Digital & Print Membership
Yearly + Receive 8 free printed back issues
$420 Annually
Monthly + Receive 3 free printed back issues
$40 Monthly
Excerpts From
“ON THE ZERO LINE”
Excerpts from “On the Zero Line”, Tariq Asrawi et al, published by Slow Factory and Isolarii.
The entries in On the Zero Line were written in the immediate aftermath of Israel’s invasion of Gaza in October, 2023. Given how the situation has worsened, from the increasing severity of famine in Gaza to the scores of civilians shot dead while seeking food at distribution points, one might say these entries are “outdated,” and in a sense they are; an anthology of writing from Gaza written in late 2025 would look different to this one. In another sense, however, the entries included here are not altered by a change in Gaza’s situation, because they are concerned with questions and themes that extend far into the past, and far into the future.
This anthology was compiled in the original Arabic by Tariq Asrawi of Tibaq Publishing, based in the Occupied “West Bank” in Palestine. At this current moment, he is unable to account for the whereabouts of all the authors included in the anthology. The very existence of this anthology is an act of cultural persistence and a rejection of cultural hegemony. In the wake of a catastrophe designed not only to destroy lives but also to erase the cultural landscape of a people, to publish these voices is to resist. When libraries are shelled, and literary institutions all over Europe reveal themselves as determined to repress any mention of Palestine, the act of putting ink to paper asserts that Palestinian thought and literature cannot be obliterated. By translating and publishing this collection, we hope to support a fundamental element of Palestinian self-determination: the preservation and continuation of its cultural infrastructure.
On Returning
IBRAHIM MATAR
I wonder, will I survive long enough to return to my beloved Gaza? Will I return to the simple things I love?
To return to walk long in its streets, or to sit by the seaside first thing in the morning, pondering the blue of the wide sea and enormous space of the sky—knowing that sky and sea are our one and only vent out into the wider world.
To return to hear music by the sea, to sit with my friends, speaking, laughing, making fun of the world, singing, telling stories until morning?
Will I return to sit again in that café with the phenomenal coffee and sublime nutella cake? Will I feel again that I’m in the most beautiful city in the world? Will I return to sit with my mother and watch the sun meet the ocean, the two of us celebrating the central moment of recurring beauty in her life? Will we walk again on chilled nights, the breeze tingling on our cheeks, spray grazing our fingers?
Will we slow down in the Rimal neighborhood, relishing the walk through Omar Al-Mukhtar Market? Will we return to our favorite meal, a hot falafel sandwich from Al-Sousi and a lemon ice from Kazem Ice Cream—the most incredible combination in the world?
Will we go to class at the university, then stroll through the battalion park, watching grass turn from bright to darker green, breathing pure oxygen, the air conditioning of the trees and the sea “switched on,” as Uncle Abu Ahmed says when he prepares our tea?
Will men return to the port to buy fresh fish at six in the morning? Will we eat again until our stomachs and souls are full?
Will a gentle family stretching from grandfather to child carry again their wide raft to the beach on Friday morning, then stay til nightfall and let the salt and sand mingle in the children’s breaths as they play and rejoice to total exhaustion?
Will I return to take my morning walk without fear of being snatched away by a missile? Will I dream again of becoming the champion of my gym, then go shopping at the most beautiful mall in the world, Carrefour?
Will the thought ever again occur that Gaza, the most magnificent city in existence, is all I could ever need, is enough to quench my furthest hopes of fulfillment? Will I ever long not to be away from Gaza, if only to be close to my father and mother, to our tree and our house?
Will we ever return to our alleys and walkways, without the fear of meeting dead bodies, broken trees, and buildings collapsed on the ground? Will we ever walk again across our own smooth asphalt? Will we return from this nightmare?
