Digital & Print Membership
Yearly + Receive 8 free printed back issues
$420 Annually
Monthly + Receive 3 free printed back issues
$40 Monthly
Israel’s Environmental Degradation in Palestine, Lebanon, and Syria
Earth for Palestine
Introduction
Environmental degradation under occupation and apartheid often stems from military operations, resource exploitation, and infrastructural destruction. In the context of Israel’s occupation of Palestine, Lebanon, and Syria, significant environmental harm has been reported. These impacts include deforestation, pollution, depletion of water resources, and destruction of agricultural lands on top of human life loss. This report focuses and outlines the key environmental issues in these regions attributed to Israeli policies and military actions.
Environmental Impact in Palestine
Water Resource Exploitation and Pollution
Israel exerts control over most water resources in the occupied Palestinian territories. The diversion of water from the Jordan River and over-extraction from the Mountain and Coastal Aquifers has led to severe water shortages for Palestinians. Moreover, wastewater from Israeli settlements has polluted Palestinian farmlands and water sources, with untreated sewage discharged into the West Bank’s valleys and streams.
Theft of Natural Resources: Gas and Oil Exploitation
Israel has been stealing Palestinian natural resources, particularly in Gaza, where it has restricted Palestinian access to offshore gas fields. Reports indicate that Israel has taken control of gas reserves off the coast of Gaza, depriving Palestinians of their rightful resources and economic opportunities. Furthermore, Israel has shown interest in oil drilling in Gaza, raising concerns over environmental degradation and economic exploitation.
Gaza is home to significant natural gas reserves, primarily located offshore in the Mediterranean Sea. These reserves have the potential to provide Palestinians with economic independence and energy security. However, Israeli policies and military control have largely prevented Palestinians from accessing and benefiting from these resources. This section examines Israel’s exploitation of Gaza’s oil and gas reserves and the environmental, economic, and political consequences of this resource theft.
Gas Reserves in Gaza
The Gaza Marine gas field, discovered in 1999 by British Gas (BG Group), is estimated to contain over 1 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. It lies about 30 kilometers off the coast of Gaza in Palestinian territorial waters. This field could generate billions in revenue and significantly reduce Palestinian dependence on foreign energy imports. However, despite this potential, Palestinians have been denied the ability to develop and extract these resources due to Israeli restrictions.
Israeli Control and Resource Exploitation
Israel has effectively seized control over Gaza’s maritime resources, preventing Palestinian authorities from extracting gas and negotiating independent deals for its sale.
Over the years, Israel has:
-
Blocked Palestinian access to the gas field through military-enforced maritime restrictions.
-
Negotiated with international energy companies to exploit the gas without Palestinian consent.
-
Extracted gas from adjacent fields, some of which extend into Palestinian waters, depriving Gaza of its rightful share.
-
Blocked all fuel, water, food from entering Gaza for 17 months, violating International human rights law
Israeli authorities have argued security concerns as justification for these restrictions, but critics view this as part of a broader strategy to maintain economic dominance over the Palestinian territories.

Oil Exploration in Gaza
Beyond natural gas, reports indicate that Israel has explored the possibility of offshore oil drilling in Palestinian-controlled areas. While oil reserves in Gaza are less documented than its gas fields, Israeli interest in energy exploration raises concerns over further** environmental degradation and economic exploitation.**
Economic and Environmental Consequences
Economic Consequences
-
The inability to exploit its own natural gas means **Gaza remains dependent on Israeli energy supplies, **which are often restricted or cut off at whim.
-
Potential revenue from gas sales, estimated in the billions of dollars, could have funded infrastructure, healthcare, and development in Gaza.
-
Israel’s control over these resources reinforces Palestinian economic stagnation and vulnerability.
Environmental Consequences
-
Any unauthorized Israeli drilling and extraction risks polluting Gaza’s coastline and disrupting marine ecosystems.
-
Oil and gas extraction, if improperly managed, could lead to oil spills, gas leaks, and long-term ecological damage in Palestinian waters.
-
By denying Palestinians control, Israel prevents the development of environmentally sustainable energy policies in Gaza.
The case of Gaza’s oil and gas reserves highlights the broader issue of resource exploitation in occupied territories. Israel’s control over these vital energy sources has deprived Palestinians of economic independence, reinforced dependence on Israeli energy supplies, and raised concerns about environmental degradation. Addressing this issue requires international intervention and legal accountability to ensure that Palestinians regain control over their natural wealth.
Deforestation, Fruit Tree Theft, and Land Degradation
Israeli settlement expansion and military occupation have led to large-scale deforestation in Palestine. Olive groves, which are crucial for Palestinian livelihoods, have been systematically uprooted or burned by settlers and the Israeli military. Beyond destruction, reports indicate that Israeli entities have engaged in the systematic theft of Palestinian fruit-bearing trees, particularly olive trees, citrus trees, and date palms. These stolen trees are often transplanted into Israeli settlements or sold commercially for profit. The removal of these trees not only affects the Palestinian agricultural economy but also depletes the region’s biodiversity and accelerates desertification. The construction of the separation wall has further fragmented ecosystems and disrupted natural habitats, making it difficult for Palestinian farmers to access and tend to their lands.
Air and Soil Pollution
Frequent military strikes and the use of heavy artillery, including white phosphorus munitions in Gaza, have contaminated the soil and air, impacting public health and biodiversity. The destruction of waste treatment facilities in Gaza has resulted in the uncontrolled spread of hazardous materials. The use of phosphorus gas has exacerbated environmental and health risks, as it releases toxic chemicals that persist in the air and soil, further harming ecosystems and human populations.

Environmental Impact in Lebanon
Oil Spill and Marine Pollution
One of the most catastrophic environmental disasters in Lebanon occurred during the 2006 war, when Israeli airstrikes targeted the Jiyyeh power station, causing a massive oil spill along Lebanon’s Mediterranean coast. This spill devastated marine life and severely compromised the livelihoods of coastal communities dependent on fishing.
Forest Fires and Land Degradation
Israeli shelling and airstrikes have led to extensive wildfires in southern Lebanon, destroying large forested areas. These fires have further contributed to soil erosion and loss of biodiversity. The use of cluster munitions has left unexploded ordnance scattered across agricultural lands, posing risks to farmers and restricting land use.
**Phosphorus Gas Usage
**Reports indicate that Israeli forces have used white phosphorus munitions in Lebanon, particularly during the 2006 war. The use of this incendiary substance has led to severe environmental and health hazards, contaminating soil and water sources, and causing long-term ecological damage.
Effects of White Phosphorus on the Environment
Air Pollution and Toxic Emissions
When white phosphorus burns, it releases toxic phosphorus pentoxide, which reacts with moisture in the air to form corrosive phosphoric acid. This leads to:
-
Severe air pollution, particularly in areas where phosphorus munitions are used extensively.
-
Respiratory problems in exposed populations due to inhalation of toxic fumes.
-
Acidic rainfall, which can damage crops, contaminate water sources, and degrade soil quality over time.
Soil and Water Contamination
-
Phosphorus residue can seep into the soil, making agricultural land infertile and contaminating groundwater.
-
Rainwater can carry phosphorus particles into rivers and reservoirs, polluting drinking water sources.
-
Toxic runoff from phosphorus-affected areas can disrupt local ecosystems, harming wildlife and fisheries.
