Digital & Print Membership
Yearly + Receive 8 free printed back issues
$420 Annually
Monthly + Receive 3 free printed back issues
$40 Monthly
Who’s afraid of AI?
We have been living in the AI era much longer than you think
When it comes to “artificial intelligence,” there are so many hopes and fears that touch on the most fundamental questions of existence, consciousness, freewill, and what type of society we are creating.
A 2023 Reuters/Ipsos poll found that 65% of Americans express concern about AI’s direction. The truth is that an Artificial Intelligence system has been operating for hundreds, if not thousands of years; it’s called the Economy. And it’s not your friend. It’s programmed to extract and centralize wealth at all costs. Its hardware is you and I and all humans living under its dominion. Its software is the bureaucracy and impersonal systems that govern our interactions.
From 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) and The Terminator series, to The Matrix, most cautionary tales of AI imagine some dramatic fictional future moment—the Singularity—when the AI becomes “self-aware” and decides to act against humanity.
But what is the AI boogeyman, really? A non-human, unfeeling system that enforces its psychopathic agenda, regardless of the cost of human life and the suffering inflicted. This actually began happening long ago. And unlike most apocalyptic visions, this has been happening much more slowly and less cinematically than we imagined.
Imagine a system run by rules and enforcement without soul or humanity, enabled by human agents who serve that system by “just doing their job.” This is exactly what has been in place since we started writing spreadsheets on paper.
From the moment the concept of debt-based money was formalized and written down, the system of debt and capital functions as a societal virus that we now call the Economy.
The exact moment is hard to pinpoint because it’s more of a process than a moment. It could be the creation of the modern corporation. The 1604 Dutch East India Company and the 1670 Hudson’s Bay Company are two of the world’s first companies where a profit mandate was designed to supersede the importance of their human creators and to outlive any individual. However, it was likely far earlier than 1604 when the debt-based money system was created and imposed upon humanity through violence.
Indigenous gift economies, are objectively more sustainable for people and planet. They are based on an expected flow of mutual aid and trust-based interdependence, rather than exchanges of a transactional nature. Tracking debt formalizes hierarchy and breaks down systems built on equality and trust. Debt is the beginning of the dehumanization that allows an unconscious system (the debt system powering the Economy) to rule over conscious beings (humans as subservient to the Economy). In any case, we have certainly been living under this intelligent, omnipresent system whose goal is the endless accumulation of capital, where gravity (hoarding) overpowers entropy (wealth equality).
Things that people generally get wrong about AI:
-
It’s not Intelligent. I have to say this: there will never be a “singularity”. Any of the technologies grouped under the “Artificial Intelligence” label (machine learning, large language models, natural language processors, etc), driven by defined algorithms, will never be intelligent or conscious in the way that a living being is. Even once a semantic feedback engine with machine learning model (AI) can pass a Turing test, it will never have consciousness or awareness of what it is saying, because at the root, it is not driven by life force, it is driven by a simple mechanical program.
-
It’s not Individualized. The naive concept of an individualized, personality-driven anthropomorphic robot (everything from Star Wars to The Terminator to Blade Runner to Ex Machina) is simply not how connected technology works. AI is not a hermetic being within a physical body and never will be. It will always be connected to larger models and centralized data.
-
It’s not going to “change the world,” not in any structural sense. Advances in AI will change the aesthetics of Empire, not the balance of power. Because we are already running a more fundamental version of AI (the Economy), and WE are the software and hardware.
The group of technologies that we call AI is a simple extension of the same abstract system we already live under, optimized to accelerate it.
When we talk about AI, we should be talking about power. Who owns the tools? Who trains the models? Who sets the objectives? And whose lives are made disposable in the name of progress? Complex learning models, in the hands of the Economy, simply reinforce existing power structures; they will not create any new inequality.
