Digital & Print Membership
Yearly + Receive 8 free printed back issues
$420 Annually
Monthly + Receive 3 free printed back issues
$40 Monthly
Trump & Climate
Trump began his administration with countless attacks: an onslaught of executive orders targeted migrants, queer and trans people, and the planet we live on. During his campaign, Donald Trump solicited $1 billion from the fossil fuel industry, and while they didn’t pony up quite that much, they contributed by the million, and he’s now ready to do their bidding for the duration of his term.
On day one Trump announced multiple executive orders and policies intended to boost oil and gas production. He also rescinded numerous environmental protections, withdrew at once from the Paris Climate Accord, and rolled back environmental justice initiatives. He opened protected waters to offshore drilling, canceled agreements to expand how much land and water the United States protects, and declared an energy emergency. It’s vital to know that this so-called “energy emergency” is fake. In 2023, the US produced more energy than it consumed, and the country has been a net exporter of energy since 2019.
What is real is the desire the fossil fuel industry has to make even more money, to raise gas prices wherever they can, and, crucially, to reject climate science and continue operating as usual while the world burns. And the fascist movement is right there with them. Fascism entails the fusion of corporate power and state power, and we’re seeing that occur with the tech industry, the fossil fuel industry, Wall Street and more.
The tech oligarchs like Musk, Zuckerberg, Bezos and others have fallen in line with Trump both because they agree with him on many things, and because their darling new industry, AI, is likely to fail completely without serious government intervention. We tend to think of government regulation as something that hurts companies, but the tech industry, among others, has shown repeatedly that it needs a version of regulation that allows for a handful of corporations to profit while competitors are iced out. We’re seeing that right now as the Chinese leap forward in AI and U.S. companies appear likely to fall behind unless the government intervenes dramatically.
Tech barons, like the fossil fuel bosses, want the federal government to ignore its massive and devastating environmental impact. AI uses up an ungodly amount of water, at a time when a water crisis is making itself abundantly clear from California to Colorado and beyond. In return, ordinary people are getting very little. In fact, the main result for most people appears to be less job security, while a handful of people get rich, for now— as the Trump administration has already announced a new $500 billion AI plan with several of the big tech companies, from Microsoft and OpenAI to Oracle to SoftBank.
So we know who this administration works for, and we know they’ll gladly pour fuel on the fire ravaging our planet and its ecosystems if it makes them and their cronies a few billion dollars in the short term. Our long-term future is being sacrificed, and the right knows that. But of course they can’t simply give the game away, which is why they turn to lies and scapegoating to buy time and delude as much of the population as possible.
As a whole, these lies can be best understood under the guise of ecofascism.
As Alexander Menrisky says,
“Ecofascism is any environmentalism that advocates or accepts violence and does so in a way that reinforces existing systems of inequality or targets certain people while leaving others untouched. It is basically environmentalism that suggests that certain people are naturally and exclusively entitled to control and enjoy environmental resources.”
We see this manifesting in numerous ways right now, even if we’re not aware that what’s coming from the fascist movement on the topic of conservation and environmentalism often fits under this umbrella.
One rendition of this is the talk around migrants. The MAGA movement often utilizes an argument that says “there’s not enough room for those people” in an effort to legitimize their deportation efforts. Of course, when you look a little closer you see JD Vance and Elon Musk and others advocating for more babies, more American babies, by which they obviously mean more white babies. Because they know there’s enough room for everyone in this country, they’re just racist. And they may invoke “this pristine land” or “our beautiful natural landscape” or similar phrases to tie the land to the need to remove people, and buying into that can mean buying into the logic of ecofascism.
Because there is enough. There’s enough land in this country to support the people who live on it. But MAGA will never take on Big AG, or the meat industry, or the car-centric transportation system that consumes so much of this land, spreads us out, and makes a lot of money doing it. They’ll never take on the for-profit housing industry that makes life so expensive, or the healthcare industry, and the list goes on. Instead they’ll pull vile, ecofascist moves like attempting to blame homeless people for the LA fires instead of climate change. That kind of dangerous and disgusting scapegoating is the biggest red flag that you’re dealing with when it comes to ecofascism, as is the obfuscation of the real problem, namely the climate crisis.
