{ "article": { "title" : "Dissonant Solidarity: Venezuela and the International Left", "author" : "Luken Ignacio Quintana", "category" : "essays", "url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/dissonant-solidarity", "date" : "2026-01-12 16:36:00 -0500", "img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/Img%2001.jpg", "excerpt" : "", "content" : "This clarification might be unnecessary, but since this article has a very specific target audience, I want to make sure that after reading the title, your ideological programming doesn’t short-circuit and cause you to stop before reaching what is truly important:I do not subscribe to the ideas, the methods, or the discourse of Donald Trump - nor to neoliberalism, nor to imperialism (of any kind). Much less do I celebrate the death of compatriots of any kind, nor the fact that, at least for the foreseeable future, we Venezuelans have been incapable of providing a solution to our own problems - neither through peaceful means nor by force - to guarantee some degree of control over our own destiny.My family, Venezuelan and Basque, is a melting pot of anti-Franco/anti-fascist exiles - who had to flee Franco’s authoritarian dictatorship after the fall of the Second Spanish Republic in 1939 (never to return) - and working-class Venezuelans who made the transition from the countryside to the city in a true display of social mobility as our democracy, now absolutely destroyed, consolidated itself during the 20th century.Furthermore, I am a product of Venezuela’s free, public university education system and a staunch defender of its autonomy.All of this makes me fundamentally opposed to totalitarianism, impositions, and, of course, social injustice. It also makes me understand the need for international law and order that guarantees we do not return to an era where strong states can trample the weak without consequence.Even if none of the above were true, the suffering of an individual or a collective - especially the level of suffering we Venezuelans have endured (forced migration, humiliation, political persecution, fear, torture, extrajudicial executions, legal and illegal abuses, impoverishment, and much more) - does not cease to be real simply because the person suffering does not share your worldview.If you have made it this far and are capable of empathizing with what I’ve explained, keep reading. If not, you are just one more “lost cause” - one of those who put pseudo-ideological loyalties before critical thinking; perhaps something closer to a religious fanatic than a human capable of experiencing pain through the eyes of another or showing some empathy. Some “solidarity” that is!If you have the perception that the vast majority of Venezuelans you encounter lean to the right and influence your country’s politics by voting for and backing candidates you dislike, the reason is quite simple:EVERY ABUSE COMMITTED IN VENEZUELA OVER THE LAST 25 YEARS WAS DONE IN THE NAME OF SOCIALISM.Yes, we can debate at length which of Chávez’s - and later Maduro’s - policies were truly leftist; whether the system’s collapse was due to corruption or a structural flaw in its conception; whether the dream was diverted; whether Marx, Gramsci, Bernstein, or Rosa Luxemburg; reform or revolution; Bolívar, Sandino, Che, or Martí; pragmatic communism; or whether “it doesn’t matter the color of the cat as long as it catches mice.”It doesn’t matter. None of these intellectual justifications matter (nor will they ever matter) to the mother of a student murdered in a protest; to the person who had to cross the Andes on foot; to the person who swallowed a ton of tear gas claiming their rights; or to the person who lost everything the moment they left their homeland.In English, it is often said that even a broken clock is right twice a day. That Maduro is in a cell is good for Venezuelans, regardless of how it happened and regardless of the major reservations that remain about whether there will be a true transition to democracy.How This Finally HappenedFor years, the regional left, the European left, and a good part of the global left - what Teodoro Petkoff called the “Borbonic Left” because of its inability to mutate, adapt to the times, or recognize past mistakes - not only ignored the thousands of complaints we made from Venezuela but openly cheered the “Bolivarian Revolution” while it advanced its designs based on a petro-checkbook that would later deflate.These complaints came from across the entire political spectrum: from Marxist-Leninist organizations like the Communist Party of Venezuela or Bandera Roja; social democrats like Acción Democrática or Un Nuevo Tiempo; centrist or Christian-democratic parties like Primero Justicia or Voluntad Popular; and others further into liberalism like Vente Venezuela, María Corina Machado’s party. A polyphony of voices pointing to the same thing: human rights were being violated in Venezuela and the population was being trampled.It wasn’t just political parties. Labor unions, social movements, professional guilds, NGOs (those that have a lot of legitimacy when they talk about Gaza but none when they talk about Caracas), university movements, and intellectuals - everyone denounced, over and over again, how the democratic space was closing and we were falling at an accelerated pace into a kleptocratic nightmare with totalitarian overtones.Many leftist personalities, some