Digital & Print Membership
Yearly + Receive 8 free printed back issues
$420 Annually
Monthly + Receive 3 free printed back issues
$40 Monthly
Zaatar Near the Border
This article is from Land Stories, a storytelling project by Jibal, an NGO in Beirut working for environmental and social justice centered on Lebanon and the nearby region.
Writer & photographer: Jenny Gustafsson
Researchers: Angela Saade, Yara Ward, Nagham Khalil, Rana Hassan
Editor: Nisreen Kaj

It is early morning and barely light outside when a group of women arrives at a small field on the outskirts of Qana, a town in the hilly countryside of southern Lebanon. They wear sneakers and comfortable clothes and carry a stack of empty black vegetable crates. The ground beneath their feet is rocky and covered with green plants. There are grass and different kinds of weeds, but also growing among the stones and leaves, the much-loved herb that is deeply rooted in Lebanese and Palestinian food traditions, and is the reason for their coming here today: zaatar.
“The south is known for its zaatar. Sure, you find it elsewhere in Lebanon, but we are very connected to it here,” says Majida Boutros, one of the women. She holds a green bunch in her hands, tied together with a rubber band. She takes a couple of steps, walks over to one of the crates, and drops the zaatar in. The women continue picking herbs as the sun slowly rises in the sky. They are five, all part of an agricultural cooperative in the village. Two of them, Majida and Suzane, are co-founders of the cooperative, which was officially established in 2011 (though it began work in 2007). There is also Ghada Boutros, Majida’s sister, and two others (a woman who goes by the name Um Ibrahim and her daughter) who are hired specifically for the harvest.

Qana, with its dry climate and hilly topography, is an ideal spot to grow zaatar. The herb grows there in the wild, where people forage for it for their own consumption. It is also grown on plantations, where it is cultivated to be sold in the market. Some zaatar is eaten fresh, but most of it will be dried and mixed with sesame seeds and sumac to make herb mixes, also known simply as zaatar.
Zaatar is a generic name for a number of different herbs belonging to the larger Lamiaceae botanical family, which includes plants like lavender, sage, oregano, basil, rosemary, and thyme. Most zaatar picked in Lebanon, including the cooperative’s zoube3 variety, is either origanum syriacum (sometimes called “Lebanese oregano” or “Syrian oregano”) or origanum ehrenbergii, both varieties of oregano that are native to Lebanon and the larger eastern Mediterranean. This zaatar has soft, almost feather-like leaves that are tiny and rounded, and great for drying. Zaatar might also be any of a number of different kinds of wild thyme, which are sturdier and have long, thin leaves. This zaatar, when not dried, is often added to salads, typically with rocca (arugula or rocket) leaves and onion.
The most popular way to eat zaatar is in its dried form, mixed with olive oil and spread on top of manouche dough, then baked for a few minutes in a large oven. Zaatar mixes vary, but almost all include sesame seeds and sumac, a tangy spice made from the pulverized berries of the sumac plant. There are also blends like zaatar Halabi (Aleppo zaatar), with a much longer list of ingredients, such as pomegranate molasses, pistachios, fennel, and coriander. At bakeries across Lebanon, it is not uncommon for people to bring their own zaatar, harvested and dried at home, to use instead of the bakery’s.

When the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization, FAO, published a standard for zaatar in 2020, it listed four botanical genera that may appear in dry zaatar mixes: origanum, thymbra, thymus, and satureja. Each of these four, on its own, is the parent of several different kinds of herbs. In Lebanon (and elsewhere in the region), names overlap and vary. Besides zoube3, there’s also zaatar da22 or di22i, words that come from the same root as dukkah, the name for a number of different mixes of herbs, nuts, or spices eaten in the region, most commonly in Egypt. Many Lebanese also simply say zaatar barri (wild zaatar) when referring to the foraged plants.
These different herbs form part of the region’s social and culinary history. The origanum family, for instance, is a Mediterranean herb group: 35 of its 43 species only occur in the eastern Mediterranean (and four solely in the western Mediterranean). The herbs grow mainly in mountainous areas, not necessarily at high altitudes, but on stony slopes. Indeed, the name origanum, made up from the Greek words oros (mountain or hill) and ganos ( joy, celebration), translates to “joy of the mountains.”

The southern Lebanese landscape, with its soft hills and rocky lands, continues in a similar manner in Palestine, where zaatar holds equal, if not more, significance. Just like the Lebanese, Palestinians have been foraging and eating zaatar throughout history. These herbs and the histories connected to them have come to represent the Palestinian people’s belonging to their country, linking them directly to the land from which they are forced away. “As long as there’s zaatar and olives, we will remain,” a saying goes.
Mahmoud Darwish, who has chronicled many aspects of Palestinian culture in his writings, mentions zaatar in his poem “Ahmed al Zaatar,” written in the aftermath of the 1978 Tel al Zaatar massacre in Beirut. “For two hands, of stone and zaatar,” he writes, “I dedicate this song, for Ahmad, forgotten between two butterflies.” Edward Said, in a conversation with Salman Rushdie, said about breakfast that, “It is a sign of a Palestinian home that it has zaatar in it.” Ismail Haniyeh, the now assassinated former leader of Hamas, evoked the political importance of zaatar when he famously said in a 2006 speech that, “We will eat zaatar, grass, and salt, but we will not give in or renounce our principles.”
