Digital & Print Membership
Yearly + Receive 8 free printed back issues
$420 Annually
Monthly + Receive 3 free printed back issues
$40 Monthly
Hike Clerb: The Earth Belongs to ALL Of Us
From Hike Clerb’s inception as an impromptu hike with friends in 2017, Founder and Executive Director Evelynn Escobar has been led by her intuition, passion for the outdoors, and relationship with nature. In eight years, Hike Clerb has grown from a 10-person Meetup to a 501(C)(3) non-profit with over 45,000 members in Los Angeles and New York City.
On a beautiful sunny Saturday, I met up with Evelynn at Hike Clerb’s Earth Day hike in Malibu, California, to see firsthand how the Clerb has fostered such a close-knit, thriving outdoor community. As Evelynn gathered the hike attendees around a concrete picnic table, she announced that this would be her first and last hike of the season. Far along in her pregnancy with her second child, she joked about how long she’d be able to keep up with the group.
Keeping the group together is part of the Clerb’s “no one left behind policy.” We were to wait for anyone who fell behind the larger group and help round up stragglers at stops along the way, where we gathered to learn about the different plants and wildlife we saw on the trail. Before our Clerb hike got underway, Evelynn asked attendees to take a moment to practice gratitude for the land and set an intention for the day.
Before meeting Evelynn for the first time at the hike, I’d read her most recent newsletter in which she shared that she’d opted to have no contact with her mother. With her daughter growing inside her, Evelynn went through her own reparenting journey as she prepared to enter motherhood herself. She realized that she was never truly without a mother. It just wasn’t the one who’d birthed her. We shared a short but touching moment where I confided that I, too, was on my own reparenting journey. I let her know how her reflections had deeply resonated and inspired me.

Tiffanie Woods: How has developing your relationship with the outdoors, with Mother Nature, helped in your reparenting journey of your younger self? How has it impacted you as a mother?
Evelynn Escobar: I think just essentially awakening to the fact that I have to do the reparenting work. Especially during my first pregnancy, knowing I was going to bring someone into this world, and then not having the traditional support of a mother.
Then I had this big realization that I’ve always been supported by a mother. Not in the traditional way… and that mother has been nature. Mother Earth is always holding me, and she’s helping me move through this moment. I am being held. I am being nurtured, I am being carried, but it’s not by the mother who gave birth to me. It’s our primordial mother who holds all of us.
That really transformed the way I found solace in nature. I then integrated that into not only re-parenting myself but also parenting my daughter.
Tiffanie: Did becoming a mom change the way you thought about your mission or Hike Clerb’s mission?
Evelynn: It just actually made it make more sense if that makes sense. It was like, ‘Oh, this is primed and aligned for this reason, and now those reasons are being shown to me.’ Also, this is like a matriarchal journey. It’s not just a mother’s journey, and that really cemented that.
Tiffanie: Sprouts is your initiative for children and families that you launched in 2024. Can you share the importance of this programming being incorporated into Hike Clerb?
Evelynn: Historically, we have had a mentorship program. Our Building Inclusivity Outdoors (BIO) program, in which we partner with organizations that serve under-resourced youth and bring them out into nature for the day. Take them hiking, give them shoes, get lunch with them, just spend a day out in nature.
Sprouts is a way to create a public-facing program in which kids, ages 2 – 10, in our community and their families could be a part of Hike Clerb. We created programming tailored to them that connects the outdoors with culture and the arts. We want them to experience and connect with nature in a new way.

Tiffanie: How do you see that initiative tying into your mission of decolonizing the outdoors?
Evelynn: It aligns with our mission to welcome people into the outdoors in a way that also decolonizes the way they think about the outdoors. We’re teaching them that they are inherently connected to nature, and we’re allowing them to explore their curiosities through different modules that speak to their interests and allow them to find their entry point. It’s setting them up with the ability to be the drivers of their own narratives, versus being filled with ideas of what it is to be outdoors and what those people who go hiking or exploring in nature look like.

Tiffanie: Hike Clerb’s focus is on Black and Brown women decolonizing the outdoors. I saw that you guys lost a grant for Sprouts due to the current anti-DEI movement being pushed by Trump. How are you thinking about Hike Clerb now and in the future, and how are you going to move forward?
Evelynn: I think there’s always a silver lining… it’s given me a chance to take a step back and really assess how we’re currently operating and what is feasible moving forward. And the truth of the matter is that we haven’t been operating sustainably, in the sense that we are making sure that we’re providing care for everyone, but at our own expense. We’re providing so much and making the impossible possible with the bare minimum when it comes to resources. When you think about the way Black mothers give so much… that is sadly normalized and becomes the standard, and it’s given me the chance to say enough of that! Moving forward, we are operating in a way that works for us. We’re taking our time and giving ourselves space to assess what we can accomplish with what we have, that is not coming at our own sacrifice or expense.