Human Health Consequences
It is estimated that the lethal dose of white phosphorus in humans is 0.1 grams, but even a much smaller amount can have adverse effects on people including:
-
Severe burns: White phosphorus sticks to human skin, causing deep burns that are difficult to treat.
-
Chronic respiratory diseases: Inhalation of phosphorus fumes can lead to lung damage, chronic coughing, and long-term breathing issues.
-
Neurological damage: Long-term exposure has been linked to neurological disorders and cognitive impairments.
-
Damage to vital organs: Exposure to white phosphorus is also linked to **kidney and liver failure and gastrointestinal irritation **as well.
-
Increased cancer risk: Studies suggest exposure to phosphorus combustion byproducts may increase the likelihood of certain cancers.
Measuring Air Quality in Phosphorus-Affected Areas
1. Particulate Matter (PM) Sensors – Detecting Airborne Phosphorus Particles
Example: The PurpleAir PA-II Sensor, used globally for real-time air quality monitoring, can detect fine particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) that may contain phosphorus residues. Similar sensors have been deployed in Gaza and Lebanon by environmental organizations to measure pollution from conflict zones.
Application in Lebanon: These sensors can be placed in bombed areas to detect phosphorus dust and track its spread. Data can help assess how far toxic particles travel and how long they remain in the air.
2. Chemical Gas Analyzers – Measuring Phosphorus Pentoxide and Acidic Compounds
Example: The Thermo Scientific Model 43i SO₂ Analyzer can measure sulfur dioxide and phosphorus oxides, which are byproducts of white phosphorus combustion. Gas analyzers like this have been used in Iraq and Syria to monitor chemical weapon residues.
Application in Lebanon: After phosphorus bombings, these analyzers can detect toxic gases lingering in the air, confirming environmental contamination and assessing health risks.
3. Satellite Imaging and Remote Sensing – Tracking Pollution and Fire-Related Emissions
Example:
-
**NASA’s MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) **has been used to monitor fire emissions and air pollution from forest fires, wars, and industrial explosions.
-
The Sentinel-5P satellite (operated by the European Space Agency) can detect airborne chemicals, including phosphorus-related pollutants.
** Application in Lebanon:**
Satellite data can show where phosphorus munitions were used, the scale of air pollution, and how long contamination persists. This method has already been used to track oil spill pollution from Israeli airstrikes on Lebanon’s Jiyyeh power plant in 2006.
**4. Groundwater and Soil Testing – Detecting Phosphorus Contamination in Land and Water
**
Example:
-
The ICP-MS (Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry) technique has been used to detect heavy metal contamination in war zones, including Gaza.
-
Lebanon’s National Council for Scientific Research (CNRS-L) has conducted soil and water quality assessments after Israeli bombings.
**Application in Lebanon: **After phosphorus munitions are used, soil and groundwater samples can be tested for phosphorus compounds. This can confirm contamination levels in farmlands and drinking water sources, affecting agriculture and human health.
International agencies, including the UN and environmental monitoring organizations, could deploy these methods to document the long-term consequences of phosphorus weapon use in Lebanon.
The use of white phosphorus by the Israeli military in Lebanon has had severe environmental, health, and ecological consequences. Toxic emissions contribute to air pollution, soil degradation, and water contamination, while exposed populations suffer from chronic illnesses and long-term health risks. Conducting air quality and soil contamination assessments is essential to quantify the full impact and push for accountability under international law.
Environmental Impact in Syria
Destruction of Agricultural Lands and Water Resource Control in Syria
Destruction of Agricultural Lands in the Golan Heights
The Golan Heights, a fertile and strategic plateau occupied by Israel since 1967, has faced extensive environmental destruction due to Israeli military operations. Syrian officials and environmental organizations have reported severe damage to farmland caused by:
- Airstrikes and Bombardment – Israeli airstrikes targeting Syrian infrastructure and military positions have also impacted farmlands, orchards, and grazing areas. Explosions cause soil degradation, destroy crops, and leave behind unexploded ordnance that makes agricultural activities hazardous.
Example: In multiple strikes on Syrian territories near the Golan Heights, Israeli missiles have set farmland ablaze, reducing agricultural productivity.
- Land Confiscation and Settlement Expansion – Israeli settlements in the occupied Golan Heights have expanded, displacing Syrian farmers and reducing the available land for local agricultural production.
Example: The Israeli government has promoted new settlements such as Trump Heights, further restricting access to farmlands for displaced Syrian families.
- Military Exercises and Land Degradation – The Israeli military frequently conducts live-fire exercises in parts of the Golan Heights, which result in:
-
Soil contamination from spent ammunition.
-
Fires caused by explosions, further damaging local ecosystems and farmland.
-
Erosion due to heavy military vehicle movement, making it harder to cultivate crops.
The destruction of Syrian farmland has led to:
Loss of food security, as Syria depends on the Golan for fruit, grains, and livestock grazing.
Economic hardship for farmers who rely on agriculture as their primary source of income.
Long-term environmental damage, including desertification and reduced soil fertility.
Water Resource Control and Its Impact on Syrian Communities
The Golan Heights is a vital water source, as it supplies the Jordan River, Yarmouk River, and Sea of Galilee, making it one of the most strategically important regions in the Middle East. Since Israel’s occupation, it has imposed severe restrictions on Syrian communities’ access to water, leading to drought and agricultural collapse. As of now, **Israel controls 40% of Jordan and Syria’s shared water resources. **
1. Israeli Control of Springs, Rivers, and Aquifers
-
The Banias and Dan Springs, which contribute to the Jordan River’s flow, have been heavily diverted by Israel.
-
The Yarmouk River, which originally supplied water to both Syria and Jordan, has been partially controlled and redirected by and to Israel, reducing both Syrian and Jordanian water availability.
2. Water Theft by Israeli Settlements
Israeli authorities are stealing water access for settlers in the Golan Heights, leaving Syrian villages with minimal or no water supply for drinking and irrigation.
Example: Syrian farmers in the Golan struggle to irrigate their fields, while Israeli settlements enjoy advanced water infrastructure for agriculture and domestic use.
3. Desertification and Agricultural Decline
-
Without sufficient water, once-fertile Syrian lands in the Golan are turning into arid wastelands.
-
Reduced water flow has led to lower crop yields and made livestock farming unsustainable.
****Deforestation and loss of vegetation due to Israeli land seizures and military actions have worsened soil erosion.
Impact on Local Farmers: Many Syrian Druze farmers in the Golan Heights have faced **increased water shortages **and have been forced to abandon their agricultural lands due to Israeli-imposed restrictions.
Political and Economic Consequences: Israel’s monopolization of Golan’s water has weakened Syrian agricultural independence and placed further strain on Syria’s war-torn economy.
Israeli policies in the occupied Golan Heights have led to the systematic destruction of agricultural lands and severe water shortages for Syrian communities. Military operations, settlement expansion, and water control measures have turned once-productive lands into **barren, drought-stricken areas.
** These actions exacerbate food insecurity, economic hardship, and environmental decline, further deepening the impact of Israel’s occupation on Syria’s rural populations.
Satellite imagery has been instrumental in documenting the environmental and infrastructural impacts of military actions in Lebanon, Palestine, and Syria. Below are specific examples illustrating these effects:
Lebanon:
-
Beirut Port Explosion (August 2020): Satellite images captured the extensive damage caused by the explosion at Beirut’s port, highlighting the widespread destruction of the surrounding area.