who have even become global icons, held power during this time: Lula, Gustavo Petro, Michelle Bachelet, Gabriel Boric, Pepe Mujica, Pedro Sánchez, just to name a few. Their positions, when they had the chance to seriously confront what was happening in Venezuela, moved between lukewarm denunciation and direct logistical, economic, and political support for the regime.It is true that some, behind the scenes and timidly, made diplomatic efforts to find a solution when the crisis began to cross borders and the continent filled with refugees. But it was clearly insufficient. In most cases, their principles - or their selfish interests - did not allow them to recognize the level of disaster they had legitimized.Hiding behind the errors, blunders, and - in many cases - severely questionable behavior of the opposition leadership, they washed their hands of their neighbors’ suffering and dropped the flag of justice. Despite their own countries having gone through equally terrible dictatorships or conflicts, they did not confront the victimizers - which is equivalent to ignoring the victims, no matter what justification they want to give now.Gravity does not forgive; a vacuum calls to whoever wants to fill it. In the Venezuelan case, it has been filled by Donald Trump and his allies - whose values are absolutely foreign to me and many Venezuelans - whose focus is shamelessly on profiting from a collapsed country, but whose interests (at least instantaneously on January 3rd) aligned with the aspirations of millions who felt abandoned and betrayed by those who should have been the first at their side.It’s okay. You are still in time to collaborate and help Venezuelans without giving up your convictions. By doing so, you won’t be helping Donald Trump - or maybe you will, I don’t know - but fundamentally you will be contributing to improving our lives and those of our families.How can you do it? First, by understanding several things:Maduro is not a revolutionary kidnapped by the empire. He is also likely not the head of a cartel (at least in the strict sense of the word). He is simply a dictator and a criminal responsible for the collapse of a country; the death of hundreds of protesters; and thousands of extrajudicial executions - who openly ignored the popular will after the July 28, 2024 elections. Along with military and civilians (like the Rodríguez siblings) who remain in charge of the country, he is also responsible for the embezzlement of billions of dollars of Venezuelan resources.The “Bolivarian Revolution” never stopped selling oil to the United States. Yes, they diversified their client portfolio and allied with Russia and China as an alternative. But for a good part of the last 25 years - even in the most heated moments of bilateral relations - business with the “gringos” never ended. Chevron - yes, the same Chevron with a criminal record - was, for the last few years, one of the regime’s main economic supporters, with special permits to operate despite sanctions.Although this doesn’t directly justify a foreign military intervention, Venezuelan sovereignty has been compromised for years. The levels of debt acquired by Venezuela with Russians and Chinese in exchange for geopolitical support, or the lifeline thrown from Caracas to Havana to keep another dictatorial regime standing with our money, are just a few concrete examples that the government’s anti-imperialist discourse does not hold up. The documented presence of Colombian irregular groups controlling territory and illegal business flows is another. So is the confirmation by the Cuban government that most of the military who died protecting Maduro came from that country.Maduro offered a “blank check” to Donald Trump. Before his capture, he offered Trump and American companies the chance to massively exploit Venezuelan oil in exchange for legitimizing him in power and forgetting the 2024 presidential elections. It was a pragmatic deal that Trump and Marco Rubio were not willing to make with him - but they were with his successors, at least for the moment.The January 3rd operation bears the marks of betrayal. It is known that the CIA had assets infiltrated inside the government who provided information on Maduro’s location and habits. It is also still debated whether the absolute collapse of anti-aircraft defenses was due only to the military superiority of the units involved - or if there was internal help in deactivating them. One day it will be known.While you scream about “intervention,” the supposed victims have already turned the page and are “open for business,” capitulating and striking deals with the Americans to protect their lives, their impunity, or their indefinite hold on power. This deal had already been offered since the last quarter of 2024 in Qatar.The economic collapse started long before the sanctions. It began when oil prices collapsed after being inflated by George W. Bush’s blunders in Iraq and Afghanistan. Shortly before dying, Chávez himself announced the need for an absolute shift in the economic model that never materialized. One could argue the military man himself saw the inviability of his project - and died before facing the consequences.You don’t have to like María Corina Machado to recognize her leadership. Many, like me, see how she has been displaced by the very forces she set in motion. In a country where democracy returns, we would have the