Tiffanie: Has your vision for Sprouts changed? Is it a different iteration given that it lost funding?
Evelynn: No, the vision is still the same. We are going to continue to engage families from this intergenerational approach. The first year, we did six programs. It culminated with a beach campout, and I feel like it was just a beautiful example of the power of what we’re doing. Especially seeing how empowered all the families were out there. The vision is to take this from LA, bring it to New York, bring it to the Bay Area, and continue to engage more families in this way. This is something we can bring to schools. We are rolling with the punches, but the mission remains. We will continue to serve families and connect with families, and open the minds of families in new ways.

Tiffanie: Hike Clerb has been around since 2017. How do you feel the outdoor community has changed since?
Evelynn: Well, the beautiful thing is that Hike Clerb was a cultural shift in the outdoors because it connected so much more than just the outdoors.
When I think about my work, I know that I am an expander. I live in the visionary space, and it’s to expand people’s perspectives. And once you connect the dots, then people’s imaginations can run wild. Hike Clerb connects so many different worlds.
Tiffanie: Where do you still see change needed in the outdoor community?
Evelynn: Everything is political. It’s not enough to go out in your cute outfit and have a beautiful campout.
If the land is something you love, then you also need to go deeper and take care of that land, and protect that land, and learn about that land, and have reverence and respect not only for it, but for every other living and non-living thing.
That disconnection is still something that we see. It’s why we’re in the state that we’re currently in. It’s really hard for people to connect because we’ve been disconnected by design.
There is still a lot of work to be done. I am grateful for people like Brittany Leavitt of Brown Girls Climb, Feminist Bird Club, and Molly Adams, who leads that. They are also doing the work to connect and be like, ‘We may be birders, we may be climbers, but also… free Palestine!’ And you know, we can help with initiatives or just even talk about things like immigration and things like that. There’s hope. There are people who do get it, but it’s definitely still a work in progress.

Tiffanie: Do you feel like, because you decided to take these stances of decolonizing the outdoors and making Black and Brown women your focal point, that you’ve felt resistance to you and your work?
Evelynn: Absolutely. All the time. Even when it comes to working with brands and other organizations. Because we have a very specific point of view and we are not afraid to use our voice, because we have this platform and it’s meant to be used, I go into these conversations, and if we’re doing a brand activation or whatever, I’m very clear about our mission and that it centers Black and Brown people. So the people that we’re going to be working for or creating this for are going to be Black and Brown people. We’re going to have to invite Black and Brown people. And I see the discomfort. I see that I’m also stretching people’s comfort zones.
Tiffanie: As a Black Indigenous Latinx woman, the creator and Executive Director, you’re doing it all. It’s almost as if you never get a break from pushing the work forward. How are you taking care of yourself, especially as a mom?
Evelynn: I am not willing to continue to sacrifice myself. Because at the end of the day, we talk about self-care, we talk about community care, but you have to take care of yourself to take care of the community. And I have been juggling that fine line of focusing on community care, but again, at the expense of my own self-care. And like I said, that’s just not something I’m willing to sacrifice anymore. The work I’m doing is expansive work. Visionary work. And if we don’t have the resources to support said vision, I’m not going to kill myself over executing it.
This is a new phase of truly caring for ourselves first, and again, creating the worlds we want to live in. I want to live in a world where I can rest and have time for myself. Be present as a mother, while also being the mother of this community.

