Digital & Print Membership
Yearly + Receive 8 free printed back issues
$420 Annually
Monthly + Receive 3 free printed back issues
$40 Monthly
A Woman is Political
Arab Women are Speaking.
Why is mainstream media ignoring us?
When my book A Woman Is a School was released, it sold 3,000 copies in the first three months—a remarkable feat for an independently published work. Yet, despite its success and the critical conversations it sparked about womanhood, diaspora, and resistance, mainstream media outlets remained largely silent. Not silent, as in the story wasn’t a good fit — silent, as in, writers were excitedly pitching the book to their editors, only for us to experience the same bottleneck every time: these stories would go through a rigorous review, before ultimately being rejected by editors whose hands seemed to be tied.
This is not an anomaly. It is a pattern.

Arab women in the United States, whether authors, activists, or artists, have long been excluded from the national conversation, particularly when our narratives challenge dominant Western frameworks. Our voices are either ignored or tokenized, erased or exoticized. Rarely are we granted the full complexity, nuance, and visibility afforded to other women of color in the literary and media landscape.
The reality is that Arab women’s stories—our authentic, unfiltered stories—are often perceived as too inconvenient, too political, or too radical for mainstream platforms. When we write about our histories, our struggles, and our liberation, we are met with polite dismissals or outright rejection. We are seen as a risk, with our perspectives too disruptive to neatly fit into pre-approved narratives of diversity and representation. This isn’t new necessarily; we had seen a guilt-driven burst of inclusion during the 2020 movement behind Black Lives Matter. The ongoing erasure of Black, Indigenous and Minority Ethnic women, including Arab women, was just the norm up until that point.
Take the case of my book. A Woman Is a School is an exploration of womanhood through an Arab lens, weaving together personal and collective memory, history, and futurism. It is a book about resilience, about love, about the ways in which women shape the world around them. But it is also a book that refuses to flatten its identity to fit a Western framework. It does not ask for permission to exist. It simply exists. It doesn’t want to be labeled as a victim. It refuses the identity of a subjugated woman needing the Western gaze to be freed, it is liberated from and in fact liberating the West by just existing in its totality. Our identities as Arabs break the Western mindset of Black & White and the over-simplification and flattening of foreign identities into a “good or bad” bucket. Arabs are not a monolith; we are our own culture, but a highly diverse, multi- faith and multicultural group of people who are, imposing by their very existence, an expansion into Western popular consciousness. Ultimately, they’re forcing an expansion of concepts that go beyond the West as the center of the world. By challenging colonial paradigms and demanding justice, they are showing the world as a powerful biodiverse universe.
And that, perhaps, is the problem.
Mainstream media has long dictated which stories about Arab women are acceptable for public consumption, often limiting their appearance as a stereotype of their own culture to justify a white savior’s lens as the eternal occupier of our Lands. We are only allowed visibility when we are victims—when our pain can be used to justify interventionist policies or to reinforce Western narratives of saviorism. We are granted space when we denounce our own cultures, when we serve as proof of the “backwardness” of the places we come from.
But when we speak on our own terms—when we center our agency, our joy, our wisdom, or our defiance—the doors close.
This is not just about me or my book. It is about the larger forces that determine whose voices matter. The media, as a gatekeeper, plays a significant role in shaping public discourse, and its refusal to engage with Arab women’s narratives, contributes to a cycle of erasure.
If we are only visible when we conform to predetermined roles—either as oppressed or as exceptional tokens—then we are never truly seen. And if the publishing and media industries continue to sideline us, then they are complicit in maintaining the structures that silence us.
The irony is that despite this exclusion, Arab women continue to create, to write, to resist. We are speaking. And we have always been speaking.
The question is: when will the media start listening?