On Writing a Will
AHMAD ISSA
We are terrorists. That is what they call us and, certainly, I have no choice but to believe the Zionist narrative. Surely, the Israeli media machine knows more than I ever could. I should believe that my wife, who expertly prepares the maqluba, is a terrorist, and her maqluba a weapon of mass destruction. My wife, who waits all day for me to return from work, forever ensuring the house is tidy and the food prepared, is a terrorist in denial of Israel’s right to exist. My only son, Fares, who came to us after seventeen years of waiting, and seven rounds of IVF—I must believe that he is a terrorist too, this little boy, not yet two years old, who is still learning to speak; who, when I left him with my wife’s family at the start of the war, had learned only a few words in Arabic and English, those for the numbers, animals, and colors; who, when I visited him yesterday, had learned new words: “plane,” “missile,” “bomb”, all muttered fearfully as he trembled through the reverberations of explosions near and far, searching constantly for his mother’s arms. As I hold him and weep for his stolen childhood, I should accept what members of the Israeli Knesset say—that this child deserves to die, for clearly, if he were to grow up, he’d be yet another terrorist. His killing, of course, is justified as an act of self- defense. Those who expelled me from my home must be able to defend themselves. Those who have possessed this land cannot have “rights”—here, family, childhood and basic humanity do not exist.
I had grown used to coming home from work to find Fares sitting on his little chair in front of the house, waiting for me and the lollipops and chocolates I’d bring him. The moment he saw me, he’d come running into my arms. His attachment to me is natural, like mine to him. I can’t imagine life without him, but that is the possibility I must live with, even if the thought forces tears down my face.
Ok, I tell myself. Alright. Maybe, in the best case, we just lose the house. But maybe I’ll lose my wife and son. Maybe I’ll die. Maybe my child will live as an orphan. Maybe, quite possibly, all three of us will die together.
I think too often about the moment the missile strikes. Is it painful? Will my child suffer? Will he have any notion of what’s happening? Could I possibly shield him? Could my body cradle him from the power of a one-ton bomb? Then, another thought—what if we die, then meet again in heaven? Could our family be reunited? Could we gather again to eat dinner and watch a movie at night, as we always have?
We terrorists practice our distinct terrorist rituals. Every night, we prepare the nuts and popcorn, turn off the lights, and watch an Arabic or American film. Something by the silent Arabs, or by the America that underwrites our extermination, that arms the occupier with bombs, missiles, gear, and soldiers.
The world forms leagues against us as if we were a nuclear superpower, not a helpless people yearning for freedom, ordinary and simple in our needs for food, roofs over our heads, dignity and life on our own land—even on the land that is not our original homeland, but the site of our first displacement, the place where we have watched our hopes of return to our original villages fade into an almost impossible dream.
I left behind hundreds of pages of novels I was drafting. In my writing, I used to traverse great distances, to dream of different lands beyond this occupation. I wrote about the future, about science, fantasy, technology. Sometimes Gaza brought me back to reality, but on some nights my imagination drifted very freely. I wrote constantly. I lived a thousand lives and a thousand possible futures. I traversed dimensions, alighted in spacecraft, pierced wormholes in spacetime, battled monsters from the depths of history. But my son has never known any of this. I hoped to leave behind a large library that he might read in full one day. I wanted to tell him, someday soon, with pride, that his father was a writer. I wanted him to read my work, and, maybe ten or twenty years from now, to hear his opinion of what I wrote. It would be the most valuable feedback I’d ever receive, more meaningful than anything from critics and academics.
Will any of this happen? We don’t know. The bombing makes no distinctions among us, between resistance fighters or civilians. Everything is struck down. Death from every direction. You can’t even see your enemy: death is delivered by a mythical beast above the clouds, spewing down fire that engulfs each and every civilian—if anyone does survive the conflagration, they must face it again the next day.
Survival remains a possibility—a faint, distant one. Maybe I’ll make it, but if so, how then to go on living after the loss of so many friends, and so much of my family?
Since I am likely to die, I think to myself, I should write a will. And yet I cannot leave behind a will—because how am I to know who will survive this massacre? Me? My wife? My child? Who will be left for me to entrust with anything, or to instill with the power to entrust things to others? I don’t know. Perhaps I could simply write, “Forgive me.” But who will remain in my homeland to forgive or withhold forgiveness? Again, I don’t know. Our dreams are pulverised above our heads. The homes we built crumble around us. Our lives hang on the pressing of buttons by pilots who never see the faces below. If they could see the eyes of their victims, would they still do it? Would they press the button?
This question will never be answered. Civilization, I know, is a lie. The world fails to be human. It has revealed its true face. It has revealed the fiction of the claims of the supposedly civilized. The lie is put, ultimately, to any claim of goodness. This world is not suited for our life within it—so then, should we die content, if this world is so base that we cannot live within it?