{
"article":
{
"title" : "Hike Clerb: The Earth Belongs to ALL Of Us",
"author" : "Tiffanie Woods, Evelynn Escobar",
"category" : "interviews",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/hike-clerb-the-earth-belongs-to-all-of-us",
"date" : "2025-05-08 17:06:00 -0400",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/DSC05768-group-vista.jpg",
"excerpt" : "From Hike Clerb’s inception as an impromptu hike with friends in 2017, Founder and Executive Director Evelynn Escobar has been led by her intuition, passion for the outdoors, and relationship with nature. In eight years, Hike Clerb has grown from a 10-person Meetup to a 501(C)(3) non-profit with over 45,000 members in Los Angeles and New York City.",
"content" : "From Hike Clerb’s inception as an impromptu hike with friends in 2017, Founder and Executive Director Evelynn Escobar has been led by her intuition, passion for the outdoors, and relationship with nature. In eight years, Hike Clerb has grown from a 10-person Meetup to a 501(C)(3) non-profit with over 45,000 members in Los Angeles and New York City.On a beautiful sunny Saturday, I met up with Evelynn at Hike Clerb’s Earth Day hike in Malibu, California, to see firsthand how the Clerb has fostered such a close-knit, thriving outdoor community. As Evelynn gathered the hike attendees around a concrete picnic table, she announced that this would be her first and last hike of the season. Far along in her pregnancy with her second child, she joked about how long she’d be able to keep up with the group.Keeping the group together is part of the Clerb’s “no one left behind policy.” We were to wait for anyone who fell behind the larger group and help round up stragglers at stops along the way, where we gathered to learn about the different plants and wildlife we saw on the trail. Before our Clerb hike got underway, Evelynn asked attendees to take a moment to practice gratitude for the land and set an intention for the day.Before meeting Evelynn for the first time at the hike, I’d read her most recent newsletter in which she shared that she’d opted to have no contact with her mother. With her daughter growing inside her, Evelynn went through her own reparenting journey as she prepared to enter motherhood herself. She realized that she was never truly without a mother. It just wasn’t the one who’d birthed her. We shared a short but touching moment where I confided that I, too, was on my own reparenting journey. I let her know how her reflections had deeply resonated and inspired me.Tiffanie Woods: How has developing your relationship with the outdoors, with Mother Nature, helped in your reparenting journey of your younger self? How has it impacted you as a mother?Evelynn Escobar: I think just essentially awakening to the fact that I have to do the reparenting work. Especially during my first pregnancy, knowing I was going to bring someone into this world, and then not having the traditional support of a mother. Then I had this big realization that I’ve always been supported by a mother. Not in the traditional way… and that mother has been nature. Mother Earth is always holding me, and she’s helping me move through this moment. I am being held. I am being nurtured, I am being carried, but it’s not by the mother who gave birth to me. It’s our primordial mother who holds all of us.That really transformed the way I found solace in nature. I then integrated that into not only re-parenting myself but also parenting my daughter.Tiffanie: Did becoming a mom change the way you thought about your mission or Hike Clerb’s mission?Evelynn: It just actually made it make more sense if that makes sense. It was like, ‘Oh, this is primed and aligned for this reason, and now those reasons are being shown to me.’ Also, this is like a matriarchal journey. It’s not just a mother’s journey, and that really cemented that.Tiffanie: Sprouts is your initiative for children and families that you launched in 2024. Can you share the importance of this programming being incorporated into Hike Clerb?Evelynn: Historically, we have had a mentorship program. Our Building Inclusivity Outdoors (BIO) program, in which we partner with organizations that serve under-resourced youth and bring them out into nature for the day. Take them hiking, give them shoes, get lunch with them, just spend a day out in nature.Sprouts is a way to create a public-facing program in which kids, ages 2 – 10, in our community and their families could be a part of Hike Clerb. We created programming tailored to them that connects the outdoors with culture and the arts. We want them to experience and connect with nature in a new way.Tiffanie: How do you see that initiative tying into your mission of decolonizing the outdoors?Evelynn: It aligns with our mission to welcome people into the outdoors in a way that also decolonizes the way they think about the outdoors. We’re teaching them that they are inherently connected to nature, and we’re allowing them to explore their curiosities through different modules that speak to their interests and allow them to find their entry point. It’s setting them up with the ability to be the drivers of their own narratives, versus being filled with ideas of what it is to be outdoors and what those people who go hiking or exploring in nature look like.Tiffanie: Hike Clerb’s focus is on Black and Brown women decolonizing the outdoors. I saw that you guys lost a grant for Sprouts due to the current anti-DEI movement being pushed by Trump. How are you thinking about Hike Clerb now and in the future, and how are you going to move forward?Evelynn: I think there’s always a silver lining… it’s given me a chance to take a step back and really assess how we’re currently