The Express Tribune
-
Southern Lebanon Airstrikes (2024): NASA’s Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) detected numerous heat signatures in southern Lebanon, confirming intense airstrikes that significantly impacted the region. Sensex falls over 100 pts+1www.ndtv.com+1
Palestine (Gaza Strip):
-
Destruction in Rafah (2024): Satellite imagery revealed vast destruction in Rafah following ground operations, with significant damage to residential areas and infrastructure. bellingcat
-
Widespread Damage Across Gaza (2024): Maps, charts, and satellite images demonstrated extensive damage to buildings throughout the Gaza Strip since the onset of conflict. The Express Tribune+3The Guardian+3AP News+3

*Satellite images show destruction from Israel’s assault on Gaza *
Israel’s Actions as Ecocide: The Environmental Destruction in Palestine, Lebanon, and Syria
Beyond the catastrophic loss of human life, Israel’s military actions and environmental policies amount to ecocide—the deliberate destruction of ecosystems, natural resources, and biodiversity in Palestine, Lebanon, and Syria. The widespread devastation to land, water, and air in these regions has caused long-term, possibly irreversible, damage to the environment, affecting both people and wildlife for generations to come.
1. Systematic Destruction of Farmlands and Forests
Palestine (West Bank & Gaza)
-
Olive Tree Uprooting & Agricultural Sabotage: The Israeli military and settlers have destroyed over 800,000 olive trees in the West Bank since 1967. These trees are essential to Palestinian culture, economy, and environmental stability.
-
Bombing of Gaza’s Agricultural Land: Repeated aerial bombardments and shelling have burned entire farmlands, rendering them infertile due to chemical contamination from explosives.
-
Use of Herbicides to Destroy Crops: Israel has sprayed toxic herbicides along Gaza’s border, killing Palestinian crops under the pretext of clearing security zones. This has led to soil degradation, loss of biodiversity, and food insecurity.
Lebanon
-
Forest Fires Caused by Bombing: Israeli shelling in southern Lebanon has sparked wildfires that consume vast forested areas, leading to habitat loss and soil erosion.
-
**Cluster Munitions Contaminating Land: **Unexploded Israeli cluster bombs from the 2006 war still litter fields, making large areas unsafe for farming and human habitation.
Syria (Golan Heights)
-
**Deforestation and Desertification: **Israeli policies have restricted Syrian farmers’ access to their land, leading to soil degradation and loss of tree cover. The conversion of agricultural lands into Israeli military zones has resulted in mass deforestation.
-
Illegal Settler Agriculture: Israeli settlers exploit Syrian agricultural lands, redirecting water supplies for exclusive use in Israeli farms while Syrian farmers are denied access to irrigation.
2. Pollution of Water Sources and Deliberate Resource Theft
Palestine (Gaza & West Bank)
-
Water Apartheid in the West Bank: Israel diverts over 80% of Palestinian water resources for use by Israeli settlers, leaving Palestinian communities with severe water shortages.
*** Destruction of Water Infrastructure in Gaza:** Israeli airstrikes have targeted Gaza’s water desalination plants, sewage treatment facilities, and wells, causing:
- Toxic contamination of groundwater
- Severe drinking water shortages (97% of Gaza’s water is undrinkable)
- Widespread diseases due to waterborne pollution
Lebanon
-
Oil Spill Disaster from Israeli Strikes: In 2006, Israel bombed the Jiyyeh power plant, releasing 15,000 tons of oil into the Mediterranean Sea, devastating marine life and fisheries along Lebanon’s coast.
-
Targeting of Dams and Water Networks: Israeli airstrikes have damaged water infrastructure, reducing Lebanon’s access to clean water and irrigation.
Syria (Golan Heights)
-
Theft of Water Resources: Israel has diverted water from the Banias and Dan rivers, which are crucial for Syrian agriculture, while settlers receive privileged access.
-
**Water Pollution from Military Activity: **Israeli military zones in the Golan Heights have led to **chemical runoff and contamination of soil and water sources, **harming local wildlife and agriculture.
3. Air, Soil, and Chemical Contamination from Military Weapons
Phosphorus Gas and Toxic Bombardment
Israel’s use of white phosphorus munitions in Gaza and Lebanon has led to:
*Soil contamination, making agricultural land infertile
*Airborne toxic chemicals, affecting human and animal health
*Acid rain formation**, further degrading water and land quality
Long-Term Effects on Ecosystems
-
**Destruction of Pollinators (Bees, Birds, and Wildlife): **Bombings and deforestation have wiped out bee populations and migratory birds, disrupting natural pollination cycles and food production.
-
Collapse of Marine Ecosystems: The Mediterranean coast has suffered massive fish die-offs due to oil spills, phosphorus contamination, and destruction of wastewater treatment plants.
4. The Definition of Ecocide: How Israel’s Actions Qualify
Under international law, ecocide is defined as:
- “Unlawful or wanton acts committed with the knowledge that there is a substantial likelihood of severe and widespread damage to the environment.”*
Israel’s military operations and policies in Palestine, Lebanon, and Syria meet this definition because:
- They systematically destroy natural ecosystems through bombings, land seizures, and resource theft.
- They disproportionately target environmental infrastructure (water plants, farmlands, forests).
- They cause long-term harm to biodiversity, food security, and climate resilience.
Holding Israel Accountable for Ecocide
The destruction of Palestinian, Lebanese, and Syrian ecosystems is not merely collateral damage but a calculated strategy of environmental warfare. By depriving communities of their lands, water, and clean air, Israel’s actions have devastating consequences for both human populations and the planet.
Call to Action:
*** International organizations and environmental watchdogs must document and prosecute ecocide crimes in conflict zones.
-
Palestinian, Lebanese, and Syrian communities deserve restoration efforts and reparations for environmental destruction.
-
Global awareness and legal frameworks must be strengthened to prevent the weaponization of nature in warfare.
