go deep if they wanted, or keep the process internal. I’d love to continue the work, but I’d need more resources and a safer way to do it, given current immigration policing.
WARD: Back to “Braided Prayers I” [2024]—you’ve activated it in different NYC contexts, like Tambao and with Artists and Mothers. How do these contexts affect the work?
That’s something I’m still exploring. Tambao is a Latin American design store; their clientele is warm and festive. That activation felt casual and celebratory. People braided with wine, came with friends, chatted, and moved on to dinner.
CASSANDRA: With Artists and Mothers, the group was all artist-mothers, and the activity took place around Mother’s Day. The braids became reflections on motherhood and art-making—more contained; more intimate. I’ve done family braiding sessions where kids, parents, and grandparents braid together. Every variation adds something; it never subtracts.
WARD: Do you think there’s a greater narrative uniting all these activations?
CASSANDRA: Yes. Unlike “Maps of Displacement” [2021-], which focused on a specific group and experience, the braided activities invite everyone in. That creates space for people from very different backgrounds—some thinking about migration, some not—to see themselves in one another. Braiding itself is universal. It exists in every culture, whether in hair, rope, or textiles. It’s safe, accessible, and easy to learn. That universality allows participation without appropriation. It belongs to everyone.
WARD: When did you realize you wanted to be an artist, and when did you realize you were an artist?
CASSANDRA: I think I realized I was an artist as a child. I’ve always been ingenious and creative, more inclined to making than to science. But coming from a conservative, traditional family in Venezuela, I put it aside for stability. In New York, trying to live a “normal” life made me miserable. I realized there was no other option; this is the only way I can make sense of my life.
WARD: Where did you go to school and what did you study?
CASSANDRA: I studied journalism in Venezuela but dropped out. I later graduated in graphic design. In art, I’m self-taught. No formal art school, though I count Skowhegan as education.
WARD: So much of your work is about memory. Braiding itself is ancient, passed down for thousands of years. Can you tell me your first memory of braiding or being braided?
CASSANDRA: I grew up in Margarita, an island in Venezuela on the Caribbean, and wore braids in my hair— very Caribbean girl. I created tiny braids, transforming my own clothes, and making things unique so they didn’t look like everyone else’s. I went to a bilingual school and befriended braiders at the beach. They wanted more tourist customers but only had signs in Spanish. One day, I brought them a little cardboard sign in English saying “We Make Braids” so they could reach foreigners. They glued it alongside the Spanish one and used both.
{
"article":
{
"title" : "Cassandra Mayela Allen",
"author" : "Cassandra Mayela Allen, Gabrielle Richardson",
"category" : "interviews",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/heirlooms-cassandra-mayela-allen",
"date" : "2025-09-08 10:09:00 -0400",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/78556_CFA_Cassandra_003_09.jpg",
"excerpt" : "WARD: Can you introduce yourself?",
"content" : "WARD: Can you introduce yourself?CASSANDRA: My name is Cassandra Mayela Allen. I am originally from Venezuela, and I’ve been in New York for the past 11 years. I work mostly with textiles, but I also work in a variety of mediums. I’m really interested in creating a practice that revolves around participatory and communal social work.WARD: For Slow Forest, you’re sharing a piece of “BRAIDED PRAYER I” [2024], and you have a participatory performance guiding it through the piece. How do you think the setting of Slow Forest will change the context of that work?CASSANDRA: Well, as you know, I’m currently at Skowhegan, and being here, I’m definitely in nature. When I first planned to come here, I packed a bunch of stuff thinking that I would be focusing on a certain kind of practice or projects, and I basically didn’t touch any of those things. I mainly focused on creating site-specific works, and I developed a net made out of these braids that’s going to be left out here. I recently learned very basic welding, so attaching the weavings could also be something fun. It truly depends on how or where we want to set it up. In a previous residency I did in Uruguay, I extended the thousand-foot-long braid along a path, which was special as a guide through a meditation path. But here, in contrast to those works, the forest “eats” the braid, if that makes sense. It’s thin and spread out, whereas in more compact compositions, there’s a dialogue between the work and the space that I think I’m more interested in exploring. Letting a space guide your work into creating something else has been fun.You can’t be too precious or too methodical: A, when working with people in manual labor, because we all have different ways of making, and B, when installing in a site-specific space, especially outdoors, because the work is in conversation with the space. It’s been fun to see