{
"article":
{
"title" : "Excerpts From: “ON THE ZERO LINE”",
"author" : "Ibrahim Matar, Ahmad Issa",
"category" : "excerpts",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/on-the-zero-line",
"date" : "2025-11-21 09:00:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/on-the-zero-line-thumb.jpg",
"excerpt" : "Excerpts from “On the Zero Line”, Tariq Asrawi et al, published by Slow Factory and Isolarii.",
"content" : "Excerpts from “On the Zero Line”, Tariq Asrawi et al, published by Slow Factory and Isolarii.The entries in On the Zero Line were written in the immediate aftermath of Israel’s invasion of Gaza in October, 2023. Given how the situation has worsened, from the increasing severity of famine in Gaza to the scores of civilians shot dead while seeking food at distribution points, one might say these entries are “outdated,” and in a sense they are; an anthology of writing from Gaza written in late 2025 would look different to this one. In another sense, however, the entries included here are not altered by a change in Gaza’s situation, because they are concerned with questions and themes that extend far into the past, and far into the future.This anthology was compiled in the original Arabic by Tariq Asrawi of Tibaq Publishing, based in the Occupied “West Bank” in Palestine. At this current moment, he is unable to account for the whereabouts of all the authors included in the anthology. The very existence of this anthology is an act of cultural persistence and a rejection of cultural hegemony. In the wake of a catastrophe designed not only to destroy lives but also to erase the cultural landscape of a people, to publish these voices is to resist. When libraries are shelled, and literary institutions all over Europe reveal themselves as determined to repress any mention of Palestine, the act of putting ink to paper asserts that Palestinian thought and literature cannot be obliterated. By translating and publishing this collection, we hope to support a fundamental element of Palestinian self-determination: the preservation and continuation of its cultural infrastructure.On ReturningIBRAHIM MATARI wonder, will I survive long enough to return to my beloved Gaza? Will I return to the simple things I love?To return to walk long in its streets, or to sit by the seaside first thing in the morning, pondering the blue of the wide sea and enormous space of the sky—knowing that sky and sea are our one and only vent out into the wider world.To return to hear music by the sea, to sit with my friends, speaking, laughing, making fun of the world, singing, telling stories until morning?Will I return to sit again in that café with the phenomenal coffee and sublime nutella cake? Will I feel again that I’m in the most beautiful city in the world? Will I return to sit with my mother and watch the sun meet the ocean, the two of us celebrating the central moment of recurring beauty in her life? Will we walk again on chilled nights, the breeze tingling on our cheeks, spray grazing our fingers?Will we slow down in the Rimal neighborhood, relishing the walk through Omar Al-Mukhtar Market? Will we return to our favorite meal, a hot falafel sandwich from Al-Sousi and a lemon ice from Kazem Ice Cream—the most incredible combination in the world?Will we go to class at the university, then stroll through the battalion park, watching grass turn from bright to darker green, breathing pure oxygen, the air conditioning of the trees and the sea “switched on,” as Uncle Abu Ahmed says when he prepares our tea?Will men return to the port to buy fresh fish at six in the morning? Will we eat again until our stomachs and souls are full?Will a gentle family stretching from grandfather to child carry again their wide raft to the beach on Friday morning, then stay til nightfall and let the salt and sand mingle in the children’s breaths as they play and rejoice to total exhaustion?Will I return to take my morning walk without fear of being snatched away by a missile? Will I dream again of becoming the champion of my gym, then go shopping at the most beautiful mall in the world, Carrefour?Will the thought ever again occur that Gaza, the most magnificent city in existence, is all I could ever need, is enough to quench my furthest hopes of fulfillment? Will I ever long not to be away from Gaza, if only to be close to my father and mother, to our tree and our house?Will we ever return to our alleys and walkways, without the fear of meeting dead bodies, broken trees, and buildings collapsed on the ground? Will we ever walk again across our own smooth asphalt? Will we return from this nightmare?On Writing a WillAHMAD ISSAWe are terrorists. That is what they call us and, certainly, I have no choice but to believe the Zionist narrative. Surely, the Israeli media machine knows more than I ever could. I should believe that my wife, who expertly prepares the maqluba, is a terrorist, and her maqluba a weapon of mass destruction. My wife, who waits all day for me to return from work, forever ensuring the house is tidy and the food prepared, is a terrorist in denial of Israel’s right to exist. My only son, Fares, who came to us after seventeen years of waiting, and seven rounds of IVF—I must believe that he is a terrorist