In 1977, the Israeli government—when Ariel Sharon was the minister of agriculture— imposed a ban on the harvest of wild zaatar.
Foragers, if found with plants, were fined or had their herbs confiscated. The stated reason was environmental—that zaatar was at risk of becoming extinct. But the ban was largely seen and served as a move to target Palestinian culture, heritage, and economic life. It also coincided with a sharp increase in Israeli cultivation of zaatar, an example of the colonial practice of erasing what is seen as “wild” and instead transforming such heritage into schemes that benefit the colonizer.
There are other cases of Israeli laws targeting Palestinian culinary and agricultural heritage as well, such as the 2005 ban on foraging akkoub (another significant wild plant), and the criminalization in the 1950s of owning and herding black goats (the most common livestock animal in Palestine before 1948).

On the other side of the border, in Lebanon’s south, food and agricultural practices have come under different forms of attack since Israel’s genocide in Gaza started in October 2023. Land has been directly targeted, trees have been uprooted and destroyed, and people have been stopped from tending to their lands and harvesting their crops. In March 2025, the World Bank published an estimate of US$6.8 billion in damage and US$7.2 billion in economic losses. Lebanon’s two southernmost governorates, Nabatieh and the South, were the most affected.
“They destroyed everything in our region. Churches, mosques, agricultural lands, trees, houses. Everything,” says Faten Serhan. She sits on the sofa in a bright living room in the mountain town of Jezzine, with views over the rocky slopes just outside the window. Next to her sit her mother, Afife Serhan, and her brother, Mohammad Serhan. The family came to Jezzine when life in their home village of Kfarkela, right on the southern border and among the worst hit during the war, became too dangerous.
“At some point, we started seeing people dying, one after another,” Mohammad says. “The last time I was in Kfarkela, for a funeral, I stopped to water the trees near our house. Soon enough, I realized I had forgotten some, but I thought to myself, ‘No worries, I can do that tomorrow.’ Then, when I came back the next day, every single tree was gone. They had bombed the village that morning.” He grabs a small cup of coffee brought out on a tray from the kitchen. “We had been using all our available water to try and save the life of our trees and land. We had managed to keep everything alive until that moment.”
The family grows many things on their land in Kfarkela, including olives and all kinds of vegetables. Afife’s other son, Ali, runs a popular Instagram account, My Land, where he shares videos of his mother cooking and spending time on the land. The family also has a restaurant where they serve the food they grow.
“We don’t use chemical fertilizers; we believe in natural methods. When you plant with good intentions, everything grows well,” Afife says. They grow zaatar as well, on a piece of land next to their house. “The one we have is rainfed, which means the zaatar has more aroma. It loses some of its character when irrigated. Zaatar doesn’t like too much water, and it needs sun,” she says. Afife says that, most of all, she likes to eat zaatar mixed with olive oil, spread on top of her own bread. Majida prefers it the same way. “We just mix the zaatar with olive oil and some salt. Whether fresh or dried, it’s best that way,” she says.

When Israeli airstrikes began devastating towns and villages across the south, Qana was one of many that came under attack. The sisters and others in the cooperative had to flee, like people all over the south. At the peak in November last year, 900,000 people, one-fifth of Lebanon’s population, were displaced across the country. When the women were able to return to Qana, they found many of their plants dead. They had not been directly targeted but were dried out from the lack of water. “They had been left for two months without any care. We managed to find a few surviving plants, which we uprooted and planted on another piece of land so they could be saved,” Suzane says.
In Kfarkela, the situation is far worse. Much of the village is heavily destroyed, with many homes entirely reduced to rubble. Satellite images and other photos show devastation where life, both human and botanical, used to be. “This is not the first time Israel targets Kfarkela, far from it.
The village was one of the first in Lebanon to be occupied in 1978,” Mohammad says. Four years later, in 1982, Israeli forces returned and began an occupation of southern Lebanon that continued until 2000. During this era, people’s social, political, and economic independence was constantly violated. It was only possible to leave and re-enter the region through Israeli-controlled checkpoints set up on Lebanese soil.
Mohammad says that the period damaged people’s connection to the land. “Everything was destroyed during the occupation. The older generation left with their children; many went abroad to live and study. It created a gap of over 20 years, during which the new generation lost its connection.” The oppressive policies enforced during the occupation were an attempt at slowly destroying agriculture in the south. Vegetables and other produce could no longer move freely, while goods brought over from Israel took over the market. Citrus was left to rot on the trees, as farmers never knew whether their fruits would reach buyers in Beirut and the north.
A bit further away, in the midst of filling one last box with zaatar, is a woman who goes by the name Um Ibrahim, working alongside her daughter. They come from Aleppo in Syria but have lived and worked in southern Lebanon for many years. “We have worked with the cooperative for three years. Otherwise, we often work in tobacco. There’s a lot of tobacco here,” Um Ibrahim says. “But zaatar is easier to harvest. With tobacco, you have to start very early, at four or five in the morning, and pick it leaf by leaf.”
