Digital & Print Membership
Yearly + Receive 8 free printed back issues
$420 Annually
Monthly + Receive 3 free printed back issues
$40 Monthly
Excerpts From
“ON THE ZERO LINE”
Excerpts from “On the Zero Line”, Tariq Asrawi et al, published by Slow Factory and Isolarii.
The entries in On the Zero Line were written in the immediate aftermath of Israel’s invasion of Gaza in October, 2023. Given how the situation has worsened, from the increasing severity of famine in Gaza to the scores of civilians shot dead while seeking food at distribution points, one might say these entries are “outdated,” and in a sense they are; an anthology of writing from Gaza written in late 2025 would look different to this one. In another sense, however, the entries included here are not altered by a change in Gaza’s situation, because they are concerned with questions and themes that extend far into the past, and far into the future.
This anthology was compiled in the original Arabic by Tariq Asrawi of Tibaq Publishing, based in the Occupied “West Bank” in Palestine. At this current moment, he is unable to account for the whereabouts of all the authors included in the anthology. The very existence of this anthology is an act of cultural persistence and a rejection of cultural hegemony. In the wake of a catastrophe designed not only to destroy lives but also to erase the cultural landscape of a people, to publish these voices is to resist. When libraries are shelled, and literary institutions all over Europe reveal themselves as determined to repress any mention of Palestine, the act of putting ink to paper asserts that Palestinian thought and literature cannot be obliterated. By translating and publishing this collection, we hope to support a fundamental element of Palestinian self-determination: the preservation and continuation of its cultural infrastructure.
On Returning
IBRAHIM MATAR
I wonder, will I survive long enough to return to my beloved Gaza? Will I return to the simple things I love?
To return to walk long in its streets, or to sit by the seaside first thing in the morning, pondering the blue of the wide sea and enormous space of the sky—knowing that sky and sea are our one and only vent out into the wider world.
To return to hear music by the sea, to sit with my friends, speaking, laughing, making fun of the world, singing, telling stories until morning?
Will I return to sit again in that café with the phenomenal coffee and sublime nutella cake? Will I feel again that I’m in the most beautiful city in the world? Will I return to sit with my mother and watch the sun meet the ocean, the two of us celebrating the central moment of recurring beauty in her life? Will we walk again on chilled nights, the breeze tingling on our cheeks, spray grazing our fingers?
Will we slow down in the Rimal neighborhood, relishing the walk through Omar Al-Mukhtar Market? Will we return to our favorite meal, a hot falafel sandwich from Al-Sousi and a lemon ice from Kazem Ice Cream—the most incredible combination in the world?
Will we go to class at the university, then stroll through the battalion park, watching grass turn from bright to darker green, breathing pure oxygen, the air conditioning of the trees and the sea “switched on,” as Uncle Abu Ahmed says when he prepares our tea?
Will men return to the port to buy fresh fish at six in the morning? Will we eat again until our stomachs and souls are full?
Will a gentle family stretching from grandfather to child carry again their wide raft to the beach on Friday morning, then stay til nightfall and let the salt and sand mingle in the children’s breaths as they play and rejoice to total exhaustion?
Will I return to take my morning walk without fear of being snatched away by a missile? Will I dream again of becoming the champion of my gym, then go shopping at the most beautiful mall in the world, Carrefour?
Will the thought ever again occur that Gaza, the most magnificent city in existence, is all I could ever need, is enough to quench my furthest hopes of fulfillment? Will I ever long not to be away from Gaza, if only to be close to my father and mother, to our tree and our house?
Will we ever return to our alleys and walkways, without the fear of meeting dead bodies, broken trees, and buildings collapsed on the ground? Will we ever walk again across our own smooth asphalt? Will we return from this nightmare?
On Writing a Will
AHMAD ISSA
We are terrorists. That is what they call us and, certainly, I have no choice but to believe the Zionist narrative. Surely, the Israeli media machine knows more than I ever could. I should believe that my wife, who expertly prepares the maqluba, is a terrorist, and her maqluba a weapon of mass destruction. My wife, who waits all day for me to return from work, forever ensuring the house is tidy and the food prepared, is a terrorist in denial of Israel’s right to exist. My only son, Fares, who came to us after seventeen years of waiting, and seven rounds of IVF—I must believe that he is a terrorist too, this little boy, not yet two years old, who is still learning to speak; who, when I left him with my wife’s family at the start of the war, had learned only a few words in Arabic and English, those for the numbers, animals, and colors; who, when I visited him yesterday, had learned new words: “plane,” “missile,” “bomb”, all muttered fearfully as he trembled through the reverberations of explosions near and far, searching constantly for his mother’s arms. As I hold him and weep for his stolen childhood, I should accept what members of the Israeli Knesset say—that this child deserves to die, for clearly, if he were to grow up, he’d be yet another terrorist. His killing, of course, is justified as an act of self- defense. Those who expelled me from my home must be able to defend themselves. Those who have possessed this land cannot have “rights”—here, family, childhood and basic humanity do not exist.