too, this little boy, not yet two years old, who is still learning to speak; who, when I left him with my wife’s family at the start of the war, had learned only a few words in Arabic and English, those for the numbers, animals, and colors; who, when I visited him yesterday, had learned new words: “plane,” “missile,” “bomb”, all muttered fearfully as he trembled through the reverberations of explosions near and far, searching constantly for his mother’s arms. As I hold him and weep for his stolen childhood, I should accept what members of the Israeli Knesset say—that this child deserves to die, for clearly, if he were to grow up, he’d be yet another terrorist. His killing, of course, is justified as an act of self- defense. Those who expelled me from my home must be able to defend themselves. Those who have possessed this land cannot have “rights”—here, family, childhood and basic humanity do not exist.I had grown used to coming home from work to find Fares sitting on his little chair in front of the house, waiting for me and the lollipops and chocolates I’d bring him. The moment he saw me, he’d come running into my arms. His attachment to me is natural, like mine to him. I can’t imagine life without him, but that is the possibility I must live with, even if the thought forces tears down my face.Ok, I tell myself. Alright. Maybe, in the best case, we just lose the house. But maybe I’ll lose my wife and son. Maybe I’ll die. Maybe my child will live as an orphan. Maybe, quite possibly, all three of us will die together.I think too often about the moment the missile strikes. Is it painful? Will my child suffer? Will he have any notion of what’s happening? Could I possibly shield him? Could my body cradle him from the power of a one-ton bomb? Then, another thought—what if we die, then meet again in heaven? Could our family be reunited? Could we gather again to eat dinner and watch a movie at night, as we always have?We terrorists practice our distinct terrorist rituals. Every night, we prepare the nuts and popcorn, turn off the lights, and watch an Arabic or American film. Something by the silent Arabs, or by the America that underwrites our extermination, that arms the occupier with bombs, missiles, gear, and soldiers.The world forms leagues against us as if we were a nuclear superpower, not a helpless people yearning for freedom, ordinary and simple in our needs for food, roofs over our heads, dignity and life on our own land—even on the land that is not our original homeland, but the site of our first displacement, the place where we have watched our hopes of return to our original villages fade into an almost impossible dream.I left behind hundreds of pages of novels I was drafting. In my writing, I used to traverse great distances, to dream of different lands beyond this occupation. I wrote about the future, about science, fantasy, technology. Sometimes Gaza brought me back to reality, but on some nights my imagination drifted very freely. I wrote constantly. I lived a thousand lives and a thousand possible futures. I traversed dimensions, alighted in spacecraft, pierced wormholes in spacetime, battled monsters from the depths of history. But my son has never known any of this. I hoped to leave behind a large library that he might read in full one day. I wanted to tell him, someday soon, with pride, that his father was a writer. I wanted him to read my work, and, maybe ten or twenty years from now, to hear his opinion of what I wrote. It would be the most valuable feedback I’d ever receive, more meaningful than anything from critics and academics.Will any of this happen? We don’t know. The bombing makes no distinctions among us, between resistance fighters or civilians. Everything is struck down. Death from every direction. You can’t even see your enemy: death is delivered by a mythical beast above the clouds, spewing down fire that engulfs each and every civilian—if anyone does survive the conflagration, they must face it again the next day.Survival remains a possibility—a faint, distant one. Maybe I’ll make it, but if so, how then to go on living after the loss of so many friends, and so much of my family?Since I am likely to die, I think to myself, I should write a will. And yet I cannot leave behind a will—because how am I to know who will survive this massacre? Me? My wife? My child? Who will be left for me to entrust with anything, or to instill with the power to entrust things to others? I don’t know. Perhaps I could simply write, “Forgive me.” But who will remain in my homeland to forgive or withhold forgiveness? Again, I don’t know. Our dreams are pulverised above our heads. The homes we built crumble around us. Our lives hang on the pressing of buttons by pilots who never see the faces below. If they could see the eyes of their victims, would they still do it? Would they press the button?This question will never be answered. Civilization, I know, is a lie. The world fails to be human. It has revealed its true face. It has revealed the fiction of the claims of the supposedly civilized. The lie is put, ultimately, to any claim of goodness. This world is not suited for our life within it—so then, should we die content, if this world is so base that we cannot live within it?"