Um Ibrahim and her family fled, like so many others, when the south was bombed. Among the 900,000 displaced by the war were not just Lebanese, but also families from Syria, working in industries like construction and agriculture across the south, as well as people from Sudan, Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and countries in West Africa, living and working in Lebanon. The death toll from the war continues to grow. In December, one week after the ceasefire agreement came into place, Lebanon’s health minister, Firass Abiad, said that 4,047 people had been killed in Israeli attacks. In October 2025, the UN’s OHCHR reported that at least 100 civilians had been killed after the ceasefire deal was signed, a number that continues to grow.
Facing all of this, the women in Qana are uncertain about the future. “When we came back from the war, I had a lot of emotions. I even told the others, ‘Let’s shut down the cooperative.’ For two years, nothing moved for us, and our savings were stuck. I kept asking myself, ‘Why are we doing this?’” Majida says. Then, they started thinking about trying out a new product: distilled zaatar, which can be bottled and added to tea or juice to help strengthen the immune system and relieve cough and cold. “We already have some plants we will try this with. We have saved leftover parts and stems,” Majida says.
Wild plants, including varieties of zaatar, have been used in folk medicine throughout history. Oregano and thyme, rich in the essential oil thymol, and carvacrol, a phenol (an aromatic organic compound), have antioxidant and antiseptic properties. In Lebanon, Palestine, and the surrounding region, zaatar is perhaps most known for one particular benefit: it sharpens the brain. The day before an exam, children will typically be told by their parents to drink or eat zaatar.
In Jezzine, Afife and her children walk out onto the terrace at the back of the house they are renting. There is a small piece of land next to it, where they grow different vegetables. They have to try new methods and crops, since Jezzine is at a high altitude. In the meantime, until they return to Kfarkela, Ali continues sharing videos of his mother on the land—planting, harvesting, cooking, and preserving.
{
"article":
{
"title" : "Zaatar Near the Border",
"author" : "Jibal, Jenny Gustafsson",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/zaatar-near-the-border",
"date" : "2025-11-21 09:01:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/zaatar-8.jpg",
"excerpt" : "This article is from Land Stories, a storytelling project by Jibal, an NGO in Beirut working for environmental and social justice centered on Lebanon and the nearby region.",
"content" : "This article is from Land Stories, a storytelling project by Jibal, an NGO in Beirut working for environmental and social justice centered on Lebanon and the nearby region.Writer & photographer: Jenny GustafssonResearchers: Angela Saade, Yara Ward, Nagham Khalil, Rana HassanEditor: Nisreen KajIt is early morning and barely light outside when a group of women arrives at a small field on the outskirts of Qana, a town in the hilly countryside of southern Lebanon. They wear sneakers and comfortable clothes and carry a stack of empty black vegetable crates. The ground beneath their feet is rocky and covered with green plants. There are grass and different kinds of weeds, but also growing among the stones and leaves, the much-loved herb that is deeply rooted in Lebanese and Palestinian food traditions, and is the reason for their coming here today: zaatar.“The south is known for its zaatar. Sure, you find it elsewhere in Lebanon, but we are very connected to it here,” says Majida Boutros, one of the women. She holds a green bunch in her hands, tied together with a rubber band. She takes a couple of steps, walks over to one of the crates, and drops the zaatar in. The women continue picking herbs as the sun slowly rises in the sky. They are five, all part of an agricultural cooperative in the village. Two of them, Majida and Suzane, are co-founders of the cooperative, which was officially established in 2011 (though it began work in 2007). There is also Ghada Boutros, Majida’s sister, and two others (a woman who goes by the name Um Ibrahim and her daughter) who are hired specifically for the harvest.Qana, with its dry climate and hilly topography, is an ideal spot to grow zaatar. The herb grows there in the wild, where people forage for it for their own consumption. It is also grown on plantations, where it is cultivated to be sold in the market. Some zaatar is eaten fresh, but most of it will be dried and mixed with sesame seeds and sumac to make herb mixes, also known simply as zaatar.Zaatar is a generic name for a number of different herbs belonging to the larger Lamiaceae botanical family, which includes plants like lavender, sage, oregano, basil, rosemary, and thyme. Most zaatar picked in Lebanon, including the cooperative’s zoube3 variety, is either origanum syriacum (sometimes called “Lebanese oregano” or “Syrian oregano”) or origanum ehrenbergii, both varieties of oregano that are native to Lebanon and the larger eastern Mediterranean. This zaatar has soft, almost feather-like leaves that are tiny and rounded, and great for drying. Zaatar might also be any of a number of different kinds of wild thyme, which are sturdier and have long, thin leaves. This zaatar, when not dried, is often added to salads, typically with rocca (arugula or rocket) leaves and onion.The most popular way to eat zaatar is in its dried form, mixed with olive oil and spread on top of manouche dough, then baked for a few minutes in a large oven. Zaatar mixes vary, but almost all include sesame seeds and sumac, a tangy spice made from the pulverized berries of the sumac plant. There are also blends like zaatar Halabi (Aleppo zaatar), with a much longer list of ingredients, such as pomegranate molasses, pistachios, fennel, and coriander. At