possibility to settle that conflict peacefully and electorally.The poor and the working class in Venezuela ARE NOT WITH MADURO. That myth ended years ago; it possibly was never entirely real. In 2015, the opposition coalition swept the elections. From that moment on, the regime decided not to truly compete for ten years. And when it did so again in 2024, it was razed at the polls. Today, the repudiation of Chavismo is not a matter of class - it is a cross-cutting sentiment in our country.Government propaganda financed a global campaign. Aided largely by the Russian communication apparatus (see the alliance between Telesur and RT), they reached out to “alternative” causes worldwide - from Palestine to the Sahara; from sectors of the Basque Left to pan-Arabist regimes; from Iranian theocracy to the anti-globalist U.S. protesters of the early 2000s and Black Lives Matter. They wove a network that allowed Chavismo to present itself as a patron of progressive causes while using the military boot to repress and murder in its own territory.Venezuelan society is as broad as yours and deserves the chance to reconfigure itself freely. The privileges and benefits you enjoy were forcibly canceled for us for two and a half decades, and when you defend the ones who did it, you re-victimize an entire population.Don’t take my word for it. As soon as you finish reading this, do your own research. Look at the numbers and statistics again with new eyes. Talk to those of us who have suffered this firsthand. Get out of the echo chamber you have carefully curated on social media and take a walk through the real world.Then, mobilize with us so that, instead of throwing a tantrum and complaining fruitlessly about the actions of the U.S. government, you can pressure your own country, your party comrades, or your peers to stand up against those who seek to commit similar abuses in other parts of the world.Help us push a collective cry to ensure that everything that has happened opens the way for a true democratic transition in Venezuela - finishing the dismantling of the remnants of the dictatorship that now servilely seek to get on good terms with the “new master,” so as not to be definitively replaced.If after all this you still don’t understand, then, respectfully and using your own terminology: do not seek to help anymore - and at least do not go protest in front of a gringo embassy after you failed to do so in front of one of ours.HANDS OFF F*CKING VENEZUELA." } , "relatedposts": [ { "title" : "Nothing Is ”Apolitical”:: Why I Refused to Exhibit at the Venice Biennale", "author" : "Céline Semaan", "category" : "", "url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/nothing-is-apolitical", "date" : "2026-02-24 15:51:00 -0500", "img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/Cover_EIP_Apolitical_Venice_Biennale-19ed6f.jpg", "excerpt" : "After October 2023, the art world felt comfortable discriminating against Arab artists and dehumanizing us when Israel began carpet bombing Gaza leading to a genocide . For a few years since that moment, many Arab artists saw their work rejected, refused, or cancelled from shows, publications, and galleries. But in 2025, the propaganda against Arabs began to be debunked and the world recognized that Israel was in fact a colonial military occupation decimating Indigenous people, and curiously, we started receiving invitations to participate in the art world again.", "content" : "After October 2023, the art world felt comfortable discriminating against Arab artists and dehumanizing us when Israel began carpet bombing Gaza leading to a genocide . For a few years since that moment, many Arab artists saw their work rejected, refused, or cancelled from shows, publications, and galleries. But in 2025, the propaganda against Arabs began to be debunked and the world recognized that Israel was in fact a colonial military occupation decimating Indigenous people, and curiously, we started receiving invitations to participate in the art world again.In the middle of last year, I was invited to exhibit my work at the Venice Biennale as part of their Personal Structures art exhibition. But unfortunately, I found myself needing to decline the invitation due to their separation between artistic practice and political reality: An expectation, stated and implied, that the work remain “apolitical.”For many artists, this is understood as an important recognition in one’s art career, a symbolic entrance into contemporary art history. Venice confers legitimacy, visibility, and, for many of us, validation from a historically extractive, colonial arts system. It also functions, like all major biennials, as an instrument of cultural diplomacy, soft power, and geopolitical storytelling. So a representation at the Venice Biennale as a Lebanese artist means a lot on a political scale.The word “apolitical” was used as part of a response that the Venice Biennale curator sent to justify their position regarding centering Israeli artists. It was an attempt to make explicit that engaging with the ongoing violence shaping the present moment, including the mass killing and destruction in Gaza, is a personal choice. That art exists without consequence, an elevated ideal that has the privilege of existing outside reality.I couldn’t tolerate pretending art was separated from politics, when Israel continues to bomb Lebanon daily, erase and sell Gaza, and