I had grown used to coming home from work to find Fares sitting on his little chair in front of the house, waiting for me and the lollipops and chocolates I’d bring him. The moment he saw me, he’d come running into my arms. His attachment to me is natural, like mine to him. I can’t imagine life without him, but that is the possibility I must live with, even if the thought forces tears down my face.
Ok, I tell myself. Alright. Maybe, in the best case, we just lose the house. But maybe I’ll lose my wife and son. Maybe I’ll die. Maybe my child will live as an orphan. Maybe, quite possibly, all three of us will die together.
I think too often about the moment the missile strikes. Is it painful? Will my child suffer? Will he have any notion of what’s happening? Could I possibly shield him? Could my body cradle him from the power of a one-ton bomb? Then, another thought—what if we die, then meet again in heaven? Could our family be reunited? Could we gather again to eat dinner and watch a movie at night, as we always have?
We terrorists practice our distinct terrorist rituals. Every night, we prepare the nuts and popcorn, turn off the lights, and watch an Arabic or American film. Something by the silent Arabs, or by the America that underwrites our extermination, that arms the occupier with bombs, missiles, gear, and soldiers.
The world forms leagues against us as if we were a nuclear superpower, not a helpless people yearning for freedom, ordinary and simple in our needs for food, roofs over our heads, dignity and life on our own land—even on the land that is not our original homeland, but the site of our first displacement, the place where we have watched our hopes of return to our original villages fade into an almost impossible dream.
I left behind hundreds of pages of novels I was drafting. In my writing, I used to traverse great distances, to dream of different lands beyond this occupation. I wrote about the future, about science, fantasy, technology. Sometimes Gaza brought me back to reality, but on some nights my imagination drifted very freely. I wrote constantly. I lived a thousand lives and a thousand possible futures. I traversed dimensions, alighted in spacecraft, pierced wormholes in spacetime, battled monsters from the depths of history. But my son has never known any of this. I hoped to leave behind a large library that he might read in full one day. I wanted to tell him, someday soon, with pride, that his father was a writer. I wanted him to read my work, and, maybe ten or twenty years from now, to hear his opinion of what I wrote. It would be the most valuable feedback I’d ever receive, more meaningful than anything from critics and academics.
Will any of this happen? We don’t know. The bombing makes no distinctions among us, between resistance fighters or civilians. Everything is struck down. Death from every direction. You can’t even see your enemy: death is delivered by a mythical beast above the clouds, spewing down fire that engulfs each and every civilian—if anyone does survive the conflagration, they must face it again the next day.
Survival remains a possibility—a faint, distant one. Maybe I’ll make it, but if so, how then to go on living after the loss of so many friends, and so much of my family?
Since I am likely to die, I think to myself, I should write a will. And yet I cannot leave behind a will—because how am I to know who will survive this massacre? Me? My wife? My child? Who will be left for me to entrust with anything, or to instill with the power to entrust things to others? I don’t know. Perhaps I could simply write, “Forgive me.” But who will remain in my homeland to forgive or withhold forgiveness? Again, I don’t know. Our dreams are pulverised above our heads. The homes we built crumble around us. Our lives hang on the pressing of buttons by pilots who never see the faces below. If they could see the eyes of their victims, would they still do it? Would they press the button?
This question will never be answered. Civilization, I know, is a lie. The world fails to be human. It has revealed its true face. It has revealed the fiction of the claims of the supposedly civilized. The lie is put, ultimately, to any claim of goodness. This world is not suited for our life within it—so then, should we die content, if this world is so base that we cannot live within it?