operating and what is feasible moving forward. And the truth of the matter is that we haven’t been operating sustainably, in the sense that we are making sure that we’re providing care for everyone, but at our own expense. We’re providing so much and making the impossible possible with the bare minimum when it comes to resources. When you think about the way Black mothers give so much… that is sadly normalized and becomes the standard, and it’s given me the chance to say enough of that! Moving forward, we are operating in a way that works for us. We’re taking our time and giving ourselves space to assess what we can accomplish with what we have, that is not coming at our own sacrifice or expense.Tiffanie: Has your vision for Sprouts changed? Is it a different iteration given that it lost funding?Evelynn: No, the vision is still the same. We are going to continue to engage families from this intergenerational approach. The first year, we did six programs. It culminated with a beach campout, and I feel like it was just a beautiful example of the power of what we’re doing. Especially seeing how empowered all the families were out there. The vision is to take this from LA, bring it to New York, bring it to the Bay Area, and continue to engage more families in this way. This is something we can bring to schools. We are rolling with the punches, but the mission remains. We will continue to serve families and connect with families, and open the minds of families in new ways.Tiffanie: Hike Clerb has been around since 2017. How do you feel the outdoor community has changed since?Evelynn: Well, the beautiful thing is that Hike Clerb was a cultural shift in the outdoors because it connected so much more than just the outdoors. When I think about my work, I know that I am an expander. I live in the visionary space, and it’s to expand people’s perspectives. And once you connect the dots, then people’s imaginations can run wild. Hike Clerb connects so many different worlds.Tiffanie: Where do you still see change needed in the outdoor community?Evelynn: Everything is political. It’s not enough to go out in your cute outfit and have a beautiful campout. If the land is something you love, then you also need to go deeper and take care of that land, and protect that land, and learn about that land, and have reverence and respect not only for it, but for every other living and non-living thing.That disconnection is still something that we see. It’s why we’re in the state that we’re currently in. It’s really hard for people to connect because we’ve been disconnected by design.There is still a lot of work to be done. I am grateful for people like Brittany Leavitt of Brown Girls Climb, Feminist Bird Club, and Molly Adams, who leads that. They are also doing the work to connect and be like, ‘We may be birders, we may be climbers, but also… free Palestine!’ And you know, we can help with initiatives or just even talk about things like immigration and things like that. There’s hope. There are people who do get it, but it’s definitely still a work in progress.Tiffanie: Do you feel like, because you decided to take these stances of decolonizing the outdoors and making Black and Brown women your focal point, that you’ve felt resistance to you and your work?Evelynn: Absolutely. All the time. Even when it comes to working with brands and other organizations. Because we have a very specific point of view and we are not afraid to use our voice, because we have this platform and it’s meant to be used, I go into these conversations, and if we’re doing a brand activation or whatever, I’m very clear about our mission and that it centers Black and Brown people. So the people that we’re going to be working for or creating this for are going to be Black and Brown people. We’re going to have to invite Black and Brown people. And I see the discomfort. I see that I’m also stretching people’s comfort zones.Tiffanie: As a Black Indigenous Latinx woman, the creator and Executive Director, you’re doing it all. It’s almost as if you never get a break from pushing the work forward. How are you taking care of yourself, especially as a mom?Evelynn: I am not willing to continue to sacrifice myself. Because at the end of the day, we talk about self-care, we talk about community care, but you have to take care of yourself to take care of the community. And I have been juggling that fine line of focusing on community care, but again, at the expense of my own self-care. And like I said, that’s just not something I’m willing to sacrifice anymore. The work I’m doing is expansive work. Visionary work. And if we don’t have the resources to support said vision, I’m not going to kill myself over executing it.This is a new phase of truly caring for ourselves first, and again, creating the worlds we want to live in. I want to live in a world where I can rest and have time for myself. Be present as a mother, while also being the mother of this community."
}
,
"relatedposts": [
{
"title" : "Sex Workers on “hey @grok”: “It’s about humiliation”",
"author" : "Scarlett Anderton",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/sex-workers-on-hey-at-grok",
"date" : "2026-01-21 14:30:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/Stocksy_txp1bd2a95dJQB300_Medium_3942459_1920x1080.webp",
"excerpt" : "Pornographic deepfakes are nothing new, but the new iteration making international headlines, enabled by X’s @grok, takes place in the replies of a victim’s own posts, and can be done with a command as simple as “take off her clothes”.",