}
,
"relatedposts": [
{
"title" : "Malcolm X and Islam: U.S. Islamophobia Didn’t Start with 9/11",
"author" : "Collis Browne",
"category" : "",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/malcolm-x-and-islam",
"date" : "2025-11-27 14:58:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/life-malcolm-3.jpg",
"excerpt" : "",
"content" : "Anti-Muslim hate has been deeply engrained and intertwined with anti-Black racism in the United States for well over 60 years, far longer than most of us are taught or are aware.As the EIP team dug into design research for the new magazine format of our first anniversary issue, we revisited 1960s issues of LIFE magazine—and landed on the March 1965 edition, published just after the assassination of Malcolm X.The reporting is staggering in its openness: blatantly anti-Black and anti-Muslim in a way that normalizes white supremacy at its most fundamental level. The anti-Blackness, while horrifying, is not surprising. This was a moment when, despite the formal dismantling of Jim Crow, more than 10,000 “sundown towns” still existed across the country, segregation remained the norm, and racial terror structured daily life.What shocked our team was the nakedness of the anti-Muslim propaganda.This was not yet framed as anti-Arab in the way Western Islamophobia is often framed today. Arab and Middle Eastern people were not present in the narrative at all. Instead, what was being targeted was organized resistance to white supremacy—specifically, the adoption of Islam by Black communities as a source of political power, dignity, and self-determination. From this moment, we can trace a clear ideological line from anti-Muslim sentiment rooted in anti-Black racism in the 1960s to the anti-Arab, anti-MENA, and anti-SWANA racism that saturates Western culture today.The reporting leaned heavily on familiar colonial tropes: the implication of “inter-tribal” violence, the suggestion that resistance to white supremacy is itself a form of reverse racism or inherent aggression, and the detached, almost smug tone surrounding the violent death of a cultural leader.Of course, the Nation of Islam and Elijah Muhammad represent only expressions within an immense and diverse global Muslim world—spanning Morocco, Sudan, the Gulf, Iraq, Pakistan, Indonesia, and far beyond. Yet U.S. cultural and military power has long blurred these distinctions, collapsing complexity into a singular enemy image.It is worth naming this history clearly and connecting the dots: U.S. Islamophobia did not begin with 9/11. It is rooted in a much older racial project—one that has always braided anti-Blackness and anti-Muslim sentiment together in service of white supremacy, at home and abroad."
}
,
{
"title" : "The Billionaire Who Bought the Met Gala: What the Bezoses’ Check Means for Fashion’s Future",
"author" : "Louis Pisano",
"category" : "",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/the-billionaire-who-bought-the-met-gala",
"date" : "2025-11-27 10:41:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/Cover_EIP_TBesos_MET_Galajpg.jpg",
"excerpt" : "On the morning of November 17, 2025, the Metropolitan Museum of Art announced that Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez Bezos would serve as the sole lead sponsors of the 2026 Met Gala and its accompanying Costume Institute exhibition, “Costume Art”. Saint Laurent and Condé Nast were listed as supporting partners. To be clear, this is not a co-sponsorship. It is not “in association with.” It is the first time in the modern history of the gala that the headline slot, previously occupied by Louis Vuitton, TikTok, or a discreet old-money surname, has been handed to a tech billionaire and his wife. The donation amount remains undisclosed, but sources familiar with the negotiations place it comfortably north of seven figures, in line with the checks that helped the event raise $22 million last year.",
"content" : "On the morning of November 17, 2025, the Metropolitan Museum of Art announced that Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez Bezos would serve as the sole lead sponsors of the 2026 Met Gala and its accompanying Costume Institute exhibition, “Costume Art”. Saint Laurent and Condé Nast were listed as supporting partners. To be clear, this is not a co-sponsorship. It is not “in association with.” It is the first time in the modern history of the gala that the headline slot, previously occupied by Louis Vuitton, TikTok, or a discreet old-money surname, has been handed to a tech billionaire and his wife. The donation amount remains undisclosed, but sources familiar with the negotiations place it comfortably north of seven figures, in line with the checks that helped the event raise $22 million last year.Within hours of the announcement, the Met’s Instagram post was overrun with comments proclaiming the gala “dead.” On TikTok and X, users paired declarations of late-stage capitalism with memes of the museum staircase wrapped in Amazon boxes. Not that this was unexpected. Anyone paying attention could see it coming for over a decade.When billionaires like Bezos, whose Amazon warehouses reported injury rates nearly double the industry average in 2024 and whose fashion supply chain has been linked to forced labor and poverty wages globally, acquire influence over prestigious institutions like the Met Museum through sponsorships, it risks commodifying fashion as a tool for not only personal but corporate image-laundering. To put it simply: who’s going to bite the hand that feeds them? Designers, editors, and curators will have little choice but to turn a blind eye to keep the money flowing and the lights on.Back in 2012, Amazon