{
"article":
{
"title" : "Excerpts From: “ON THE ZERO LINE”",
"author" : "Ibrahim Matar, Ahmad Issa",
"category" : "excerpts",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/on-the-zero-line",
"date" : "2025-11-21 09:00:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/on-the-zero-line-thumb.jpg",
"excerpt" : "Excerpts from “On the Zero Line”, Tariq Asrawi et al, published by Slow Factory and Isolarii.",
"content" : "Excerpts from “On the Zero Line”, Tariq Asrawi et al, published by Slow Factory and Isolarii.The entries in On the Zero Line were written in the immediate aftermath of Israel’s invasion of Gaza in October, 2023. Given how the situation has worsened, from the increasing severity of famine in Gaza to the scores of civilians shot dead while seeking food at distribution points, one might say these entries are “outdated,” and in a sense they are; an anthology of writing from Gaza written in late 2025 would look different to this one. In another sense, however, the entries included here are not altered by a change in Gaza’s situation, because they are concerned with questions and themes that extend far into the past, and far into the future.This anthology was compiled in the original Arabic by Tariq Asrawi of Tibaq Publishing, based in the Occupied “West Bank” in Palestine. At this current moment, he is unable to account for the whereabouts of all the authors included in the anthology. The very existence of this anthology is an act of cultural persistence and a rejection of cultural hegemony. In the wake of a catastrophe designed not only to destroy lives but also to erase the cultural landscape of a people, to publish these voices is to resist. When libraries are shelled, and literary institutions all over Europe reveal themselves as determined to repress any mention of Palestine, the act of putting ink to paper asserts that Palestinian thought and literature cannot be obliterated. By translating and publishing this collection, we hope to support a fundamental element of Palestinian self-determination: the preservation and continuation of its cultural infrastructure.On ReturningIBRAHIM MATARI wonder, will I survive long enough to return to my beloved Gaza? Will I return to the simple things I love?To return to walk long in its streets, or to sit by the seaside first thing in the morning, pondering the blue of the wide sea and enormous space of the sky—knowing that sky and sea are our one and only vent out into the wider world.To return to hear music by the sea, to sit with my friends, speaking, laughing, making fun of the world, singing, telling stories until morning?Will I return to sit again in that café with the phenomenal coffee and sublime nutella cake? Will I feel again that I’m in the most beautiful city in the world? Will I return to sit with my mother and watch the sun meet the ocean, the two of us celebrating the central moment of recurring beauty in her life? Will we walk again on chilled nights, the breeze tingling on our cheeks, spray grazing our fingers?Will we slow down in the Rimal neighborhood, relishing the walk through Omar Al-Mukhtar Market? Will we return to our favorite meal, a hot falafel sandwich from Al-Sousi and a lemon ice from Kazem Ice Cream—the most incredible combination in the world?Will we go to class at the university, then stroll through the battalion park, watching grass turn from bright to darker green, breathing pure oxygen, the air conditioning of the trees and the sea “switched on,” as Uncle Abu Ahmed says when he prepares our tea?Will men return to the port to buy fresh fish at six in the morning? Will we eat again until our stomachs and souls are full?Will a gentle family stretching from grandfather to child carry again their wide raft to the beach on Friday morning, then stay til nightfall and let the salt and sand mingle in the children’s breaths as they play and rejoice to total exhaustion?Will I return to take my morning walk without fear of being snatched away by a missile? Will I dream again of becoming the champion of my gym, then go shopping at the most beautiful mall in the world, Carrefour?Will the thought ever again occur that Gaza, the most magnificent city in existence, is all I could ever need, is enough to quench my furthest hopes of fulfillment? Will I ever long not to be away from Gaza, if only to be close to my father and mother, to our tree and our house?Will we ever return to our alleys and walkways, without the fear of meeting dead bodies, broken trees, and buildings collapsed on the ground? Will we ever walk again across our own smooth asphalt? Will we return from this nightmare?On Writing a WillAHMAD ISSAWe are terrorists. That is what they call us and, certainly, I have no choice but to believe the Zionist narrative. Surely, the Israeli media machine knows more than I ever could. I should believe that my wife, who expertly prepares the maqluba, is a terrorist, and her maqluba a weapon of mass destruction. My wife, who waits all day for me to return from work, forever ensuring the house is tidy and the food prepared, is a terrorist in denial of Israel’s right to exist. My only son, Fares, who came to us after seventeen years of waiting, and seven rounds of IVF—I must believe that he is a terrorist