murders Palestinians almost on a daily basis. Not when, just this February, Israel proposed to install a death penalty for the abducted Palestinians in Israeli jails with complete immunity. We are living through a time in which bombardment, starvation, displacement, and civilian death are documented in real time. Images circulate instantly; testimony is archived before bodies are buried. The evidence is not obscured by distance or ambiguity, but rather, is immediate, relentless, and impossible to ignore. Yet cultural institutions claim ignorance or worse, voluntary exclusion. In such a context, neutrality is not a passive stance but an alignment with injustice.Moral clarity is non-negotiable for me. It is my anchor in a time where global forces are unveiling their corruption for the world to see. In shock and despair, overwhelmed by the intensity of the crimes, many remain silent. Motionless. Like deers in the headlights. Hence, the safe label of remaining apolitical.But the myth of the apolitical artist has always depended on their proximity to power. It is a luxury position historically afforded to those whose bodies are not directly threatened by the carceral order. For many artists—particularly those shaped by colonization, occupation, exile, or racial violence—the political is not a thematic choice. It is the ground of existence itself.Arab women artists have shown me the path to moral clarity, integrity, and honor. The Palestinian American painter Samia Halaby has long argued that all art is political in its relation to society, whether acknowledged or not. For instance, Mona Hatoum’s sculptural language, often read through the lens of minimalism, is inseparable from histories of displacement and surveillance. The body remains present even when absent, reminding viewers that aesthetics do not transcend geopolitics.The Egyptian feminist writer Nawal El Saadawi warned with unmistakable clarity: “Neutrality in situations of injustice is siding with the oppressor.” Her words emerged from lived confrontation with imprisonment, censorship, and patriarchal state violence. Neutrality was never theoretical to her, it was lethal.Black feminist artists and thinkers have articulated the same truth. Audre Lorde’s assertion—“Your silence will not protect you”—dismantles the illusion that withholding speech preserves safety. Silence is participation in the maintenance of power. Lorraine O’Grady’s performances exposed how cultural institutions erase entire populations while claiming universality, revealing that visibility itself can be a political rupture. These perspectives converge on a single recognition: Art does not exist outside power structures. It either interrogates them or reinforces them.We remember artists who refused neutrality because their work altered the moral imagination of their time. Artists like Ai Weiwei, whose work centers politics and identity, go as far as putting their own bodies in danger. We remember the cultural boycott of apartheid South Africa, when artists refused lucrative opportunities rather than legitimize a racist regime. We remember Nina Simone transforming grief and rage into sonic resistance. We remember the Black Arts Movement insisting that aesthetics could not be detached from liberation.We also remember the artists who accommodated power. History is rarely generous toward them. The contemporary art world often performs political engagement while it structurally protects capital, donors, and institutional relationships behind closed doors. Calls for “complexity” or “nuance” frequently operate as ways to avoid taking positions that might threaten funding streams or geopolitical alliances. Requests for artists to remain apolitical are risk-management strategies that prioritize donors’ comfort.The insistence that artists claim they “do not know enough” to speak while mass civilian death unfolds is abdication. It mirrors political rhetoric that justifies violence through ideology, nationalism, or divine authority. Both rely on belief systems that absolve responsibility. The role of the artist is not to decorate power. It is to feel reality—to alchemize collective experiences into forms that expand perception rather than sterilize it.Art is essential precisely because we are living through rupture. But essential art is not decorative. It is not institutional ornamentation detached from consequence. It does not require erasing humanity in exchange for belonging to elite cultural circuits. Refusing the Biennale was not a heroic gesture. In fact, I had no desire to write this piece to begin with. It was just a form of moral clarity. Moral clarity some can live without, but unlike them, I refuse to become numb. I want to exist with a deep connection to my own humanity, and to feel it all.Including this moment that forces us to reckon with our own privileges and position. No exhibition, no platform, no symbolic prestige outweighs the responsibility of responding honestly to the conditions shaping our world. Participation under forced neutrality in accepting the presence of genocidal entities such as Israel would have required fragmentation — an agreement to pretend that art exists outside the systems producing suffering, including settler colonial violence and military occupation.It does not. And I cannot fake it." } , { "title" : "ICE Interference Is a Food Sovereignty Issue", "author" : "Jill