The real danger of AI is not that it will become some evil supermind; it’s that the smallest, most violent, and aggressive minority will use it, as they’ve always used technology, to further entrench a system that treats life as secondary to profit. Technology, no matter how simple or complex, is only a tool for the system it is enforcing.
Artificial intelligence is not coming to destroy us. The Economy, which drives colonialism and imperialism, is already doing that. Unless we consciously, collectively, and courageously decide otherwise.
{
"article":
{
"title" : "Who’s afraid of AI? We have been living in the AI era much longer than you think",
"author" : "Collis Browne",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/whos-afraid-of-ai",
"date" : "2025-07-19 21:35:46 -0400",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/whos-afriad-of-ai.png",
"excerpt" : "When it comes to “artificial intelligence,” there are so many hopes and fears that touch on the most fundamental questions of existence, consciousness, freewill, and what type of society we are creating.",
"content" : "When it comes to “artificial intelligence,” there are so many hopes and fears that touch on the most fundamental questions of existence, consciousness, freewill, and what type of society we are creating.A 2023 Reuters/Ipsos poll found that 65% of Americans express concern about AI’s direction. The truth is that an Artificial Intelligence system has been operating for hundreds, if not thousands of years; it’s called the Economy. And it’s not your friend. It’s programmed to extract and centralize wealth at all costs. Its hardware is you and I and all humans living under its dominion. Its software is the bureaucracy and impersonal systems that govern our interactions.From 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) and The Terminator series, to The Matrix, most cautionary tales of AI imagine some dramatic fictional future moment—the Singularity—when the AI becomes “self-aware” and decides to act against humanity.But what is the AI boogeyman, really? A non-human, unfeeling system that enforces its psychopathic agenda, regardless of the cost of human life and the suffering inflicted. This actually began happening long ago. And unlike most apocalyptic visions, this has been happening much more slowly and less cinematically than we imagined.Imagine a system run by rules and enforcement without soul or humanity, enabled by human agents who serve that system by “just doing their job.” This is exactly what has been in place since we started writing spreadsheets on paper. From the moment the concept of debt-based money was formalized and written down, the system of debt and capital functions as a societal virus that we now call the Economy.The exact moment is hard to pinpoint because it’s more of a process than a moment. It could be the creation of the modern corporation. The 1604 Dutch East India Company and the 1670 Hudson’s Bay Company are two of the world’s first companies where a profit mandate was designed to supersede the importance of their human creators and to outlive any individual. However, it was likely far earlier than 1604 when the debt-based money system was created and imposed upon humanity through violence.Indigenous gift economies, are objectively more sustainable for people and planet. They are based on an expected flow of mutual aid and trust-based interdependence, rather than exchanges of a transactional nature. Tracking debt formalizes hierarchy and breaks down systems built on equality and trust. Debt is the beginning of the dehumanization that allows an unconscious system (the debt system powering the Economy) to rule over conscious beings (humans as subservient to the Economy). In any case, we have certainly been living under this intelligent, omnipresent system whose goal is the endless accumulation of capital, where gravity (hoarding) overpowers entropy (wealth equality).Things that people generally get wrong about AI: It’s not Intelligent. I have to say this: there will never be a “singularity”. Any of the technologies grouped under the “Artificial Intelligence” label (machine learning, large language models, natural language processors, etc), driven by defined algorithms, will never be intelligent or conscious in the way that a living being is. Even once a semantic feedback engine with machine learning model (AI) can pass a Turing test, it will never have consciousness or awareness of what it is saying, because at the root, it is not driven by life force, it is driven by a simple mechanical program. It’s not Individualized. The naive concept of an individualized, personality-driven anthropomorphic robot (everything from Star Wars to The Terminator to Blade Runner to Ex Machina) is simply not how connected technology works. AI is not a hermetic being within a physical body and never will be. It will always be connected to larger models and centralized data. It’s not going to “change the world,” not in any structural sense. Advances in AI will change the aesthetics of Empire, not the balance of power. Because we are already running a more fundamental version of AI (the Economy), and WE are the software and hardware. The group of technologies that we call AI is a simple extension of the same abstract system we already live under, optimized to accelerate it.When we talk about AI, we should be talking about power. Who owns the tools? Who trains the models? Who sets the objectives? And whose lives are made disposable in the name of progress? Complex learning models, in the hands of the Economy, simply reinforce existing power structures; they will not create any new inequality.The real danger of AI is not that it will become some evil supermind; it’s that the smallest, most violent, and aggressive minority will use it, as they’ve always used technology, to further entrench a system that treats life as secondary to profit. Technology, no matter how simple or complex, is only a tool for the system it is enforcing.Artificial intelligence is not coming to destroy us. The Economy, which drives colonialism and imperialism, is already doing that. Unless we consciously, collectively, and courageously decide otherwise."