Trump’s administration has set in motion numerous moves to attack the environment, harm our climate, and hand out cash to the fossil fuel and tech industries. Oil and gas production hitting record highs, the massive environmental damage done to Gaza, and the tech industry’s vast harms to the Congo all occurred under the Biden administration, but now we also have to contend with ecofascism, total climate denial, and numerous new climate related attacks.
So know that there is enough. Know that the most vulnerable among us are never the cause of your problems. Know to assign blame to the powerful and their systems, rather than the relatively powerless. Do not get distracted by scapegoating and fascist rhetoric. The villains are clear. The fossil fuel industry has known about the impending climate crisis, and their role in it, for 50 years. They’ve just chosen profit over this planet, and the people on it. We need a movement that beats back fascism and institutes a system that prioritizes life more than the dollar. It’s our one and only way out. No other lies, distractions, no amount of throwing people under the bus will get us where we need to go. Solidarity alone will bring us to collective liberation.
More from: J.P. Hill
Keep reading:
Global Echoes of Resistance:
Artists Harnessing Art, Culture, and Ancestry
Charlie Engman
Global Echoes of Resistance:
Artists Harnessing Art, Culture, and Ancestry
HaveCooth
{
"article":
{
"title" : "Trump & Climate",
"author" : "J.P. Hill",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/trump-and-climate",
"date" : "2025-01-27 12:30:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/EIP_Covers_Trump_Climate.jpg",
"excerpt" : "Trump began his administration with countless attacks: an onslaught of executive orders targeted migrants, queer and trans people, and the planet we live on. During his campaign, Donald Trump solicited $1 billion from the fossil fuel industry, and while they didn’t pony up quite that much, they contributed by the million, and he’s now ready to do their bidding for the duration of his term.",
"content" : "Trump began his administration with countless attacks: an onslaught of executive orders targeted migrants, queer and trans people, and the planet we live on. During his campaign, Donald Trump solicited $1 billion from the fossil fuel industry, and while they didn’t pony up quite that much, they contributed by the million, and he’s now ready to do their bidding for the duration of his term.On day one Trump announced multiple executive orders and policies intended to boost oil and gas production. He also rescinded numerous environmental protections, withdrew at once from the Paris Climate Accord, and rolled back environmental justice initiatives. He opened protected waters to offshore drilling, canceled agreements to expand how much land and water the United States protects, and declared an energy emergency. It’s vital to know that this so-called “energy emergency” is fake. In 2023, the US produced more energy than it consumed, and the country has been a net exporter of energy since 2019.What is real is the desire the fossil fuel industry has to make even more money, to raise gas prices wherever they can, and, crucially, to reject climate science and continue operating as usual while the world burns. And the fascist movement is right there with them. Fascism entails the fusion of corporate power and state power, and we’re seeing that occur with the tech industry, the fossil fuel industry, Wall Street and more.The tech oligarchs like Musk, Zuckerberg, Bezos and others have fallen in line with Trump both because they agree with him on many things, and because their darling new industry, AI, is likely to fail completely without serious government intervention. We tend to think of government regulation as something that hurts companies, but the tech industry, among others, has shown repeatedly that it needs a version of regulation that allows for a handful of corporations to profit while competitors are iced out. We’re seeing that right now as the Chinese leap forward in AI and U.S. companies appear likely to fall behind unless the government intervenes dramatically.Tech barons, like the fossil fuel bosses, want the federal government to