Damatac", "category" : "essay", "url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/ice-interference-is-a-food-sovereignty-issue", "date" : "2026-02-24 11:26:00 -0500", "img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/ice_food_soveriegnty.jpg", "excerpt" : "Food inequality, like the carceral state, is not a bug, but a feature.", "content" : "Food inequality, like the carceral state, is not a bug, but a feature.California National Guard troops face off with protestors during a federal immigration raid on Glass House Farms in Camarillo, Calif. on July 10, 2025. Photo Credit: Blake Fagan via AFPIn June 2025, ICE agents walked into Glenn Valley Foods, a meat plant in Omaha, Neb. and detained roughly half the workforce. Production sagged to a fraction of normal: Producers were already strained by drought, thinned herds, and high cattle prices. On paper and in headlines, the Trump administration claimed an enforcement success; on the plant floor, workers stayed home, choosing to lose wages rather than risk returning. Beef processors warned that if raids became routine, they would buy fewer animals, and bottlenecks would pinch slaughterhouses and feedlots. The systemic shock emerged in the price of ground beef, which edged, at one point, towards seven dollars a pound. Still, raids were sold to voters as proof of control, even as they paid more for food and meals.ICE actions against food workers, already exhausted and criminally underpaid, have a demonstrable effect on sky-high food prices and our tax dollars: Raids further strain an already fragile, extractive food production and service system by not only further funding violent carceral systems, but also our fiscal ability to put food on the table. And while it’s clear that much needs to be changed when it comes to how we treat food workers–from livable wages and health insurance to legal protections and affordable housing –one thing has not been properly acknowledged. ICE interference shapes how we eat and our ability to have food sovereignty.By definition, food sovereignty is, first and foremost, a claim to power. It is the right of communities, including immigrant food workers, to decide how food is grown, who profits from it, and what it costs. True self-determination means the land and our labor serve everyone, rather than corporations or government agencies. It means the price of food stays low and steady enough that working-class households eat well, that profits are shared so that small farmers, migrant workers, and food workers can live with dignity and comfort. But this is far from the reality we face today: with grocery and restaurant bills rising and food workers one threat away from deportation, what we are left with is a food system benefiting corporate interests, flanked by a carceral force wearing a false claim to justice as a mask.Immigrant food workers carry the nation’s appetite on their shoulders: According to a 2020 study by the American Immigrant Council, over 20% of food industry workers are immigrants. Within agriculture, 40-50% of workers are undocumented on any given year, while in the restaurant industry, undocumented immigrants are 10-15% of the workforce. Their work is in our carts, fridges, and pantries, on our restaurant tables, takeout counters, and drive-throughs. Workers are keenly aware that ICE knows exactly where to detainthem to hit their arrest quota: in fruit orchards and vegetable farms, meat processing plants, egg barns, dairy plants, grocery stores, restaurant kitchens, and even the parking lots where they gather at dawn, hoping to find work for the day. With agents detaining and deporting workers regardless of immigration status or criminal record, workers are scared into staying home, giving up precious income just to live another day. Meanwhile, fields go unpicked, stores scramble to cover shifts, and kitchens stall. Crews thin out rather than risk being taken, or, as in the case of Jaime Alanís García, are killed while fleeing an ICE farm raid.These calculations between fear and courage in the face of aggression are not abstract to me; they’re personal. My father was an undocumented immigrant who worked nights stocking a cereal aisle. He was given thirty-two hours a week, just shy of full-time, so the grocery store could avoid providing health insurance. When a new manager began to ask employees for identification, my dad and other undocumented co-workers quit, leaving the store scrambling to find people willing to work for minimum wage, nearly full-time, with no healthcare. These violent acts move through the food chain under the guise of “rising prices,” a surcharge in our grocery carts and restaurant bills.The U.S. government has played with the lives of immigrant food workers many times before. Under President Herbert Hoover during the Great Depression, “Mexican repatriation” campaigns deported hundreds of thousands of Mexicans and Mexican Americans, many of them farmworkers recruited in boom years, as officials caved to white workers, who were both unwilling to cede the work to immigrants or to take on the low-paying farm jobs themselves. Filipino farmworkers, known as the Manongs, were treated similarly: in the 1920s and 30s, Filipino workers slept in crowded bunkhouses, were paid low wages, worked through illnesses such as tuberculosis, and were given no path to citizenship, even though the Philippines was then a U.S. territory. In