**
Topics:
Filed under:
Location:
{
"article":
{
"title" : "Israel’s Environmental Degradation in Palestine, Lebanon, and Syria",
"author" : "EIP Editors",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/israel-environmental-degradation-palestine-lebanon-syria",
"date" : "2025-04-10 14:16:00 -0400",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/SlowFactory_EarthPercent_Campaign-09.jpg",
"excerpt" : "Earth for Palestine",
"content" : "Earth for PalestineIntroductionEnvironmental degradation under occupation and apartheid often stems from military operations, resource exploitation, and infrastructural destruction. In the context of Israel’s occupation of Palestine, Lebanon, and Syria, significant environmental harm has been reported. These impacts include deforestation, pollution, depletion of water resources, and destruction of agricultural lands on top of human life loss. This report focuses and outlines the key environmental issues in these regions attributed to Israeli policies and military actions.Environmental Impact in PalestineWater Resource Exploitation and PollutionIsrael exerts control over most water resources in the occupied Palestinian territories. The diversion of water from the Jordan River and over-extraction from the Mountain and Coastal Aquifers has led to severe water shortages for Palestinians. Moreover, wastewater from Israeli settlements has polluted Palestinian farmlands and water sources, with untreated sewage discharged into the West Bank’s valleys and streams.Theft of Natural Resources: Gas and Oil ExploitationIsrael has been stealing Palestinian natural resources, particularly in Gaza, where it has restricted Palestinian access to offshore gas fields. Reports indicate that Israel has taken control of gas reserves off the coast of Gaza, depriving Palestinians of their rightful resources and economic opportunities. Furthermore, Israel has shown interest in oil drilling in Gaza, raising concerns over environmental degradation and economic exploitation.Gaza is home to significant natural gas reserves, primarily located offshore in the Mediterranean Sea. These reserves have the potential to provide Palestinians with economic independence and energy security. However, Israeli policies and military control have largely prevented Palestinians from accessing and benefiting from these resources. This section examines Israel’s exploitation of Gaza’s oil and gas reserves and the environmental, economic, and political consequences of this resource theft.Gas Reserves in GazaThe Gaza Marine gas field, discovered in 1999 by British Gas (BG Group), is estimated to contain over 1 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. It lies about 30 kilometers off the coast of Gaza in Palestinian territorial waters. This field could generate billions in revenue and significantly reduce Palestinian dependence on foreign energy imports. However, despite this potential, Palestinians have been denied the ability to develop and extract these resources due to Israeli restrictions.Israeli Control and Resource ExploitationIsrael has effectively seized control over Gaza’s maritime resources, preventing Palestinian authorities from extracting gas and negotiating independent deals for its sale.Over the years, Israel has: Blocked Palestinian access to the gas field through military-enforced maritime restrictions. Negotiated with international energy companies to exploit the gas without Palestinian consent. Extracted gas from adjacent fields, some of which extend into Palestinian waters, depriving Gaza of its rightful share. Blocked all fuel, water, food from entering Gaza for 17 months, violating International human rights law Israeli authorities have argued security concerns as justification for these restrictions, but critics view this as part of a broader strategy to maintain economic dominance over the Palestinian territories.Oil Exploration in GazaBeyond natural gas, reports indicate that Israel has explored the possibility of offshore oil drilling in Palestinian-controlled areas. While oil reserves in Gaza are less documented than its gas fields, Israeli interest in energy exploration raises concerns over further** environmental degradation and economic exploitation.**Economic and Environmental ConsequencesEconomic Consequences The inability to exploit its own natural gas means **Gaza remains dependent on Israeli energy supplies, **which are often restricted or cut off at whim. Potential revenue from gas sales, estimated in the billions of dollars, could have funded infrastructure, healthcare, and development in Gaza. Israel’s control over these resources reinforces Palestinian economic stagnation and vulnerability. Environmental Consequences Any unauthorized Israeli drilling and extraction risks polluting Gaza’s coastline and disrupting marine ecosystems. Oil and gas extraction, if improperly managed, could lead to oil spills, gas leaks, and long-term ecological damage in Palestinian waters. By denying Palestinians control, Israel prevents the development of environmentally sustainable energy policies in Gaza. The case of Gaza’s oil and gas reserves highlights the broader issue of resource exploitation in occupied territories. Israel’s control over these vital energy sources has deprived Palestinians of economic independence, reinforced dependence on Israeli energy supplies, and raised concerns about environmental degradation. Addressing this issue requires international intervention and legal accountability to ensure that Palestinians regain control over their natural wealth.Deforestation, Fruit Tree Theft, and Land DegradationIsraeli settlement expansion and military occupation have led to large-scale deforestation in Palestine. Olive groves, which are crucial for Palestinian livelihoods, have been systematically uprooted or burned by settlers and the Israeli military. Beyond destruction, reports indicate that Israeli entities have engaged in the systematic theft of Palestinian fruit-bearing trees, particularly olive trees, citrus trees, and date palms. These stolen trees are often transplanted into Israeli settlements or sold commercially for profit. The removal of these trees not only affects the Palestinian agricultural economy but also depletes the region’s biodiversity and accelerates desertification. The construction of the separation wall has further fragmented ecosystems and disrupted natural habitats, making it difficult for Palestinian farmers to access and tend to their lands.Air and Soil PollutionFrequent military strikes and the use of heavy artillery, including white phosphorus munitions in Gaza, have contaminated the soil and air, impacting public health and biodiversity. The destruction of waste treatment facilities in Gaza has resulted in the uncontrolled spread of hazardous materials. The use of phosphorus gas has exacerbated environmental and health risks, as it releases toxic chemicals that persist in the air and soil, further harming ecosystems and human populations.Environmental Impact in LebanonOil Spill and Marine PollutionOne of the most catastrophic environmental disasters in Lebanon occurred during the 2006 war, when Israeli airstrikes targeted the Jiyyeh power station, causing a massive oil spill along Lebanon’s Mediterranean coast. This spill devastated marine life and severely compromised the livelihoods of coastal communities dependent on fishing.Forest Fires and Land DegradationIsraeli shelling and airstrikes have led to extensive wildfires in southern Lebanon, destroying large forested areas. These fires have further contributed to soil erosion and loss of biodiversity. The use of cluster munitions has left unexploded ordnance scattered across agricultural lands, posing risks to farmers and restricting land use.**Phosphorus Gas Usage**Reports indicate that Israeli forces have used white phosphorus munitions in Lebanon, particularly during the 2006 war. The use of this incendiary substance has led to severe environmental and health hazards, contaminating soil and water sources, and causing long-term ecological damage.Effects of White Phosphorus on the EnvironmentAir Pollution and Toxic EmissionsWhen white phosphorus burns, it releases toxic phosphorus pentoxide, which reacts with moisture in the air to form corrosive phosphoric acid. This leads to: Severe air pollution, particularly in areas where phosphorus munitions are used extensively. Respiratory problems in exposed populations due to inhalation of toxic fumes. Acidic rainfall, which can damage crops, contaminate water sources, and degrade soil quality over time. Soil and Water Contamination Phosphorus residue can seep into the soil, making agricultural land infertile and contaminating groundwater. Rainwater can carry phosphorus particles into rivers and reservoirs, polluting drinking water sources. Toxic runoff from phosphorus-affected areas can disrupt local ecosystems, harming wildlife and fisheries. Human Health ConsequencesIt is estimated that the lethal dose of white phosphorus in humans is 0.1 grams, but even a much smaller amount can have adverse effects on people including: Severe burns: White phosphorus sticks to human skin, causing deep burns that are difficult to treat. Chronic respiratory diseases: Inhalation of phosphorus fumes can lead to lung damage, chronic coughing, and long-term breathing issues. Neurological damage: Long-term exposure has been linked to neurological disorders and cognitive impairments. Damage to vital organs: Exposure to white phosphorus is also linked to **kidney and liver failure and gastrointestinal irritation **as well. Increased cancer risk: Studies suggest exposure to phosphorus combustion byproducts may increase the likelihood of certain cancers. Measuring Air Quality in Phosphorus-Affected Areas1. Particulate Matter (PM) Sensors – Detecting Airborne Phosphorus ParticlesExample: The PurpleAir PA-II Sensor, used globally for real-time air quality monitoring, can detect fine particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) that may contain phosphorus residues. Similar sensors have been deployed in Gaza and Lebanon by environmental organizations to measure pollution from conflict zones.Application in Lebanon: These sensors can be placed in bombed areas to detect phosphorus dust and track its spread. Data can help assess how far toxic particles travel and how long they remain in the air.2. Chemical Gas Analyzers – Measuring Phosphorus Pentoxide and Acidic CompoundsExample: The Thermo Scientific Model 43i SO₂ Analyzer can measure sulfur dioxide and phosphorus oxides, which are byproducts of white phosphorus combustion. Gas analyzers like this have been used in Iraq and Syria to monitor chemical weapon residues.Application in Lebanon: After phosphorus bombings, these analyzers can detect toxic gases lingering in the air, confirming environmental contamination and assessing health risks.3. Satellite Imaging and Remote Sensing – Tracking Pollution and Fire-Related EmissionsExample: **NASA’s MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) **has been used to monitor fire emissions and air pollution from forest fires, wars, and industrial explosions. The Sentinel-5P satellite (operated by the European Space Agency) can detect airborne chemicals, including phosphorus-related pollutants. ** Application in Lebanon:**Satellite data can show where phosphorus munitions were used, the scale of air pollution, and how long contamination persists. This method has already been used to track oil spill pollution from Israeli airstrikes on Lebanon’s Jiyyeh power plant in 2006.**4. Groundwater and Soil Testing – Detecting Phosphorus Contamination in Land and Water**Example: The ICP-MS (Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry) technique has been used to detect heavy metal contamination in war zones, including Gaza. Lebanon’s National Council for Scientific Research (CNRS-L) has conducted soil and water quality assessments after Israeli bombings. **Application in Lebanon: **After phosphorus munitions are used, soil and groundwater samples can be tested for phosphorus compounds. This can confirm contamination levels in farmlands and drinking water sources, affecting agriculture and human health.International agencies, including the UN and environmental monitoring organizations, could deploy these methods to document the long-term consequences of phosphorus weapon use in Lebanon.The use of white phosphorus by the Israeli military in Lebanon has had severe environmental, health, and ecological consequences. Toxic emissions contribute to air pollution, soil degradation, and water contamination, while exposed populations suffer from chronic illnesses and long-term health risks. Conducting air quality and soil contamination assessments is essential to quantify the full impact and push for accountability under international law.Environmental Impact in SyriaDestruction of Agricultural Lands and Water Resource Control in SyriaDestruction of Agricultural Lands in the Golan HeightsThe Golan Heights, a fertile and strategic plateau occupied by Israel since 1967, has faced extensive environmental destruction due to Israeli military operations. Syrian officials and environmental organizations have reported severe damage to farmland caused by: Airstrikes and Bombardment – Israeli airstrikes targeting Syrian infrastructure and military positions have also impacted farmlands, orchards, and grazing areas. Explosions cause soil degradation, destroy crops, and leave behind unexploded ordnance that makes agricultural activities hazardous.Example: In multiple strikes on Syrian territories near the Golan Heights, Israeli missiles have set farmland ablaze, reducing agricultural productivity. Land Confiscation and Settlement Expansion – Israeli settlements in the occupied Golan Heights have expanded, displacing Syrian farmers and reducing the available land for local agricultural production.Example: The Israeli government has promoted new settlements such as Trump Heights, further restricting access to farmlands for displaced Syrian families. Military Exercises and Land Degradation – The Israeli military frequently conducts live-fire exercises in parts of the Golan Heights, which result in: Soil contamination from spent ammunition. Fires caused by explosions, further damaging local ecosystems and farmland. Erosion due to heavy military vehicle movement, making it harder to cultivate crops. The destruction of Syrian farmland has led to:Loss of food security, as Syria depends on the Golan for fruit, grains, and livestock grazing.Economic hardship for farmers who rely on agriculture as their primary source of income.Long-term environmental damage, including desertification and reduced soil fertility.Water Resource Control and Its Impact on Syrian CommunitiesThe Golan Heights is a vital water source, as it supplies the Jordan River, Yarmouk River, and Sea of Galilee, making it one of the most strategically important regions in the Middle East. Since Israel’s occupation, it has imposed severe restrictions on Syrian communities’ access to water, leading to drought and agricultural collapse. As of now, **Israel controls 40% of Jordan and Syria’s shared water resources. **1. Israeli Control of Springs, Rivers, and Aquifers The Banias and Dan Springs, which contribute to the Jordan River’s flow, have been heavily diverted by Israel. The Yarmouk River, which originally supplied water to both Syria and Jordan, has been partially controlled and redirected by and to Israel, reducing both Syrian and Jordanian water availability. 2. Water Theft by Israeli SettlementsIsraeli authorities are stealing water access for settlers in the Golan Heights, leaving Syrian villages with minimal or no water supply for drinking and irrigation.Example: Syrian farmers in the Golan struggle to irrigate their fields, while Israeli settlements enjoy advanced water infrastructure for agriculture and domestic use.3. Desertification and Agricultural Decline Without sufficient water, once-fertile Syrian lands in the Golan are turning into arid wastelands. Reduced water flow has led to lower crop yields and made livestock farming unsustainable.****Deforestation and loss of vegetation due to Israeli land seizures and military actions have worsened soil erosion. Impact on Local Farmers: Many Syrian Druze farmers in the Golan Heights have faced **increased water shortages **and have been forced to abandon their agricultural lands due to Israeli-imposed restrictions.Political and Economic Consequences: Israel’s monopolization of Golan’s water has weakened Syrian agricultural independence and placed further strain on Syria’s war-torn economy.Israeli policies in the occupied Golan Heights have led to the systematic destruction of agricultural lands and severe water shortages for Syrian communities. Military operations, settlement expansion, and water control measures have turned once-productive lands into **barren, drought-stricken areas.** These actions exacerbate food insecurity, economic hardship, and environmental decline, further deepening the impact of Israel’s occupation on Syria’s rural populations.Satellite imagery has been instrumental in documenting the environmental and infrastructural impacts of military actions in Lebanon, Palestine, and Syria. Below are specific examples illustrating these effects:Lebanon: Beirut Port Explosion (August 2020): Satellite images captured the extensive damage caused by the explosion at Beirut’s port, highlighting the widespread destruction of the surrounding area.The Express Tribune Southern Lebanon Airstrikes (2024): NASA’s Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) detected numerous heat signatures in southern Lebanon, confirming intense airstrikes that significantly impacted the region. Sensex falls over 100 pts+1www.ndtv.com+1 Palestine (Gaza Strip): Destruction in Rafah (2024): Satellite imagery revealed vast destruction in Rafah following ground operations, with significant damage to residential areas and infrastructure. bellingcat Widespread Damage Across Gaza (2024): Maps, charts, and satellite images demonstrated extensive damage to buildings throughout the Gaza Strip since the onset of conflict. The Express Tribune+3The Guardian+3AP News+3 *Satellite images show destruction from Israel’s assault on Gaza *Israel’s Actions as Ecocide: The Environmental Destruction in Palestine, Lebanon, and SyriaBeyond the catastrophic loss of human life, Israel’s military actions and environmental policies amount to ecocide—the deliberate destruction of ecosystems, natural resources, and biodiversity in Palestine, Lebanon, and Syria. The widespread devastation to land, water, and air in these regions has caused long-term, possibly irreversible, damage to the environment, affecting both people and wildlife for generations to come.1. Systematic Destruction of Farmlands and ForestsPalestine (West Bank & Gaza) Olive Tree Uprooting & Agricultural Sabotage: The Israeli military and settlers have destroyed over 800,000 olive trees in the West Bank since 1967. These trees are essential to Palestinian culture, economy, and environmental stability. Bombing of Gaza’s Agricultural Land: Repeated aerial bombardments and shelling have burned entire farmlands, rendering them infertile due to chemical contamination from explosives. Use of Herbicides to Destroy Crops: Israel has sprayed toxic herbicides along Gaza’s border, killing Palestinian crops under the pretext of clearing security zones. This has led to soil degradation, loss of biodiversity, and food insecurity. Lebanon Forest Fires Caused by Bombing: Israeli shelling in southern Lebanon has sparked wildfires that consume vast forested areas, leading to habitat loss and soil erosion. **Cluster Munitions Contaminating Land: **Unexploded Israeli cluster bombs from the 2006 war still litter fields, making large areas unsafe for farming and human habitation. Syria (Golan Heights) **Deforestation and Desertification: **Israeli policies have restricted Syrian farmers’ access to their land, leading to soil degradation and loss of tree cover. The conversion of agricultural lands into Israeli military zones has resulted in mass deforestation. Illegal Settler Agriculture: Israeli settlers exploit Syrian agricultural lands, redirecting water supplies for exclusive use in Israeli farms while Syrian farmers are denied access to irrigation. 