spiders building webs in the gaps of the net, or fabrics starting to sun-bleach because they’re out in the elements. That, in my opinion, adds to the work in an ephemeral way. It’s creating its own life.WARD: One thing I love about your work is that it has a tangible use. You can feel it as a blanket or rope. I was looking at “Bodega Quilts” [2025] and could imagine covering myself with them. Even with braids, there’s so much historical context—as beauty, but also as utility. What drew you to work that is so rooted in craft?CASSANDRA: I agree. I’m always trying to challenge notions of what can be utilitarian but also hold metaphor in that utility. It’s not just covering in a practical sense, but emotionally, feeling contained in community. Same with the net. You build the net to play, but we were trying to keep the ball in the air as long as possible, a way of holding or lifting each other up.WARD: Your work is also tactile and ritualistic, expressing these elements through braiding, clothing, and tapestry. What are you accessing internally in your process, and how do you connect it to your history and surroundings?CASSANDRA: For me, working with my hands is definitely an active meditation. It’s how I channel and process anxiety, calm down, and ground myself. That energy comes through my hands; it’s soothing. I’m more interested in the process of making than the conceptual part—not that there’s no concept, but I’m more excited about the making.This connects to life in the city, carving space for yourself and connecting with others through making. A lot of artists in the Western understanding work alone in a studio, which can be isolating. I enjoy making by myself, but I’m flexible about what my studio can be. I can cut and braid fabric on the subway. I can work during a studio visit while chatting. It’s two streams of release and engagement, making the load easier because so much is repetitive and tedious at times.I don’t work with fibers. I work with discarded clothing and fabric, material already here. I hate the concept of waste, which only exists in our modern human world. In nature, there’s no waste: leaves fall and compost, feeding the soil; metal rusts and returns nutrients to the earth. But humans put everything in garbage bags and hope for the best.Growing up in Venezuela taught me that resources aren’t infinite. Even though larger powers could make big changes and don’t, my small protest is to reuse and repurpose. I’d rather work with materials considered waste than buy new canvas or fabric. As for ritual, society often frames ceremony as needing a temple, priest, or extraordinary setting. I believe there are many ways to tap into the ceremonial in the mundane. That communion when making with people feels sacred.WARD: Earlier, you mentioned growing up in Venezuela and how it shaped your work and use of donated fabrics. Could you elaborate on how growing up affected your process and philosophy?CASSANDRA: Growing up in a failing state as I became an adult shaped how I think—not just in art, but in life. In the U.S., many take certain things for granted because they’ve never seen the end of them. Experiencing state failure and lacking access to basics like water and electricity makes you resourceful. Crisis teaches you to see things differently and make something out of nothing.I also come from a very fragmented society. This made me conscious of the need to focus on what people have in common rather than the differences. In my practice, I initially wanted to bring the Venezuelan diaspora together through a tapestry of stories, a physical space for healing and communication. But I learned that migration often means parting radically with roots, and some aren’t ready to revisit them. Non-participation became the most common form of participation. So, I shifted my focus to a broader immigrant community, and also to parallels in movement and adaptation that exist even within one’s own country or city.Longing for home and belonging is universal, and if my work can create empathy rather than displacement, that’s my goal— establishing conversations between people who might otherwise never talk. Even if you come to one of these gatherings and sit next to someone you don’t think you have anything in common with—or don’t agree with—the space itself opens an opportunity for a conversation you wouldn’t normally have. That’s the spark you need to maybe contemplate certain things in your life.WARD: You’ve also lived in New York for 11 years now. How do you think New York City has changed your practice compared to growing up in Venezuela?CASSANDRA: New York has given me and taken so much. It’s a city that can embrace you, squeeze you so hard, spit you out, and then take you back again—it’s such a moody girl. It’s been an amazing place to understand what an expansive community can be. A lot of like-minded people navigate here, and things can happen spontaneously if you’re open to them. It’s tall, it’s challenging, and at this point, almost offensive to live in, but it has exposed me to so many backgrounds I never would have met in Venezuela. One of my best friends is from Cambodia; I’ve learned about weaving traditions in the Philippines that are similar to those in South America. New York shows the human part of what life can be, and I’m grateful for that.WARD: We met in New York years ago.CASSANDRA: Yes, and that’s a beautiful thing. You meet people in passing, connect, then life gets busy, and later you reconnect. There’s a rhythm to it, like breathing within the city with everyone else. I also love how anonymous it can be—like Where’s Waldo?