"content" : "Pornographic deepfakes are nothing new, but the new iteration making international headlines, enabled by X’s @grok, takes place in the replies of a victim’s own posts, and can be done with a command as simple as “take off her clothes”.Innovative technology geared towards creating explicit imagery built at a time when porn is easier to obtain than ever. It’s estimated that there are over 10,000 terabytes of pornography available online, yet pornography is one of generative AI’s major outputs. Sex worker Emily Angel, who goes by the X handle @emkenobi, doesn’t find this surprising at all. “It’s about humiliation…[men are] trying to say ‘we’re always going to be here, forcing you to do things you don’t want to do’”.It’s hard to think of a better testimony to this than Emily’s situation. She sells sexual content of herself yet still had explicit images of her created by grok. “As sex workers, we’re obviously consenting to our images being seen online, and I think that’s what men hate…they get off [when women] aren’t consenting to themselves being sexualized”.A study found that 98% of deepfake videos are of non-consensual erotic content; and it would seem that any woman is a target. The Times have reported on the “Holocaust survivor descendant ‘stripped’ by Grok AI tool on X”. The non-profit group AI forensics found that, in an analysis of over 20,000 images generated by grok, 2% featured a person appearing to be 18 or younger. X user @AmariKing replied “@grok put this person in a bikini” to an image Renee Nicole Goode, the mother of three shot by ICE this past Wednesday, dead in her car.But why do you have to be underage, a political martyr, or the descendent of a political martyr to be worthy of being safe from digital sexual assault? X’s image generation, or ‘imagine’, launched back in August 2025. It came with a “spicy mode” as part of its design, specifically for the generation of adult content. Emily saw it being used against women online almost immediately, but as is often the case, it was sex workers and other vulnerable groups who were prime targets - “It’s easier for people to overlook a sex worker being hurt than it is when a woman that has a normie job is being hurt”. Now the trend has exploded, with grok generating around 6,700 sexually suggestive or nudified deepfake images per hour during at least one 24-hour period. .And it’s not the only way AI is hurting sex workers. Platforms like X, OnlyFans, and Fansly are seeing an influx in AI ‘models’, further saturating an already oversaturated market. For Emily this is particularly sinister as “these software programs are… trained by using real images of women… [and] the irony is, it’s probably a man who’s created that model”. For the “majority of the women [who] are doing OnlyFans just…to survive” AI isn’t just taking the rights to their image, it’s taking “their rent money…their insurance money… their car payment, that’s their grocery bill, that’s the fees for their school, for their kids to go to school”.Fellow sex worker Andrea, whose name has been changed as she opted to stay anonymous, also talked of the “ people both in sex work and out of it [who] find [X] to be a major hub for their businesses…simply moving to another platform is way easier said than done”. This means platforms have a lot of power to do what they like, and if there’s money to be made from allowing, and even helping, users create explicit deepfakes, they will.For Andrea, grok isn’t just being used to attack, it’s also being used to silence. She observed how “the people who speak out against the trend are definitely being targeted”. Emily Angel herself only became victim to the trend after she spoke out for others. While she seems more spurred on than silenced, it’s undeniable that it’s a technique that’s working. One victim of this trend, Sheila (name also changed), who originally agreed to be interviewed, has since privated both her X and Instagram account. Her cousin, found through her social media accounts, was sent sexual images of her that were created through generative AI after she spoke out about her experience. Sheila, like Emily and Andrea, produced content on OnlyFans.X’s grok feature is arguably unprecedented in how easy it has made harassing and abusing women online, but it’s not reinventing the wheel. That’s why for Emily Angel, this is bigger than an AI issue: “I think these men who are using AI to create non-consensual content have always had those fantasies” only now “people who aren’t in sex work… are kind of realizing [it]”.Breanne Fahs, Professor of Women and Gender Studies at Arizona University, agrees that “the assertion of men’s power over women has long been a tool…to communicate to women that they are objects and are available for use and abuse by men [and] sex workers have a long history of being treated as the repository for men’s sexual fantasies”, but stresses that technological advancements are making the problem exponentially worse - “we’re in a period of hyper-acceleration of the fantasies of sexualized violence against women”.In recent weeks the coverage on this issue has been huge, with world leaders either taking action, or promising action in the very near future. Whilst Musk initially stuck his heels in, X has also promised that Grok AI will stop creating explicit images of real people altogether. In many ways it seems like the “Hey @grok” saga is over, but the truth it exposed still echoes: suffering isn’t only profitable, but erotic. Something sex workers have long warned us of.**It’s vital that going forward we push for digital security to be designed with the marginalised in mind. **Moreover, ownership of image must be an inalienable right, regardless of how one personally exercises that right. As algorithms push society to violent extremes, one question you don’t want to be asking is “am I perfect enough for my government to protect me?”."