ignore its massive and devastating environmental impact. AI uses up an ungodly amount of water, at a time when a water crisis is making itself abundantly clear from California to Colorado and beyond. In return, ordinary people are getting very little. In fact, the main result for most people appears to be less job security, while a handful of people get rich, for now— as the Trump administration has already announced a new $500 billion AI plan with several of the big tech companies, from Microsoft and OpenAI to Oracle to SoftBank.So we know who this administration works for, and we know they’ll gladly pour fuel on the fire ravaging our planet and its ecosystems if it makes them and their cronies a few billion dollars in the short term. Our long-term future is being sacrificed, and the right knows that. But of course they can’t simply give the game away, which is why they turn to lies and scapegoating to buy time and delude as much of the population as possible.As a whole, these lies can be best understood under the guise of ecofascism.As Alexander Menrisky says,“Ecofascism is any environmentalism that advocates or accepts violence and does so in a way that reinforces existing systems of inequality or targets certain people while leaving others untouched. It is basically environmentalism that suggests that certain people are naturally and exclusively entitled to control and enjoy environmental resources.”We see this manifesting in numerous ways right now, even if we’re not aware that what’s coming from the fascist movement on the topic of conservation and environmentalism often fits under this umbrella.One rendition of this is the talk around migrants. The MAGA movement often utilizes an argument that says “there’s not enough room for those people” in an effort to legitimize their deportation efforts. Of course, when you look a little closer you see JD Vance and Elon Musk and others advocating for more babies, more American babies, by which they obviously mean more white babies. Because they know there’s enough room for everyone in this country, they’re just racist. And they may invoke “this pristine land” or “our beautiful natural landscape” or similar phrases to tie the land to the need to remove people, and buying into that can mean buying into the logic of ecofascism.Because there is enough. There’s enough land in this country to support the people who live on it. But MAGA will never take on Big AG, or the meat industry, or the car-centric transportation system that consumes so much of this land, spreads us out, and makes a lot of money doing it. They’ll never take on the for-profit housing industry that makes life so expensive, or the healthcare industry, and the list goes on. Instead they’ll pull vile, ecofascist moves like attempting to blame homeless people for the LA fires instead of climate change. That kind of dangerous and disgusting scapegoating is the biggest red flag that you’re dealing with when it comes to ecofascism, as is the obfuscation of the real problem, namely the climate crisis.Trump’s administration has set in motion numerous moves to attack the environment, harm our climate, and hand out cash to the fossil fuel and tech industries. Oil and gas production hitting record highs, the massive environmental damage done to Gaza, and the tech industry’s vast harms to the Congo all occurred under the Biden administration, but now we also have to contend with ecofascism, total climate denial, and numerous new climate related attacks.So know that there is enough. Know that the most vulnerable among us are never the cause of your problems. Know to assign blame to the powerful and their systems, rather than the relatively powerless. Do not get distracted by scapegoating and fascist rhetoric. The villains are clear. The fossil fuel industry has known about the impending climate crisis, and their role in it, for 50 years. They’ve just chosen profit over this planet, and the people on it. We need a movement that beats back fascism and institutes a system that prioritizes life more than the dollar. It’s our one and only way out. No other lies, distractions, no amount of throwing people under the bus will get us where we need to go. Solidarity alone will bring us to collective liberation."