In Conversation:
Illustration by:
{
"article":
{
"title" : "A Woman is Political",
"author" : "Céline Semaan",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/a-woman-is-political",
"date" : "2025-03-21 17:36:00 -0400",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/a-woman-is-a-school.jpg",
"excerpt" : "Arab Women are Speaking.",
"content" : "Arab Women are Speaking.Why is mainstream media ignoring us?When my book A Woman Is a School was released, it sold 3,000 copies in the first three months—a remarkable feat for an independently published work. Yet, despite its success and the critical conversations it sparked about womanhood, diaspora, and resistance, mainstream media outlets remained largely silent. Not silent, as in the story wasn’t a good fit — silent, as in, writers were excitedly pitching the book to their editors, only for us to experience the same bottleneck every time: these stories would go through a rigorous review, before ultimately being rejected by editors whose hands seemed to be tied.This is not an anomaly. It is a pattern.Arab women in the United States, whether authors, activists, or artists, have long been excluded from the national conversation, particularly when our narratives challenge dominant Western frameworks. Our voices are either ignored or tokenized, erased or exoticized. Rarely are we granted the full complexity, nuance, and visibility afforded to other women of color in the literary and media landscape.The reality is that Arab women’s stories—our authentic, unfiltered stories—are often perceived as too inconvenient, too political, or too radical for mainstream platforms. When we write about our histories, our struggles, and our liberation, we are met with polite dismissals or outright rejection. We are seen as a risk, with our perspectives too disruptive to neatly fit into pre-approved narratives of diversity and representation. This isn’t new necessarily; we had seen a guilt-driven burst of inclusion during the 2020 movement behind Black Lives Matter. The ongoing erasure of Black, Indigenous and Minority Ethnic women, including Arab women, was just the norm up until that point.Take the case of my book. A Woman Is a School is an exploration of womanhood through an Arab lens, weaving together personal and collective memory, history, and futurism. It is a book about resilience, about love, about the ways in which women shape the world around them. But it is also a book that refuses to flatten its identity to fit a Western framework. It does not ask for permission to exist. It simply exists. It doesn’t want to be labeled as a victim. It refuses the identity of a subjugated woman needing the Western gaze to be freed, it is liberated from and in fact liberating the West by just existing in its totality. Our identities as Arabs break the Western mindset of Black & White and the over-simplification and flattening of foreign identities into a “good or bad” bucket. Arabs are not a monolith; we are our own culture, but a highly diverse, multi- faith and multicultural group of people who are, imposing by their very existence, an expansion into Western popular consciousness. Ultimately, they’re forcing an expansion of concepts that go beyond the West as the center of the world. By challenging colonial paradigms and demanding justice, they are showing the world as a powerful biodiverse universe.And that, perhaps, is the problem.Mainstream media has long dictated which stories about Arab women are acceptable for public consumption, often limiting their appearance as a stereotype of their own culture to justify a white savior’s lens as the eternal occupier of our Lands. We are only allowed visibility when we are victims—when our pain can be used to justify interventionist policies or to reinforce Western narratives of saviorism. We are granted space when we denounce our own cultures, when we serve as proof of the “backwardness” of the places we come from.But when we speak on our own terms—when we center our agency, our joy, our wisdom, or our defiance—the doors close.This is not just about me or my book. It is about the larger forces that determine whose voices matter. The media, as a gatekeeper, plays a significant role in shaping public discourse, and its refusal to engage with Arab women’s narratives, contributes to a cycle of erasure.If we are only visible when we conform to predetermined roles—either as oppressed or as exceptional tokens—then we are never truly seen. And if the publishing and media industries continue to sideline us, then they are complicit in maintaining the structures that silence us.The irony is that despite this exclusion, Arab women continue to create, to write, to resist. We are speaking. And we have always been speaking.The question is: when will the media start listening?"
}
,
"relatedposts": [
{
"title" : "100+ Years of Genocidal Intent in Palestine",
"author" : "Collis Browne",
"category" : "essays",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/100-years-of-genocidal-intent",
"date" : "2025-10-07 18:01:00 -0400",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/1920-jerusalem.jpg",
"excerpt" : "Every single Israeli prime minister, president, and major Zionist leader has voiced clear intent to erase the Palestinian people from their lands, either by forced expulsion, or military violence. From Herzl and Chaim Weizmann to Ben-Gurion to Netanyahu, the record is not ambiguous:",
"content" : "Every single Israeli prime minister, president, and major Zionist leader has voiced clear intent to erase the Palestinian people from their lands, either by forced expulsion, or military violence. From Herzl and Chaim Weizmann to Ben-Gurion to Netanyahu, the record is not ambiguous:{% for person in site.data.genocidalquotes %}{{ person.name }}{% if person.title %}<p class=\"title-xs\">{{ person.title }}</p>{% endif %}{% for quote in person.quotes %}“{{ quote.text }}”{% if quote.source %}— {{ quote.source }}{% endif %}{% endfor %}{% endfor %}"
}
,
{
"title" : "Dignity Before Stadiums:: Morocco’s Digital Uprising",
"author" : "Cheb Gado",
"category" : "",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/dignity-before-stadiums",
"date" : "2025-10-02 09:08:00 -0400",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/EIP_Cover_Morocco_GenZ.jpg",