—and then on a Wednesday in Astoria, you’ll run into someone and think, “I really live in New York.”WARD: Let’s go back to your fabric use. You work with donated and reworked fabric. Do you feel there’s energetic memory in the clothing?CASSANDRA: Definitely. When working with clothes people intentionally bring, they’re charged with energy. In gatherings, I ask people to bring something tied to their migratory story, something seen as joy, resistance, or something they want to let go of. This space offers a cathartic outlet, a way to honor and transform it. Even without telling the audience every story, the work holds those layers. You can feel that presence without knowing the details.WARD: Could you talk about your work “Maps of Displacement” [2021-] and how shipping memory contributes to it? Do you envision an end to the project?CASSANDRA: I’d love to return to and expand that body of work, but right now it feels precarious given the current persecution of immigrants. When I started “Maps of Displacement” [2021-], I noticed an increase in Venezuelans in New York. Venezuela’s migration is young—only in the past 20 years—and recognized as a crisis internationally for just the past decade. Compared to older diasporas like Mexican, Puerto Rican, Bangladeshi, or Filipino communities, it’s very new. I became curious about why people were choosing New York, which seems hostile if you don’t know the language. The media offered little. Right-wing narratives frame Venezuela as a communist hellhole; left-wing ones romanticize it because it’s a leftist government. Neither side holds it accountable as a dictatorship.So I started asking Venezuelans to share something from their migratory process, regardless of why they left. I received everything from a childhood stuffed animal to the outfit worn on the day they traveled, to a favorite pair of pants that no longer fit. I kept the request flexible so people could go deep if they wanted, or keep the process internal. I’d love to continue the work, but I’d need more resources and a safer way to do it, given current immigration policing.WARD: Back to “Braided Prayers I” [2024]—you’ve activated it in different NYC contexts, like Tambao and with Artists and Mothers. How do these contexts affect the work?That’s something I’m still exploring. Tambao is a Latin American design store; their clientele is warm and festive. That activation felt casual and celebratory. People braided with wine, came with friends, chatted, and moved on to dinner.CASSANDRA: With Artists and Mothers, the group was all artist-mothers, and the activity took place around Mother’s Day. The braids became reflections on motherhood and art-making—more contained; more intimate. I’ve done family braiding sessions where kids, parents, and grandparents braid together. Every variation adds something; it never subtracts.WARD: Do you think there’s a greater narrative uniting all these activations?CASSANDRA: Yes. Unlike “Maps of Displacement” [2021-], which focused on a specific group and experience, the braided activities invite everyone in. That creates space for people from very different backgrounds—some thinking about migration, some not—to see themselves in one another. Braiding itself is universal. It exists in every culture, whether in hair, rope, or textiles. It’s safe, accessible, and easy to learn. That universality allows participation without appropriation. It belongs to everyone.WARD: When did you realize you wanted to be an artist, and when did you realize you were an artist?CASSANDRA: I think I realized I was an artist as a child. I’ve always been ingenious and creative, more inclined to making than to science. But coming from a conservative, traditional family in Venezuela, I put it aside for stability. In New York, trying to live a “normal” life made me miserable. I realized there was no other option; this is the only way I can make sense of my life.WARD: Where did you go to school and what did you study?CASSANDRA: I studied journalism in Venezuela but dropped out. I later graduated in graphic design. In art, I’m self-taught. No formal art school, though I count Skowhegan as education.WARD: So much of your work is about memory. Braiding itself is ancient, passed down for thousands of years. Can you tell me your first memory of braiding or being braided?CASSANDRA: I grew up in Margarita, an island in Venezuela on the Caribbean, and wore braids in my hair— very Caribbean girl. I created tiny braids, transforming my own clothes, and making things unique so they didn’t look like everyone else’s. I went to a bilingual school and befriended braiders at the beach. They wanted more tourist customers but only had signs in Spanish. One day, I brought them a little cardboard sign in English saying “We Make Braids” so they could reach foreigners. They glued it alongside the Spanish one and used both."