}
,
"relatedposts": [
{
"title" : "100+ Years of Genocidal Intent in Palestine",
"author" : "Collis Browne",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/100-years-of-genocidal-intent",
"date" : "2025-10-07 18:01:00 -0400",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/1920-jerusalem.jpg",
"excerpt" : "Every single Israeli prime minister, president, and major Zionist leader has voiced clear intent to erase the Palestinian people from their lands, either by forced expulsion, or military violence. From Herzl and Chaim Weizmann to Ben-Gurion to Netanyahu, the record is not ambiguous:",
"content" : "Every single Israeli prime minister, president, and major Zionist leader has voiced clear intent to erase the Palestinian people from their lands, either by forced expulsion, or military violence. From Herzl and Chaim Weizmann to Ben-Gurion to Netanyahu, the record is not ambiguous:{% for person in site.data.genocidalquotes %}{{ person.name }}{% if person.title %}<p class=\"title-xs\">{{ person.title }}</p>{% endif %}{% for quote in person.quotes %}“{{ quote.text }}”{% if quote.source %}— {{ quote.source }}{% endif %}{% endfor %}{% endfor %}"
}
,
{
"title" : "Dignity Before Stadiums:: Morocco’s Digital Uprising",
"author" : "Cheb Gado",
"category" : "",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/dignity-before-stadiums",
"date" : "2025-10-02 09:08:00 -0400",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/EIP_Cover_Morocco_GenZ.jpg",
"excerpt" : "No one expected a generation raised on smartphones and TikTok clips to ignite a spark of protest shaking Morocco’s streets. But Gen Z, the children of the internet and speed, have stepped forward to write a new chapter in the history of uprisings, in their own style.The wave of anger began with everyday struggles that cut deep into young people’s lives: soaring prices, lack of social justice, and the silencing of their voices in politics. They didn’t need traditional leaders or party manifestos; the movement was born out of a single hashtag that spread like wildfire, transforming individual frustration into collective momentum.",
"content" : "No one expected a generation raised on smartphones and TikTok clips to ignite a spark of protest shaking Morocco’s streets. But Gen Z, the children of the internet and speed, have stepped forward to write a new chapter in the history of uprisings, in their own style.The wave of anger began with everyday struggles that cut deep into young people’s lives: soaring prices, lack of social justice, and the silencing of their voices in politics. They didn’t need traditional leaders or party manifestos; the movement was born out of a single hashtag that spread like wildfire, transforming individual frustration into collective momentum.One of the sharpest contradictions fueling the protests was the billions poured into World Cup-related preparations, while ordinary citizens remained marginalized when it came to healthcare and education.This awareness quickly turned into chants and slogans echoing through the streets: “Dignity begins with schools and hospitals, not with putting on a show for the world.”What set this movement apart was not only its presence on the streets, but also the way it reinvented protest itself:Live filming: Phone cameras revealed events moment by moment, exposing abuses instantly.Memes and satire: A powerful weapon to dismantle authority’s aura, turning complex political discourse into viral, shareable content.Decentralized networks: No leader, no party, just small, fast-moving groups connected online, able to appear and disappear with agility.This generation doesn’t believe in grand speeches or delayed promises. They demand change here and now. Moving seamlessly between the physical and digital realms, they turn the street into a stage of revolt, and Instagram Live into an alternative media outlet.What’s happening in Morocco strongly recalls the Arab Spring of 2011, when young people flooded the streets with the same passion and spontaneity, armed only with belief in their power to spark change. But Gen Z added their own twist, digital tools, meme culture, and the pace of a hyper-connected world.Morocco’s Gen Z uprising is not just another protest, but a living experiment in how a digital generation can redefine politics itself. The spark may fade, but the mark it leaves on young people’s collective consciousness cannot be erased.Photo credits: Mosa’ab Elshamy, Zacaria Garcia, Abdel Majid Bizouat, Marouane Beslem"