}
,
"relatedposts": [
{
"title" : "Black Liberation Views on Palestine",
"author" : "EIP Editors",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/black-liberation-on-palestine",
"date" : "2025-10-17 09:01:00 -0400",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/mandela-keffiyeh.jpg",
"excerpt" : "",
"content" : "In understanding global politics, it is important to look at Black liberation struggles as one important source of moral perspective. So, when looking at Palestine, we look to Black leaders to see how they perceived the Palestinian struggle in relation to theirs, from the 1960’s to today.Why must we understand where the injustice lies? Because, as Desmond Tutu famously said, “If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.”{% for person in site.data.quotes-black-liberation-palestine %}{{ person.name }}{% for quote in person.quotes %}“{{ quote.text }}”{% if quote.source %}— {{ quote.source }}{% endif %}{% endfor %}{% endfor %}"
}
,
{
"title" : "First Anniversary Celebration of EIP",
"author" : "EIP Editors",
"category" : "events",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/1st-anniversary-of-eip",
"date" : "2025-10-14 18:01:00 -0400",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/WSA_EIP_Launch_Cover.jpg",
"excerpt" : "Celebrating One Year of Independent Publishing",
"content" : "Celebrating One Year of Independent PublishingJoin Everything is Political on November 21st for the launch of our End-of-Year Special Edition Magazine.This members-only evening will feature a benefit dinner, cocktails, and live performances in celebration of a year of independent media, critical voices, and collective resistance.The EventNovember 21, 2025, 7-11pmLower Manhattan, New YorkLaunching our End-of-Year Special Edition MagazineSpecial appearances and performancesFood & Drink includedTickets are extremely limited, reserve yours now!Become an annual print member: get x back issues of EIP, receive the End-of-Year Special Edition Magazine, and come to the Anniversary Celebration.$470Already a member? Sign in to get your special offer. Buy Ticket $150 Just $50 ! and get the End-of-Year Special Edition Magazine Buy ticket $150 and get the End-of-Year Special Edition Magazine "
}
,
{
"title" : "Miu Miu Transforms the Apron From Trad Wife to Boss Lady: The sexiest thing in Paris was a work garment",
"author" : "Khaoula Ghanem",
"category" : "",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/miu-miu-transforms-the-apron-from-trad-wife-to-boss-lady",
"date" : "2025-10-14 13:05:00 -0400",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/Cover_EIP_MiuMiu_Apron.jpg",
"excerpt" : "Miuccia Prada has a habit of taking the least “fashion” thing in the room and making it the argument. For Spring 2026 at Miu Miu, the argument is the apron; staged not as a coy retro flourish but as a total system. The show’s mise-en-scène read like a canteen or factory floor with melamine-like tables, rationalist severity, a whiff of cleaning fluid. In other words, a runway designed to force a conversation about labor before any sparkle could distract us.",
"content" : "Miuccia Prada has a habit of taking the least “fashion” thing in the room and making it the argument. For Spring 2026 at Miu Miu, the argument is the apron; staged not as a coy retro flourish but as a total system. The show’s mise-en-scène read like a canteen or factory floor with melamine-like tables, rationalist severity, a whiff of cleaning fluid. In other words, a runway designed to force a conversation about labor before any sparkle could distract us.From the opening look—German actress Sandra Hüller in a utilitarian deep-blue apron layered over a barn jacket and neat blue shirting—the thesis was loud: the “cover” becomes the thing itself. As silhouettes marched on, aprons multiplied and mutated—industrial drill cotton with front pockets, raw canvas, taffeta and cloqué silk, lace-edged versions that flirted with lingerie, even black leather and crystal-studded incarnations that reframed function as ornament. What the apron traditionally shields (clothes, bodies, “the good dress”) was inverted; the protection became the prized surface. Prada herself spelled it out: “The apron is my favorite piece of clothing… it symbolizes women, from factories through to serving to the home.”Miu Miu Spring 2026 Ready-to-Wear. SuppliedThis inversion matters historically. The apron’s earliest fashion-adjacent life was industrial. It served as a barrier against grease, heat, stain. It was a token of paid and unpaid care. Miu Miu tapped that lineage directly (canvas, work belts, D-ring hardware), then sliced it against domestic codes (florals, ruffles, crochet), and finally pushed into nightlife with bejeweled and leather bibs. The garment’s migration across materials made its social migrations visible. It is a kitchen apron, yes, but also one for labs, hospitals, and factories; the set and styling insisted on that plurality.What makes the apron such a loaded emblem is not just what it covers, but what it reveals about who has always been working. Before industrialization formalized labor into factory shifts and wages, women were already performing invisible labour, the kind that doesn’t exist on payrolls but sits at