too, this little boy, not yet two years old, who is still learning to speak; who, when I left him with my wife’s family at the start of the war, had learned only a few words in Arabic and English, those for the numbers, animals, and colors; who, when I visited him yesterday, had learned new words: “plane,” “missile,” “bomb”, all muttered fearfully as he trembled through the reverberations of explosions near and far, searching constantly for his mother’s arms. As I hold him and weep for his stolen childhood, I should accept what members of the Israeli Knesset say—that this child deserves to die, for clearly, if he were to grow up, he’d be yet another terrorist. His killing, of course, is justified as an act of self- defense. Those who expelled me from my home must be able to defend themselves. Those who have possessed this land cannot have “rights”—here, family, childhood and basic humanity do not exist.I had grown used to coming home from work to find Fares sitting on his little chair in front of the house, waiting for me and the lollipops and chocolates I’d bring him. The moment he saw me, he’d come running into my arms. His attachment to me is natural, like mine to him. I can’t imagine life without him, but that is the possibility I must live with, even if the thought forces tears down my face.Ok, I tell myself. Alright. Maybe, in the best case, we just lose the house. But maybe I’ll lose my wife and son. Maybe I’ll die. Maybe my child will live as an orphan. Maybe, quite possibly, all three of us will die together.I think too often about the moment the missile strikes. Is it painful? Will my child suffer? Will he have any notion of what’s happening? Could I possibly shield him? Could my body cradle him from the power of a one-ton bomb? Then, another thought—what if we die, then meet again in heaven? Could our family be reunited? Could we gather again to eat dinner and watch a movie at night, as we always have?We terrorists practice our distinct terrorist rituals. Every night, we prepare the nuts and popcorn, turn off the lights, and watch an Arabic or American film. Something by the silent Arabs, or by the America that underwrites our extermination, that arms the occupier with bombs, missiles, gear, and soldiers.The world forms leagues against us as if we were a nuclear superpower, not a helpless people yearning for freedom, ordinary and simple in our needs for food, roofs over our heads, dignity and life on our own land—even on the land that is not our original homeland, but the site of our first displacement, the place where we have watched our hopes of return to our original villages fade into an almost impossible dream.I left behind hundreds of pages of novels I was drafting. In my writing, I used to traverse great distances, to dream of different lands beyond this occupation. I wrote about the future, about science, fantasy, technology. Sometimes Gaza brought me back to reality, but on some nights my imagination drifted very freely. I wrote constantly. I lived a thousand lives and a thousand possible futures. I traversed dimensions, alighted in spacecraft, pierced wormholes in spacetime, battled monsters from the depths of history. But my son has never known any of this. I hoped to leave behind a large library that he might read in full one day. I wanted to tell him, someday soon, with pride, that his father was a writer. I wanted him to read my work, and, maybe ten or twenty years from now, to hear his opinion of what I wrote. It would be the most valuable feedback I’d ever receive, more meaningful than anything from critics and academics.Will any of this happen? We don’t know. The bombing makes no distinctions among us, between resistance fighters or civilians. Everything is struck down. Death from every direction. You can’t even see your enemy: death is delivered by a mythical beast above the clouds, spewing down fire that engulfs each and every civilian—if anyone does survive the conflagration, they must face it again the next day.Survival remains a possibility—a faint, distant one. Maybe I’ll make it, but if so, how then to go on living after the loss of so many friends, and so much of my family?Since I am likely to die, I think to myself, I should write a will. And yet I cannot leave behind a will—because how am I to know who will survive this massacre? Me? My wife? My child? Who will be left for me to entrust with anything, or to instill with the power to entrust things to others? I don’t know. Perhaps I could simply write, “Forgive me.” But who will remain in my homeland to forgive or withhold forgiveness? Again, I don’t know. Our dreams are pulverised above our heads. The homes we built crumble around us. Our lives hang on the pressing of buttons by pilots who never see the faces below. If they could see the eyes of their victims, would they still do it? Would they press the button?This question will never be answered. Civilization, I know, is a lie. The world fails to be human. It has revealed its true face. It has revealed the fiction of the claims of the supposedly civilized. The lie is put, ultimately, to any claim of goodness. This world is not suited for our life within it—so then, should we die content, if this world is so base that we cannot live within it?"