}
,
{
"title" : "A Shutdown Exposes How Fragile U.S. Governance Really Is",
"author" : "EIP Editors",
"category" : "",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/a-shutdown-exposes-how-fragile-us-governance-really-is",
"date" : "2025-10-01 22:13:00 -0400",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/EIP_Cover_Gov_ShutDown.jpg",
"excerpt" : "Each time the federal government shutters its doors, we hear the same reassurances: essential services will continue, Social Security checks will still arrive, planes won’t fall from the sky. This isn’t the first Governmental shutdown, they’ve happened 22 times since 1976, and their toll is real.",
"content" : "Each time the federal government shutters its doors, we hear the same reassurances: essential services will continue, Social Security checks will still arrive, planes won’t fall from the sky. This isn’t the first Governmental shutdown, they’ve happened 22 times since 1976, and their toll is real.Shutdowns don’t mean the government stops functioning. They mean millions of federal workers are asked to keep the system running without pay. Air traffic controllers, border patrol agents, food inspectors — people whose jobs underpin both public safety and economic life — are told their labor matters, but their livelihoods don’t. People have to pay the price of bad bureaucracy in the world’s most powerful country, if governance is stalled, workers must pay with their salaries and their groceries.In 1995 and 1996, clashes between President Bill Clinton and House Speaker Newt Gingrich triggered two shutdowns totaling 27 days. In 2013, a 16-day standoff over the Affordable Care Act furloughed 850,000 workers. And in 2018–2019, the longest shutdown in U.S. history stretched 35 days, as President Trump refused to reopen the government without funding for a border wall. That impasse left 800,000 federal employees without paychecks and cost the U.S. economy an estimated $11 billion — $3 billion of it permanently lost.More troubling is what happens when crises strike during shutdowns. The United States is living in an age of accelerating climate disasters: historic floods in Vermont, wildfire smoke choking New York, hurricanes pounding Florida. These emergencies do not pause while Congress fights over budgets. Yet a shutdown means furloughed NOAA meteorologists, suspended EPA enforcement, and delayed FEMA programs. In the most climate-vulnerable decade of our lifetimes, we are choosing paralysis over preparedness.This vulnerability didn’t emerge overnight. For decades, the American state has been hollowed out under the logic of austerity and privatization, while military spending has remained sacrosanct. That imbalance is why budgets collapse under the weight of endless resources for war abroad, too few for resilience at home.Shutdowns send a dangerous message. They normalize instability. They tell workers they are disposable. They make clear that in our system, climate resilience and public health aren’t pillars of our democracy but rather insignificant in the face of power and greed. And each time the government closes, it becomes easier to imagine a future where this isn’t the exception but the rule.The United States cannot afford to keep running on shutdown politics. The climate crisis, economic inequality, and the challenges of sustaining democracy itself demand continuity, not collapse. We need a politics that treats stability and resilience not as partisan victories, but as basic commitments to one another. Otherwise, the real shutdown isn’t just of the government — it’s of democracy itself."
}
]
}