}
,
"relatedposts": [
{
"title" : "Couture in Paris, Cuts at the 'Post'",
"author" : "Louis Pisano",
"category" : "essay",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/bezos-sanchez-paris-couture-week-wapo-layoffs",
"date" : "2026-02-02 10:49:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/Cover_EIP_Bezos_Sanchez_Pisano.jpg",
"excerpt" : "The Cruel Irony of the Bezos-Sánchez Empire",
"content" : "The Cruel Irony of the Bezos-Sánchez EmpireLate on January 25, as snow dusted Washington, about 60 foreign correspondents at The Washington Post hit send on an email that felt like a last stand. They had dodged gunfire in Ukraine, documented Iran’s water crises and protester crackdowns, risked sources’ lives in gang territories. Now they faced their own existential threat: rumors of up to 300 company-wide layoffs, with foreign desks, sports, metro, and arts likely gutted. Their collective letter to owner Jeff Bezos was direct, almost pleading.“Robust, powerful foreign coverage is essential to The Washington Post’s brand and its future success in whatever form the paper takes moving forward,” they wrote. “We urge you to consider how the proposed layoffs will certainly lead us first to irrelevance, not the shared success that remains attainable.” They offered flexibility on costs but drew a line: slashing overseas reporting in Trump’s second term, amid global flashpoints, would hollow out the institution they had built.Whether Bezos opened that email remains unclear. As of this writing, he has not publicly responded to it. In fact, Bezos was 4,000 miles away, strolling hand-in-hand with Lauren Sánchez Bezos into Schiaparelli’s Haute Couture show in Paris. Flashbulbs popped as they arrived, Sánchez in a blood red skirt suit from the house and a white crocodile bag. Hours on, she switched to a steel-blue-gray vintage Dior pencil-skirt suit, its enormous fur collar evoking a mob wife, for Jonathan Anderson’s couture debut with the house.The two didn’t just sit front row, either. Backstage at Dior, Bezos and Sánchez posed with Anderson and LVMH CEO Delphine Arnault. Sánchez lunched with Anna Wintour at The Ritz and was allegedly dressed by Law Roach, the “image architect” behind Zendaya’s accession to fashion darling, who once declared fashion’s power to challenge norms and amplify the marginalized. Roach reshared Sánchez’s Instagram stories, crediting the vintage Dior; later, they toured Schiaparelli’s atelier together. The partnership felt sudden and loaded.Back in D.C., the newsroom simmered. Staffers posted on X under #SaveThePost, Yeganeh Torbati recounting government violence against protesters, Loveday Morris describing blasts rattling windows and the mortal risks to sources, tagging Bezos directly in urgent appeals. In a guild-prompted twist meant to amplify the message, the Washington-Baltimore News Guild encouraged tagging even Lauren Sánchez, though not every reporter followed through. The betrayal stung deeper after years of buyouts, a libertarian-tilted Opinions section, a rebranded mission (“Riveting Storytelling for All of America”) that rang corporate. Losses topped $100 million in 2024 and now the axe is hovering over desks that produced the scoops Bezos once praised when he bought the paper for $250 million in 2013. Now, Bezos parties on in Paris, his wife climbing fashion’s ranks.While the billionaires party, a profound unease is permeating the American media landscape, exacerbated by political shifts and technological disruptions that empower owners like Bezos to sideline core missions in favor of personal ventures. The press, once a vigilant watchdog against authority, now frequently finds itself complicit with power structures, buckling under misinformation, partisan censorship, and budgetary constraints that stifle investigative depth. This dynamic deprives the public of the unflinching journalism that is capable of exposing foreign policy overreaches or everyday human struggle, amplified by economic slowdowns and subscription fatigue in an increasingly fragmented ecosystem. With eroding confidence driving audiences to social platforms, now eclipsing traditional TV and websites as the primary news source in the U.S., the fallout further deepens this public