}
,
"relatedposts": [
{
"title" : "aja monet’s new single: “hollyweird”",
"author" : "aja monet",
"category" : "visual",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/aja-monet-hollyweird-release",
"date" : "2026-02-19 05:00:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/aja-monet---Hollyweird-_-Single-Art.jpg",
"excerpt" : "Surrealist blues poet aja monet shares her first new music since 2023 with the release of her timely new single “hollyweird” via drink sum wtr. The track, produced by monet, Meshell Ndegeocello and Justin Brown, arrives with a bold video directed by B+ and Monet herself, and features Chicago rapper and close collaborator, Vic Mensa.",
"content" : "Surrealist blues poet aja monet shares her first new music since 2023 with the release of her timely new single “hollyweird” via drink sum wtr. The track, produced by monet, Meshell Ndegeocello and Justin Brown, arrives with a bold video directed by B+ and Monet herself, and features Chicago rapper and close collaborator, Vic Mensa.“I wrote ‘hollyweird’ on scraps of found paper, frantically jotting down observations and sentiments of the moment during the Los Angeles fires and its aftermath,” monet explains. “The song is an Afropunkesque ode to frustrations and feelings around our current culture of social isolation and performative solidarity. I wanted to speak to the emptiness of ‘hollyweird’ not as a place but as a way of being where insincerity is normalized. Where social interactions become void in of sincerity and we lose sight of community and connection.”“hollyweird” is the first taste of new music from monet since the release of her debut album, when the poems do what they do, in 2023. The album was released by drink sum wtr to wide critical praise and was nominated at the 66th GRAMMY Awards for Best Spoken Word Poetry Album in 2024. The album marked the arrival of a singular poet and peerless lyricist. On it, monet explored themes of resistance, love, and the inexhaustible quest for joy.monet is bringing her singular live show to New York City’s famed Carnegie Hall Theater. The show will take place at the Zankel Hall on May 20th.Get the track on all digital platforms here"
}
,
{
"title" : "How to Resist “Organized Loneliness”: resisting isolation in the age of digital authoritarianism ",
"author" : "Emma Cieslik",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/how-to-resist-organized-loneliness",
"date" : "2026-02-13 15:11:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/American_protesters_in_front_of_White_House-11.jpg",
"excerpt" : "Over the past year, many of us have encountered, navigated, and processed violence alone on our phones. We watched videos of Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti being fatally shot and Liam Conejo Ramos being detained by ICE agents. These photos and videos triggered anger, sadness, and desperation for many (along with frustration that these deaths were the inciting blow against ICE agents that have killed many more people of color this year and last).",
"content" : "Over the past year, many of us have encountered, navigated, and processed violence alone on our phones. We watched videos of Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti being fatally shot and Liam Conejo Ramos being detained by ICE agents. These photos and videos triggered anger, sadness, and desperation for many (along with frustration that these deaths were the inciting blow against ICE agents that have killed many more people of color this year and last).While the institutions and people committing these crimes do not want them recorded, the Department of Homeland Security and the wider Trump administration is using “organized loneliness,” a totalitarian tool that seeks to distort peoples’ perception of reality. Although seemingly a symptom of COVID-19 pandemic isolation and living in a more social media focused world, “organized loneliness” is being weaponized to change the way people not only engage with violence but respond to it online, simultaneously desensitizing us to bodily trauma and escalating radicalization and recruitment online.Back in 2022, philosopher Samantha Rose Hill argued that the loneliness epidemic sparked by the COVID-19 pandemic could and would have dangerous consequences. She specifically cites Hannah Arendt’s 1951 book The Origins of Totalitarianism, which argued that authoritarian leaders like Hitler and Stalin weaponized people’s loneliness to exert control over them. Arendt was a Jewish woman who barely escaped Nazi Germany.As Hill told Steve Paulson for “To The Best Of Our Knowledge,” “the organized loneliness that underlies totalitarian movements destroys people’s relationship to reality. Their political propaganda makes it difficult for people to trust their own opinions and perceptions of reality.” Because as Arendt wrote, “the ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the convinced Communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction and the distinction between true and false no longer exist.”But there are ways in which we can resist the threat that “organized loneliness” represents, especially in the age of social media. They include acknowledging this campaign of loneliness, taking proactive steps when engaging with others online, and fostering relationships with friends and our communities to stand in solidarity amidst the rise of fascism.1. The first step is accepting that loneliness affects everyone and can be exploited by authoritarian movements.Many of us know this intimately. Back in 2023, the U.S. Surgeon General flagged an already dire loneliness epidemic, that in combination with a transition of most interaction onto social media, changes the way in which we engage with violence and tragedy online. But it can be hard to admit that loneliness affects us, especially when we are constantly connected through social media. It’s important to admit that even for the most digitally literate and active among us, “organized loneliness” not only can occur but especially occurs on social media.Being susceptible to or affected by “organized loneliness” is not a moral shortcoming or a personal failure but acknowledging it and taking steps to connect with one another is the one way we resist totalitarian regimes.2. Next, take social media breaks–and avoid doomscrooling.Even before the advent of social media or online news outlets, Arendt was warning about how loneliness can become a breeding ground for downward spirals. She explains that the constant consumption of tragic, violent, and deeply upsetting news–and