co-chaired the “Schiaparelli and Prada” gala, and honorary chair Jeff Bezos showed up in a perfectly respectable tux with then-wife MacKenzie Scott by his side and an Anna Wintour-advised pocket square. After his divorce from Scott in 2019, Bezos made a solo appearance at the Met Gala, signaling that he was becoming a familiar presence in fashion circles on his own. Of course, by that point, he already had Lauren Sánchez. Fast forward to 2020: print advertising was crumbling, and Anna Wintour co-signed The Drop, a set of limited CFDA collections sold exclusively on Amazon, giving the company a veneer of fashion credibility. By 2024, Sánchez made her Met debut in a mirrored Oscar de la Renta gown personally approved by Wintour, signaling that the Bezos orbit was now squarely inside the fashion world.Then, the political world started to catch up, as it always does. In January 2025, Sánchez and Bezos sat three rows behind President-elect Donald Trump at the inauguration. Amazon wrote a one-million-dollar check to Trump’s inaugural fund, and Bezos, once mocked by Trump as “Jeff Bozo,” publicly congratulated Trump on an “extraordinary political comeback.” By June 2025, Bezos and Sánchez became cultural and political mainstays: Sánchez married Bezos in Venice, wearing a Dolce & Gabbana gown Wintour had helped select. This landed Sánchez the digital cover of American Vogue almost immediately afterward. Wintour quietly handed day-to-day control of the magazine to Chloe Malle but kept the Met Gala, the global title, and her Condé Nast equity stake, cementing a new era of fashion power where money, influence, and optics are inseparable.Underneath all of it, the quiet hum of Amazon’s fashion machine continued to whirr. By 2024, the company already controlled 16.2 percent of every dollar Americans spent on clothing, footwear, and accessories—more than Walmart, Target, Macy’s, and Nordstrom combined. That same year, it generated $34.7 billion in U.S. apparel and footwear revenue that year, with the women’s category alone on pace to top $40 billion. No legacy house has ever had that volume of real-time data on what people actually try on, keep, or return in shame. Amazon can react in weeks rather than seasons, reordering winning pieces, tweaking existing ones, and killing unpopular options before they’re even produced at scale.Wintour did more than simply observe this shift; she engineered a soft landing by bringing Amazon in when it was still somewhat uncool and seen mostly as a discount retailer, lending it credibility when it needed legitimacy, and spending the last two years turning Sánchez from tabloid footnote to Vogue cover star. The Condé Nast sale rumors that began circulating in July 2025, complete with talk of Wintour cashing out her equity and Sánchez taking a creative role, have been denied by every official mouthpiece. But they have also refused to die, because the timeline is simply too tidy.The clearest preview of what billionaire ownership can do to a cultural institution remains Bezos’ other pet project, The Washington Post. Bezos bought it for $250 million in 2013, saved it from bankruptcy, and built it into a profitable digital operation with 2.5 million subscribers. Then, in October 2024, he personally blocked a planned editorial endorsement of Kamala Harris. More than 250,000 subscribers canceled in the following days. By February 2025, the opinion section was restructured around “personal liberties and free markets,” triggering another exodus and the resignation of editorial page editor David Shipley. Former executive editor Marty Baron called it “craven.” The timing, just months after Bezos began warming to the incoming Trump administration, was not lost on anyone. The story didn’t stop there: in the last few days, U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance revealed he had texted Bezos suggesting the hiring of a right-leaning Breitbart journalist, Matthew Boyle, to run the Post’s political coverage. This is a clear signal of how staffing decisions at a storied paper now sit within the same power matrix that funds the Met Gala and shapes culture, media, and politics alike. It’s a tangled, strategic web—all of Bezos’ making.It’s curious that, in the same 30-day window that the Trump DOJ expanded its antitrust inquiry into Amazon, specifically how its algorithms favor its own products over third-party sellers, including many fashion brands, the MET, a city-owned museum, handed the keys of its marquee event to the man whose company now wields outsized influence over designers’ fortunes and faces regulatory scrutiny from the administration he helped reinstall. This is not sponsorship; it’s leverage. Wintour once froze Melania Trump out of Vogue because she could afford to.But she cannot freeze out Sánchez or Bezos. Nor does she want to.So on the first Monday in May, the museum doors will open as they always do for the Met Gala. The carpet will still be red (or whatever color the theme demands). The photographs of celebrities posing in their interpretations of “Costume Art” will still break the internet. Andrew Bolton’s exhibition, roughly 200 objects tracing the dressed body across five millennia, displayed in the newly renamed Condé Nast Galleries, will still be brilliant. But the biggest check will come from the couple who already control 16 percent of America’s clothing spend, who own The Washington Post, and who sat three rows behind Trump at the inauguration. Everything else, guest list tweaks, livestream deals, shoppable moments, will flow from that single source of money and power. That is who now has the final word on the most influential night in American fashion."