distrust.To be clear, fashion isn’t innocent in this. It loves to posture as progressive, touting body positivity, diversity, resistance as it’s relevant, but rolling out the red carpet for the ultra-rich when the checks clear, especially when the checks come from people whose fortunes are built on real harm. Once upon a time, you couldn’t simply buy your way into the Met Gala; invitations were curated by Wintour based on cultural relevance, creative influence, and a carefully guarded sense of who truly belonged in the room. That’s all over now. The Bezoses have turned every norm in fashion on its head, sponsoring the 2026 Met Gala (funding the event and reportedly influencing invites), making their debut as a couple in 2024, and now leveraging those ties to claim space in couture’s inner circles. Bezos and Sánchez’s couture jaunt is just the latest proof that fashion’s gates, once guarded by creativity and taste, now swing widest for raw wealth and access.Wintour lunches and their prominent sponsorship role in the Met Gala don’t help quell the whispers that Bezos is eyeing Condé Nast (Vogue, Vanity Fair, The New Yorker) as a “wedding gift” to Sánchez. Rumors denied yet persistent, revived by every Paris sighting.Not everyone in fashion is staying silent. Some insiders are pushing back hard against the normalization. Gabriella Karefa-Johnson, a longtime voice in the industry, posted bluntly on X: “The hyper normalization is doing my head in… keep your mouth shut about ICE if you’re mingling with them, seating them, dressing them. Accepting their cash.” She called out Amazon’s cloud systems as the backbone of DHS deportation operations and billions in government contracts that sustain what she called “Trump’s terror machine,” concluding that Bezos and Sánchez are at couture simply because they are rich—and their wealth comes from profoundly harming millions daily. “I feel crazy,” she wrote. While couture has always been a bastian of the uber-rich, Karefa-Johnson’s frustration underscores how even fashion’s own are starting to question the cost of that welcome.If that Conde-Nast deal ever materializes, the consequences would compound because control over fashion’s most influential titles would allow Bezos the opportunity to shape narratives around billionaires, soften coverage of labor abuses, environmental costs, or surveillance contracts. The same hand that funds AWS’s CIA contracts, DoD cloud deals, ICE enforcement tools, fossil-fuel operations, warehouse injuries, anti-union tactics, and small-business-crushing monopoly would quietly steer the stories about wealth and style. Already deferential to its biggest advertisers and attendees, fashion journalism would fold into the same closed loop, fusing tech dominance with cultural gatekeeping into one unassailable private empire—all of it ultimately bankrolling the yachts, the space joyrides with Katy Perry, the private-jet hops to couture shows and fashion influence, to polish an image that the Post’s own reporters once might have skewered.[x] It’s almost elegant the way one empire’s dirt gets laundered through another.It’s cruelly ironic how wide the gap between the risks assumed by WaPo correspondents tasked with holding power to account and the comfort with which their owner moves among the powerful in Paris actually is. Fashion has political power, as Roach once said. It can challenge and provoke. It can also resist. But when it courts figures like Bezos, whose empire thrives on the very inequalities it sometimes pretends to critique, it becomes another asset in his already enormous portfolio.But there is no challenge, no provocation. There is no major resistance. Instead, there’s champagne and constant disassociation. Somewhere between the clink of glasses and the photos, Bezos and his wife get a glow up while The Washington Post newsroom waits, knowing the cuts are coming but not yet here. No one is confused about what happened; this is simply how the trade now unfortunately works.Wealth drifts through media, fashion, culture, picking up prestige and shedding people along the way. Whether Bezos ever read the letter is beside the point. The stranger thing is how little anyone expects him, or anyone like him, to answer anymore."