watching it unfold in front of us can not only be overstimulating but can desensitize us and disconnect us from reality.While it can be difficult when most of our social lives exist on social media (this will be unpacked later), experts recommend that people limit using social media to less than two hours per day and avoid using it during the first hour after waking up and the last hour before going to sleep. People can use apps that limit overall screen time or restrict access to social media at set times–the best being Opal, One Sec, Forest, and StayFree. People can also use these apps to limit access to specific websites that might include triggering news.But it’s important to recognize that avoiding doomscrooling does not give people license not to stay informed or to look away from atrocities that are not affecting their communities.3. Resist social media echo-chambers by diversifying your algorithm.When you are on social media, however, it’s important to recognize that AI-based algorithms track what we engage with and show us similar content. People can use a VPN to search without creating a record that AI can track and thus offer us like offerings, but while the most pronounced (and reported on) examples focus on White, cis straight men and the Manoverse, echochambers can affect all of us and shift our perception of publicly shared beliefs.People can resist echo-chambers by seeking out new sources and accounts that offer different, fact-based perspectives but also acknowledge their commitment to resisting fascism, such as Ground News, ProPublica, and Truthout. Another idea is to follow anti-fascist online educators like Saffana Monajed who promote and share lessons for media literacy. People can also do this by cultivating their intellectual humility, or the recognition that your awareness has limits based largely on your own experiences and privileges and your beliefs could be wrong. Fearless Culture Design has some great tips.While encountering and engaging different perspectives is vital to resisting echochambers and social algorithms, this is not an invitation to follow or platform any news outlet, content creator, or commentator that denies your or other people’s personhood.4. Cultivate your friendships and make new ones.In a time when many of us only stay in contact with friends through social media, friendships are more important than ever. Try, if you can, to engage friends outside of social media–whether it’s through in-person meet ups (dinners, parties, game nights) or on digital platforms that are not social media-based, for example coordinating meet-ups over Zoom or Skype. This can be a virtual D&D campaign, craft circle, or a virtual book club. While these may seem like silly events throughout the week, they help build real connection.It’s important to connect with people outside of a space that uses an algorithm to design content and to reinforce that people are three-dimensional (not just a two-dimensional representation of a social media profile). There are even some apps that assist with this goal, such as Connect, a web app designed by MIT graduate students Mohammad Ghassemi and Tuka Al Hanai to bring students from diverse backgrounds together for lunch conversations.Arendt writes that totalitarian domination destroys not only political life but also private life as well. Cultivating friendships–and relationships of solidarity with your neighbors and fellow community members–are the ways in which we not only resist the destruction of private relationships but also reinforce that we and others belong in our communities–and that we can achieve great things when we stand together!5. With this in mind, practice intentional solidarity with one another.While it’s likely no surprise, fascism functions to both establish a nationalist identity that breeds extremism and destroy unification and rebellion against authority. The best way to resist the isolation that totalitarian governments breed is to practice intentional acts of solidarity with marginalized communities, especially communities facing systemic violence at the hands of an authoritarian power.Writer and advocate Deepa Iyer discusses the importance of action-based solidarity in her program Solidarity Is, part of the Building Movement Project, and Solidarity Is This Podcast (co-hosted with Adaku Utah) discusses and models a solidarity journey that foregrounds marginalized communities. I highly recommend reading her Solidarity Is Practice Guide and the Solidarity Syllabus, a blog series that Iyer just started this month to highlight lessons, resources, and ideas of how to cultivate solidarity within your own communities.6. Consume locally and ethically, and reject capitalist productivity.And one way that people can stand in solidarity with their communities is to support local small businesses that invest back into the communities. When totalitarianism strips people of many platforms to voice concern, one of the last remaining power people have is how and where they spend their money. Often, this is what draws the most attention and impact, so it’s important to buy (and sell) based on Iyer’s Solidarity Stances and to also resist the ways in which productivity culture not only disempowers community but devalues human labor.At the heart of Arendt’s criticism of totalitarian domination is the ways in which capitalism, a “tyranny over ‘laborers,’” contributes to loneliness itself (pg. 476). Whether intentional or not, this connects to modern campaigns not only of malicious compliance but also purposeful obstinance in which people refuse to labor for a fascist regime but to mobilize their ability to labor as a form of resistance–thinking about the recent walkouts and boycotts that resist by weaponizing our labor and our spending power.Not only should people resist the conflation of a person’s value to their productivity, but they should use their labor–and the economic products of it–as tools of resistance in capitalism.Thankfully as Arendy writes, “totalitarian domination, like tyranny, bears the germs of its own destruction,” so totalitarianism by definition cannot succeed just as humans cannot thrive under the pressure of “organized loneliness.” For this reason, it’s a challenge to hold on and resist the administration using disconnection to garner support for the dehumanization of and violence against human beings. But as long as we do, we have the most powerful tools of resistance–awareness, friendship, community, and solidarity–at our disposal to undo totalitarianism just as it was undone back in the 1940s."