}
,
{
"title" : "Communicating Palestine: A Guide for Liberation and Narrative Power",
"author" : "Palestine Institute for Public Diplomacy",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/communicating-palestine",
"date" : "2025-11-25 14:04:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/Cover_EIP_Template-MIT_Engineering_Genocide.jpg",
"excerpt" : "Communication as a Tool of Erasure",
"content" : "Communication as a Tool of ErasureAs new “peace plans” for Palestine are drafted far from Palestinian life, Palestinians find themselves once again spoken for - another reminder of how communication is weaponized to sustain Zionist colonialism. Colonialism doesn’t just seize land; it seizes the story and its agents. From early myths like “a land without a people for a people without a land” to today’s narrative spin that frames Palestinians as “rejecting peace,” the Zionist project has aimed to erase not only a people but also their agency, voice, and narratives.Today, as Israel continues its genocide on the ground, its propaganda apparatus, known as Hasbara (“explanation” in Hebrew), wages a parallel war over narrative in the media, in diplomatic halls, and online. From smear campaigns, to lobbying governments and media outlets, to pressuring digital platforms like Meta, the machinery of erasure is well-funded and relentless.As Edward Said wrote in Blaming the Victim, Zionist success was not just military - it was narrative. They won the global narrative battle long before 1948. Narrative control is not symbolic - it justifies policy, enables displacement, and legitimizes genocide.Our ResponseFor Palestinians, the narrative struggle has never been separate from the struggle for liberation. We recognized that incredible work is already being done to amplify Palestinian narratives and counter disinformation—through platforms like MAKAN, Decolonize Palestine, Let’s Talk Palestine, Newscord, and others. But what was missing was a one-stop toolkit that brings together the best practices and resources across all areas of communication, for everyone who communicates Palestine: media, policymakers, artists, content creators, advocates, and more. A space rooted not in defensiveness, but in reclaiming our agency and our narratives.So we built one.Communicating Palestine is more than a guide; it’s a manifesto for liberatory and decolonised communication. It is the outcome of a Palestinian-led process, woven from the wisdom of focus groups in Ramallah, Battir village, and Dheisheh Refugee Camp as well as journalists, activists and analysts. It centers Palestinian narratives on their own terms, refusing to be defined in reaction to the propaganda that seeks to erase them.What does the guide look like in practice? It’s a one-stop platform for anyone communicating about Palestine—journalists, activists, artists, policymakers. It’s organized into four core sections: Narratives and framings – analysis and recommendations to counter harmful tropes and disinformation. Visual representations – guidance for photographers, artists and video journalists on ethical imagery. **Communication and engagement practices **– tips and tools for ethical reporting and centering Palestinians with dignity, Tools – user-friendly resources that can be day-to-day support in your work. Practical checklists on key take-aways from across the guide Terminology guide for accurate wording and reporting. Photography and video guidelines to avoid harmful visuals. Resources countering disinformation, bias and fallacies. **This is a call to action. **It’s an invitation to unlearn the narratives we’ve been fed, to relearn how to engage with dignity and integrity, and to finally practice a form of communication that doesn’t just talk about justice, but actively builds it—one word, one image, one story at a time."
}
]
}