}
,
{
"title" : "Why We Must Bring Disability into Immigrant Liberation",
"author" : "Conchita Hernandez Legorreta, Qudsiya Naqui",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/disability-immigrant-liberation",
"date" : "2026-02-02 09:49:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/Disability-Immigration-Collage-Compressed.jpeg",
"excerpt" : "It is the only way to move toward collective liberation.",
"content" : "It is the only way to move toward collective liberation.A vertical digital collage in shades of orange, teal, and blue. In the background, a semi-transparent AAC communication device displays the text “I can help.” The top left shows a woman with a hearing aid in profile. On the right, a woman in a black headscarf gestures toward her ear. At the bottom, a woman and a child stand on a bed of large, realistic ice cubes; both are using white canes for the blind. Orange sparks float across the center, and the overall style is grainy, reminiscent of a Riso-printed protest zine. Illustration Credit: Jennifer White-JohnsonThe deadly surge of ICE agents in Minneapolis and across the country has wreaked havoc across communities, with particularly dangerous consequences for disabled people. In one instance on January 15, 2026, a woman in Minneapolis, Aliya Rahman, was pulled from her car and into an ICE vehicle, despite telling the ICE agents that she was on her way to a doctor’s appointment. The woman explained that she was autistic and needed accommodations, which the ICE agents readily ignored.The reentrenchment of ableism in Trump 2.0 is everywhere. In July 2025, for example, the president issued an executive order, “Ending Crime and Disorder on America’s Streets,” which seeks to overturn decades of progress for disabled people. The “R- word,” a slur against people with cognitive disabilities and a word that so many activists fought to eliminate from our daily lexicon, is back in full force. And for many immigrants with disabilities, the cultural landscape is more treacherous than ever: since Trump’s ascent, his administration has continued to double down on a centuries-old legacy of ableism and maltreatment of disabled immigrants. Most recently, the State Department announced that it will suspend the processing of immigrant visas from 75 countries because their citizens are collectively deemed likely to become reliant on public assistance if admitted into the U.S. This not only reflects our government’s racist and xenophobic approach to immigration—it is also a clear manifestation of its contempt for disabled people, or anyone perceived as unable to produce the labor that drives American capitalism.This is why conversations about disability must be central to the movement for immigrant justice. When we create resources and protections for the most marginalized, we move closer to liberation for all immigrant communities.The term “no le digas a nadie” or “do not tell anyone” is a phrase many immigrants know and take to heart. It speaks to the fear that, if you tell the wrong person, your life and your family’s can be turned upside down. This is felt tenfold by disabled immigrants: Today, an estimated 1 in 4 Americans has a disability. With over 15.2 million immigrants in the United States, a large portion may have disabilities, even if they do not identify as having one. Disability is often stigmatized, leading people to hide their conditions or have less access to information and services. Disability is also the only minority group that anyone can join at any time, whether from birth, through chronic illness, or accident. What’s more, many people become disabled as they travel long distances to cross borders. The immigration system itself creates disability in the violence of enforcement and the terrible conditions of immigrant detention.As a formerly undocumented blind educator and a blind law professor who has spent the past 15 years advocating for immigrant and disability justice, we understand firsthand the added layer that comes with being disabled, in addition to being a target of immigration enforcement. One of us (Conchita) remembers feeling anxious to go outside while growing up undocumented, for fear of having any type of encounter with law enforcement. She and her family were terrified of disclosing any information to the wrong person who might report them to immigration officials. As a result, Conchita hid her immigration and disability status from most people. This led to a lack of information and access to resources, as well as exclusion from a community that could have supported her.Conchita’s story is not unique. We have heard countless accounts of disabled immigrants being arrested and detained without basic access to the tools they need to communicate and defend themselves. In November 2025, ICE detained a blind man in New York and denied him access to his white cane and a text-to-speech app on his phone that he needed in order to read legal documents. A few months before that, in June, a Deaf man lawfully present in the U.S. was arrested in Los Angeles, and even though he signaled to the ICE agents that he could not speak, he was thrown into a vehicle and sent to a detention center without any communication about why he was being detained. ICE took away his phone when he attempted to communicate, and when he arrived at the detention facility in El Paso, Texas, he was provided with documents in Spanish, a language he cannot read. In all of these situations, lack of accessibility led to needless incarceration and family separation without fair due process.But despite this struggle, ableism, disability, and accessibility are rarely discussed in the fight for immigrant justice. Activists on the front lines of immigration work often do not understand the full scope of disability and its impact on people’s lives. Many immigration advocates tend to be on a shoestring budget and have told us, “We do not have the capacity right now” when we’ve asked to make immigration resources accessible, or to grow their understanding of disability rights laws and the lived experiences of disabled people. Not to mention, disabled lawyers and legal advocates are grossly underrepresented in their professions, and as a consequence, this perspective, including making critical legal information accessible to all, is not part of the conversation. For instance, videos that show how to confront ICE should include captions, transcripts, and audio descriptions, but rarely do.This became clear to us when we presented a “Know Your Rights” webinar to support disabled immigrants in August 2025, as ICE enforcement actions expanded across the country. To our surprise, over 150 people attended the webinar, including disabled immigrants and their allies concerned about how they would protect themselves if they encountered ICE. We received questions like, “What do I do if I’m blind and I’m presented with a paper warrant I can’t read?” or “What if ICE agents take my phone and I can’t signal to them that I’m deaf and need an interpreter?”What many people tend to forget is that when accessibility and inclusion are part of the conversation for any movement work, the result benefits everyone. We saw this during the COVID-19 pandemic, when immigration and disability rights advocates came together to challenge the detention of those at risk of severe illness or death using federal disability rights laws. This helped reduce transmission rates, reaffirm fair legal standards for all, and strengthen public health by giving everyone accessible vaccination information and even food resources. Designing a world and protections that help people with disabilities is just as crucial to our advocacy as organizing protests, defending individuals in deportation cases, and lobbying our lawmakers to support more humane immigration policies.Our plea to immigration advocates is that they make it a priority to understand the full extent of how immigration and disability justice intersect. They can do this by educating themselves on disability rights laws that apply in detention centers and when people come into contact with federal, state, and local law enforcement. Immigration advocates must also ensure that legal information and other educational content they produce are accessible to everyone.Above all, they must form coalitions with people with disabilities and incorporate their ideas into all advocacy efforts. Because our shared survival depends on the survival of every individual and community affected by this administration. Bringing disability into the immigrant struggle is the only way to move toward collective access, cross-movement solidarity, and collective liberation."