January 1930, white mobs in Watsonville, Calif. hunted Filipino men, beat them, threw them off bridges, and shot and lynched them. Soon after, California banned marriage between Filipinos and white people, and Congress slashed Filipino immigration to a token quota. The food industry has long built itself on brown people’s labor while the law denied them basic human rights. At the root of it all is a sinister plantation logic: a nation’s wealth and abundance built on enslaved Black people’s labor and deprivation. It’s just new bodies in the fields, now.Today’s arrests and deportations are a continuation of this very logic: exploited migrant workers are still denied basic rights and protections while the food industry that employs them grows, year on year. Many lack legal status; many more live in mixed-status families. Using the excuse of “border security,” ICE and DHS agents press on that vulnerability by design. As a result, fear of ICE enforcement becomes a cost itself, narrowing what people can afford and where they can eat. These enforcements, carried out without input the food industry or local communities, and often against their will, directly impact our food sovereignty—how people determine the way food is grown, distributed, made, and served, as well as how workers within the food industry are paid and treated.Take summer 2025 as an example: ICE raids swept through produce fields around Oxnard in California’s Ventura County, arriving in unmarked vehicles (and sometimes helicopters) at the height of harvest. The raids spread, so crews went into hiding: one Ventura County grower estimated that roughly 70% of workers vanished from the rows almost overnight, leaving farms heavy with rotting produce and no one to pick it. Economists modeling removals of migrant farmworkers from California estimate that growers could lose up to 40% of their workforce, wiping out billions of dollars in crop value and raising produce prices by as much as 10%.These losses are passed on to communities and households, obfuscating why and how the increases happened in the first place. The American consumer is consequently exploited, too, absorbing the real labor cost of detentions and deportations. In Los Angeles, immigration sweeps in June 2025 hit downtown produce markets and surrounding eateries; vendors called business “worse than COVID” as customers vanished and supplies wasted away in storage. In January 2026, along Lake Street in south Minneapolis, immigrant-run spots like Lito’s Burritos and stalls at Midtown Global Market, a popular food hall in downtown Minneapolis, saw revenue plunge due to ICE enforcement, forcing them to cut hours, or close altogether. In nearby St. Paul, Minn., El Burrito Mercado shut down after its owner watched agents circle the building “like a hunting ground.” Meanwhile, four ICE agents ate at El Tapatio, a restaurant in Willmar, Mn. Hours later, they returned after closing time to arrest the owners and a dishwasher. Hmong restaurants and Mexican groceries across the Twin Cities have gone dark for days or weeks at a time, suffocating the local economy, leaving consumers with shrinking access to food, and small business owners with no revenue while their employees go unpaid.If food sovereignty means real control over how food is grown, distributed, and accessed, it must begin with the safety of the workers holding the system up. Workers’ wellbeing is not ornamental: it is the precondition for steady harvests, stable prices, and an affordable Main Street. Federal and state legislation must build strict firewalls between labor and immigration enforcement so that workers can file complaints, call inspectors, or take a sick day without fear. Laws can enforce and extend safety protections, wage standards, and the right to unionize. This can only happen with comprehensive immigration reform: A durable legal status and a path to citizenship for food and farmworkers would help immigrant families break the old pattern of being extracted for labor while being denied the basic right to stability.There are also infrastructures that must be abolished to truly achieve food sovereignty: specifically, the burgeoning immigration detention industrial complex. The Big Beautiful Bill allocated $75 billion dollars, spread over four years, to ICE, funding the expansion of private prison facilities. Alongside the nation’s existing prison industrial complex, the immigration detention industrial complex has become a key economic driver, albeit one that benefits only a few, such as shareholders in CoreCivic and Geo Group, two of the nation’s biggest private prison companies.Food inequality and lack of food sovereignty, like the carceral state, are not bugs, but features: soaring food, housing, and healthcare costs, voter discontent, and public unrest form a feedback loop, reinforcing the manufactured narrative scapegoating immigrant and migrant workers. If enough Americans believe that immigrants are to blame for the high prices in grocery stores and restaurants, no one will pause long enough to scrutinize the corporations (and owners) who stand to profit.Should legislators have the courage to change the infrastructure that allows these inequities to occur, the hands that harvest, pack, cook, serve, and wash would be fairly recognized as part of the nation they feed. Because fear and imprisonment should never be priced into the dinner table. Everyone