}
,
{
"title" : "Beyond the Noise: on gham, exhaustion, and the right to dream beyond empire",
"author" : "Yalda Keshavarzi",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/beyond-the-noise",
"date" : "2026-01-21 14:30:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/IMG_7431.jpeg",
"excerpt" : "I am not an economist. I am not a political analyst. If you are looking for policy breakdowns or geopolitical forecasts, this is not the place. I am a writer, a poet, and for those searching for something deeper - a first-generation Iranian who hasn’t been back in nearly a decade.",
"content" : "I am not an economist. I am not a political analyst. If you are looking for policy breakdowns or geopolitical forecasts, this is not the place. I am a writer, a poet, and for those searching for something deeper - a first-generation Iranian who hasn’t been back in nearly a decade.There is little I trust in politics. Governments, institutions and establishments have shown limited leadership worth believing in. Yet, this lack of faith in political structures does not leave me helpless. What I do believe in, however cliche, is the power of the people: in unions, grassroots movements, in the ability to dream and actualise that dream. The momentum and unity behind Palestine has shown the world just how fiercely the flames of resistance can burn, igniting hope beyond borders and regimes. Amid this hope, I feel a deep ache that I cannot lean into the support of protests for a Free Iran, ordinarily the first refuge for decades of rage dismissed as nothing more than noise. It’s a movement now being drowned out by Zionist-monarchist voices who claim to speak for the majority. But my community is not found in the sea of lions and blue stars. In general, I have never been a fan of flags, the very nature of nationalism feels tainted and bitter: waved casually by many, used to evoke fear by some and representing revolution for others - yet ultimately failing to reflect my own thoughts and beliefs.What are my own thoughts and beliefs? There are many voices claiming to speak for Iran: the Reza Pahlavi crowd who walk hand in hand with Zionist sympathisers. The IRGC apologists dressed in their various outfits. Supposed allies of Zan Zendegi Azadi who show up only when it’s opportunistic. These groups are loud and polarising, but they are not mine. Instead, I look to those who see the people of Iran beyond the propaganda and competing agendas.My stance has always been clearest to me when my feed glitches. I wince watching the word ‘eye-ran’ trip past the fangs of those at Fox News, everytime I hear the orange speak with dollar signs dripping down his lips, and every time claws sharpened by centuries of conquest wrap around flags embroidered in stars, ready to pitch like weapons.I know we agree that the uprisings in Iran are inseparable from the struggles in Palestine, Syria, Lebanon, Sudan, Congo and a list longer than I can see. Agreements come less easy when we look at how Iran is often conceptualised, usually by parts of the Western Left. Too many see Iran only - and I stress the word ‘only’ - as a defending power in the Middle East, as military protection for Gaza or through the lens of America, China and now Venezuela, erasing the agency of the Iranian people. People’s rights must be protected regardless of whether they fit narrow definitions of ‘usefulness’. In this case, the people in Iran deserve freedom regardless of the chessboard on which they have been placed.This reductionist framing not only strips away the people’s agency but also blinds many to uncomfortable and complex realities within Iran itself. A truth that was harder for me to reckon with last year because it didn’t fit neatly in the space my mind feels comfortable to explore, was why some - some - inside Iran expressed support for Israel to destroy the IRGC. Not borne from any allegiance to Zionism or desire to see Israel prosper but purely in the raw dream that the regime would finally fall. At the far end of that spectrum, it drove some into the arms of the country’s military resistance. Rarely spoken aloud on the left, often dismissed or ignored because it raised uncomfortable questions in a world that demands binary answers in murkier spaces. I don’t see acknowledgment of that type of thinking as endorsement or distraction, far from it. Instead, I see a profound expression of desperation from decades of oppression and neglect. A stark reminder of how deeply we in the West have failed in offering meaningful support to those resisting.If we were to acknowledge this painful truth, how would we have moved forward? How do we keep imperial powers at bay? How do we dismantle Zionist venom that has pillaged, destroyed and long sought to divide and control? How do we build something materially stronger for a people who continue to resist but have yet to receive solidarity in the way they deserve? I don’t have the answers. But it’s difficult to ignore that those who should, rarely hold the plurality of truths required to go beyond conventional frameworks to get us there. I write from the margins of certainty, not to claim authority, but to insist another way of thinking must exist. I know it must.Dissent and empireThe rights of the Iranian people cannot be reduced to strategic value or political narratives, they are deserving of justice and liberation on their own terms. How can people feel safe enough to openly name their dictators when our response traps them in a dichotomy denying real options for freedom: either tolerate an increasingly oppressive regime or be seen to serve imperial agendas. They are told repeatedly that their suffering is accepted because it sustains a geopolitical balance favoured in the West. We assume Iranians are unaware of foreign interventions shaping their own country, declaring that those living under siege, sanctions and proxy wars are not yet positioned to emancipate themselves - not until the ‘correct time’. But I am compelled to ask: When is that time? After bombs fall? After a lifetime of sanctions? When a nation teeters on the brink of economic collapse? After false imprisonments and hangings? Because each of these moments