}
,
{
"title" : "A Trail of Soap",
"author" : "susan abulhawa, Diana Islayih",
"category" : "excerpts",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/a-trail-of-soap",
"date" : "2026-02-13 08:40:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/Trail_of_Soap.png",
"excerpt" : "From EVERY MOMENT IS A LIFE compiled by susan abulhawa. Copyright © 2026 by Palestine Writes. Reprinted by permission of One Signal Publishers/Atria Books, an Imprint of Simon Schuster, LLC.",
"content" : "From EVERY MOMENT IS A LIFE compiled by susan abulhawa. Copyright © 2026 by Palestine Writes. Reprinted by permission of One Signal Publishers/Atria Books, an Imprint of Simon Schuster, LLC.Illustration by Rama DuwajiI met Diana Islayih at a series of writing workshops I conducted in Gaza between February and May 2024. She was one of a couple dozen young people who traveled for hours on foot, by donkey cart, or in cars forced to crawl through the crush of displacement. They were all trying to survive an ongoing genocide. Still, they risked Israeli drones and bombs to be there, just to feel human for a few hours, like they belong in this world, to touch the lives they believed they might still have.Soft-spoken and slight, Diana was the only one who recognized me, asking quietly if I was “the real susan abulhawa.” Each writer progressed their piece at their own pace, and would read their work aloud in the workshops to receive group feedback. Diana’s was the only story that emerged almost fully formed, as if it had been waiting for language. She teared up the first time she read it aloud, and again, the second.By the third reading, the tears were gone. “I got used to the indignities,” she told me. “Now I’m used to reading them out loud.” She confessed that she struggled living “a life that doesn’t resemble me.” On our last day together, I reminded her of what she’d said. She smiled ironically. “Now I don’t know if I resemble life,” she said.What follows is Diana’s story, written from inside that unrecognizable life, bearing witness not through spectacle, but through one intimate moment in the unbearable weight of the everyday. — susan abulhawa, editor of Every Moment Is a Life, of which this essay is part.Courtesy of Simon & SchusterI poured yellow liquid dish soap into my left palm, which instinctively cupped into a deep hollow, like a well yearning to be a well once more. I would need to wash my hands after using the toilet near our tent, though the faucet was usually empty. Water had been annihilated alongside people in this genocide, becoming a ghost that graciously deigns to appear to us when it wishes to—one we chase after rather than flee.The miserable toilet was made of four wooden posts, wrapped in a makeshift curtain made from an old scrap of fabric—so sheer you could see silhouettes behind it. A blanket full of holes and splinters served as a “door.”Inside, a concrete slab with a hole in the middle. You need time to convince yourself to enter such a place. The stench alone seizes your eyelids and turns your stomach the moment it creeps into your nose.I thought about going to the damned, distant women’s public toilet. I hated it during the first weeks of our displacement, but it was the only one in the area where you could both relieve yourself and scrub off the dust of misery that clung to every air molecule.It infuriated me that it was wretched and run-down, and the crowding only made it worse—full of sand, soiled toilet paper, and sanitary pads scattered in every corner.“Should I go?” I asked myself, aloud.I decided to go, taking one step forward and two steps back. I’d ask anyone returning from the toilet, “Is there water in the tap today?” and await the answer with the eagerness of a child hoping for candy.“You have to hurry before it runs out!”Or, more often, “There isn’t any.”So we’d all—men, women, and children—arm ourselves with a plastic water bottle, which was a kind of public declaration: “We’re off to the toilet.” We’d also carry a bar of soap in a box, although most people didn’t bother using it since it didn’t lather and was like washing your hands with a rock.I looked up and exhaled, staring into the vast gray nothingness that stared right back at me. Then I stepped out onto the sand across from our ramshackle displacement camp—Karama, “Camp Dignity”—though dignity itself cries out in this filthy, exhausted place, choked with chaos and a desperate scramble to moisten our veins with a drop of life.The road was empty, as it was early morning, and even the clamor of camp life lay dormant at that hour. Still, I