bakeries across Lebanon, it is not uncommon for people to bring their own zaatar, harvested and dried at home, to use instead of the bakery’s.When the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization, FAO, published a standard for zaatar in 2020, it listed four botanical genera that may appear in dry zaatar mixes: origanum, thymbra, thymus, and satureja. Each of these four, on its own, is the parent of several different kinds of herbs. In Lebanon (and elsewhere in the region), names overlap and vary. Besides zoube3, there’s also zaatar da22 or di22i, words that come from the same root as dukkah, the name for a number of different mixes of herbs, nuts, or spices eaten in the region, most commonly in Egypt. Many Lebanese also simply say zaatar barri (wild zaatar) when referring to the foraged plants.These different herbs form part of the region’s social and culinary history. The origanum family, for instance, is a Mediterranean herb group: 35 of its 43 species only occur in the eastern Mediterranean (and four solely in the western Mediterranean). The herbs grow mainly in mountainous areas, not necessarily at high altitudes, but on stony slopes. Indeed, the name origanum, made up from the Greek words oros (mountain or hill) and ganos ( joy, celebration), translates to “joy of the mountains.”The southern Lebanese landscape, with its soft hills and rocky lands, continues in a similar manner in Palestine, where zaatar holds equal, if not more, significance. Just like the Lebanese, Palestinians have been foraging and eating zaatar throughout history. These herbs and the histories connected to them have come to represent the Palestinian people’s belonging to their country, linking them directly to the land from which they are forced away. “As long as there’s zaatar and olives, we will remain,” a saying goes.Mahmoud Darwish, who has chronicled many aspects of Palestinian culture in his writings, mentions zaatar in his poem “Ahmed al Zaatar,” written in the aftermath of the 1978 Tel al Zaatar massacre in Beirut. “For two hands, of stone and zaatar,” he writes, “I dedicate this song, for Ahmad, forgotten between two butterflies.” Edward Said, in a conversation with Salman Rushdie, said about breakfast that, “It is a sign of a Palestinian home that it has zaatar in it.” Ismail Haniyeh, the now assassinated former leader of Hamas, evoked the political importance of zaatar when he famously said in a 2006 speech that, “We will eat zaatar, grass, and salt, but we will not give in or renounce our principles.”In 1977, the Israeli government—when Ariel Sharon was the minister of agriculture— imposed a ban on the harvest of wild zaatar.Foragers, if found with plants, were fined or had their herbs confiscated. The stated reason was environmental—that zaatar was at risk of becoming extinct. But the ban was largely seen and served as a move to target Palestinian culture, heritage, and economic life. It also coincided with a sharp increase in Israeli cultivation of zaatar, an example of the colonial practice of erasing what is seen as “wild” and instead transforming such heritage into schemes that benefit the colonizer.There are other cases of Israeli laws targeting Palestinian culinary and agricultural heritage as well, such as the 2005 ban on foraging akkoub (another significant wild plant), and the criminalization in the 1950s of owning and herding black goats (the most common livestock animal in Palestine before 1948).On the other side of the border, in Lebanon’s south, food and agricultural practices have come under different forms of attack since Israel’s genocide in Gaza started in October 2023. Land has been directly targeted, trees have been uprooted and destroyed, and people have been stopped from tending to their lands and harvesting their crops. In March 2025, the World Bank published an estimate of US$6.8 billion in damage and US$7.2 billion in economic losses. Lebanon’s two southernmost governorates, Nabatieh and the South, were the most affected.“They destroyed everything in our region. Churches, mosques, agricultural lands, trees, houses. Everything,” says Faten Serhan. She sits on the sofa in a bright living room in the mountain town of Jezzine, with views over the rocky slopes just outside the window. Next to her sit her mother, Afife Serhan, and her brother, Mohammad Serhan. The family came to Jezzine when life in their home village of Kfarkela, right on the southern border and among the worst hit during the war, became too dangerous.“At some point, we started seeing people dying, one after another,” Mohammad says. “The last time I was in Kfarkela, for a funeral, I stopped to water the trees near our house. Soon enough, I realized I had forgotten some, but I thought to myself, ‘No worries, I can do that tomorrow.’ Then, when I came back the next day, every single tree was gone. They had bombed the village that morning.” He grabs a small cup of coffee brought out on a tray from the kitchen. “We had been using all our available water to try and save the life of our trees and land. We had managed to keep everything alive until that moment.”The family grows many things on their land in Kfarkela, including olives and all kinds of vegetables. Afife’s other son, Ali, runs a popular Instagram account, My Land, where he shares videos of his mother cooking and spending time on the land. The family also has a restaurant where they serve the food they grow.