can—and should be able to—eat." } , { "title" : "To Grieve Together Is to Heal Together: Rituals of Care In Minneapolis", "author" : "Joi Lee", "category" : "essays", "url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/healing-rituals-minneapolis", "date" : "2026-02-20 08:48:00 -0500", "img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/Lee_Minn_Image1.jpeg", "excerpt" : "", "content" : "Signs of resistance and community solidarity are found on every block, in every neighborhood. This is a sign a few houses down from Renee Good’s memorial. Photo Credit: Joi LeeOver the last three months, the Twin Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minn. have lived under siege. On December 4, 2025, the Department of Homeland Security announced the start of Operation Metro Surge as part of Trump’s crackdown on immigration. Around 3,000 immigration agents flooded into the region, turning Minneapolis into the epicenter for what would become the largest immigration enforcement operation in United States history.Neighbors watched other neighbors being abducted. The shrill sound of whistles—the warning sign that ICE was nearby—became the all-too-familiar soundtrack to the city. Streets, and the businesses that lined them, once bustling, became quiet, threatening the many diverse communities that form the cultural backbone of the Twin Cities: Somali, Hmong, Latine, among others.And then, on January 7, Renee Good, an everyday Minnesotan who was watching out for her neighbors, a legal observer, was shot and killed. Seventeen days later, Alex Pretti, an ICU Nurse, met the same fate at the hands of ICE officers.What followed made international headlines: civilians clashing with federal agents as flash bangs, tear gas, and rubber bullets filled the streets of Minneapolis. Images of confrontation traveled far beyond the city, flattening a much more complicated reality unfolding on the ground—as the news cycle has done repeatedly to Minneapolis over the years with the murders of Jamar Clarke in 2014, Philando Castile in 2016, and George Floyd in 2020 at the hands of police brutality.As tensions threatened to spiral further, the Trump administration announced a series of changes: replacing ICE commander Greg Bovino with so-called “border czar” Tom Homan, and on February 12, announcing that the operation in Minneapolis would come to an end. But in Minneapolis, many residents say the shift has been more cosmetic than substantive. Raids continue, surveillance lingers, and entire communities remain on edge.The fear has not lifted. It has settled.In this fragile uncertainty of what happens next, the Minneapolis community has turned to care. Across the city, people are gathering not just to strategize or protest, but to also grieve together: to light candles, pray, sing, and move their bodies in unison. Memorials for Good and Pretti have become meeting grounds. Healing circles, ceremonies, and music-filled vigils have emerged as lifelines for a community nowhere near recovered, yet refusing to unravel.Posters of Renee Good and Alex Pretti adorn the city, plastered on empty walls, hung up on store windows. Photo Credit: Joi LeeA legacy of trauma—and healingIn Minneapolis, trauma does not arrive without memory. Neither does healing.I met Leslie Redmond, an organizer and former president of Minneapolis NAACP, at a healing circle she convened the day after Pretti’s murder. Nestled in a small community cafe, tables were pushed aside and chairs brought into the circle. Wafts of warm home-made chili floated in from the vegan kitchen, and cups of piping hot lemon ginger tea—nourishing for the soul, we were assured—were handed out.As folks trickled into their seats, nervous chatter gave way to quiet realization that everyone was holding a pain that needed to be shared. Looking around the faces in the room, many etched with stress and exhaustion, Redmond reminded us, “Before we can build, we must heal.”Redmond is no stranger to collective trauma inflicted by the hands of law enforcement. She had lived through the police killings of Jamar Clarke, Philando Castile, and George Floyd, as well as the uprisings that followed.“Back then, I wasn’t actively healing. My back went out. My hair was falling out. We were in the fight phase. And then I realized, we need to move to the healing phase.”By the end of 2020, Redmond decided to create a community healing team for collective mourning. When Good was killed, that infrastructure, built slowly and deliberately, was ready to spring into action.“Healing is fundamental,” Redmond said, before quoting Audre Lorde’s seminal words from A Burst of Light: “Self-care is not self-indulgence. Self-care is self-preservation, which is an act of political warfare.”These days, Remond facilitates weekly healing circles. For many, the healing circles have become a place to reset. To find solace in knowing that what Minnesotans are going through is real, and not imagined. To find validation in their pain, yet also resolution in how to move forward. At one of the meetings, a 13-year-old quietly confessed to the group, “I feel like I’ve lost my peace.” At another, a Somali elder shared, “We’ve been living in fear. But looking around, how beautiful to remember why I decided to call this place my home.”Different cultures, shared medicine in memorialThe memorials of Pretti and Good, built at the sites where they were killed, have become