"excerpt" : "No one expected a generation raised on smartphones and TikTok clips to ignite a spark of protest shaking Morocco’s streets. But Gen Z, the children of the internet and speed, have stepped forward to write a new chapter in the history of uprisings, in their own style.The wave of anger began with everyday struggles that cut deep into young people’s lives: soaring prices, lack of social justice, and the silencing of their voices in politics. They didn’t need traditional leaders or party manifestos; the movement was born out of a single hashtag that spread like wildfire, transforming individual frustration into collective momentum.",
"content" : "No one expected a generation raised on smartphones and TikTok clips to ignite a spark of protest shaking Morocco’s streets. But Gen Z, the children of the internet and speed, have stepped forward to write a new chapter in the history of uprisings, in their own style.The wave of anger began with everyday struggles that cut deep into young people’s lives: soaring prices, lack of social justice, and the silencing of their voices in politics. They didn’t need traditional leaders or party manifestos; the movement was born out of a single hashtag that spread like wildfire, transforming individual frustration into collective momentum.One of the sharpest contradictions fueling the protests was the billions poured into World Cup-related preparations, while ordinary citizens remained marginalized when it came to healthcare and education.This awareness quickly turned into chants and slogans echoing through the streets: “Dignity begins with schools and hospitals, not with putting on a show for the world.”What set this movement apart was not only its presence on the streets, but also the way it reinvented protest itself:Live filming: Phone cameras revealed events moment by moment, exposing abuses instantly.Memes and satire: A powerful weapon to dismantle authority’s aura, turning complex political discourse into viral, shareable content.Decentralized networks: No leader, no party, just small, fast-moving groups connected online, able to appear and disappear with agility.This generation doesn’t believe in grand speeches or delayed promises. They demand change here and now. Moving seamlessly between the physical and digital realms, they turn the street into a stage of revolt, and Instagram Live into an alternative media outlet.What’s happening in Morocco strongly recalls the Arab Spring of 2011, when young people flooded the streets with the same passion and spontaneity, armed only with belief in their power to spark change. But Gen Z added their own twist, digital tools, meme culture, and the pace of a hyper-connected world.Morocco’s Gen Z uprising is not just another protest, but a living experiment in how a digital generation can redefine politics itself. The spark may fade, but the mark it leaves on young people’s collective consciousness cannot be erased.Photo credits: Mosa’ab Elshamy, Zacaria Garcia, Abdel Majid Bizouat, Marouane Beslem"
}
,
{
"title" : "A Shutdown Exposes How Fragile U.S. Governance Really Is",
"author" : "EIP Editors",
"category" : "",
"url" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/readings/a-shutdown-exposes-how-fragile-us-governance-really-is",
"date" : "2025-10-01 22:13:00 -0400",
"img" : "https://everythingispolitical.com/uploads/EIP_Cover_Gov_ShutDown.jpg",
"excerpt" : "Each time the federal government shutters its doors, we hear the same reassurances: essential services will continue, Social Security checks will still arrive, planes won’t fall from the sky. This isn’t the first Governmental shutdown, they’ve happened 22 times since 1976, and their toll is real.",
"content" : "Each time the federal government shutters its doors, we hear the same reassurances: essential services will continue, Social Security checks will still arrive, planes won’t fall from the sky. This isn’t the first Governmental shutdown, they’ve happened 22 times since 1976, and their toll is real.Shutdowns don’t mean the government stops functioning. They mean millions of federal workers are asked to keep the system running without pay. Air traffic controllers, border patrol agents, food inspectors — people whose jobs underpin both public safety and economic life — are told their labor matters, but their livelihoods don’t. People have to pay the price of bad bureaucracy in the world’s most powerful country, if governance is stalled, workers must pay with their salaries and their groceries.In 1995 and 1996, clashes between President Bill Clinton and House Speaker Newt Gingrich triggered two shutdowns totaling 27 days. In 2013, a 16-day standoff over the Affordable Care Act furloughed 850,000 workers. And in 2018–2019, the longest shutdown in U.S. history stretched 35 days, as President Trump refused to reopen the government without funding for a border wall. That impasse left 800,000 federal employees without paychecks and cost the U.S. economy an estimated $11 billion — $3 billion of it permanently lost.More troubling is what happens when crises strike during shutdowns. The United States is living in an age of accelerating climate disasters: historic floods in Vermont, wildfire smoke choking New York, hurricanes pounding Florida. These emergencies do not pause while Congress fights over budgets. Yet a shutdown means furloughed NOAA meteorologists, suspended EPA enforcement, and delayed FEMA programs. In the most climate-vulnerable decade of our lifetimes, we are choosing paralysis over preparedness.This vulnerability didn’t emerge overnight. For decades, the American state has been hollowed out under the logic of austerity and privatization, while military spending has remained sacrosanct. That imbalance is why budgets collapse under the weight of endless resources for war abroad, too few for resilience at home.Shutdowns send a dangerous message. They normalize instability. They tell workers they are disposable. They make clear that in our system, climate resilience and public health aren’t pillars of our democracy but rather insignificant in the face of power and greed. And each time the government closes, it becomes easier to imagine a future where this isn’t the exception but the rule.The United States cannot afford to keep running on shutdown politics. The climate crisis, economic inequality, and the challenges of sustaining democracy itself demand continuity, not collapse. We need a politics that treats stability and resilience not as partisan victories, but as basic commitments to one another. Otherwise, the real shutdown isn’t just of the government — it’s of democracy itself."
}
]
}