“We don’t use chemical fertilizers; we believe in natural methods. When you plant with good intentions, everything grows well,” Afife says. They grow zaatar as well, on a piece of land next to their house. “The one we have is rainfed, which means the zaatar has more aroma. It loses some of its character when irrigated. Zaatar doesn’t like too much water, and it needs sun,” she says. Afife says that, most of all, she likes to eat zaatar mixed with olive oil, spread on top of her own bread. Majida prefers it the same way. “We just mix the zaatar with olive oil and some salt. Whether fresh or dried, it’s best that way,” she says.When Israeli airstrikes began devastating towns and villages across the south, Qana was one of many that came under attack. The sisters and others in the cooperative had to flee, like people all over the south. At the peak in November last year, 900,000 people, one-fifth of Lebanon’s population, were displaced across the country. When the women were able to return to Qana, they found many of their plants dead. They had not been directly targeted but were dried out from the lack of water. “They had been left for two months without any care. We managed to find a few surviving plants, which we uprooted and planted on another piece of land so they could be saved,” Suzane says.In Kfarkela, the situation is far worse. Much of the village is heavily destroyed, with many homes entirely reduced to rubble. Satellite images and other photos show devastation where life, both human and botanical, used to be. “This is not the first time Israel targets Kfarkela, far from it.The village was one of the first in Lebanon to be occupied in 1978,” Mohammad says. Four years later, in 1982, Israeli forces returned and began an occupation of southern Lebanon that continued until 2000. During this era, people’s social, political, and economic independence was constantly violated. It was only possible to leave and re-enter the region through Israeli-controlled checkpoints set up on Lebanese soil.Mohammad says that the period damaged people’s connection to the land. “Everything was destroyed during the occupation. The older generation left with their children; many went abroad to live and study. It created a gap of over 20 years, during which the new generation lost its connection.” The oppressive policies enforced during the occupation were an attempt at slowly destroying agriculture in the south. Vegetables and other produce could no longer move freely, while goods brought over from Israel took over the market. Citrus was left to rot on the trees, as farmers never knew whether their fruits would reach buyers in Beirut and the north.A bit further away, in the midst of filling one last box with zaatar, is a woman who goes by the name Um Ibrahim, working alongside her daughter. They come from Aleppo in Syria but have lived and worked in southern Lebanon for many years. “We have worked with the cooperative for three years. Otherwise, we often work in tobacco. There’s a lot of tobacco here,” Um Ibrahim says. “But zaatar is easier to harvest. With tobacco, you have to start very early, at four or five in the morning, and pick it leaf by leaf.”Um Ibrahim and her family fled, like so many others, when the south was bombed. Among the 900,000 displaced by the war were not just Lebanese, but also families from Syria, working in industries like construction and agriculture across the south, as well as people from Sudan, Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and countries in West Africa, living and working in Lebanon. The death toll from the war continues to grow. In December, one week after the ceasefire agreement came into place, Lebanon’s health minister, Firass Abiad, said that 4,047 people had been killed in Israeli attacks. In October 2025, the UN’s OHCHR reported that at least 100 civilians had been killed after the ceasefire deal was signed, a number that continues to grow.Facing all of this, the women in Qana are uncertain about the future. “When we came back from the war, I had a lot of emotions. I even told the others, ‘Let’s shut down the cooperative.’ For two years, nothing moved for us, and our savings were stuck. I kept asking myself, ‘Why are we doing this?’” Majida says. Then, they started thinking about trying out a new product: distilled zaatar, which can be bottled and added to tea or juice to help strengthen the immune system and relieve cough and cold. “We already have some plants we will try this with. We have saved leftover parts and stems,” Majida says.Wild plants, including varieties of zaatar, have been used in folk medicine throughout history. Oregano and thyme, rich in the essential oil thymol, and carvacrol, a phenol (an aromatic organic compound), have antioxidant and antiseptic properties. In Lebanon, Palestine, and the surrounding region, zaatar is perhaps most known for one particular benefit: it sharpens the brain. The day before an exam, children will typically be told by their parents to drink or eat zaatar.In Jezzine, Afife and her children walk out onto the terrace at the back of the house they are renting. There is a small piece of land next to it, where they grow different vegetables. They have to try new methods and crops, since Jezzine is at a high altitude. In the meantime, until they return to Kfarkela, Ali continues sharing videos of his mother on the land—planting, harvesting, cooking, and preserving."
}
,
"relatedposts": [
{
"title" : "Our Era of Insecurity: How Unaffordability and Uncertainty Became Our Monoculture",
"author" : "Alissa Quart",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/our-era-of-insecurity",
"date" : "2025-12-16 11:56:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/Cover_EIP_Unaffordability.jpg",
"excerpt" : "In 2025, I’ve interviewed a number of people who saw themselves as living in “survival mode.” At first, their professions might surprise you. They are government contractors, public broadcasters, and tech workers, formerly safe professions. And some of their jobs disappeared this year due to DOGE “efficiency” cuts, the dismantling of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, and AI acceleration. They are among the millions now living through an experience that I call terra infirma, a new level of economic and social uncertainty.",