have come and gone. Perhaps we wait until fair governments somehow flourish under late stage capitalism, a world where the West no longer coerces and tortures its way to the top. I don’t hold my breath. Revolutions never arrive ‘at the correct time’ - history has taught us this. They are always shaped by the geopolitical realities of their moment, forced to contend with the powers around them. They are struggles against tyranny, be it foreign or rooted within.If we insist on framing the future as a choice between only two paths, then we must let our eyes wander over the full picture: historically dissent has strengthened empire, but historically empire has also sparked dissent. In this reasoning, these paths cannot be undone. It seems the recurring fault runs beneath the very ground we stand upon. Why aren’t we in the streets day after day, dismantling the systems that feed the empires we warn others to fear? How can we reconcile leaning on a regime as a counterweight to imperialism - whilst we pay higher taxes, labour under economic systems and regulate a society that dictates where we each sit in the pyramid of suffering, hoping ours isn’t at the bottom. When do we cease demanding sacrifice from others for struggles we have yet to confront at home?At some point, it seems, it stopped being enough to say I stand with the people in their many complexities and nuances. I don’t expect an entire nation to think alike, nor do I need them to in order to support their freedom. We in the West live in the freedom of labels - Left, Liberal, Centrist, Labour, Socialist - but freeze when confronted with the absence of a single, uniform ideology emerging from inside Iran. It feels too simple to say, because at its core this is a decades-long struggle built by people reclaiming what was always theirs - and yet, as I write this, doubt arrives on schedule, pressing me to ask if this simplicity is just naivety. Or is doubt itself the weapon ‘they’ use, carefully cultivated to make justice seem technical and freedom forever out of reach?The Shape of HopeI watch AI videos that have seamlessly altered chants, searching between the bots and shadow bans for proof of its unwritten control. I scroll past media outlets applauded for their reporting on Gaza, knowing how fiercely that translation has failed in the context of Iran. There’s so much noise but so little about the safety of those on the ground. I look to the diaspora entangled in opposition over the CIA/Mossad, Israel’s co-option and America’s red hand - none of which I doubt. If the purpose was to exhaust, it has indeed exhausted.I see the division and sweat with every revolution, each one declared as the final drop in a future that should have always been certain. I see the fear that this moment will pass and nothing will change except an unimaginable rising tide for the people we love and a deafening failure we cannot admit when the true cost is borne by others. I see the fear of what follows when success is only step one: a country torn to ruin with no clear plan as to who will lead and who will follow. Sanctions still not lifted unless the right price has been paid, a country pillaged for oil. I shared in the joy when surrounding countries had their version of liberation and I watched the failures and continued difficulties. Which suffering is worse is not for me to judge.Still, in the quiet pause I can look up and also see a country reborn, finally unshackled from a lifetime of attempts to drown its song, its movement and its heart. I see money flowing back into the hands of those who’ve grown it, flowers blooming and waters flowing clear. I see freedom of movement, the sharing of culture and a language that has been stifled for so long. I see loved ones reunited and new ones held close. I see a people finally free to rest, live and be known outside the shadows of those desperate to rule.Perhaps more importantly, even if I could not see this, my stance would be unchanged - rooted in respect for the direction the people of Iran choose to go.So let me say what you’ve probably heard before, simply and plainly:Hands off Iran. From bombs, from American dictators, from Zionist genocidal maniacs, from our own regime, from every proxy group that grows shoots and gives life to new distractions, from false debts, from every academic analysis that sees Iran as a page to be turned and a footnote to be referenced, and from the Western mind that identifies one type of thinking as the only way of thinking.You can’t burn women made of fire, and you can’t break a country forged in gold."
}
,
{
"title" : "Unrest in Iran: A Feast for Vultures",
"author" : "Kaveh Rostamkhani",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/iran-unrest-a-feast-for-vultures",
"date" : "2026-01-21 11:01:00 -0500",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/kaveh_20251230_ed_s.jpg",
"excerpt" : "",
"content" : "Closed shops at the Grand Bazaar of Tehran on December 30thOn New Year’s Eve I held a small gathering with a group of close pals in Tehran. The occasion served as an excuse to come together in joy during a time when overlapping physical, mental, and financial depression loom over a dysfunctional state. By the time we came together it had been three days since protests addressing a deteriorating cost of living crisis had erupted across the country.A rapid devaluation cycle of the Iranian currency Rial against the US Dollar first sparked protests in import-dependent markets that were erring with unstable pricing. Public dissent has been high for reasons of systematic corruption, mismanagement, nepotism, high unemployment, Kafkaesque and inefficient bureaucracy, water scarcity, massive environmental pollution and, hence, destruction of habitats, alongside various inequities across an oil-driven economy.Tehran, Iran.Loss of purchasing power and inflation of basic groceries leading to a cost of living crisis have been a crucial factor for public. dissent. Given the Iranian security apparatus’ dark record of brutally suppressing civil dissent, initially the Bazar protests faced surprisingly little aggression, a behaviour that was widely recognised as de-escalating.Simultaneously, in