2. Pollution of Water Sources and Deliberate Resource TheftPalestine (Gaza & West Bank) Water Apartheid in the West Bank: Israel diverts over 80% of Palestinian water resources for use by Israeli settlers, leaving Palestinian communities with severe water shortages.*** Destruction of Water Infrastructure in Gaza:** Israeli airstrikes have targeted Gaza’s water desalination plants, sewage treatment facilities, and wells, causing: Toxic contamination of groundwater Severe drinking water shortages (97% of Gaza’s water is undrinkable) Widespread diseases due to waterborne pollutionLebanon Oil Spill Disaster from Israeli Strikes: In 2006, Israel bombed the Jiyyeh power plant, releasing 15,000 tons of oil into the Mediterranean Sea, devastating marine life and fisheries along Lebanon’s coast. Targeting of Dams and Water Networks: Israeli airstrikes have damaged water infrastructure, reducing Lebanon’s access to clean water and irrigation. Syria (Golan Heights) Theft of Water Resources: Israel has diverted water from the Banias and Dan rivers, which are crucial for Syrian agriculture, while settlers receive privileged access. **Water Pollution from Military Activity: **Israeli military zones in the Golan Heights have led to **chemical runoff and contamination of soil and water sources, **harming local wildlife and agriculture. 3. Air, Soil, and Chemical Contamination from Military WeaponsPhosphorus Gas and Toxic BombardmentIsrael’s use of white phosphorus munitions in Gaza and Lebanon has led to:*Soil contamination, making agricultural land infertile*Airborne toxic chemicals, affecting human and animal health*Acid rain formation**, further degrading water and land qualityLong-Term Effects on Ecosystems **Destruction of Pollinators (Bees, Birds, and Wildlife): **Bombings and deforestation have wiped out bee populations and migratory birds, disrupting natural pollination cycles and food production. Collapse of Marine Ecosystems: The Mediterranean coast has suffered massive fish die-offs due to oil spills, phosphorus contamination, and destruction of wastewater treatment plants. 4. The Definition of Ecocide: How Israel’s Actions QualifyUnder international law, ecocide is defined as: “Unlawful or wanton acts committed with the knowledge that there is a substantial likelihood of severe and widespread damage to the environment.”*Israel’s military operations and policies in Palestine, Lebanon, and Syria meet this definition because: They systematically destroy natural ecosystems through bombings, land seizures, and resource theft. They disproportionately target environmental infrastructure (water plants, farmlands, forests). They cause long-term harm to biodiversity, food security, and climate resilience.Holding Israel Accountable for EcocideThe destruction of Palestinian, Lebanese, and Syrian ecosystems is not merely collateral damage but a calculated strategy of environmental warfare. By depriving communities of their lands, water, and clean air, Israel’s actions have devastating consequences for both human populations and the planet.Call to Action:*** International organizations and environmental watchdogs must document and prosecute ecocide crimes in conflict zones. Palestinian, Lebanese, and Syrian communities deserve restoration efforts and reparations for environmental destruction. Global awareness and legal frameworks must be strengthened to prevent the weaponization of nature in warfare.** "
}
,
"relatedposts": [
{
"title" : "Who is COP for, really?",
"author" : "Keyah Hanwi",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/who-is-cop-for-really",
"date" : "2025-11-07 09:00:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com",
"excerpt" : "For thirty years, the world has looked at COP as the path to climate progress. But the reality is different. COP isn’t failing; it’s working exactly as it was designed: protecting and further producing capital.",
"content" : "For thirty years, the world has looked at COP as the path to climate progress. But the reality is different. COP isn’t failing; it’s working exactly as it was designed: protecting and further producing capital.COP has made promises it never intended to keep. It is not about saving the planet, but about protecting profit and power. COP3 was the beginning of the Global North making broken promises. At COP3, the Kyoto Protocol was proposed as a plan to target emissions cuts from industrialized countries. The agreement paved the way for carbon markets, allowing countries and corporations to trade pollution credits instead of actually cutting emissions. The U.S. signed but never ratified it (source), Canada later withdrew (source). Europe met targets in part by outsourcing oil emissions through offsets, often harming and displacing frontline communities (source). What came out of COP3 was not climate justice but a system that let the Global North maintain its power and profit while exporting the consequences.The broken promises of Kyoto set the blueprint for decades of destructive extraction and dispossession that followed. The Global South is not a side note; it is the beating heart of the climate crisis and the first to bleed. While wealthy countries build their prosperity on fossil fuels, the Global South faces devastating man-made ‘natural disasters’ floods, fires, and droughts. These communities continue to fight to protect land, water, and futures, even as rich nations push “net zero by 2050” while backing fossil fuel interests. Promised climate finance remains late, insufficient, and often deepens debt, while Indigenous leaders and frontline activists are routinely excluded from decision-making.Decades later, those same dynamics played out in Glasgow during COP26, which ignited a surge of fossil fuel industry influence and greenwashing. While earlier COPs like COP3 set the foundation, COP26 made it impossible to ignore who these summits are really for. Over 500 fossil fuel lobbyists were present, more than any country’s single delegation, and more than the total number of representatives from the most climate vulnerable nations combined (source).This was not a flaw in the process. This was the process. Inside the Blue Zone, oil executives and carbon traders ran panels while Indigenous people were shut out. The industries fueling climate collapse were prioritized. Frontline communities were left with surveillance, side events, or silence. COP26 didn’t just accommodate fossil fuel power, it handed it a badge and a microphone. Oil companies secured deeper access through sponsorships and side events, pushing carbon markets and voluntary commitments instead of binding action.At COP28, there were approximately 2,456 fossil fuel lobbyists, over 900 more than the total number of delegates from the ten most climate vulnerable countries, which numbered around 1,500 (source). Indigenous people and other climate activists made up only a small fraction of that number. The UAE’s state oil company had access to summit emails (source), while COP28 president Sultan Ahmed Al Jaber used his power to pursue $100 billion in oil and gas deals (source).During COP29 the fossil fuel industry dominated the conversation. They bought access by sponsoring events, and shaped the entire agenda. Chevron, BP, ExxonMobil, Shell, Glencore and TotalEnergies pushed carbon trading schemes and false climate solutions while the planet burned (source). This was never about protecting the environment. Indigenous and frontline activists were pushed aside and silenced. COP29 made it clear: these summits serve capital, not people. COP30 is accelerating the greenwashing that is central to COP.As the international spotlight shines on the Amazon, the greenwashing only intensifies. From November 10-21 COP30 will take place in Belém, the capital of Pará, Brazil in the heart of the Amazon. The summit is being presented as a milestone for climate action while politicians fast track the destruction of the environment. During a visit to Pará in August 2023, President Lula said: “I leave Pará with the certainty that we are going to hold the best COP in history (source). But what is the reality? What does COP30 mean for the people actually living in the Amazon? Who is it really for?As COP30 draws attention to the Amazon, corporate greenwashing takes many forms. On September 17th, the mining company Vale S.A. and Rock in Rio hosted the music festival “Amazon Forever” (source). The festival was a thinly veiled attempt to sanitize the image of a mining giant with a legacy of poisoning and displacing Indigenous communities in Indonesia (source) and the Brazilian Amazon. In February 2025, Brazil’s Federal Prosecutor’s Office filed a lawsuit against Vale, the Brazilian government, and the state of Pará over heavy metal contamination found in the Xikrin Indigenous people. A Federal University of Pará study revealed dangerously high levels of lead, mercury, and nickel in the hair of nearly all 720 individuals surveyed in the Xikrin do Cateté Indigenous Territory.This contamination is linked to Vale’s nickel mining operations at Onça-Puma, which polluted the Cateté River, a vital water source for the community. Despite an agreement in 2022 for monthly compensation, health concerns were unaddressed, prompting legal action demanding a permanent health monitoring program and environmental oversight. Vale disputes responsibility, claiming its operations aren’t to blame and that it monitors water quality around its sites (source).In Pará, a COP30 project called