couldn’t relax my shoulders—to signal my senses that we were alone, that we were safe. My fingers remained clenched over the yellow dish soap, my hand hanging at my side to keep it from spilling.I crossed the distance to the toilet—step by step, meter by meter, tent by tent. The souls who dwelled in them, just as they were, unchanged, their curious eyes fixed on me. I passed a garbage heap, shaped like a crescent moon, overflowing with all kinds of empty food cans—food that had ruined the linings of our intestines and united us in the agonies of digestion and bowel movements.Something trickled from my palm—a thread of liquid that felt like blood dripping between my fingers, down my wrist in thickening droplets. My hand trembled, and my eyes blurred. I convinced myself—without looking—that it was all in my head, not in my hand, quickened my pace, my heartbeat thudding in my ears.At last, I reached the only two public toilets in the area, one for men and the other for women, both encased in white plastic printed with the blue UNICEF logo.Inside, I was met with the “toilet chronicles”—no less squalid than the toilet itself—unparalleled chatter among women who’d waited long hours in the line together.The old women bemoaned the soft nature of our generation, insisting our condition was a “moral consequence” of our being spoiled.Other women pleaded to be let into the toilet quickly because they were diabetic. They banged on the door with urgency and physical pain, like they would break in and grab the person behind it by the throat, shouting, “When will you come out?!”The woman inside yelled back, “I’m squeezing my guts out! Should I vomit them up too? Have patience! Damn whoever called this a ‘rest room’!”I looked around. A pale-faced woman smiled at me. I returned her smile, but my face quickly stiffened again, as if the muscles scolded me for stretching them into a smile. A voice inside me whispered meanly, What are you both even smiling about?A furious cry rang from the other stall, “Oh my God! Someone is plucking her body hair! What are you doing, you bitch? It’s a toilet! A toilet!”Another voice shot back, “Lower your voice, woman, and hurry up! The child’s crying!”Two little girls stood nearby, with tousled hair, drool marking their cheeks, their eyes half shut. They were crying to use the toilet, clutching their crotches, shifting restlessly in the sandy corridor where we stood.I was trying to push through to the water tap at the end of the hall, attempting to escape this tiresome, tragic theater. As my luck would have it, there was no water. I opened my palm. It too was empty. The yellow dish soap my mother bought yesterday was gone. All that remained was a sticky smear across my left hand and a long thread trailing behind me in the sand. Had it been dripping from my hand all along the way?I twisted the faucet handle back and forth—a futile hope for even a thin thread of water. Not a single drop came.My body sagged under the weight of rage, disappointment, fury, and a storm of unanswerable questions. I rushed through the crowded corridor of angry women, out into the street. I couldn’t hold back tears.I wept, cursing myself and the occupation and Gaza and her sea— the sea I love with a weary, lonely love, just as I’ve always loved everything in this patch of earth.I sobbed the entire way back. Without shame. I didn’t care who saw—not the passersby, not the homes or tents, not the ground I walked on. My grief rained tears on this land on my way there and back.But the land’s thirst is never quenched—neither with our tears, nor with our blood.My eyes were wrung dry from crying by the time I reached our tent. I collapsed on the ground, questions clamoring in my head.Can a homeland also be exile?Can another exile exist within exile?What is home?Is home the homeland itself, the soil of a nation?Or is it the other way around—the homeland is only so if it’s truly home?If the homeland is the home, why do I feel like a stranger in Rafah—a place just ten minutes from my city, Khan Younis?And why did I fear the feeling I had when I imagined myself in our kitchen, where my mother cooked mulukhiya and maqluba for the first time in six months, even though I wasn’t at home—in our house?That day, I said aloud, “Is this what the occupation wants? For me to feel ‘at home’ merely in the memory of home?”How can I feel at home without being there?How can I be outside of my homeland when I’m in it?I looked down at my hand—dry and cracked with January’s chill. The yellow soap liquid had turned into frozen white powder between my fingers."
}
]
}