"content" : "In 2025, I’ve interviewed a number of people who saw themselves as living in “survival mode.” At first, their professions might surprise you. They are government contractors, public broadcasters, and tech workers, formerly safe professions. And some of their jobs disappeared this year due to DOGE “efficiency” cuts, the dismantling of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, and AI acceleration. They are among the millions now living through an experience that I call terra infirma, a new level of economic and social uncertainty.It’s the mood that encapsulates so much of Trump 2.0. A November 2025 Pew study found that almost half of U.S. adults are uncertain about having enough retirement income. When it comes to health insurance, they may be waiting for their ACA health subsidies to sunset or for their partner’s premiums to skyrocket. Addressing unaffordability and uncertainty is even the newest theme song in politics, most recently in the Maine campaign of gubernatorial candidate, oyster farmer and military veteran Graham Platner.Seventy years ago, the critic Raymond Williams used the term “structure of feeling” to describe a collective emotion that is tied to a time and place, as well as social and economic conditions. Today, our “structure of feeling” is uncertainty. You could even take it further, and call “precarity” the last monoculture as it’s a condition shared by so many Americans. As Astra Taylor, author of The Age of Insecurity: Coming Together as Things Fall Apart, says, insecurity is a “defining feature of our time.”As far as mass moods go, “insecurity” is certainly a disconcerting one. The economist Pranab Bardhan writes in A World of Insecurity, that “insecurity, more than inequality, agitates people.” What makes 2025 different from other years, however, is the degree to which we all experienced this precarity. The usual uncertainty level has been turned up from a whine to a 135-decibel air raid scream.What’s happened? Tariffs have raised our costs. Medicaid will be scaled back over the next decade by a trillion dollars. Meanwhile, dozens of Venezuelan fishermen have been exploded by our armed forces. And while two-thirds of Americans are already living with economic insecurity, their feelings about it don’t necessarily involve the discrepancy between their lot and those of the very rich. As Steven Semler, the co-founder of Security Policy Reform Institute (SPRI), explains it to me, these Americans have a mindset that “is more fearful of poverty than aspirations of being a millionaire.”The people of terra infirma do describe such fears. In the words of one, they’ve experienced a “mental health decline and a loss of purpose” and in another, “a serious financial pinch”, because they are their family’s main breadwinner. Uncertainty is the common refrain of the growing number of laid-off software workers, according to Human-Centered Design scholar Samuel So. In addition to feeling destabilized about their professional security for the first time, software workers have experienced disillusionment and alienation from the technology industry’s “military and police partnerships.” Jobs themselves are part of this insecurity, with never-ending hiring processes, the race of automation, and ghost jobs, the twisted contemporary version of the perished Russian serfs of Nikolai Gogol’s Dead Souls, except now professional opportunities are offered that don’t actually exist. People are also nervous about their future, because insecurity is a temporal emotion, as much about the future as the present. Many of us wonder how our security will further erode, as our health plan premiums soar, or as our subways catch on fire, or as ICE comes to our cities. This causes not only stress in the moment, but discomfort about what lies ahead.Of course, it’s not just Trump 2.0 alone that has caused this. The forces behind Trump’s win in 2024—and the anger at the traditional Democratic party—have something to do with this disposition, as well. In the weeks leading up to Trump’s election, people surveyed by the Federal Reserve Board ranked one of their top concerns as pricing and their top concern as inflation. Disparate phenomena—AI slop, job cuts, relentless and confusing cutbacks in crucial academic research—are entwined. It’s as if they were all figures in a paranoiac Thomas Pynchon novel. In a “world of insecurity,” as economist Bardhan writes, instabilities interlink. In other words, what I think of as “informational insecurity”—bots, false ads, fake news—often joins up with economic instability.These different instances of confusion and instability blend into a gnarly color wheel of distress. Economic distress, sure—that is also accentuated by societal, cultural, environmental, and physical examples of insecurity we see all around us, every day.How do we pick apart these knotted-together insecurities? For starters, we can embrace candidates who address economic uncertainty head-on, including New York’s new mayor, Zohran Mamdani, Seattle’s new mayor, Katie Wilson, and Virginia’s governor-elect Abigail Spanberger. These politicians, as Nicholas Jacobs has written of Maine candidate Platner, are “speaking to grievances that are real, measurable, and decades in the making.”Another line of defense is being brave and grasping for community in any way we can. I think of the ordinary people blowing whistles near Chicago to alert their neighbors when ICE showed up in their suburban towns: they were accidental upstanders, refusing to be part of manufactured uncertainty and instability.One traditional definition of security is “freedom from fear.” And while we are unlikely to experience that freedom from fear as long as the populist American Right continues its goosestep, it’s also important to remember that uncertainty, like any “structure of feeling,” is an unfinished emotion.Yes, insecurity shapes us now. But we, as a collective, are so much more than it. Because even if we are living in a time of such negative uncertainty, it won’t necessarily stay that way. We can still redefine ourselves and, most importantly, recognize we are not alone."