Nova Doca dumps waste in poor Black neighborhoods while sewage systems serve the rich. Untreated sewage flows into local waters. This is environmental racism masked by greenwashing (source).The contradictions run so deep that even sacred guardians are being turned into COP30’s mascot. Curupira, a forest guardian whose feet face backwards to mislead hunters and invaders, has been chosen as the official mascot for COP30 (source). This choice feels like a mockery of Curupira. The government is pushing laws opening the door for land grabs, extraction, and displacement. Forests continue to burn. Curupira is not a mascot. Curupira does not forgive those who harm the forest. He takes revenge, and many attending COP30 would be the exact people he would take revenge on.COP30 is sold as a celebration of the Amazon, but the laws and destructive projects being pushed through tell a different story. The government fast tracked construction of Avenida Liberdade, a four lane highway that will cut through Indigenous and Quilombola territories (source).Quilombola are descendants of enslaved Africans who made Brazil their home, preserving their culture and freedom in remote areas. They have distinct identities and legal rights to their lands, which are constantly threatened by land grabs and development. They have stood in mutual solidarity with Indigenous peoples in Brazil, fighting together to defend their territories and cultures against exploitation.In Brazil, highways often cut through these lands. BR-163 cuts through Pará and Mato Grosso, built to move soy and used by land grabbers and illegal loggers. BR-319, set to be repaved through the Amazon, threatens dozens of communities with invasion and displacement. These roads don’t bring protection or progress, they bring violence and destruction. One recent incident occurred in December 2024, when Guarani Kaiowá and Terena communities protesting for basic access to drinking water faced violent repression by police forces who could quickly mobilize thanks to these roads (source). Such infrastructure facilitates state violence against Indigenous resistance, widening the threats faced by these communities.As a Lakota, seeing brutalization of Guarani Kaiowá and Terena at the hands of military police for protesting for water painfully echoed the fight at Standing Rock. Water is sacred. Water is life. Violence is no accident, it’s embedded into law.Indigenous and Quilombola territories remain under threat and await proper demarcation. The Brazilian Senate passed bills that threaten land rights. In May, they approved PL 2159/21, the Devastation Bill, which dismantles Brazil’s environmental licensing system, making it easier for corporations to push through destructive projects. It accelerates deforestation, putting 32.6% of Indigenous lands and 80.1% of Quilombola territories at risk. On the final day permitted by law, President Lula vetoed 63 of the bill’s nearly 400 provisions, including clauses that would have allowed medium-impact projects to bypass full environmental review and provisions that would have excluded Indigenous and Quilombola communities from consultation. While these vetoes preserve some environmental protections, the law still allows the federal government to accelerate certain ‘strategic’ projects, leaving communities and ecosystems at continued risk (source).Lula recently approved an offshore oil drilling project near the mouth of the Amazon River, signaling continued support for fossil fuel extraction even as COP30 approaches (source). This decision highlights the tension between Brazil’s role as host of a major climate summit and its ongoing promotion of environmentally destructive projects. Days after the Senate approved the Devastation Bill, PL 717/24 was approved (source). If it becomes law, it would suspend the demarcation of Indigenous and Quilombola lands, including Imbuh and Morro dos Cavalos.In April, after decades of struggle, the Guarani Mbya finally had Morro dos Cavalos officially recognized, but that recognition is already under threat.Helder Barbalho, Governor of Pará, is a driving force behind many issues linked to COP30. Under his administration, public funds are funneled into symbolic projects like fake metal trees in Belém, while forests are cleared for the Avenida Liberdade highway, which cuts through Indigenous and Quilombola territories. He inherited a political machine built to protect elites and reward exploitation from his father.Barbalho is using the summit to push the lie of his self-proclaimed title of “Green Governor.” In September 2024, during New York Climate Week, he made a $180 million carbon credit deal with the LEAF Coalition, involving Amazon and the Walmart Foundation. Helder claimed Indigenous participation, but 38 organizations from Pará publicly denounced the lack of consultation. The deal, aiming to sell 12 million tons of credits, faces legal challenges for violating Brazilian law and pre-selling carbon without consulting them (source).Barbalho drapes himself in the image of the Amazon while pushing its destruction through agribusiness, mining, logging, and infrastructure. His inherited corruption fuels land grabbing and deforestation. According to his 2022 disclosure, he owns over 6,000 head of cattle valued at about $2.87 million (combining $2.5 million for cattle and $370,000 share in Agropecuária Rio Branco), with total assets near $3.9 million (source).The hypocrisy of politicians like Barbalho, who present themselves as champions of the environment, mirrors what happens on the global stage, just as what Txai Suruí, an Indigenous leader and activist from Brazil experienced during COP16, the United Nations Biodiversity Conference held in Cali, Colombia in 2024. While COP16 focused on biodiversity under the Convention on Biological Diversity process, COP30 continues that agenda under a different frame. Both are UN environmental summits addressing overlapping and inseparable issues.At COP16, Txai Suruí was protesting against Marco Temporal, a dangerous, anti-Indigenous legal argument in Brazil that threatens Indigenous land rights by claiming only lands occupied before 1988 should be recognized. All of Brazil is, and always has been Indigenous land. During the protest, she described how a UN security guard grabbed her arm. “She grabbed me by the arm and my hands are painted red, which symbolizes our blood. And she said: you got me dirty. Then she twisted my arm. That’s when I started screaming for help. I was scared, I didn’t expect it.” According to Txai, she and other activists had their badges forcibly removed and they were detained in a COP security room (source). Txai and other protesters complied with demands, but they were still met with violence and detained, having their badges temporarily stripped. This violence and repression illustrate the ongoing struggles Indigenous peoples face, not only politically with attacks like Marco Temporal but also physically, even within international forums that claim to protect biodiversity and the climate.As Indigenous leaders continue to resist the corporate and political forces shaping COP30, their frustration is expressed in clear and uncompromising words. Auricélia Arapiuns, president of COIAB (Coordenação das Organizações Indígenas da Amazônia Brasileira), stated:“COP30 is as much a farce as the Governor of this state, who is a farce. And it’s a farce that attacks the rights of Indigenous peoples and nature every day.”Her words capture the deep mistrust many Indigenous peoples hold toward a summit that claims to protect the Amazon while allowing continued exploitation.Aílton Krenak, Indigenous leader and philosopher, has criticized the use of the Amazon as symbolic cover for climate inaction. In an interview with Cenarium in February 2025, he stated: “The Amazon cannot be the symbol of COP30. It is the territory where this global event will take place, but it will very likely come at a high social cost. I do not imagine that local communities will receive direct benefits from this event.” He warned that turning the Amazon into a symbol erases the lives, cultures, and resistance of its peoples, substituting deep structural justice with superficial branding. For Krenak, framing the Amazon as a symbol while extractive policies continue is not just cynical. It is a betrayal of the forest’s living communities and ancestral knowledge.Alessandra Korap Munduruku has called COP30 what it is: a violation and a betrayal of land and people. At TEDxAmazônia in Belém, she denounced COP30 and the empty promises behind the summit:“We realize that we, Indigenous peoples, are sick because of mining, because of mercury. Every time we sit with researchers, they say women’s breast milk is contaminated with mercury, women’s wombs are contaminated with mercury. This shouldn’t exist. But what solution will they bring? Will COP bring this solution?”“We know it’s 30 years of COP, but what we see is a COP of business, agreements, parties, festivals, not solving the problems happening in the territory. They are trying to erase us, but we keep fighting, speaking, shouting, so they hear the needs of Indigenous peoples, Quilombola peoples, and traditional peoples. It is our duty to shout, and their obligation to act.” Korap is not just rejecting commodification. She is naming the lie: the Amazon is being used to sell the illusion of climate justice, while the people who have defended it for generations are silenced, sidelined, or sold out.COP30, like its predecessors, must be scrutinized through this lens. Indigenous peoples continue to resist both political and physical violence while fighting to protect their territories and ways of life. You cannot talk about climate justice while threatening the rights of the people who have protected these ecosystems for centuries. You cannot continue to exploit and exclude the Global South while pushing false solutions, deepening debt, and criminalizing resistance."