}
,
{
"title" : "Against Dictators and Intervention: Sahar Delijani on Iran",
"author" : "Sahar Delijani, Céline Semaan",
"category" : "interviews",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/sahar-delijani-on-iran",
"date" : "2026-02-01 16:53:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/2026_01_29_Sahar_Interview_1.jpg",
"excerpt" : "CÉLINE:These are very difficult times as we are watching what’s happening in Iran unfolding in such a rapid pace, there are numbers that are coming out in the news: first we saw a few thousand, then we saw 5000 reported on Democracy Now! and recently, we have gone from 30,000 to 45,000 people massacred in Iran. What is the latest that you’ve heard from your end, from Iranian sources?",
"content" : "CÉLINE:These are very difficult times as we are watching what’s happening in Iran unfolding in such a rapid pace, there are numbers that are coming out in the news: first we saw a few thousand, then we saw 5000 reported on Democracy Now! and recently, we have gone from 30,000 to 45,000 people massacred in Iran. What is the latest that you’ve heard from your end, from Iranian sources?SAHAR DELIJANI:I’m hearing the same numbers, I’ve heard anything from 20,000 to 30,000 to 40,000. It’s really hard to verify for the people on the ground and for people human rights organizations, even though I know that they’re working around the clock to be able to identify bodies, but the regime is really trying as much as it can to repress the information coming out. We are even hearing news of mass graves, of bodies that were just taken from the morgues and never seen again. We hear news of families that have been just going from morgue to morgue, station to station, hospital to hospital, looking for their loved ones, and they still haven’t found them.We hear news of doctors who were helping the wounded who are now imprisoned under the charge of collaborating with Israel or waging war against God, which is one of the charges that usually Islamic Republic uses to push for execution. Terrible news coming out from all these small towns, all these areas in Iran where thousands of people have been killed, and a lot of them with gunshot wounds at close range in their chest or their neck or their heads.So it’s an absolute to nightmare. I don’t even know what the right word is, but it’s one of the biggest slaughters of civil uprising we’ve ever seen in our recent history.CÉLINE:Thank you. And I know that now everyone is watching, holding their breath for what is potentially a US intervention. The situation is escalating. There are the people of Iran are facing their own government oppression, and they might be also under US bombs. Do you have any family members in Iran? How are you coping with the news, and what are the best ways to follow what’s happening now closely on the ground?SAHAR DELIJANI:Yes, I do have family and friends, and it’s just devastating that they are now sort of trapped between these two absolutely brutal forces. One is the Islamic Republic on the ground, just slaughtering its own people. And then you know, the threat of wars and bombs and the devastation that we know it will bring. The tragedy is immense. I don’t even have the right words to talk about it. Iranian people have worked so hard in the past 30-40 years to be able to build a democratic society, to be able to have freedom for everyone, for minorities, for women, for a society to be built on equality and justice.This isn’t the first time the Iranian people have been fighting against this regime — this has been a long, long fight, and I feel like it has reached a point of no return. We will not be the same people. I am not the same person as I was just a few days, few weeks back. And you know, this is also, in some ways, the story of our of our region. There’s just too much blood, too much violence, and there’s this open wound that had been in Iran since the 80s, with the mass executions of political prisoners, including my own family members, and that wound was still open, and now we have this we have this slaughter. Our region needs and deserves something more than wars or dictatorship. We deserve to be able to fight for what we want. We deserve to be able to live in safe societies, to live in dignity, to live in freedom, and the right to fight for it.CÉLINE:An attack on Iran is an attack on the region, on the Iranian people, first and foremost, but also has repercussions on the entire region. A lot of people think that the Iranian government is holding the Palestinian cause, and is the only force that has been against Israel. How is it looking like from your perspective, as someone who is understanding of the Palestinian cause and seeing what’s happening and unfolding today?SAHAR