}
,
{
"title" : "On the Failures of Mainstream Media: The Rise of Independent Newsrooms",
"author" : "Céline Semaan",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/on-the-failures-of-mainstream-media",
"date" : "2025-12-15 15:53:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/B417273E-EA4A-4BB8-9245-081928282D6D.jpeg",
"excerpt" : "Has it become immoral to be featured in the New York Times? I remember when I first saw my face in the iconic newspaper that for decades was regarded as a global standard‑bearer of mainstream journalism, I felt vindicated. Vindicated because, finally, my Lebanese family stopped asking if I had a real career. Vindicated because they would maybe stop worrying that I had blown my chances (and their immense sacrifices getting me an education), devoting my life instead to art and endless revolution. The New York Times’ legitimacy, now long gone, was regarded as the highest badge of honor, in particular, for immigrant kids who chose a different path than the usual career options afforded to us, and despite their rebellion, found a way to be recognized for it.",
"content" : "Has it become immoral to be featured in the New York Times? I remember when I first saw my face in the iconic newspaper that for decades was regarded as a global standard‑bearer of mainstream journalism, I felt vindicated. Vindicated because, finally, my Lebanese family stopped asking if I had a real career. Vindicated because they would maybe stop worrying that I had blown my chances (and their immense sacrifices getting me an education), devoting my life instead to art and endless revolution. The New York Times’ legitimacy, now long gone, was regarded as the highest badge of honor, in particular, for immigrant kids who chose a different path than the usual career options afforded to us, and despite their rebellion, found a way to be recognized for it.When the headline for the piece read “Refugee Designer Shines a Light on Global Issues,” my mother called me that day, not to congratulate me, but to demand I contact the editor and have them remove the word “refugee” before the word “designer.” I tried, in vain. Little did I know that this form of belittling, discrediting, and choice of words designed to incite disdain and eventually violence was core to the New York Times’ ethos.Over the past two years, increasingly immoral headlines and editorial choices in its Opinion section have eroded that credibility among many readers and contributors, particularly around coverage of the war in Gaza. A growing number of scholars, writers, and public intellectuals have publicly criticized the Times for framing geopolitical violence in ways that align with oppressive power structures rather than interrogate them — a criticism that raises deep concerns about misinformation and manufactured consent of dangerous ideologies.Headlines like “Bondi Beach Is What ‘Globalize the Intifada’ Looks Like” and “No, Israel Is Not Committing Genocide in Gaza” are editorial strategies designed to reshape public understanding of systemic violence to support far-right narratives and the interests of the global military-industrial complex. What happens when mainstream media becomes a mouthpiece for fascism and arms dealers? Where “objectivity” is marketed as truth, but really serves as a code for “obey the rulers” and “ask no questions.”This editorial leadership at the New York Times has sparked significant backlash within the intellectual community and among independent journalists. More than 300 writers, scholars, and former contributors have pledged a boycott of the Times’ Opinion pages, accusing the paper of anti‑Palestinian bias and demanding editorial accountability, including a re‑evaluation of its coverage and calls for a U.S. arms embargo on Israel. Alongside this, peace and justice organizations have condemned their editorial decisions, such as rejecting advertising that simply described Israel’s actions in Gaza as genocide.The larger consequence of these controversies is not simply a reputational dispute; it reflects a broader shift in public trust away from legacy media toward people‑driven platforms that prioritize accountability, lived experience, and political context over corporate interests or geopolitical alignment. As mainstream outlets retreat from confronting systemic violence in favor of the bottom line, audiences — especially younger and more globally connected readers — are turning to independent media for context and truth‑telling that legacy institutions increasingly fail to provide.That’s where platforms like Everything is Political come in. I started this platform because I was fed up with pitching stories to mainstream media platforms and receiving bogus rejections, only to later read the most outrageous takes in their Opinion section, exposing racism and deliberate calls for violence that had real consequences for my people back home. Rather than treating opinion as a commodity or a battleground for corporate narratives, independent media like EIP can center historically grounded analysis, intersectional understanding, and ethical engagement with stories that cover conflict and power. In an age of globalization and hypermediated conflict, how media frames violence matters deeply — not just to who lives or dies on the ground, but also whose stories are amplified, whose suffering is recognized, and whose futures are imagined. Platforms accountable to audiences rather than corporate advertisers and shareholders must emerge to fill a vacuum created by a legacy press that too often places power over people. Outlets like Democracy Now!, The Intercept, BTNews, and countless others are leading the way, reporting accurate news without ever compromising their moral compass."
}
,
{
"title" : "Mercy Over Speed: Revolutionizing Our Political Imagination",
"author" : "Sue Ariza",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/mercy-over-speed",
"date" : "2025-12-11 13:40:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/Cover_EIP_Mercy_Speed.jpg",
"excerpt" : "2025 was a masterclass in haste.",
"content" : "2025 was a masterclass in haste.Policies rushed to enact a merciless agenda that benefit only the few—President Donald Trump scrapped Biden’s AI executive order within hours of taking office, wiping out safety and transparency requirements as we enter a new digital age. Immigration officials were ordered to quadruple immigration arrests overnight. Food assistance was frozen while billions in relief funds sat unused; hunger used as a pawn in the longest government shutdown in American history. Entire communities pushed not just to autopilot, but to survival—by algorithms that cannot see them, by bureaucracies that cannot pause long enough to understand them, by political actors who confuse immediacy with leadership.Of course, the real crisis isn’t speed on its own. It’s what speed erases: attention, nuance, reflection, and the fundamental truth that human beings are not statistics or administrative burdens. Perhaps nowhere was this clearer than in the State Department’s human rights reports earlier this year. In the name of “streamlining,” references to prison abuse, LGBTQIA+ persecution, and attacks on human rights defenders were quietly removed. The language was technocratic—reduce redundancy, tidy up the narrative—but the effect was ideological: whole communities and categories of suffering erased from national memory.Because the truth is, what speed strategically, ruthlessly, obliterates is the one crucial political practice we need most: mercy.Our world has taught us to think of mercy in opposition to speed, too soft for our lived realities, though it’s anything but that: Mercy is the