the foundation of every functioning society. They were cooking, cleaning, raising children, nursing the ill. These tasks were foundational to every economy and yet absent from every ledger. Even when women entered the industrial workforce, from textile plants to wartime assembly lines, their domestic responsibilities did not disappear, they doubled. In that context, the apron here is a quiet manifesto for the strength that goes unrecorded, unthanked, and yet keeps civilization running.The algorithmic rise of the “tradwife,” the influencer economy that packages domesticity as soft power, is the contemporary cultural shadow here. Miu Miu’s apron refuses that rehearsal. In fact, it’s intentionally awkward—oversized, undone, worn over bikinis or with sturdy shoes—so the viewer can’t flatten it into Pinterest-ready nostalgia. Critics noted the collection as a reclamation, a rebuttal to the flattening forces of the feed: the apron as a uniform for endurance rather than submission. The show notes framed it simply as “a consideration of the work of women,” a reminder that the invisible economies of effort—paid, unpaid, emotional—still structure daily life.If that sounds unusually explicit for a luxury runway, consider the designer. Prada trained as a mime at Milan’s Piccolo Teatro, earned a PhD in political science, joined the Italian Communist Party, and was active in the women’s rights movement in 1970s Milan. Those facts are not trivia; they are the grammar of her clothes. Decades of “ugly chic” were, essentially, a slow campaign against easy consumption and default beauty. In 2026, the apron becomes the newest dialect. An emblem drawn from leftist feminist history, recoded into a product that still has to sell. That tension—belief versus business—is the Miuccia paradox, and it’s precisely why these aprons read as statements, not trends.The runway narrative traced a journey from function to fetish. Early looks were squarely utilitarian—thick cottons, pocketed bibs—before migrating toward fragility and sparkle. Lace aprons laid transparently over swimmers; crystal-studded aprons slipped across cocktail territory; leather apron-dresses stiffened posture into armor. The sequencing proposed the same silhouette can encode labor, intimacy, and spectacle depending on fabrication. If most brands smuggle “workwear” in as set dressing, Miu Miu forced it onto the body as the central garment and an unmissable reminder that the feminine is often asked to be both shield and display at once.It’s instructive to read this collection against the house’s last mega-viral object: the micro-mini of Spring 2022, a pleated, raw-hem wafer that colonized timelines and magazine covers. That skirt’s thesis was exposure—hip bones and hemlines as post-lockdown spectacle, Y2K nostalgia framed as liberation-lite. The apron, ironically, covers. Where the micro-mini trafficked in the optics of freedom (and the speed of virality), the apron asks about the conditions that make freedom possible: who launders, who cooks, who cares? To move from “look at me” to “who is working here?” is a pivot from optics to ethics, without abandoning desire. (The aprons are, after all, deeply covetable.) In a platform economy that still rewards the shortest hemline with the biggest click-through, this is a sophisticated counter-program.Yet the designer is not romanticizing toil. There’s wit in the ruffles and perversity in the crystals; neither negate labor, they metabolize it. The most striking image is the apron treated as couture-adjacent. Traditionally, an apron protects the precious thing beneath; here, the apron is the precious thing. You could call that hypocrisy—luxurizing the uniform of workers. Or, strategy, insisting that the symbols of care and effort deserve visibility and investment.Of course, none of this exists in a vacuum. The “tradwife” script thrives because it is aesthetically legible and commercially scalable. It packages gender ideology as moodboard. Miu Miu counters with garments whose legibility flickers. The collection’s best looks ask viewers to reconcile tenderness with toughness, convenience with care, which is exactly the mental choreography demanded of women in every context from office to home to online.If you wanted a season-defining “It” item, you’ll still find it. The apron is poised to proliferate across fast-fashion and luxury alike. But the deeper success is structural: Miu Miu re-centered labor as an aesthetic category. That’s rarer than a viral skirt. It’s a reminder that clothes don’t merely decorate life, they describe and negotiate it. In making the apron the subject rather than the prop, Prada turned a garment of service into a platform for agency. It’s precisely the kind of cultural recursion you’d expect from a designer shaped by feminist politics, who never stopped treating fashion as an instrument of thought as much as style.The last image to hold onto is deceptively simple: a woman in an apron, neither fetishized nor infantilized, striding, hands free. Not a costume for nostalgia, not a meme for the feed, but a working uniform reframed, respected, and suddenly, undeniably beautiful. That is Miu Miu’s provocation for Spring 2026: the work behind the work, made visible at last."
}
]
}