DELIJANI:I think any attack on any country in the region is an attack on the region. I don’t think this is only about valid for Iran. When Iraq was attacked, it was an attack on the region, when Afghanistan was attacked, when it was an attack on the region, all of our fates are intertwined, they’re not separate from each other. They’re not isolated. I do not believe that the Iranian regime has been fighting for the Palestinian cause. I believe that, yes, the Iranian regime is the enemy of Israel. That doesn’t mean that it has the Palestinian cause in its heart. It only means that it has its own geopolitical interest and advancements that it wants to push forward.It wants more power and more influence in the region. And it uses the Syrian civil war, it uses the opportunities it has in Iraq, and throughout the region, it’s only pushing forward its own agenda. I think that is very important to note also, because a country that has been torturing and killing its own people, how could it liberate another people?What does that liberation even look like when we talk about America bringing this rhetoric of liberation, why don’t we believe it? Because we know what it means, because we’ve seen it historically, and we also see what it does to its own people. If an American power that speaks of liberation for the Iranian does this to its own people—kills them in broad daylight, their shoots them in the face, in their car, or arrest protesters, abducts people. Same goes for Iran and Palestine. What kind of liberation does Iran have in mind for Palestine, if it’s killing its own people, if it’s repressing its own people?I believe that anti war movements, anti imperialist movements must go hand in hand with anti dictatorship movements and pro democracy movements. Otherwise, it’s just empty shells, it changes nothing for the people on the ground. We need to want the same things for everyone, we can’t pick and choose whose liberation we want or whose repression is okay for now, no one’s repression is okay. Because I think more everybody wants the same thing. We might have different ways of expressing it, but people want to live in dignity and safety and equality, right? Everybody wants that, so we need to listen to them, instead of imposing our own geopolitical agendas or our own interpretation of the region, without listening to the people living that reality.CÉLINE:Absolutely. How can a dictator that is also violating the rights of their own constituents and their own citizens in the United States, such as Donald Trump, want the best for Iranians? That’s where the cognitive dissonance happens online when we have members of the Iranian diaspora who are calling for US intervention, and in that same breath, harassing or attacking or creating a campaign against anyone who is raising a flag that US intervention might not lead to liberation for Iranian people. US intervention has a track record of being disastrous, from Iraq to Afghanistan to what’s going on in Venezuela around the world, wherever the United States came in to “save” it never really ended up being for the people. How do you make sense of this call for US intervention?SAHAR DELIJANI:I think in the diaspora, we have a responsibility not to call for more violence, especially when we’re not going to be the victims of that violence, not being in Iran ourselves. Because when we say no bombs, no intervention in Iran, we mean it for everybody. But the people in Iran who are asking for [US military intervention] are not just completely crazy—just think about the reality that the extremely difficult, violent reality that the Iranian regime, the Islamic Republic, has made for people, that they’ve reached a point that they’re thinking, “Oh, maybe bombs, at least would save us from this violence.”People who have lived through a tragedy, a massacre of 30,000 people in just a few days, you know, there is just so much pain. There’s so much pain, okay, but you’re saying, you know that the foreign intervention is dangerous, but look at what is happening to us now. The only way we are credible to the people on the ground if we want to stand against this sort of imperialist interventions and forces, is if we stand as strongly against the dictators that are killing them. Now, if we are just a little bit hesitant, even a tiny bit hesitant, to stand against those dictators, we are being huge hypocrites, and nobody will believe us. Nobody will believe that we have their liberation in mind when we stand against imperialist intervention. You are just telling us to choose between two types of killings. We need to stand against all types of oppression, no matter who’s doing it. It’s not about who does it, it’s about what we can do to bring it to an end."
}
]
}