living spaces of ceremony and connection. The rituals of healing are as diverse as the communities that Pretti and Good gave their lives to protect. At a vigil for Pretti organized by his fellow nurses, I met members of the Hmong community, an ethnic group that originates from Southeast Asia and largely came over as refugees to Minneapolis in the mid-1970’s. The Twin Cities are home to the largest concentration of Hmong people in the U.S.One person held a sign reading, “A Hmong shaman for healers & humanity!” Another read, “A Hmong Christian for healers & humanity!”A woman who asked me to call her Yaya explained why she was there. “As a healer from the Hmong community, as a shaman, I came to support them, healer to healer,” she said. “Because we do so much healing, but we forget to heal ourselves. Today is about healing the healers.”The group offered both prayers and blessed strings. People approached quietly, asking for care. Some requested Christian prayer, others a shamanic blessing. Kiki, the Christian, clasped their hands tightly, offering a prayer and a hug. Yaya took each person’s right hand, looping a thin string around the wrist and tying it gently in place, murmuring a prayer so soft it barely rose above the street noise.Many accepted both.Ceremony as resistanceIndigenous communities also organized ceremonies honoring Good and Pretti.Among them was a Jingle Dress Dance ceremony, rooted in Ojibwe healing traditions, meant to restore health and balance to those who need it. Over 30 members of the Minneapolis Native community came together at both memorials to perform their sacred dance, adorned in vibrant dresses. Metal cones are woven in intricate patterns around the dress, such that a slight movement creates a rhythmic sound.“The dress came to our people when there was a time of sickness. And so that’s what we do. We show up when there’s people suffering,” Downwind said, one of the organizers of the ceremony.Jingle Dress Dancers gather at Renee Good memorial’s site to perform a healing ceremony. Photo Credit: Joi LeeThe sound of metal cones sewn onto the dresses echoed through the cold air—each step a prayer, each movement an offering—was met with quiet attentiveness by the audience.When the dance finished at Good’s memorial, the crowd moved to Pretti’s, a journey that in itself felt like a pilgrimage, connecting the deaths of two Minnesotans with the lives of all those who remained, continuing their legacy.For many in attendance, the presence of Native dancers felt both sacred and a reminder that this land holds older traditions of survival. That healing did not begin, nor will it end, with this moment.**Music and the permission to feel **Music has also become a vessel for collective healing. Groups like Brass Solidarity,a band that was founded in response to the murder of George Floyd, have organized performances at the memorials, bringing instruments into spaces thick with grief.In the cold, unforgiving nights of Minneapolis, hundreds gather by Alex Pretti’s memorial site to listen to the musical tribute given by Brass Solidarity. Photo Credit: Joi LeeOne evening at Pretti’s memorial, hundreds of people stood shoulder to shoulder, bodies seeking warmth and rhythm. Brass instruments rang out, fingers braving subzero temperatures to play. Anthony Afful, a musician with Brass Solidarity, described the role of music in these spaces. “Part of what we’re doing,” he said, “is helping people remember that they’re human.”Music, he explained, creates room for the full range of emotion. “This is a dark time. There has to be space for grief, for rage, and also for joy—to exist together.”I spoke to another musician, Tufawon, who is Native-Boricua. For him, it is not just experiencing music but also its creative expression that helps unlock emotional processing. He’s currently holding a music workshop for Native youth, many of whom have been deeply impacted by ICE raids despite being the Indigenous peoples of this land.“As colonized people, we’re impacted by historical trauma,” Tufawon explained. “We carry it through our genes. And now there’s a collective trauma that the entire city, the entire state, really, is holding. We don’t take the time to process what we experience. Music is a mindfulness practice. So I use music to bring healing into the moment, so they can find some level of balance and not crash so hard when it’s all over.”Tufawon is a local Minneapolis artist, both Native and Puerto Rican, who uses music as an educational and community tool to heal and lift up the Native youth community. Photo Credit: Joi LeeHealing circles, ceremonies, music, and prayer: many of these are rituals with a rich, long history. They have navigated many cultures in the past and will continue to do so in the future.They have passed through countless cultures and generations, carrying meaning far beyond any single moment.But in a time where Minneapolis is being ripped apart—when the very definition of who belongs, of what it means to be an “American,” is under violent scrutiny—these rituals of care have reaffirmed something that cannot be detained, erased, or deported. That the very fabric of this place has been woven together by so many cultures, by so many peoples. And that it will be healed by them, together.Minneapolis is no stranger to rebuilding. It is a city, a sacred land, that is practiced in rising from devastation, again and again." } ] }