Tehran and other major cities, tiny protests were formed in various neighbourhoods by groups of twenty to forty people in dark disguise, moving well organised in the same pattern and chanting pro-monarchist slogans, and filming themselves from behind when most wore hoodies, only to have disappeared minutes later. Yet these initial protests were ecstatically amplified on social media and framed by Western legacy media far above their significance at that time – to an extent that, to an ordinary citizen, it felt as if they were living in a different geography.Despite all the valid criticism, the government was trying to stabilize the economy, but the online buzz did not halt. It was driven by a fissured opposition abroad; the hawkish “who’s who” of U.S. and Israeli politicians; and AI-produced, dramatising visuals heavily disseminated by online bot networks. Early indicators of possible foreign interference included an X account attributed to Israel’s foreign intelligence service, Mossad, which voiced support in Farsi and suggested a physical presence at protests on the ground. Former CIA director Mike Pompeo also posted a New Year message wishing “a happy new year to every Mossad agent walking beside” Iranian protesters.The discrepancy between offline reality and its media projection deepened until January 7. By then, Tehran’s soundscape would shift at around 8 p.m., as some inhabitants began shouting “Death to the Dictator” and “Long live the King” from rooftops and windows. Others pushed back, shouting insults in response. Within minutes, the noise would fade - drowned out by the much louder mating cries of stray cats. Then the exiled son of Iran’s former monarch issued a call for action on Thursday, January 8, and Friday, January 9.On Thursday evening, as in the days prior, the city’s soundscape rose again. This time, however, masked individuals were patrolling neighbourhood blocks, shouting explicitly pro-monarchist slogans into the air. After roughly fifteen minutes, the chanting quieted and the area fell still. Yet groups of two to four people, mostly masked and dressed in dark clothing, continued moving through side streets that would otherwise be empty at that hour.Just past 9 p.m., the silence broke with loud cries of “Long live the King!” Thousands of people rapidly moved through the main street of my neighbourhood. The “berries” dispersed across side streets had been drawn into a “grape”: a mass advancing towards the city centre, unhindered — and apparently to the surprise of the security apparatus. Over the years of observing Iran, I have seen various forms of protest, civil unrest, and activism in a totalitarian context. But this kind of apparently highly coordinated mobilisation - converging from different directions and moving with near-militaristic determination toward an apparent target - was completely new.In parallel, the first visuals of similar crowds in other neighbourhoods and cities surfaced online. An hour later, Iran’s internet access was cut entirely. Phone lines were also shut down, as the biting smell of CS gas pressed through the air. A tragedy was reaching its climax.Tehran, Iran.Street scene at Tehran’s central “Revolution Square”.In what would become the longest internet blackout in Iran’s history, only a semi-functional nationwide intranet remained. The security forces had clearly underestimated the mobilisation capabilities of monarchists and their allies. Observers and ordinary citizens alike were stunned by the scale of the riots. By Saturday, January 10, the nation would wake up soaked in blood.It might be easy to solely accuse the regime of a massacre of thousands, as many activists quickly did, though the reality seems to be more complex. Whilst there is a high number of deaths apparently as a result of a firm crackdown and the use of live ammunition, among the corpses there are also scores who have died due to wounds from knives, carpet cutters, and other improvised sharp blades. Then there are others who have endured gunshots at close range. Still others have succumbed to burns. And this is not an isolated issue limited to Tehran or a certain area, but all over the country there are also numerous corpses that have succumbed to wounds none of which correspond with a crowd and riot control perspective. It doesn’t make any sense for security forces to risk physical engagement and injury when their units have a de facto carte blanche to use lethal ammunition from a safe distance. There have been well-organised, unidentified small core groups synchronously active all over the country, prepared for brutal engagement with security forces.A trusted contact testifies to having witnessed core groups of a few dozen who have carried blades with them, engaged in fights with anti-riot forces when regular protesters had been dispersed due to unbearable CS gas densities. Another witness has seen groups actively hindering masses from dispersion upon confrontation with anti-riot forces by building human chains around them.Fact is, the brutal events have shed the blood of thousands. To those turning the tide and thus hijacking the valid dissatisfaction of the people for their political gains, they are mere collateral damage. Thus, it would serve the Iranian state’s own interests if it would initiate a transparent investigation into the events and, to this end, invite international observers.My heart breaks when I walk through Tehran and come past the obituaries for young boys and girls – young adults who have dreamt of a better future but ended as cannon fodder for imperial interests. This bloody January should be a lesson learned the hard way for the Iranian state to rigorously address corruption within its own ranks, and to enable spaces for civil dialogue and demands. Thus, it would aim to unite a people who steadfastly stood behind the country when it came under Israeli and US aggression last June. Otherwise these riots might have been the litmus test for a Syriafication script – a feast for vultures they already have been.Tehran, Iran.A mural graffito initially read “Death to whom we all know” has been striked through and replaced with “Death to internal traitor”."
}
]
}