}
,
{
"title" : "The Real Test for Zohran Mamdani—and the Rest of Us",
"author" : "Collis Browne",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/the-real-test-for-zohran-mamdani-and-the-rest-of-us",
"date" : "2025-11-06 11:39:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/Zohran-bridge-parade.jpg",
"excerpt" : "“We have toppled a political dynasty,” Zohran Mamdani, mayor-elect of New York City, triumphantly exclaimed during his victory speech late Tuesday night, Nov. 4, in Brooklyn, NY. After a year-long arduous campaign against disgraced former NY governor, Andrew Cuomo, Mamdani’s win feels historic—because it is. One only needed to feel the energy in NYC on election night to understand the gravity of its importance: a palpable hope, inspiring people across the ideological spectrum and around the world that someone can boldly challenge the corrupt political and economic status quo and win.",
"content" : "“We have toppled a political dynasty,” Zohran Mamdani, mayor-elect of New York City, triumphantly exclaimed during his victory speech late Tuesday night, Nov. 4, in Brooklyn, NY. After a year-long arduous campaign against disgraced former NY governor, Andrew Cuomo, Mamdani’s win feels historic—because it is. One only needed to feel the energy in NYC on election night to understand the gravity of its importance: a palpable hope, inspiring people across the ideological spectrum and around the world that someone can boldly challenge the corrupt political and economic status quo and win.But here’s the thing: while Mamdani’s win is certainly encouraging, no one should be surprised by it. The overwhelming majority of the global population is bound by a shared experience of being crushed by corporate capitalism and its stranglehold on governments and the people. So any politician aiming to do literally anything to oppose corruption and economic exploitation already has an advantage. Mamdani’s message was simple, and it spoke to the majority. It was “The Rent is Too Damn High” for a new generation, without the satire, and it worked. (Not to mention, he’s charming.)But now the harder part actually starts: the work that it takes to create change. Not only for Mamdani—but for us, too.The pushback from Republicans and establishment Democrats alike is going to be strong and sustained. And they will come together to sabotage this movement with every tool they have in city hall, in the media, and elsewhere.They will try, like they do with the majority of progressive politicians, to neutralize the threat Mamdani poses to the status quo: first, by sabotaging his efforts to enact his agenda. (We’ve seen this happen with Brandon Johnson, the current mayor of Chicago, who ran on a progressive platform and has received major pushback from establishment politicians.) Second, by sustaining a lengthy war of attrition on Mamdani’s morals against the status quo and corrupt systems, wearing him down into submission. More sinisterly, Republicans may even try to co-opt this message. Conservative businessman and former U.S. presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy’s response to Mamdani’s win was, “We got our a** handed to us; … Our side needs to focus on affordability.”If this forces a broader focus on economic equality, great. But more likely, it could signal a path to hollow out a truly progressive agenda with more lies and lip service.Despite all of these obstacles, Mamdani still has a number of cards that he can play to create change.Immediately, he can make several new appointments and key hires in city government: Deputy Mayors, commissioners of more than 80 departments and agencies like DOT, DOE, NYPD, FDNY, DEP, DSNY; Rent Guidelines Board (RGB) for rent freezes or reductions; City Planning Commission (CPC) which has huge power over housing justice; Taxi & Limousine Commission (TLC) which regulates rideshare and taxi workers; the Board of Correction (BOC), an oversight body that is crucial to a decarceration agenda; the Economic Development Corporation (EDC) which controls billions in contracts, development projects, and waterfront property; the Workforce Development Board which shapes labor policy, job programs, and union partnerships; and even the Head of the NYC Law Department, who could change the city’s litigation strategies to drop harmful suits, defend protesters, or pursue housing violations.All these major systems can begin to immediately implement a more egalitarian and justice-based progressive agenda. He can also freeze the rent for millions of New Yorkers by appointing supportive members to the Rent Board (provided Eric Adams doesn’t replace all the members with expired terms before his official tenure in December). He can certainly enact the city-run grocery stores, and use the kluge that the Trump administration is using à go-go— the Executive Order—to fast-track some of his policies.But there are three crucial things he can’t do alone and where we, as constituents, cannot take a back seat. He will not be able to get a budget passed in the City Council without citizen pressure on their local borough presidents and city council members. He will also not be able to get a 2% tax hike on the ultra-wealthy passed in Albany or make buses free without Gov. Kathy Hochul’s support. (Hochul, being a notorious establishment Democrat, might give him trouble on this.)Yes, he won, and that is great news. Let’s celebrate it. But this can’t be politics “as usual.” Now, we who pledged our support for these policies must show up and make it clear to the rest of the political system that our demands must be met."
}
,
{
"title" : "Black Liberation Views on Palestine",
"author" : "EIP Editors",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/black-liberation-on-palestine",
"date" : "2025-10-17 09:01:00 -0400",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/mandela-keffiyeh.jpg",
"excerpt" : "",
"content" : "In understanding global politics, it is important to look at Black liberation struggles as one important source of moral perspective. So, when looking at Palestine, we look to Black leaders to see how they perceived the Palestinian struggle in relation to theirs, from the 1960’s to today.Why must we understand where the injustice lies? Because, as Desmond Tutu famously said, “If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.”{% for person in site.data.quotes-black-liberation-palestine %}{{ person.name }}{% for quote in person.quotes %}“{{ quote.text }}”{% if quote.source %}— {{ quote.source }}{% endif %}{% endfor %}{% endfor %}"
}
]
}