commitment to respond to harm, conflict, or complexity with clarity rather than panic—with discernment instead of reflex. Mercy is the refusal to collapse a person, an idea, or a crisis into something smaller than it is. Mercy is political imagination: the capacity to see beyond what urgency allows and stay with one another long enough to resist the reflexes that turn disagreement into instant judgment—so we can listen before we attack or defend.But what does mercy actually demand of us? For us to reclaim it politically, we first must understand what it means and how it offers a counter-rhythm to our frantic culture of speed and instant gratification.The word itself tells a story. Mercy comes from the Latin merces—wages, payment, the price of goods. Ancient Romans understood it as a transaction. But early Christians shifted the word toward the sacred: the spiritual reward for showing kindness where cruelty was expected. They moved a word about the marketplace into a vocabulary of grace.Judaism’s rachamim, Islam’s rahma, Buddhism’s karuṇā, and Hinduism’s dayā all insist on the same truth: mercy is a way of recognizing the sacredness in others.That transformation mirrors what mercy asks of us now: to move beyond the logic of exchange, beyond what is earned or owed. It asks us to look at someone who has caused pain, and instead of asking What do they deserve? ask, What does healing require here? It is seeing beyond someone’s worst moment and choosing curiosity over condemnation.But mercy is more than individual forgiveness. It is a way of moving through the world that assumes people are larger than their failures; that redemption remains possible; that, importantly, time is not a scarce resource, but something we can afford to give. Mercy requires attention—what French philosopher Simone Weil called “the rarest and purest form of generosity.” It is why American novelist James Baldwin described love as an active emotion: the daily labor of truly seeing another person, especially when the systems around us tell us to look away.The problem, however, is that attention is precisely what our culture has made almost impossible to give. We are overstimulated, overextended, algorithmically hijacked, not only bearing witness to incredible amounts of suffering, but scrolling past it. We don’t refuse mercy because we’re cruel. We refuse it because we’ve built a world that makes stopping feel unimaginable—impractical.This is why mercy is not opposed to speed; it is opposed to false urgency. There are moments when mercy requires swift, decisive intervention. The problem is not action—it’s reaction: the unexamined acceleration that mistakes immediacy for moral clarity and treats nuance as an inconvenience.Consider how the culture of speed is destabilizing basic public systems. Take the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) that feeds more than 42 million Americans. This year, households faced unprecedented threats to their benefits—not because their needs had changed, not because the money didn’t exist, but because the administration chose to let billions in contingency funds sit untouched. The crisis wasn’t a failure of capacity. It was a political choice dressed up as inevitability.Or look at the rush to implement AI—a race happening not because anyone has thought deeply about what these systems are for, but because companies fear being the last to adopt them. Across industries, AI is being plugged into hiring platforms, healthcare systems, education tools, corporate workflows, and crisis-response mechanisms, often with little understanding of the consequences. “Innovation” has become a justification to move faster than ethics, oversight, or even common sense can keep up. In that scramble to avoid falling behind, speed becomes a substitute for understanding what people actually need and for the mercy that governance requires.A merciful politics would insist that deliberation is not inefficiency but protection, and that slowing down is an ethical requirement. Because the stakes of leadership and governance without it are real: if AI systems are going to help determine who gets hired, who gets healthcare, who receives support, which students get flagged for discipline, then refusing to slow down is not neutrality—it is a political choice with human costs.Our addiction to speed also shapes how we respond to political disagreement. Our culture no longer rewards thinking or meaningful conversation. Instead, it rewards reacting. Watch how career Democrats responded to New York Assembly member Zohran Mamdani’s mayoral campaign in November. Rather than engaging with his proposals on housing, healthcare, or municipal governance, establishment voices moved immediately to demonization. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer withheld his endorsement entirely. His ideas required discussion, which takes time and attention. His vision challenged party orthodoxy, which requires deliberation to refute or incorporate. Instead of dialogue, we see instant censure, moral panic, and swift punishment.The speed of the response is the point. It signals that dissent is tolerable only when it can be quickly absorbed or quickly dismissed. Ideas that require conversation are treated as threats simply because they resist rapid processing. The issue isn’t whether Mamdani’s proposals are correct (and of course, it remains to be seen how they will actually be implemented); it’s that the reflex to demonize rather than debate reveals a political culture that has forgotten how to think collectively.We see this punitive speed logic everywhere. Students disciplined for language before conversations can happen. Social movements judged by headlines rather than the work. Communities criminalized in real time by social media cycles that flatten context into consumable outrage. We’ve built a society quicker to punish than to understand, quicker to condemn than to contextualize.But mercy could help us move differently. Mercy would refuse to relegate a person or an idea to a caricature simply because the truth requires time. Mercy asks us to hold uncertainty long enough to respond with discernment rather than reflex. It asks us to think—together.Legal scholar Matthias Mahlmann writes that dignity is “subversive,” an insistence that every human life carries irreducible worth. But dignity has a temporal requirement: you cannot witness another person’s humanity at speed. You cannot attend to the complexity of a life if you’re only interested in the fastest possible outcome.This is why systems built around optimization always feel so violent. Algorithmic welfare reviews, automated policing, real-time public shaming—all of them demand that human beings be compressed into categories that can be processed quickly. The violence isn’t just in the outcome; it’s in the refusal of attention itself.Mercy and dignity are inseparable. Dignity names the inherent worth that every person carries; mercy is the discipline that protects that worth in practice. Dignity says there is something unbreakable in each of us. Mercy is how we honor that unbreakable thing, especially when harm or conflict tempts us to forget it. What would shift if our reflex wasn’t How fast can we react?, but How deeply can we understand? What becomes possible when we refuse to hurry past another person’s humanity?Mercy is not sentiment. It is resistance. It is the refusal of dignity fatigue. It is the discipline of witnessing: in political policy, in the conversations we have, in how we treat each other’s failures and hopes. 2025 taught us what haste can destroy. The question now is whether we’re willing to build something slower—and more human—in its place."
}
]
}